How does a shutdown end if an agreement is never reached?












15














So right now, as of 3rd January 2019, the US government is shut down, due to disagreements between Trump and the Democrats on border security funding.



Both parties are in an apparent stalemate. Trump can't back down because if he doesn't get his wall, it'll be a massive failure on his part. Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a core part of their platform, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions.



So my question is simply, what happens if neither party backs down? Does the shut-down just go on indefinitely? How does this end?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    Eventually, people start quitting and going to jobs that will actually cut them a paycheck.
    – cpast
    10 hours ago






  • 9




    Considering that every single branch of government is controlled by the Republican party, maybe I'm naive but I don't really see how democrats are at fault. I mean, I'm sure they could help get the Republicans get out of this, but I don't see how they have any responsibility at all. Also minor point, but in the entire USA it is still January 2nd.
    – magnus.orion
    10 hours ago






  • 3




    @magnus.orion While I’m not arguing who’s at fault, it’s worth noting that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to pass legislation. The Republicans have 51 members in the current Senate (which ends tomorrow noon) so 9 Democratic votes are needed.
    – Panda
    9 hours ago








  • 2




    Suggest you delete the entire second paragraph as it tends to distract from your original question. Your last paragraph solicits speculation (generally discouraged in this forum) and invites votes to close or put the question on hold.
    – BobE
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a symbol of their so-called "humane" policies, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions. ... er this is a terrible characterization of the motives here. You can't seriously be arguing a wall is humane and Democrats are hypocritical for opposing it. Just remove that paragraph.
    – Azor Ahai
    7 hours ago
















15














So right now, as of 3rd January 2019, the US government is shut down, due to disagreements between Trump and the Democrats on border security funding.



Both parties are in an apparent stalemate. Trump can't back down because if he doesn't get his wall, it'll be a massive failure on his part. Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a core part of their platform, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions.



So my question is simply, what happens if neither party backs down? Does the shut-down just go on indefinitely? How does this end?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    Eventually, people start quitting and going to jobs that will actually cut them a paycheck.
    – cpast
    10 hours ago






  • 9




    Considering that every single branch of government is controlled by the Republican party, maybe I'm naive but I don't really see how democrats are at fault. I mean, I'm sure they could help get the Republicans get out of this, but I don't see how they have any responsibility at all. Also minor point, but in the entire USA it is still January 2nd.
    – magnus.orion
    10 hours ago






  • 3




    @magnus.orion While I’m not arguing who’s at fault, it’s worth noting that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to pass legislation. The Republicans have 51 members in the current Senate (which ends tomorrow noon) so 9 Democratic votes are needed.
    – Panda
    9 hours ago








  • 2




    Suggest you delete the entire second paragraph as it tends to distract from your original question. Your last paragraph solicits speculation (generally discouraged in this forum) and invites votes to close or put the question on hold.
    – BobE
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a symbol of their so-called "humane" policies, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions. ... er this is a terrible characterization of the motives here. You can't seriously be arguing a wall is humane and Democrats are hypocritical for opposing it. Just remove that paragraph.
    – Azor Ahai
    7 hours ago














15












15








15







So right now, as of 3rd January 2019, the US government is shut down, due to disagreements between Trump and the Democrats on border security funding.



Both parties are in an apparent stalemate. Trump can't back down because if he doesn't get his wall, it'll be a massive failure on his part. Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a core part of their platform, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions.



So my question is simply, what happens if neither party backs down? Does the shut-down just go on indefinitely? How does this end?










share|improve this question









New contributor




Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











So right now, as of 3rd January 2019, the US government is shut down, due to disagreements between Trump and the Democrats on border security funding.



Both parties are in an apparent stalemate. Trump can't back down because if he doesn't get his wall, it'll be a massive failure on his part. Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a core part of their platform, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions.



So my question is simply, what happens if neither party backs down? Does the shut-down just go on indefinitely? How does this end?







united-states government-shutdown






share|improve this question









New contributor




Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Shadur

13418




13418






New contributor




Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 11 hours ago









Marue

763




763




New contributor




Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Marue is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    Eventually, people start quitting and going to jobs that will actually cut them a paycheck.
    – cpast
    10 hours ago






  • 9




    Considering that every single branch of government is controlled by the Republican party, maybe I'm naive but I don't really see how democrats are at fault. I mean, I'm sure they could help get the Republicans get out of this, but I don't see how they have any responsibility at all. Also minor point, but in the entire USA it is still January 2nd.
    – magnus.orion
    10 hours ago






