Solving for $x$ in $sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) = frac pi 4$
Given an equation: $$sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) = frac pi 4$$
How do I find $x$?
I tried solving by differentiating both sides, but I get $x=0$.
How do you solve it, purely using trigonometric techniques?
trigonometry inverse-function
add a comment |
Given an equation: $$sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) = frac pi 4$$
How do I find $x$?
I tried solving by differentiating both sides, but I get $x=0$.
How do you solve it, purely using trigonometric techniques?
trigonometry inverse-function
Possibly useful - math.stackexchange.com/questions/672575/…
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday
But I don't know x^2+y^2
– user5722540
yesterday
I don't see how anyone can solve this in under two minutes. Are you sure? If so, there must be a trick. Is this a multiple choice question?
– D.B.
yesterday
Online open ended answer. Deadline of 150 seconds.
– user5722540
yesterday
Well, it takes Maple less than a second to get ${frac {sqrt {2522-1164,sqrt {2}}}{194}}$ in response to solve(expand(sin(arcsin(2*x)+arcsin(3*x))=sin(Pi/4)));. Typing the question and answer takes longer...
– Robert Israel
yesterday
add a comment |
Given an equation: $$sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) = frac pi 4$$
How do I find $x$?
I tried solving by differentiating both sides, but I get $x=0$.
How do you solve it, purely using trigonometric techniques?
trigonometry inverse-function
Given an equation: $$sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) = frac pi 4$$
How do I find $x$?
I tried solving by differentiating both sides, but I get $x=0$.
How do you solve it, purely using trigonometric techniques?
trigonometry inverse-function
trigonometry inverse-function
edited yesterday
Blue
47.7k870151
47.7k870151
asked yesterday
user5722540user5722540
1638
1638
Possibly useful - math.stackexchange.com/questions/672575/…
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday
But I don't know x^2+y^2
– user5722540
yesterday
I don't see how anyone can solve this in under two minutes. Are you sure? If so, there must be a trick. Is this a multiple choice question?
– D.B.
yesterday
Online open ended answer. Deadline of 150 seconds.
– user5722540
yesterday
Well, it takes Maple less than a second to get ${frac {sqrt {2522-1164,sqrt {2}}}{194}}$ in response to solve(expand(sin(arcsin(2*x)+arcsin(3*x))=sin(Pi/4)));. Typing the question and answer takes longer...
– Robert Israel
yesterday
add a comment |
Possibly useful - math.stackexchange.com/questions/672575/…
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday
But I don't know x^2+y^2
– user5722540
yesterday
I don't see how anyone can solve this in under two minutes. Are you sure? If so, there must be a trick. Is this a multiple choice question?
– D.B.
yesterday
Online open ended answer. Deadline of 150 seconds.
– user5722540
yesterday
Well, it takes Maple less than a second to get ${frac {sqrt {2522-1164,sqrt {2}}}{194}}$ in response to solve(expand(sin(arcsin(2*x)+arcsin(3*x))=sin(Pi/4)));. Typing the question and answer takes longer...
– Robert Israel
yesterday
Possibly useful - math.stackexchange.com/questions/672575/…
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday
Possibly useful - math.stackexchange.com/questions/672575/…
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday
But I don't know x^2+y^2
– user5722540
yesterday
But I don't know x^2+y^2
– user5722540
yesterday
I don't see how anyone can solve this in under two minutes. Are you sure? If so, there must be a trick. Is this a multiple choice question?
– D.B.
yesterday
I don't see how anyone can solve this in under two minutes. Are you sure? If so, there must be a trick. Is this a multiple choice question?
– D.B.
yesterday
Online open ended answer. Deadline of 150 seconds.
– user5722540
yesterday
Online open ended answer. Deadline of 150 seconds.
– user5722540
yesterday
Well, it takes Maple less than a second to get ${frac {sqrt {2522-1164,sqrt {2}}}{194}}$ in response to solve(expand(sin(arcsin(2*x)+arcsin(3*x))=sin(Pi/4)));. Typing the question and answer takes longer...
– Robert Israel
yesterday
Well, it takes Maple less than a second to get ${frac {sqrt {2522-1164,sqrt {2}}}{194}}$ in response to solve(expand(sin(arcsin(2*x)+arcsin(3*x))=sin(Pi/4)));. Typing the question and answer takes longer...
