A curious observation regarding eigenvectors of $3 times 3$ matrices - Hoffman and Kunze's *Linear Algebra*
I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.
In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
$$
A = begin{bmatrix}
3 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1\
2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1\
2 & 0 & -1\
2 & 2 & -2
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.
Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.
A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
$T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
$$
A =
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.
I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors
add a comment |
I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.
In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
$$
A = begin{bmatrix}
3 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1\
2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1\
2 & 0 & -1\
2 & 2 & -2
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.
Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.
A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
$T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
$$
A =
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.
I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors
add a comment |
I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.
In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
$$
A = begin{bmatrix}
3 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1\
2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1\
2 & 0 & -1\
2 & 2 & -2
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.
Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.
A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
$T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
$$
A =
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.
I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors
I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.
In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
$$
A = begin{bmatrix}
3 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1\
2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1\
2 & 0 & -1\
2 & 2 & -2
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.
Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.
A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
$T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
$$
A =
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
end{bmatrix}.
$$
The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$
The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.
I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors
linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors
asked yesterday
Brahadeesh
6,13042361
6,13042361
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
$$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.
So we have
$$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
lambda_1$.
But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
– W. mu
yesterday
Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
1
I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
@Brahadeesh You are right.
– W. mu
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060572%2fa-curious-observation-regarding-eigenvectors-of-3-times-3-matrices-hoffman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
$$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.
So we have
$$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
lambda_1$.
But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
– W. mu
yesterday
Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
1
I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
@Brahadeesh You are right.
– W. mu
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
$$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.
So we have
$$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
lambda_1$.
But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
– W. mu
yesterday
Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
1
I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
@Brahadeesh You are right.
– W. mu
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
$$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.
So we have
$$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
lambda_1$.
According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
$$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.
So we have
$$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
lambda_1$.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
W. mu
720310
720310
But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
– W. mu
yesterday
Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
1
I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
@Brahadeesh You are right.
– W. mu
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
– W. mu
yesterday
Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
1
I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
@Brahadeesh You are right.
– W. mu
yesterday
But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
– W. mu
yesterday
If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
– W. mu
yesterday
Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
1
1
I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
– Brahadeesh
yesterday
@Brahadeesh You are right.
– W. mu
yesterday
@Brahadeesh You are right.
– W. mu
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060572%2fa-curious-observation-regarding-eigenvectors-of-3-times-3-matrices-hoffman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown