What date encoding could this be?

40 years ago I read a book, but couldn't remember the title. I've been looking for it for a while, and I finally (finally!) found it!

And then I worked out why it took so long. It hasn't been released yet! In fact, according to this website I found it on, it won't be released for another seven millenia - when the Earth's spin will be so fast that December will have (at least) 80 days. Global warming? Pah!

Good book! IF you can wait 7,143 years...

http://www.holisticpage.com.au/out-of-this-world-science-fiction-stories-edward-blishen/9780753462461 (Note I’ve told them of this: they ~~may fix~~have fixed it.)

Now obviously no human entered this wild date. It's a mis-decode of something - perhaps the ISBN? My question is: can anyone think of an existing decoding algorithm that was so messed up it would invent an entirely new calendar?

edited 23 hours ago

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

New contributor

Are you sure that's not BC? ;D
– jpmc26
yesterday

@jpmc26 I don't know which is more believable: a book coming back in time, or a printing press invented 10,000 years before Gutenberg
– John Burger
yesterday

add a comment |

40 years ago I read a book, but couldn't remember the title. I've been looking for it for a while, and I finally (finally!) found it!

Good book! IF you can wait 7,143 years...

http://www.holisticpage.com.au/out-of-this-world-science-fiction-stories-edward-blishen/9780753462461 (Note I’ve told them of this: they ~~may fix~~have fixed it.)

edited 23 hours ago

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

New contributor

Are you sure that's not BC? ;D
– jpmc26
yesterday

@jpmc26 I don't know which is more believable: a book coming back in time, or a printing press invented 10,000 years before Gutenberg
– John Burger
yesterday

add a comment |

40 years ago I read a book, but couldn't remember the title. I've been looking for it for a while, and I finally (finally!) found it!

Good book! IF you can wait 7,143 years...

http://www.holisticpage.com.au/out-of-this-world-science-fiction-stories-edward-blishen/9780753462461 (Note I’ve told them of this: they ~~may fix~~have fixed it.)

edited 23 hours ago

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

New contributor

40 years ago I read a book, but couldn't remember the title. I've been looking for it for a while, and I finally (finally!) found it!

Good book! IF you can wait 7,143 years...

http://www.holisticpage.com.au/out-of-this-world-science-fiction-stories-edward-blishen/9780753462461 (Note I’ve told them of this: they ~~may fix~~have fixed it.)

computer-puzzle

edited 23 hours ago

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

New contributor

edited 23 hours ago

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

New contributor

edited 23 hours ago

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

New contributor

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

asked yesterday

John Burger

1465

New contributor

John Burger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

Are you sure that's not BC? ;D
– jpmc26
yesterday

@jpmc26 I don't know which is more believable: a book coming back in time, or a printing press invented 10,000 years before Gutenberg
– John Burger
yesterday

add a comment |

Are you sure that's not BC? ;D
– jpmc26
yesterday

@jpmc26 I don't know which is more believable: a book coming back in time, or a printing press invented 10,000 years before Gutenberg
– John Burger
yesterday

Are you sure that's not BC? ;D
– jpmc26
yesterday

@jpmc26 I don't know which is more believable: a book coming back in time, or a printing press invented 10,000 years before Gutenberg
– John Burger
yesterday

add a comment |

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

Not a real answer:

It's not an isolated issue, it seems. There is another one I found here and again the actual date is 16 September 2008

Same is the publishing date of the book in the question. It is worth noting that if we write down the date 16 September 2008 in 'american style' mmddyyyy we get the number 09162008 and this number contains the wrong 'year' 9162.

The likely explanation here is a parse algorithm error (code snippet courtesy of @IanMacDonald):
 function getDateString(input) {

     let months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'];

     let match = (input + "00000000").match(/^0*([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])/);

     let year = match[1];

     let month = (12+(match[2]-1))%12; // Make sure we're zero-indexing months

     let day = match[3];

     return day + ' ' + months[month] + ' ' + year;

 }

 

edited yesterday

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

1

Yes, the likeliest answer here is that whoever is parsing the date has made an assumption about component ordering.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

4

I can imagine that the date was 9/16/2008. Strip all non-digits, pad with a zero at the back, because we need 8 digits, then interpret as yyyymmdd. That would mean that December was represeted by 00. I can also imagine that every illegal month is shown as December, if the code goes like this:: ...; if (m==11) return "Nov"; return "Dec"; /* Treat everything else as Dec ;) */
– M Oehm
yesterday