– Robert Israel
yesterday
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
Or this way using
- $cos(a+b) = cos a cos b - sin a sin b$
- $cos a = sqrt{1-sin^2 a}$
begin{eqnarray*}
sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) & = & frac pi 4 \
sqrt{1-4x^2}sqrt{1-9x^2} - 6x^2 & = & frac{sqrt{2}}{2} \
(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2) &=& left( frac{sqrt{2}}{2} +6x^2 right)^2 \
frac{1}{2} & = & (6sqrt{2}+13)x^2 \
end{eqnarray*}
The positive solution gives:
$$boxed{x = frac{1}{sqrt{2(6sqrt{2}+13)}}}$$
The answer is not matching @clathratus solution. Please confirm.
– user5722540
yesterday
Just plug it in. It gives the correct result. Unfortunately I cannot paste the complete WA-link here.
– trancelocation
yesterday
@user5722540 : I have just checked with WA that both expressions are equivalent. Happens quite often that nested radical expressions have quite differently looking ways to be expressed.
– trancelocation
yesterday
Got that. Thanks.
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a useful identity that we can use in this case:
$arcsin{x}+arcsin{y}=arcsin{(xsqrt{1-y^2}+ysqrt{1-x^2})}$
From here we can substitute:
$arcsin{(2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2})}=frac{pi}{4}$
We are then left with:
$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2}=sin{frac{pi}{4}}$
From here, you can solve for $x$.
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
Let $theta_1 = sin^{-1}(2x)$,$theta_2 = sin^{-1}(3x)$. Then,
$$sin(theta_1+theta_2) = sin(theta_1)cos(theta_2)+sin(theta_2)cos(theta_1) = sin(pi/4) = 1/sqrt{2}$$
$$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}.$$
But I don't know how you would solve this last equation.
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
I'm gonna derive the general function for $arcsin x$ then go from there.
Recall that
$$sin x=frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$$
So if $y= arcsin x$, then $$2ix=e^{iy}-e^{-iy}$$
Letting $u=e^{iy}$, we have
$$2ix=frac{u^2-1}{u}$$
$$u^2-2ixu-1=0$$
Use the quadratic formula to find that
$$u=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
Thus
$$e^{iy}=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
$$iy=lnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
$$arcsin x=-ilnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
So we look at your equation:
$$arcsin 2x+arcsin3x=fracpi4$$
$$-ilnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]-ilnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=fracpi4$$
$$lnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]+lnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=frac{ipi}4$$
Using the property $ln(ab)=ln a+ln b$ we see that
$$lnbigg[big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)bigg]=frac{ipi}4$$
Taking $exp$ on both sides,
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=e^{ipi/4}$$
Use the formula $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$ to see that
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=frac{1+i}{sqrt2}$$
and at this point I used Wolfram|Alpha to see that
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
I will update my answer once I figure out how this result is found
Edit:
Expanding out the product on the Left hand side, then multiplying both sides by $-i$, we have
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)+6ix^2-isqrt{(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2)}=frac{1-i}{sqrt{2}}$$
We set the real parts of each side equal to eachother:
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)=frac1{sqrt2}$$
Which @ClaudeLeibovici showed reduced to
$$97y^2-13y+frac14=0$$
with $y=x^2$. Using the quadratic formula, we see that
$$y=frac{13+sqrt{72}}{194}$$
which reduces to
$$y=frac{13}{194}+frac{3sqrt2}{97}$$
Taking $sqrt{cdot}$ on both sides,
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
Is there a workaround to approach solution under 150seconds?