  • 3




    @magnus.orion While I’m not arguing who’s at fault, it’s worth noting that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to pass legislation. The Republicans have 51 members in the current Senate (which ends tomorrow noon) so 9 Democratic votes are needed.
    – Panda
    9 hours ago








  • 2




    Suggest you delete the entire second paragraph as it tends to distract from your original question. Your last paragraph solicits speculation (generally discouraged in this forum) and invites votes to close or put the question on hold.
    – BobE
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a symbol of their so-called "humane" policies, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions. ... er this is a terrible characterization of the motives here. You can't seriously be arguing a wall is humane and Democrats are hypocritical for opposing it. Just remove that paragraph.
    – Azor Ahai
    7 hours ago














  • 2




    Eventually, people start quitting and going to jobs that will actually cut them a paycheck.
    – cpast
    10 hours ago






  • 9




    Considering that every single branch of government is controlled by the Republican party, maybe I'm naive but I don't really see how democrats are at fault. I mean, I'm sure they could help get the Republicans get out of this, but I don't see how they have any responsibility at all. Also minor point, but in the entire USA it is still January 2nd.
    – magnus.orion
    10 hours ago






  • 3




    @magnus.orion While I’m not arguing who’s at fault, it’s worth noting that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to pass legislation. The Republicans have 51 members in the current Senate (which ends tomorrow noon) so 9 Democratic votes are needed.
    – Panda
    9 hours ago








  • 2




    Suggest you delete the entire second paragraph as it tends to distract from your original question. Your last paragraph solicits speculation (generally discouraged in this forum) and invites votes to close or put the question on hold.
    – BobE
    9 hours ago






  • 7




    Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a symbol of their so-called "humane" policies, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions. ... er this is a terrible characterization of the motives here. You can't seriously be arguing a wall is humane and Democrats are hypocritical for opposing it. Just remove that paragraph.
    – Azor Ahai
    7 hours ago








2




2




Eventually, people start quitting and going to jobs that will actually cut them a paycheck.
– cpast
10 hours ago




Eventually, people start quitting and going to jobs that will actually cut them a paycheck.
– cpast
10 hours ago




9




9




Considering that every single branch of government is controlled by the Republican party, maybe I'm naive but I don't really see how democrats are at fault. I mean, I'm sure they could help get the Republicans get out of this, but I don't see how they have any responsibility at all. Also minor point, but in the entire USA it is still January 2nd.
– magnus.orion
10 hours ago




Considering that every single branch of government is controlled by the Republican party, maybe I'm naive but I don't really see how democrats are at fault. I mean, I'm sure they could help get the Republicans get out of this, but I don't see how they have any responsibility at all. Also minor point, but in the entire USA it is still January 2nd.
– magnus.orion
10 hours ago




3




3




@magnus.orion While I’m not arguing who’s at fault, it’s worth noting that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to pass legislation. The Republicans have 51 members in the current Senate (which ends tomorrow noon) so 9 Democratic votes are needed.
– Panda
9 hours ago






@magnus.orion While I’m not arguing who’s at fault, it’s worth noting that 60 votes are needed in the Senate to pass legislation. The Republicans have 51 members in the current Senate (which ends tomorrow noon) so 9 Democratic votes are needed.
– Panda
9 hours ago






2




2




Suggest you delete the entire second paragraph as it tends to distract from your original question. Your last paragraph solicits speculation (generally discouraged in this forum) and invites votes to close or put the question on hold.
– BobE
9 hours ago




Suggest you delete the entire second paragraph as it tends to distract from your original question. Your last paragraph solicits speculation (generally discouraged in this forum) and invites votes to close or put the question on hold.
– BobE
9 hours ago




7




7




Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a symbol of their so-called "humane" policies, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions. ... er this is a terrible characterization of the motives here. You can't seriously be arguing a wall is humane and Democrats are hypocritical for opposing it. Just remove that paragraph.
– Azor Ahai
7 hours ago




Democrats can't back down because they've managed to make their opposition to a border wall a symbol of their so-called "humane" policies, and so allowing funding for that will be an own goal of epic proportions. ... er this is a terrible characterization of the motives here. You can't seriously be arguing a wall is humane and Democrats are hypocritical for opposing it. Just remove that paragraph.
– Azor Ahai
7 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















22














If necessary, Congress can pass a spending bill without the president's support.



Currently Trump claims he will veto any bill which doesn't include funding for the wall. However if two-thirds of each chamber of Congress agree, they can override a presidential veto and end the shutdown.



