Sequences of sequences: question about Cauchy's construction of the real numbers












1














As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






real-analysis cauchy-sequences







share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



    If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



    Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



    I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






    real-analysis cauchy-sequences







    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



      If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



      Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



      I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






      real-analysis cauchy-sequences







      share|cite|improve this question













      As is well known, one way of constructing the real numbers is to consider Cauchy sequences and call two of them equivalent if they have the same limit. I got to thinking about the Cauchy sequences themselves (ignoring the equivalence relation).



      If we have a Cauchy sequence, we can make it shorter by removing the first element, or adding the first two elements. In fact we can do this arbitrarily often, creating a sequence of sequences.



      Let the Cauchy sequence be $(a_n)_n$ and define $b_1 = (a_n)_n$ and $b_{n+1}$ by adding the first two elements of $b_n$ and attaching the remaining elements. Thus $b_2=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,dots), b_3=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,dots)$ etc.



      I am having a hard time determining what the limit of $(b_n)_n$ would be as $n$ tends to infinity. Am I correct in surmising that the limit of $(b_n)_n$ generally does not exist, and even if it exists, the limit is not a sequence? Is it therefore correct to state that the set of Cauchy sequences is not complete, even though the set of their equivalence classes (= the real numbers) obviously is complete?






      real-analysis cauchy-sequences




      real-analysis cauchy-sequences






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 4 at 18:16









      StefanieStefanie

      506




      506






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            Jan 4 at 21:19











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061924%2fsequences-of-sequences-question-about-cauchys-construction-of-the-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            Jan 4 at 21:19
















          0














          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            Jan 4 at 21:19














          0












          0








          0






          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          You are mixing up two systems of enumeration different things.



          Your $a_n$ are numbers, given for each $ngeq1$, and the $n$ enumerates these numbers in the list $(a_n)_{ngeq1}$. Assume that $lim_{ntoinfty} a_n=alphain{mathbb R}$. On the other hand, your $b_n$ are not numbers, but sequences, and the $n$ enumerates these sequences. I'd write it in the following way:
          $$eqalign{
          {bf b}_1&=(a_1,a_2,a_3,a_4,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_2&=(a_1+a_2,a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          {bf b}_3&=(a_1+a_2+a_3,a_4,a_5,ldots),cr
          &vdotscr
          {bf b}_j&=(a_1+a_2+ldots+a_j,a_{j+1},a_{j+2},a_{j+3},ldots)qquad(jgeq1).cr}$$
          Let ${bf b}_{j.k}$ be the $k^{rm th}$ element of the sequence ${bf b}_j$. Then it is easy to see that for every $jgeq1$ one has $lim_{ktoinfty}{bf b}_{j.k}=alpha$.



          That's all one can say about the sequences ${bf b}_j$, $>jgeq1$. In particular; this has nothing to do with the completeness of ${mathbb R}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 4 at 19:14









          Christian BlatterChristian Blatter

          172k7113326




          172k7113326












          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            Jan 4 at 21:19


















          • Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
            – Stefanie
            Jan 4 at 21:19
















          Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
          – Stefanie
          Jan 4 at 21:19




          Thank you! This helps a lot. Sorry for using $n$ twice. Still - suppose we have the sequence consisting of all ones. Then the first element of $b_j$ grows without bound as $jtoinfty$. Is the limit then even a sequence? Or is it not even possible to talk about the limit of a sequence of sequences? I find this topic really confusing.
          – Stefanie
          Jan 4 at 21:19


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid …



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061924%2fsequences-of-sequences-question-about-cauchys-construction-of-the-real-numbers%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          -

          Popular posts from this blog

          1300-talet

          Image
          Den här artikeln handlar om hundraårsperioden 1300–1399. För decenniet 1300–1309, se 1300-talet (decennium). .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output
          Read more

          1300-talet

          Image
          Den här artikeln handlar om hundraårsperioden 1300–1399. För decenniet 1300–1309, se 1300-talet (decennium). .mw-parser-output .infobox{border:1px solid #aaa;background-color:#f9f9f9;color:black;margin:.5em 0 .5em 1em;padding:.2em;float:right;clear:right;width:22em;text-align:left;font-size:88%;line-height:1.6em}.mw-parser-output .infobox td,.mw-parser-output .infobox th{vertical-align:top;padding:0 .2em}.mw-parser-output .infobox caption{font-size:larger}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered{border-collapse:collapse}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered th{border:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .borderless th{border:0}.mw-parser-output .infobox-showbutton .mw-collapsible-text{color:inherit}.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow td,.mw-parser-output .infobox.bordered .mergedtoprow th{border:0;border-top:1px solid #aaa;border-right:1px solid #aaa}.mw-parser-output
          Read more

          Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?

          Image
          36 3 The question Has there ever been a military combat going on around an active (running or in outage but not decommissioned) commercial nuclear power plant? Or dangerously near it? If yes, how did the plant and its personnel fare in such situation? Why I ask Let's assume for the scope of this question modern commercial nuclear power plants (CANDU, PWR, BWR of generation II plus all of gen III and newer) are usually reasonably safe to operate given that the engineering has been done right and there is a whole cohort of very well trained personnel on-site at all times, well rested and with considerable resources on their hands. Things hard to get with an armed conflict like the recent Syrian war raging around. I can't seem to find any reference or a comprehensive article about this, hence this question.
          Read more