– user5722540
yesterday
@user5722540 Yes. This is more of an alternative approach using cool complex algebra instead of trig
– clathratus
yesterday
add a comment |
We need $-1le3xle1$
But if $xle0,$ the left hand side $le0$
Now $3x=sin(pi/4-arcsin(2x))$
$3sqrt2x=sqrt{1-(2x)^2}-2x$
$sqrt{1-4x^2}=x(3sqrt2+2)$
Square both sides
add a comment |
Start with $$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$$ and square both sides to get
$$-72 x^4+13x^2+12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2=frac 12$$ that is to say
$$72 x^4-13x^2+frac 12=12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2$$ Let $y=x^2$ to make
$$72 y^2-13y+frac 12=12 ysqrt{1-9 y} sqrt{1-4 y} $$
Square again, expand and simplify to get
$$97 y^2-13 y+frac{1}{4}=0$$ which is simple.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065747%2fsolving-for-x-in-sin-12x-sin-13x-frac-pi-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Or this way using
- $cos(a+b) = cos a cos b - sin a sin b$
- $cos a = sqrt{1-sin^2 a}$
begin{eqnarray*}
sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) & = & frac pi 4 \
sqrt{1-4x^2}sqrt{1-9x^2} - 6x^2 & = & frac{sqrt{2}}{2} \
(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2) &=& left( frac{sqrt{2}}{2} +6x^2 right)^2 \
frac{1}{2} & = & (6sqrt{2}+13)x^2 \
end{eqnarray*}
The positive solution gives:
$$boxed{x = frac{1}{sqrt{2(6sqrt{2}+13)}}}$$
The answer is not matching @clathratus solution. Please confirm.
– user5722540
yesterday
Just plug it in. It gives the correct result. Unfortunately I cannot paste the complete WA-link here.
– trancelocation
yesterday
@user5722540 : I have just checked with WA that both expressions are equivalent. Happens quite often that nested radical expressions have quite differently looking ways to be expressed.
– trancelocation
yesterday
Got that. Thanks.
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
Or this way using
- $cos(a+b) = cos a cos b - sin a sin b$
- $cos a = sqrt{1-sin^2 a}$
begin{eqnarray*}
sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) & = & frac pi 4 \
sqrt{1-4x^2}sqrt{1-9x^2} - 6x^2 & = & frac{sqrt{2}}{2} \
(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2) &=& left( frac{sqrt{2}}{2} +6x^2 right)^2 \
frac{1}{2} & = & (6sqrt{2}+13)x^2 \
end{eqnarray*}
The positive solution gives:
$$boxed{x = frac{1}{sqrt{2(6sqrt{2}+13)}}}$$
The answer is not matching @clathratus solution. Please confirm.
– user5722540
yesterday
Just plug it in. It gives the correct result. Unfortunately I cannot paste the complete WA-link here.
– trancelocation
yesterday
@user5722540 : I have just checked with WA that both expressions are equivalent. Happens quite often that nested radical expressions have quite differently looking ways to be expressed.
– trancelocation
yesterday
Got that. Thanks.
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
Or this way using
- $cos(a+b) = cos a cos b - sin a sin b$
- $cos a = sqrt{1-sin^2 a}$
begin{eqnarray*}
sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) & = & frac pi 4 \
sqrt{1-4x^2}sqrt{1-9x^2} - 6x^2 & = & frac{sqrt{2}}{2} \
(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2) &=& left( frac{sqrt{2}}{2} +6x^2 right)^2 \
frac{1}{2} & = & (6sqrt{2}+13)x^2 \
end{eqnarray*}
The positive solution gives:
$$boxed{x = frac{1}{sqrt{2(6sqrt{2}+13)}}}$$
Or this way using
- $cos(a+b) = cos a cos b - sin a sin b$
- $cos a = sqrt{1-sin^2 a}$
begin{eqnarray*}
sin^{-1}(2x) + sin^{-1}(3x) & = & frac pi 4 \
sqrt{1-4x^2}sqrt{1-9x^2} - 6x^2 & = & frac{sqrt{2}}{2} \
(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2) &=& left( frac{sqrt{2}}{2} +6x^2 right)^2 \
frac{1}{2} & = & (6sqrt{2}+13)x^2 \
end{eqnarray*}
The positive solution gives:
$$boxed{x = frac{1}{sqrt{2(6sqrt{2}+13)}}}$$
answered yesterday
trancelocationtrancelocation
9,4051622
9,4051622
The answer is not matching @clathratus solution. Please confirm.
– user5722540
yesterday
Just plug it in. It gives the correct result. Unfortunately I cannot paste the complete WA-link here.
– trancelocation
yesterday
@user5722540 : I have just checked with WA that both expressions are equivalent. Happens quite often that nested radical expressions have quite differently looking ways to be expressed.
– trancelocation
yesterday
Got that. Thanks.
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
The answer is not matching @clathratus solution. Please confirm.
