A curious observation regarding eigenvectors of $3 times 3$ matrices - Hoffman and Kunze's *Linear Algebra*












2














I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.



In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
$$
A = begin{bmatrix}
3 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1\
2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
end{bmatrix}.
$$

The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 1 & -1\
2 & 2 & -1
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
1 & 1 & -1\
2 & 0 & -1\
2 & 2 & -2
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$

The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.



Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.



A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
$T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
$$
A =
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
end{bmatrix}.
$$

The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
$$
begin{align}
A - I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
end{bmatrix}\\
A - 2I &=
begin{bmatrix}
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
-1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
end{bmatrix}.
end{align}
$$

The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.



I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?










share|cite|improve this question



























    2














    I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.



    In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
    $$
    A = begin{bmatrix}
    3 & 1 & -1\
    2 & 2 & -1\
    2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
    end{bmatrix}.
    $$

    The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
    $$
    begin{align}
    A - I &=
    begin{bmatrix}
    2 & 1 & -1\
    2 & 1 & -1\
    2 & 2 & -1
    end{bmatrix}\\
    A - 2I &=
    begin{bmatrix}
    1 & 1 & -1\
    2 & 0 & -1\
    2 & 2 & -2
    end{bmatrix}.
    end{align}
    $$

    The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.



    Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.



    A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
    $T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
    $$
    A =
    begin{bmatrix}
    phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
    -1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
    phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
    end{bmatrix}.
    $$

    The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
    $$
    begin{align}
    A - I &=
    begin{bmatrix}
    phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
    -1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
    phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
    end{bmatrix}\\
    A - 2I &=
    begin{bmatrix}
    phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
    -1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
    phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
    end{bmatrix}.
    end{align}
    $$

    The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.



    I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?










    share|cite|improve this question

























      2












      2








      2


      1





      I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.



      In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
      $$
      A = begin{bmatrix}
      3 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 2 & -1\
      2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
      end{bmatrix}.
      $$

      The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
      $$
      begin{align}
      A - I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      2 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 2 & -1
      end{bmatrix}\\
      A - 2I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      1 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 0 & -1\
      2 & 2 & -2
      end{bmatrix}.
      end{align}
      $$

      The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.



      Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.



      A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
      $T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
      $$
      A =
      begin{bmatrix}
      phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
      -1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
      end{bmatrix}.
      $$

      The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
      $$
      begin{align}
      A - I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
      -1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
      end{bmatrix}\\
      A - 2I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
      -1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
      end{bmatrix}.
      end{align}
      $$

      The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.



      I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?










      share|cite|improve this question













      I am reading Hoffman and Kunze's Linear Algebra, 2nd ed., and I made a curious observation in a couple of the examples relating to computing eigenvalues and eigenvectors in Chapter 6.



      In Example 2 on pages 184-185, we have the (real) $3 times 3$ matrix
      $$
      A = begin{bmatrix}
      3 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 2 & -1\
      2 & 2 & phantom{-}0
      end{bmatrix}.
      $$

      The characteristic polynomial for $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. Thus, the characteristic values of $A$ are $1$ and $2$. We have
      $$
      begin{align}
      A - I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      2 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 2 & -1
      end{bmatrix}\\
      A - 2I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      1 & 1 & -1\
      2 & 0 & -1\
      2 & 2 & -2
      end{bmatrix}.
      end{align}
      $$

      The characteristic spaces associated to each characteristic value is one-dimensional in this case. The vector $alpha_1 = (1,0,2)$ spans the null space of $T - I$ and the vector $alpha_2 = (1,1,2)$ spans the null space of $T - 2I$.



      Here, my observation is that $alpha_1$ is the middle column vector of $A - 2I$, and $alpha_2$ is the middle column vector of $A - I$.



      A similar thing happens in Example 3 (pages 187-188):
      $T$ is the linear operator on $Bbb{R}^3$ which is represented in the standard ordered basis by the matrix
      $$
      A =
      begin{bmatrix}
      phantom{-}5 & -6 & -6 \
      -1 & phantom{-}4 & phantom{-}2 \
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -4
      end{bmatrix}.
      $$

      The characteristic polynomial is computed to be $(x-2)^2(x-1)$. Then, we have
      $$
      begin{align}
      A - I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      phantom{-}4 & -6 & -6 \
      -1 & phantom{-}3 & phantom{-}2 \
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -5
      end{bmatrix}\\
      A - 2I &=
      begin{bmatrix}
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6 \
      -1 & phantom{-}2 & phantom{-}2 \
      phantom{-}3 & -6 & -6
      end{bmatrix}.
      end{align}
      $$