@MOehm Yep, sounds possible but basically it's a algorithm/programmers mistake.
– rhsquared
yesterday

Follow-up game: find all entries on the website that have the incorrect date format entered in their database. Bonus points if you use the open API to scrape all their data, then report back to them with a list of date conversions they need to update.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

2

With regards to 00 being December, maybe they just applied a mod 12 to bring every input into the range 1 to 12, i.e. something like month = ((input-1)%12)+1. This makes 01=13=25..=January, and so on until 00=12=24..=December.
– Jaap Scherphuis
yesterday

|
show 4 more comments

This could be a human error - people are very capable of doing more messed up things than computers! It looks like it was published on the 16/09/2008 or 9/16/2008 in american date format. the year probably comes from 9162 being put into the yyyy section, and the 80 from a corruption of '08, however not sure where December has come into it!

(From a quick google it doesn't look like date is stored in the ISBN number https://www.isbn-international.org/content/what-isbn)

answered yesterday

olim

713

New contributor

It could be human error - but this was from a book site, so I assumed it was coming from some database somewhere. Yes there was a 2008 edition (some 10 years after the anthologist’s passing), but it has an ISBN-10 number, which ceased being used after 2006. Also, according to trove.nla.gov.au/work/5510591 there was a 1988 edition - plus I know I read it before then
– John Burger
yesterday

Hi, thanks for the extra info! It appears that the older edition (first published in 1988) was titled just "Science Fiction Stories" link and had different ISBN numbers (as appears to be the norm for any variations wiki ISBN ). Which website was it from? Is it a common issue across the site?
– olim
yesterday

1

That was my thought too. I didn’t investigate too deeply, but I checked other titles - they seemed fine. I’ve edited the question with the URL (apologies for forgetting!)
– John Burger
yesterday

December could have come from an "else" condition in the month parsing. if month == 1 then 'January'; else if month == 2 then 'February'; and so on until else if month == 11 then 'November'; else 'December'. Just a guess and there should be better ways of handling that parsing anyway.
– tilper
yesterday

add a comment |

Just to remove the possibility of another answer

the ISBN number was NOT parsed as a UNIX timestamp. Using this, the ISBN number corresponds to a second in the year 2280.

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

New contributor

add a comment |

Your Answer

StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\$","\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});

}
});

John Burger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78196%2fwhat-date-encoding-could-this-be%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

3 Answers
3

active

oldest

votes

Not a real answer:

It's not an isolated issue, it seems. There is another one I found here and again the actual date is 16 September 2008

Same is the publishing date of the book in the question. It is worth noting that if we write down the date 16 September 2008 in 'american style' mmddyyyy we get the number 09162008 and this number contains the wrong 'year' 9162.

The likely explanation here is a parse algorithm error (code snippet courtesy of @IanMacDonald):
 function getDateString(input) {

     let months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'];

     let match = (input + "00000000").match(/^0*([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])/);

     let year = match[1];

     let month = (12+(match[2]-1))%12; // Make sure we're zero-indexing months

     let day = match[3];

     return day + ' ' + months[month] + ' ' + year;

 }

 

edited yesterday

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

1

Yes, the likeliest answer here is that whoever is parsing the date has made an assumption about component ordering.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

4

I can imagine that the date was 9/16/2008. Strip all non-digits, pad with a zero at the back, because we need 8 digits, then interpret as yyyymmdd. That would mean that December was represeted by 00. I can also imagine that every illegal month is shown as December, if the code goes like this:: ...; if (m==11) return "Nov"; return "Dec"; /* Treat everything else as Dec ;) */
– M Oehm
yesterday

@MOehm Yep, sounds possible but basically it's a algorithm/programmers mistake.
– rhsquared
yesterday

Follow-up game: find all entries on the website that have the incorrect date format entered in their database. Bonus points if you use the open API to scrape all their data, then report back to them with a list of date conversions they need to update.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

2

With regards to 00 being December, maybe they just applied a mod 12 to bring every input into the range 1 to 12, i.e. something like month = ((input-1)%12)+1. This makes 01=13=25..=January, and so on until 00=12=24..=December.
– Jaap Scherphuis
yesterday

|
show 4 more comments

Not a real answer:

It's not an isolated issue, it seems. There is another one I found here and again the actual date is 16 September 2008

Same is the publishing date of the book in the question. It is worth noting that if we write down the date 16 September 2008 in 'american style' mmddyyyy we get the number 09162008 and this number contains the wrong 'year' 9162.