– user5722540
yesterday
Just plug it in. It gives the correct result. Unfortunately I cannot paste the complete WA-link here.
– trancelocation
yesterday
@user5722540 : I have just checked with WA that both expressions are equivalent. Happens quite often that nested radical expressions have quite differently looking ways to be expressed.
– trancelocation
yesterday
Got that. Thanks.
– user5722540
yesterday
The answer is not matching @clathratus solution. Please confirm.
– user5722540
yesterday
The answer is not matching @clathratus solution. Please confirm.
– user5722540
yesterday
Just plug it in. It gives the correct result. Unfortunately I cannot paste the complete WA-link here.
– trancelocation
yesterday
Just plug it in. It gives the correct result. Unfortunately I cannot paste the complete WA-link here.
– trancelocation
yesterday
@user5722540 : I have just checked with WA that both expressions are equivalent. Happens quite often that nested radical expressions have quite differently looking ways to be expressed.
– trancelocation
yesterday
@user5722540 : I have just checked with WA that both expressions are equivalent. Happens quite often that nested radical expressions have quite differently looking ways to be expressed.
– trancelocation
yesterday
Got that. Thanks.
– user5722540
yesterday
Got that. Thanks.
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a useful identity that we can use in this case:
$arcsin{x}+arcsin{y}=arcsin{(xsqrt{1-y^2}+ysqrt{1-x^2})}$
From here we can substitute:
$arcsin{(2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2})}=frac{pi}{4}$
We are then left with:
$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2}=sin{frac{pi}{4}}$
From here, you can solve for $x$.
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a useful identity that we can use in this case:
$arcsin{x}+arcsin{y}=arcsin{(xsqrt{1-y^2}+ysqrt{1-x^2})}$
From here we can substitute:
$arcsin{(2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2})}=frac{pi}{4}$
We are then left with:
$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2}=sin{frac{pi}{4}}$
From here, you can solve for $x$.
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a useful identity that we can use in this case:
$arcsin{x}+arcsin{y}=arcsin{(xsqrt{1-y^2}+ysqrt{1-x^2})}$
From here we can substitute:
$arcsin{(2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2})}=frac{pi}{4}$
We are then left with:
$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2}=sin{frac{pi}{4}}$
From here, you can solve for $x$.
There is a useful identity that we can use in this case:
$arcsin{x}+arcsin{y}=arcsin{(xsqrt{1-y^2}+ysqrt{1-x^2})}$
From here we can substitute:
$arcsin{(2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2})}=frac{pi}{4}$
We are then left with:
$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2}=sin{frac{pi}{4}}$
From here, you can solve for $x$.
answered yesterday
GnumbertesterGnumbertester
1505
1505
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
Let $theta_1 = sin^{-1}(2x)$,$theta_2 = sin^{-1}(3x)$. Then,
$$sin(theta_1+theta_2) = sin(theta_1)cos(theta_2)+sin(theta_2)cos(theta_1) = sin(pi/4) = 1/sqrt{2}$$
$$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}.$$
But I don't know how you would solve this last equation.
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
Let $theta_1 = sin^{-1}(2x)$,$theta_2 = sin^{-1}(3x)$. Then,
$$sin(theta_1+theta_2) = sin(theta_1)cos(theta_2)+sin(theta_2)cos(theta_1) = sin(pi/4) = 1/sqrt{2}$$
$$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}.$$
But I don't know how you would solve this last equation.
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
Let $theta_1 = sin^{-1}(2x)$,$theta_2 = sin^{-1}(3x)$. Then,
$$sin(theta_1+theta_2) = sin(theta_1)cos(theta_2)+sin(theta_2)cos(theta_1) = sin(pi/4) = 1/sqrt{2}$$
$$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}.$$
But I don't know how you would solve this last equation.
Let $theta_1 = sin^{-1}(2x)$,$theta_2 = sin^{-1}(3x)$. Then,
$$sin(theta_1+theta_2) = sin(theta_1)cos(theta_2)+sin(theta_2)cos(theta_1) = sin(pi/4) = 1/sqrt{2}$$
$$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}.$$
But I don't know how you would solve this last equation.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
D.B.D.B.