The current Senate has already passed a spending bill without funding for Trump's wall once with a veto-proof majority of 100-0. Instead of voting on that bill though, the Republican-lead House of Representatives voted on a different bill with wall funding that was sure to fail in the Senate.



The Senate won't change much in the next Congress, but the House of Representatives will have new leadership and can try to pass a similar bill to what has previously passed the Senate. If the Senate votes similarly and the House gets enough votes they can end the shutdown with or without Trump.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Since I googled it, the next congress starts today, January 3rd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/116th_United_States_Congress
    – JollyJoker
    5 hours ago



















10














The government shutdown is caused by a lapse in funding for government operations and agencies.



The Antideficiency Act mandates that the government cannot incur "obligations or the making of expenditures (outlays) in excess of amounts available in appropriations or funds". As explained by The Hill, this act "provides the framework for which government functions temporarily cease and how employees are impacted".



Thus, the only way to end a government shutdown is to pass appropriations legislation. This can be in the form of a regular appropriations bill (a yearly budget) or a continuing resolution (CR; a short-term funding bill). Without any appropriations legislation passed, the shutdown will continue indefinitely.



Currently, both parties are looking to pass a continuing resolution. However, since there was no agreement on the amount of funding to provide for border security, the Senate passed a CR which does not include funding for border security while the House passed a CR which includes $5.7 billion for border security. Since there was no agreement between the Senate and the House, the government shutdown continues to date.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "475"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    Marue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37635%2fhow-does-a-shutdown-end-if-an-agreement-is-never-reached%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    22














    If necessary, Congress can pass a spending bill without the president's support.



    Currently Trump claims he will veto any bill which doesn't include funding for the wall. However if two-thirds of each chamber of Congress agree, they can override a presidential veto and end the shutdown.



    The current Senate has already passed a spending bill without funding for Trump's wall once with a veto-proof majority of 100-0. Instead of voting on that bill though, the Republican-lead House of Representatives voted on a different bill with wall funding that was sure to fail in the Senate.



    The Senate won't change much in the next Congress, but the House of Representatives will have new leadership and can try to pass a similar bill to what has previously passed the Senate. If the Senate votes similarly and the House gets enough votes they can end the shutdown with or without Trump.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Since I googled it, the next congress starts today, January 3rd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/116th_United_States_Congress
      – JollyJoker
      5 hours ago
















    22














    If necessary, Congress can pass a spending bill without the president's support.



    Currently Trump claims he will veto any bill which doesn't include funding for the wall. However if two-thirds of each chamber of Congress agree, they can override a presidential veto and end the shutdown.



    The current Senate has already passed a spending bill without funding for Trump's wall once with a veto-proof majority of 100-0. Instead of voting on that bill though, the Republican-lead House of Representatives voted on a different bill with wall funding that was sure to fail in the Senate.



    The Senate won't change much in the next Congress, but the House of Representatives will have new leadership and can try to pass a similar bill to what has previously passed the Senate. If the Senate votes similarly and the House gets enough votes they can end the shutdown with or without Trump.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Since I googled it, the next congress starts today, January 3rd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/116th_United_States_Congress
      – JollyJoker
      5 hours ago














    22












    22








    22






    If necessary, Congress can pass a spending bill without the president's support.



    Currently Trump claims he will veto any bill which doesn't include funding for the wall. However if two-thirds of each chamber of Congress agree, they can override a presidential veto and end the shutdown.



    The current Senate has already passed a spending bill without funding for Trump's wall once with a veto-proof majority of 100-0. Instead of voting on that bill though, the Republican-lead House of Representatives voted on a different bill with wall funding that was sure to fail in the Senate.



    The Senate won't change much in the next Congress, but the House of Representatives will have new leadership and can try to pass a similar bill to what has previously passed the Senate. If the Senate votes similarly and the House gets enough votes they can end the shutdown with or without Trump.






    share|improve this answer












    If necessary, Congress can pass a spending bill without the president's support.



    Currently Trump claims he will veto any bill which doesn't include funding for the wall. However if two-thirds of each chamber of Congress agree, they can override a presidential veto and end the shutdown.



    The current Senate has already passed a spending bill without funding for Trump's wall once with a veto-proof majority of 100-0. Instead of voting on that bill though, the Republican-lead House of Representatives voted on a different bill with wall funding that was sure to fail in the Senate.