The likely explanation here is a parse algorithm error (code snippet courtesy of @IanMacDonald):
 function getDateString(input) {

     let months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'];

     let match = (input + "00000000").match(/^0*([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])/);

     let year = match[1];

     let month = (12+(match[2]-1))%12; // Make sure we're zero-indexing months

     let day = match[3];

     return day + ' ' + months[month] + ' ' + year;

 }

 

edited yesterday

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

1

Yes, the likeliest answer here is that whoever is parsing the date has made an assumption about component ordering.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

4

I can imagine that the date was 9/16/2008. Strip all non-digits, pad with a zero at the back, because we need 8 digits, then interpret as yyyymmdd. That would mean that December was represeted by 00. I can also imagine that every illegal month is shown as December, if the code goes like this:: ...; if (m==11) return "Nov"; return "Dec"; /* Treat everything else as Dec ;) */
– M Oehm
yesterday

@MOehm Yep, sounds possible but basically it's a algorithm/programmers mistake.
– rhsquared
yesterday

Follow-up game: find all entries on the website that have the incorrect date format entered in their database. Bonus points if you use the open API to scrape all their data, then report back to them with a list of date conversions they need to update.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

2

With regards to 00 being December, maybe they just applied a mod 12 to bring every input into the range 1 to 12, i.e. something like month = ((input-1)%12)+1. This makes 01=13=25..=January, and so on until 00=12=24..=December.
– Jaap Scherphuis
yesterday

|
show 4 more comments

Not a real answer:

It's not an isolated issue, it seems. There is another one I found here and again the actual date is 16 September 2008

Same is the publishing date of the book in the question. It is worth noting that if we write down the date 16 September 2008 in 'american style' mmddyyyy we get the number 09162008 and this number contains the wrong 'year' 9162.

The likely explanation here is a parse algorithm error (code snippet courtesy of @IanMacDonald):
 function getDateString(input) {

     let months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'];

     let match = (input + "00000000").match(/^0*([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])/);

     let year = match[1];

     let month = (12+(match[2]-1))%12; // Make sure we're zero-indexing months

     let day = match[3];

     return day + ' ' + months[month] + ' ' + year;

 }

 

edited yesterday

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

Not a real answer:

It's not an isolated issue, it seems. There is another one I found here and again the actual date is 16 September 2008

Same is the publishing date of the book in the question. It is worth noting that if we write down the date 16 September 2008 in 'american style' mmddyyyy we get the number 09162008 and this number contains the wrong 'year' 9162.

The likely explanation here is a parse algorithm error (code snippet courtesy of @IanMacDonald):
 function getDateString(input) {

     let months = ['January', 'February', 'March', 'April', 'May', 'June', 'July', 'August', 'September', 'October', 'November', 'December'];

     let match = (input + "00000000").match(/^0*([1-9][0-9][0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])([0-9][0-9])/);

     let year = match[1];

     let month = (12+(match[2]-1))%12; // Make sure we're zero-indexing months

     let day = match[3];

     return day + ' ' + months[month] + ' ' + year;

 }

 

edited yesterday

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

edited yesterday

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

answered yesterday

rhsquared

7,81521746

1

Yes, the likeliest answer here is that whoever is parsing the date has made an assumption about component ordering.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

4

I can imagine that the date was 9/16/2008. Strip all non-digits, pad with a zero at the back, because we need 8 digits, then interpret as yyyymmdd. That would mean that December was represeted by 00. I can also imagine that every illegal month is shown as December, if the code goes like this:: ...; if (m==11) return "Nov"; return "Dec"; /* Treat everything else as Dec ;) */
– M Oehm
yesterday

@MOehm Yep, sounds possible but basically it's a algorithm/programmers mistake.
– rhsquared
yesterday

Follow-up game: find all entries on the website that have the incorrect date format entered in their database. Bonus points if you use the open API to scrape all their data, then report back to them with a list of date conversions they need to update.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

2

With regards to 00 being December, maybe they just applied a mod 12 to bring every input into the range 1 to 12, i.e. something like month = ((input-1)%12)+1. This makes 01=13=25..=January, and so on until 00=12=24..=December.
– Jaap Scherphuis
yesterday

|
show 4 more comments

1

Yes, the likeliest answer here is that whoever is parsing the date has made an assumption about component ordering.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

4

I can imagine that the date was 9/16/2008. Strip all non-digits, pad with a zero at the back, because we need 8 digits, then interpret as yyyymmdd. That would mean that December was represeted by 00. I can also imagine that every illegal month is shown as December, if the code goes like this:: ...; if (m==11) return "Nov"; return "Dec"; /* Treat everything else as Dec ;) */
– M Oehm
yesterday