1,0748
1,0748
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
When I tried solving the equation, I got x=root(+-(root(17)+5)*10)/20. However, on again solving it, I get a completely different answer. Is the answer actually going to be this complicated, given that it is expected to be solved in under 2minutes?
– user5722540
yesterday
add a comment |
I'm gonna derive the general function for $arcsin x$ then go from there.
Recall that
$$sin x=frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$$
So if $y= arcsin x$, then $$2ix=e^{iy}-e^{-iy}$$
Letting $u=e^{iy}$, we have
$$2ix=frac{u^2-1}{u}$$
$$u^2-2ixu-1=0$$
Use the quadratic formula to find that
$$u=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
Thus
$$e^{iy}=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
$$iy=lnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
$$arcsin x=-ilnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
So we look at your equation:
$$arcsin 2x+arcsin3x=fracpi4$$
$$-ilnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]-ilnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=fracpi4$$
$$lnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]+lnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=frac{ipi}4$$
Using the property $ln(ab)=ln a+ln b$ we see that
$$lnbigg[big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)bigg]=frac{ipi}4$$
Taking $exp$ on both sides,
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=e^{ipi/4}$$
Use the formula $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$ to see that
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=frac{1+i}{sqrt2}$$
and at this point I used Wolfram|Alpha to see that
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
I will update my answer once I figure out how this result is found
Edit:
Expanding out the product on the Left hand side, then multiplying both sides by $-i$, we have
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)+6ix^2-isqrt{(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2)}=frac{1-i}{sqrt{2}}$$
We set the real parts of each side equal to eachother:
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)=frac1{sqrt2}$$
Which @ClaudeLeibovici showed reduced to
$$97y^2-13y+frac14=0$$
with $y=x^2$. Using the quadratic formula, we see that
$$y=frac{13+sqrt{72}}{194}$$
which reduces to
$$y=frac{13}{194}+frac{3sqrt2}{97}$$
Taking $sqrt{cdot}$ on both sides,
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
Is there a workaround to approach solution under 150seconds?
– user5722540
yesterday
@user5722540 Yes. This is more of an alternative approach using cool complex algebra instead of trig
– clathratus
yesterday
add a comment |
I'm gonna derive the general function for $arcsin x$ then go from there.
Recall that
$$sin x=frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$$
So if $y= arcsin x$, then $$2ix=e^{iy}-e^{-iy}$$
Letting $u=e^{iy}$, we have
$$2ix=frac{u^2-1}{u}$$
$$u^2-2ixu-1=0$$
Use the quadratic formula to find that
$$u=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
Thus
$$e^{iy}=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
$$iy=lnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
$$arcsin x=-ilnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
So we look at your equation:
$$arcsin 2x+arcsin3x=fracpi4$$
$$-ilnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]-ilnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=fracpi4$$
$$lnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]+lnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=frac{ipi}4$$
Using the property $ln(ab)=ln a+ln b$ we see that
$$lnbigg[big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)bigg]=frac{ipi}4$$
Taking $exp$ on both sides,
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=e^{ipi/4}$$
Use the formula $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$ to see that
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=frac{1+i}{sqrt2}$$
and at this point I used Wolfram|Alpha to see that
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
I will update my answer once I figure out how this result is found
Edit:
Expanding out the product on the Left hand side, then multiplying both sides by $-i$, we have
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)+6ix^2-isqrt{(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2)}=frac{1-i}{sqrt{2}}$$
We set the real parts of each side equal to eachother:
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)=frac1{sqrt2}$$
Which @ClaudeLeibovici showed reduced to
$$97y^2-13y+frac14=0$$
with $y=x^2$. Using the quadratic formula, we see that
$$y=frac{13+sqrt{72}}{194}$$
which reduces to
$$y=frac{13}{194}+frac{3sqrt2}{97}$$
Taking $sqrt{cdot}$ on both sides,
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
Is there a workaround to approach solution under 150seconds?
– user5722540
yesterday
@user5722540 Yes. This is more of an alternative approach using cool complex algebra instead of trig
– clathratus
yesterday
add a comment |
I'm gonna derive the general function for $arcsin x$ then go from there.