    The Senate won't change much in the next Congress, but the House of Representatives will have new leadership and can try to pass a similar bill to what has previously passed the Senate. If the Senate votes similarly and the House gets enough votes they can end the shutdown with or without Trump.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 10 hours ago









    CrackpotCrocodile

    1,318315




    1,318315








    • 1




      Since I googled it, the next congress starts today, January 3rd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/116th_United_States_Congress
      – JollyJoker
      5 hours ago














    • 1




      Since I googled it, the next congress starts today, January 3rd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/116th_United_States_Congress
      – JollyJoker
      5 hours ago








    1




    1




    Since I googled it, the next congress starts today, January 3rd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/116th_United_States_Congress
    – JollyJoker
    5 hours ago




    Since I googled it, the next congress starts today, January 3rd. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/116th_United_States_Congress
    – JollyJoker
    5 hours ago











    10














    The government shutdown is caused by a lapse in funding for government operations and agencies.



    The Antideficiency Act mandates that the government cannot incur "obligations or the making of expenditures (outlays) in excess of amounts available in appropriations or funds". As explained by The Hill, this act "provides the framework for which government functions temporarily cease and how employees are impacted".



    Thus, the only way to end a government shutdown is to pass appropriations legislation. This can be in the form of a regular appropriations bill (a yearly budget) or a continuing resolution (CR; a short-term funding bill). Without any appropriations legislation passed, the shutdown will continue indefinitely.



    Currently, both parties are looking to pass a continuing resolution. However, since there was no agreement on the amount of funding to provide for border security, the Senate passed a CR which does not include funding for border security while the House passed a CR which includes $5.7 billion for border security. Since there was no agreement between the Senate and the House, the government shutdown continues to date.






    share|improve this answer




























      10














      The government shutdown is caused by a lapse in funding for government operations and agencies.



      The Antideficiency Act mandates that the government cannot incur "obligations or the making of expenditures (outlays) in excess of amounts available in appropriations or funds". As explained by The Hill, this act "provides the framework for which government functions temporarily cease and how employees are impacted".



      Thus, the only way to end a government shutdown is to pass appropriations legislation. This can be in the form of a regular appropriations bill (a yearly budget) or a continuing resolution (CR; a short-term funding bill). Without any appropriations legislation passed, the shutdown will continue indefinitely.



      Currently, both parties are looking to pass a continuing resolution. However, since there was no agreement on the amount of funding to provide for border security, the Senate passed a CR which does not include funding for border security while the House passed a CR which includes $5.7 billion for border security. Since there was no agreement between the Senate and the House, the government shutdown continues to date.






      share|improve this answer


























        10












        10








        10






        The government shutdown is caused by a lapse in funding for government operations and agencies.



        The Antideficiency Act mandates that the government cannot incur "obligations or the making of expenditures (outlays) in excess of amounts available in appropriations or funds". As explained by The Hill, this act "provides the framework for which government functions temporarily cease and how employees are impacted".



        Thus, the only way to end a government shutdown is to pass appropriations legislation. This can be in the form of a regular appropriations bill (a yearly budget) or a continuing resolution (CR; a short-term funding bill). Without any appropriations legislation passed, the shutdown will continue indefinitely.



        Currently, both parties are looking to pass a continuing resolution. However, since there was no agreement on the amount of funding to provide for border security, the Senate passed a CR which does not include funding for border security while the House passed a CR which includes $5.7 billion for border security. Since there was no agreement between the Senate and the House, the government shutdown continues to date.






        share|improve this answer














        The government shutdown is caused by a lapse in funding for government operations and agencies.



        The Antideficiency Act mandates that the government cannot incur "obligations or the making of expenditures (outlays) in excess of amounts available in appropriations or funds". As explained by The Hill, this act "provides the framework for which government functions temporarily cease and how employees are impacted".



        Thus, the only way to end a government shutdown is to pass appropriations legislation. This can be in the form of a regular appropriations bill (a yearly budget) or a continuing resolution (CR; a short-term funding bill). Without any appropriations legislation passed, the shutdown will continue indefinitely.



        Currently, both parties are looking to pass a continuing resolution. However, since there was no agreement on the amount of funding to provide for border security, the Senate passed a CR which does not include funding for border security while the House passed a CR which includes $5.7 billion for border security. Since there was no agreement between the Senate and the House, the government shutdown continues to date.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 7 hours ago

























        answered 10 hours ago









        Panda

        28.5k7100156




        28.5k7100156






















            Marue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Marue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            Marue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Marue is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Politics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpolitics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f37635%2fhow-does-a-shutdown-end-if-an-agreement-is-never-reached%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            1300-talet

            1300-talet

            Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?