      The null space of $T-I$ is one-dimensional and the null space of $T-2I$ is two-dimensional. The vector $alpha_1 = (3,-1,3)$ spans the null space of $T-I$. The null space of $T-2I$ consists of the vectors $(x_1,x_2,x_3)$ with $x_1 = 2x_2 + 2x_3$, so the authors give an example of a basis of the null space of $T-2I$ as $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (2,1,0)\ alpha_3 &= (2,0,1).end{align}$$ However, we can also take $$begin{align}alpha_2 &= (-6,3,-6)\ alpha_3 &= (-6,2,-5)end{align}$$ and we see again that $alpha_1$ is the first column of $A - 2I$ and $alpha_2,alpha_3$ are the second and third columns of $A - I$.



      I find this quite curious, more so since the authors don't mention this observation at all. Is there a simple explanation for why this is happening, and can this observation be used to quickly find eigenvectors of linear transformations?







      linear-algebra matrices vector-spaces eigenvalues-eigenvectors






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      Brahadeesh

      6,13042361




      6,13042361






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
          $$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
          where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.



          So we have
          $$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
          that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
          lambda_1$
          .






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday










          • If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
            – W. mu
            yesterday










          • Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday






          • 1




            I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday












          • @Brahadeesh You are right.
            – W. mu
            yesterday











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060572%2fa-curious-observation-regarding-eigenvectors-of-3-times-3-matrices-hoffman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          2














          According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
          $$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
          where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.



          So we have
          $$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
          that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
          lambda_1$
          .






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday










          • If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
            – W. mu
            yesterday










          • Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday






          • 1




            I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday












          • @Brahadeesh You are right.
            – W. mu
            yesterday
















          2














          According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
          $$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
          where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.



          So we have
          $$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
          that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
          lambda_1$
          .






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday










          • If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
            – W. mu
            yesterday










          • Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday






          • 1




            I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday












          • @Brahadeesh You are right.
            – W. mu
            yesterday














          2












          2








          2






          According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
          $$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
          where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.



          So we have
          $$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
          that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
          lambda_1$
          .






          share|cite|improve this answer














          According to Hamilton-Cayley theorem,
          $$prod_{i=1}^n(A-lambda_i)=0,$$
          where $lambda_1,cdots,lambda_n$ are $n$ eigenvalues.



          So we have
          $$(A-lambda_1)(prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i))=0,$$
          that is, the columns of $prod_{i=2}^n(A-lambda_i)$ are eigen vectors of $
          lambda_1$
          .







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited yesterday

























          answered yesterday









          W. mu

          720310




          720310












          • But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday










          • If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
            – W. mu
            yesterday










          • Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday






          • 1




            I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday












          • @Brahadeesh You are right.
            – W. mu
            yesterday


















          • But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday










          • If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
            – W. mu
            yesterday










          • Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday






          • 1




            I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
            – Brahadeesh
            yesterday












          • @Brahadeesh You are right.
            – W. mu
            yesterday
















          But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
          – Brahadeesh
          yesterday




          But in the first example, it is only the middle column of $A - 2I$ that is an eigenvector of $A$ for the eigenvalue $1$, not the other columns.
          – Brahadeesh
          yesterday












          If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
          – W. mu
          yesterday




          If you take $lambda_1=1$ and $lambda_2=lambda_3=2$, then the result is $(A-1)((A-2)^2)=0$. The columns of matrix of $(A-2)^2$ do.
          – W. mu
          yesterday












          Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
          – Brahadeesh
          yesterday




          Oh! I see what you mean now. This is lovely :)
          – Brahadeesh
          yesterday




          1




          1




          I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
          – Brahadeesh
          yesterday






          I think one should use the minimal polynomial of $A$ in this argument, not the characteristic polynomial. For Example 3, by the given argument we will say that the columns of the matrix $(A-I)(A-2I)$ are eigenvectors of $A$ with eigenvalue $2$ because the characteristic polynomial of $A$ is $(x-1)(x-2)^2$. However, $(A-I)(A-2I) = 0$, so this does not really say anything. If we instead argue with the minimal polynomial in place of the characteristic polynomial then the argument is correct.
          – Brahadeesh
          yesterday














          @Brahadeesh You are right.
          – W. mu
          yesterday




          @Brahadeesh You are right.
          – W. mu
          yesterday


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060572%2fa-curious-observation-regarding-eigenvectors-of-3-times-3-matrices-hoffman%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          1300-talet

          1300-talet

          Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?