Recall that
$$sin x=frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$$
So if $y= arcsin x$, then $$2ix=e^{iy}-e^{-iy}$$
Letting $u=e^{iy}$, we have
$$2ix=frac{u^2-1}{u}$$
$$u^2-2ixu-1=0$$
Use the quadratic formula to find that
$$u=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
Thus
$$e^{iy}=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
$$iy=lnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
$$arcsin x=-ilnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
So we look at your equation:
$$arcsin 2x+arcsin3x=fracpi4$$
$$-ilnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]-ilnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=fracpi4$$
$$lnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]+lnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=frac{ipi}4$$
Using the property $ln(ab)=ln a+ln b$ we see that
$$lnbigg[big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)bigg]=frac{ipi}4$$
Taking $exp$ on both sides,
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=e^{ipi/4}$$
Use the formula $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$ to see that
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=frac{1+i}{sqrt2}$$
and at this point I used Wolfram|Alpha to see that
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
I will update my answer once I figure out how this result is found
Edit:
Expanding out the product on the Left hand side, then multiplying both sides by $-i$, we have
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)+6ix^2-isqrt{(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2)}=frac{1-i}{sqrt{2}}$$
We set the real parts of each side equal to eachother:
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)=frac1{sqrt2}$$
Which @ClaudeLeibovici showed reduced to
$$97y^2-13y+frac14=0$$
with $y=x^2$. Using the quadratic formula, we see that
$$y=frac{13+sqrt{72}}{194}$$
which reduces to
$$y=frac{13}{194}+frac{3sqrt2}{97}$$
Taking $sqrt{cdot}$ on both sides,
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
I'm gonna derive the general function for $arcsin x$ then go from there.
Recall that
$$sin x=frac{e^{ix}-e^{-ix}}{2i}$$
So if $y= arcsin x$, then $$2ix=e^{iy}-e^{-iy}$$
Letting $u=e^{iy}$, we have
$$2ix=frac{u^2-1}{u}$$
$$u^2-2ixu-1=0$$
Use the quadratic formula to find that
$$u=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
Thus
$$e^{iy}=ix+sqrt{1-x^2}$$
$$iy=lnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
$$arcsin x=-ilnbig[ix+sqrt{1-x^2}big]$$
So we look at your equation:
$$arcsin 2x+arcsin3x=fracpi4$$
$$-ilnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]-ilnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=fracpi4$$
$$lnbig[2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big]+lnbig[3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big]=frac{ipi}4$$
Using the property $ln(ab)=ln a+ln b$ we see that
$$lnbigg[big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)bigg]=frac{ipi}4$$
Taking $exp$ on both sides,
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=e^{ipi/4}$$
Use the formula $e^{itheta}=costheta+isintheta$ to see that
$$big(2ix+sqrt{1-4x^2}big)big(3ix+sqrt{1-9x^2}big)=frac{1+i}{sqrt2}$$
and at this point I used Wolfram|Alpha to see that
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
I will update my answer once I figure out how this result is found
Edit:
Expanding out the product on the Left hand side, then multiplying both sides by $-i$, we have
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)+6ix^2-isqrt{(1-4x^2)(1-9x^2)}=frac{1-i}{sqrt{2}}$$
We set the real parts of each side equal to eachother:
$$xbigg(2sqrt{1-9x^2}+3sqrt{1-4x^2}bigg)=frac1{sqrt2}$$
Which @ClaudeLeibovici showed reduced to
$$97y^2-13y+frac14=0$$
with $y=x^2$. Using the quadratic formula, we see that
$$y=frac{13+sqrt{72}}{194}$$
which reduces to
$$y=frac{13}{194}+frac{3sqrt2}{97}$$
Taking $sqrt{cdot}$ on both sides,
$$x=sqrt{frac{13}{194}-frac{3sqrt2}{97}}$$
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
clathratusclathratus
3,337331
3,337331
Is there a workaround to approach solution under 150seconds?
– user5722540
yesterday
@user5722540 Yes. This is more of an alternative approach using cool complex algebra instead of trig
– clathratus
yesterday
add a comment |
Is there a workaround to approach solution under 150seconds?
– user5722540
yesterday
@user5722540 Yes. This is more of an alternative approach using cool complex algebra instead of trig
– clathratus
yesterday
Is there a workaround to approach solution under 150seconds?
– user5722540
yesterday
Is there a workaround to approach solution under 150seconds?