@MOehm Yep, sounds possible but basically it's a algorithm/programmers mistake.
– rhsquared
yesterday

Follow-up game: find all entries on the website that have the incorrect date format entered in their database. Bonus points if you use the open API to scrape all their data, then report back to them with a list of date conversions they need to update.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

2

With regards to 00 being December, maybe they just applied a mod 12 to bring every input into the range 1 to 12, i.e. something like month = ((input-1)%12)+1. This makes 01=13=25..=January, and so on until 00=12=24..=December.
– Jaap Scherphuis
yesterday

Yes, the likeliest answer here is that whoever is parsing the date has made an assumption about component ordering.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

I can imagine that the date was 9/16/2008. Strip all non-digits, pad with a zero at the back, because we need 8 digits, then interpret as yyyymmdd. That would mean that December was represeted by 00. I can also imagine that every illegal month is shown as December, if the code goes like this:: ...; if (m==11) return "Nov"; return "Dec"; /* Treat everything else as Dec ;) */
– M Oehm
yesterday

@MOehm Yep, sounds possible but basically it's a algorithm/programmers mistake.
– rhsquared
yesterday

Follow-up game: find all entries on the website that have the incorrect date format entered in their database. Bonus points if you use the open API to scrape all their data, then report back to them with a list of date conversions they need to update.
– Ian MacDonald
yesterday

With regards to 00 being December, maybe they just applied a mod 12 to bring every input into the range 1 to 12, i.e. something like month = ((input-1)%12)+1. This makes 01=13=25..=January, and so on until 00=12=24..=December.
– Jaap Scherphuis
yesterday

|
show 4 more comments

(From a quick google it doesn't look like date is stored in the ISBN number https://www.isbn-international.org/content/what-isbn)

answered yesterday

olim

713

New contributor

It could be human error - but this was from a book site, so I assumed it was coming from some database somewhere. Yes there was a 2008 edition (some 10 years after the anthologist’s passing), but it has an ISBN-10 number, which ceased being used after 2006. Also, according to trove.nla.gov.au/work/5510591 there was a 1988 edition - plus I know I read it before then
– John Burger
yesterday

Hi, thanks for the extra info! It appears that the older edition (first published in 1988) was titled just "Science Fiction Stories" link and had different ISBN numbers (as appears to be the norm for any variations wiki ISBN ). Which website was it from? Is it a common issue across the site?
– olim
yesterday

1

That was my thought too. I didn’t investigate too deeply, but I checked other titles - they seemed fine. I’ve edited the question with the URL (apologies for forgetting!)
– John Burger
yesterday

December could have come from an "else" condition in the month parsing. if month == 1 then 'January'; else if month == 2 then 'February'; and so on until else if month == 11 then 'November'; else 'December'. Just a guess and there should be better ways of handling that parsing anyway.
– tilper
yesterday

add a comment |

(From a quick google it doesn't look like date is stored in the ISBN number https://www.isbn-international.org/content/what-isbn)

answered yesterday

olim

713

New contributor

It could be human error - but this was from a book site, so I assumed it was coming from some database somewhere. Yes there was a 2008 edition (some 10 years after the anthologist’s passing), but it has an ISBN-10 number, which ceased being used after 2006. Also, according to trove.nla.gov.au/work/5510591 there was a 1988 edition - plus I know I read it before then
– John Burger
yesterday

Hi, thanks for the extra info! It appears that the older edition (first published in 1988) was titled just "Science Fiction Stories" link and had different ISBN numbers (as appears to be the norm for any variations wiki ISBN ). Which website was it from? Is it a common issue across the site?
– olim
yesterday

1

That was my thought too. I didn’t investigate too deeply, but I checked other titles - they seemed fine. I’ve edited the question with the URL (apologies for forgetting!)
– John Burger
yesterday

December could have come from an "else" condition in the month parsing. if month == 1 then 'January'; else if month == 2 then 'February'; and so on until else if month == 11 then 'November'; else 'December'. Just a guess and there should be better ways of handling that parsing anyway.
– tilper
yesterday

add a comment |

(From a quick google it doesn't look like date is stored in the ISBN number https://www.isbn-international.org/content/what-isbn)

answered yesterday

olim

713

New contributor

(From a quick google it doesn't look like date is stored in the ISBN number https://www.isbn-international.org/content/what-isbn)

answered yesterday

olim

713

New contributor

answered yesterday

olim

713

New contributor

answered yesterday

olim

713

answered yesterday

olim

713

New contributor

olim is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

It could be human error - but this was from a book site, so I assumed it was coming from some database somewhere. Yes there was a 2008 edition (some 10 years after the anthologist’s passing), but it has an ISBN-10 number, which ceased being used after 2006. Also, according to trove.nla.gov.au/work/5510591 there was a 1988 edition - plus I know I read it before then
– John Burger
yesterday

Hi, thanks for the extra info! It appears that the older edition (first published in 1988) was titled just "Science Fiction Stories" link and had different ISBN numbers (as appears to be the norm for any variations wiki ISBN ). Which website was it from? Is it a common issue across the site?
– olim
yesterday

1

That was my thought too. I didn’t investigate too deeply, but I checked other titles - they seemed fine. I’ve edited the question with the URL (apologies for forgetting!)
– John Burger
yesterday

December could have come from an "else" condition in the month parsing. if month == 1 then 'January'; else if month == 2 then 'February'; and so on until else if month == 11 then 'November'; else 'December'. Just a guess and there should be better ways of handling that parsing anyway.
– tilper
yesterday

add a comment |

It could be human error - but this was from a book site, so I assumed it was coming from some database somewhere. Yes there was a 2008 edition (some 10 years after the anthologist’s passing), but it has an ISBN-10 number, which ceased being used after 2006. Also, according to trove.nla.gov.au/work/5510591 there was a 1988 edition - plus I know I read it before then
– John Burger
yesterday

Hi, thanks for the extra info! It appears that the older edition (first published in 1988) was titled just "Science Fiction Stories" link and had different ISBN numbers (as appears to be the norm for any variations wiki ISBN ). Which website was it from? Is it a common issue across the site?
– olim
yesterday

1

That was my thought too. I didn’t investigate too deeply, but I checked other titles - they seemed fine. I’ve edited the question with the URL (apologies for forgetting!)
– John Burger
yesterday

December could have come from an "else" condition in the month parsing. if month == 1 then 'January'; else if month == 2 then 'February'; and so on until else if month == 11 then 'November'; else 'December'. Just a guess and there should be better ways of handling that parsing anyway.
– tilper
yesterday

It could be human error - but this was from a book site, so I assumed it was coming from some database somewhere. Yes there was a 2008 edition (some 10 years after the anthologist’s passing), but it has an ISBN-10 number, which ceased being used after 2006. Also, according to trove.nla.gov.au/work/5510591 there was a 1988 edition - plus I know I read it before then
– John Burger
yesterday

Hi, thanks for the extra info! It appears that the older edition (first published in 1988) was titled just "Science Fiction Stories" link and had different ISBN numbers (as appears to be the norm for any variations wiki ISBN ). Which website was it from? Is it a common issue across the site?
– olim
yesterday

That was my thought too. I didn’t investigate too deeply, but I checked other titles - they seemed fine. I’ve edited the question with the URL (apologies for forgetting!)
– John Burger
yesterday

December could have come from an "else" condition in the month parsing. if month == 1 then 'January'; else if month == 2 then 'February'; and so on until else if month == 11 then 'November'; else 'December'. Just a guess and there should be better ways of handling that parsing anyway.
– tilper
yesterday

add a comment |

Just to remove the possibility of another answer

the ISBN number was NOT parsed as a UNIX timestamp. Using this, the ISBN number corresponds to a second in the year 2280.

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

New contributor

add a comment |

Just to remove the possibility of another answer

the ISBN number was NOT parsed as a UNIX timestamp. Using this, the ISBN number corresponds to a second in the year 2280.

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

New contributor

add a comment |

Just to remove the possibility of another answer

the ISBN number was NOT parsed as a UNIX timestamp. Using this, the ISBN number corresponds to a second in the year 2280.

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

New contributor

Just to remove the possibility of another answer

the ISBN number was NOT parsed as a UNIX timestamp. Using this, the ISBN number corresponds to a second in the year 2280.

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

New contributor

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

edited yesterday

Glorfindel

13.5k34983

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

New contributor

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

answered yesterday

Calvin Godfrey

1011

New contributor

Calvin Godfrey is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

add a comment |

John Burger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

John Burger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.

Please pay close attention to the following guidance:

Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …

Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});

Post as a guest

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

Name

Required, but never shown

This page is only for reference, If you need detailed information, please check here

搜尋此網誌

Mfrhtyj