– user5722540
yesterday
@user5722540 Yes. This is more of an alternative approach using cool complex algebra instead of trig
– clathratus
yesterday
@user5722540 Yes. This is more of an alternative approach using cool complex algebra instead of trig
– clathratus
yesterday
add a comment |
We need $-1le3xle1$
But if $xle0,$ the left hand side $le0$
Now $3x=sin(pi/4-arcsin(2x))$
$3sqrt2x=sqrt{1-(2x)^2}-2x$
$sqrt{1-4x^2}=x(3sqrt2+2)$
Square both sides
add a comment |
We need $-1le3xle1$
But if $xle0,$ the left hand side $le0$
Now $3x=sin(pi/4-arcsin(2x))$
$3sqrt2x=sqrt{1-(2x)^2}-2x$
$sqrt{1-4x^2}=x(3sqrt2+2)$
Square both sides
add a comment |
We need $-1le3xle1$
But if $xle0,$ the left hand side $le0$
Now $3x=sin(pi/4-arcsin(2x))$
$3sqrt2x=sqrt{1-(2x)^2}-2x$
$sqrt{1-4x^2}=x(3sqrt2+2)$
Square both sides
We need $-1le3xle1$
But if $xle0,$ the left hand side $le0$
Now $3x=sin(pi/4-arcsin(2x))$
$3sqrt2x=sqrt{1-(2x)^2}-2x$
$sqrt{1-4x^2}=x(3sqrt2+2)$
Square both sides
answered yesterday
lab bhattacharjeelab bhattacharjee
224k15156274
224k15156274
add a comment |
add a comment |
Start with $$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$$ and square both sides to get
$$-72 x^4+13x^2+12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2=frac 12$$ that is to say
$$72 x^4-13x^2+frac 12=12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2$$ Let $y=x^2$ to make
$$72 y^2-13y+frac 12=12 ysqrt{1-9 y} sqrt{1-4 y} $$
Square again, expand and simplify to get
$$97 y^2-13 y+frac{1}{4}=0$$ which is simple.
add a comment |
Start with $$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$$ and square both sides to get
$$-72 x^4+13x^2+12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2=frac 12$$ that is to say
$$72 x^4-13x^2+frac 12=12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2$$ Let $y=x^2$ to make
$$72 y^2-13y+frac 12=12 ysqrt{1-9 y} sqrt{1-4 y} $$
Square again, expand and simplify to get
$$97 y^2-13 y+frac{1}{4}=0$$ which is simple.
add a comment |
Start with $$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$$ and square both sides to get
$$-72 x^4+13x^2+12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2=frac 12$$ that is to say
$$72 x^4-13x^2+frac 12=12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2$$ Let $y=x^2$ to make
$$72 y^2-13y+frac 12=12 ysqrt{1-9 y} sqrt{1-4 y} $$
Square again, expand and simplify to get
$$97 y^2-13 y+frac{1}{4}=0$$ which is simple.
Start with $$2xsqrt{1-9x^2}+3xsqrt{1-4x^2} = frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$$ and square both sides to get
$$-72 x^4+13x^2+12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2=frac 12$$ that is to say
$$72 x^4-13x^2+frac 12=12 sqrt{1-9 x^2} sqrt{1-4 x^2} x^2$$ Let $y=x^2$ to make
$$72 y^2-13y+frac 12=12 ysqrt{1-9 y} sqrt{1-4 y} $$
Square again, expand and simplify to get
$$97 y^2-13 y+frac{1}{4}=0$$ which is simple.
answered yesterday
Claude LeiboviciClaude Leibovici
119k1157132
119k1157132
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065747%2fsolving-for-x-in-sin-12x-sin-13x-frac-pi-4%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Possibly useful - math.stackexchange.com/questions/672575/…
– Eevee Trainer
yesterday
But I don't know x^2+y^2
– user5722540
yesterday
I don't see how anyone can solve this in under two minutes. Are you sure? If so, there must be a trick. Is this a multiple choice question?
– D.B.
yesterday
Online open ended answer. Deadline of 150 seconds.
– user5722540
yesterday
Well, it takes Maple less than a second to get ${frac {sqrt {2522-1164,sqrt {2}}}{194}}$ in response to solve(expand(sin(arcsin(2*x)+arcsin(3*x))=sin(Pi/4)));. Typing the question and answer takes longer...
– Robert Israel
yesterday