Dimension of kernel of a operator
This question is simply applying a theorem. But I do not understand how . One can treat most of the content as black box. I will provide the definitions.
The context:
I want to show
If $M$ is a compact $n$-dimensional manifold, $P$ an ellipitic differential operator of order $k$, then $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^l$ has kernel whose dimension is independent of $l$.
Black box terminology explanation:
Definition: Let $E_i rightarrow M$ be two vector bundles, $P:Gamma(M,E_0) rightarrow Gamma(M,E_1)$ is an elliptic differential operator of order $k$, if locally $P$ can be written as
$$ Pf = sum_{|alpha| le k } A^alpha(y) frac{partial^alpha}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$
Definition 2: Let $E rightarrow M$ be a complex vector bundle over a compact $n$-dimensional manifold. Then we can give the space of sections $Gamma(M,E)$ a Sobolev norm. We denote $W^k$ be the completion of $Gamma(M,E)$ with respect to this norm.
Let us suppose $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^k$ is well defined and:
Theorem: Let $Pu=f$, $f in W^l$, $u in W^r$ for some integer $r$, then $u in W^{l+k}$.
It is claimed that then we have the kernel is independent of $l$.
How does this follow?
Reference: Pg 48-49.
functional-analysis differential-geometry sobolev-spaces vector-bundles
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
add a comment |
This question is simply applying a theorem. But I do not understand how . One can treat most of the content as black box. I will provide the definitions.
The context:
I want to show
If $M$ is a compact $n$-dimensional manifold, $P$ an ellipitic differential operator of order $k$, then $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^l$ has kernel whose dimension is independent of $l$.
Black box terminology explanation:
Definition: Let $E_i rightarrow M$ be two vector bundles, $P:Gamma(M,E_0) rightarrow Gamma(M,E_1)$ is an elliptic differential operator of order $k$, if locally $P$ can be written as
$$ Pf = sum_{|alpha| le k } A^alpha(y) frac{partial^alpha}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$
Definition 2: Let $E rightarrow M$ be a complex vector bundle over a compact $n$-dimensional manifold. Then we can give the space of sections $Gamma(M,E)$ a Sobolev norm. We denote $W^k$ be the completion of $Gamma(M,E)$ with respect to this norm.
Let us suppose $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^k$ is well defined and:
Theorem: Let $Pu=f$, $f in W^l$, $u in W^r$ for some integer $r$, then $u in W^{l+k}$.
It is claimed that then we have the kernel is independent of $l$.
How does this follow?
Reference: Pg 48-49.
functional-analysis differential-geometry sobolev-spaces vector-bundles
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
It may be worth pointing out that your definition for an elliptic operator is wrong (what you wrote is just the definition of a linear differential operator).
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:36
Of course, a linear differential operator is said to be elliptic if its principal symbol satisfies a non-degeneracy condition.
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:37
Oh yes, thanks a lot. I will add this.
– CL.
Jan 4 at 23:12
add a comment |
This question is simply applying a theorem. But I do not understand how . One can treat most of the content as black box. I will provide the definitions.
The context:
I want to show
If $M$ is a compact $n$-dimensional manifold, $P$ an ellipitic differential operator of order $k$, then $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^l$ has kernel whose dimension is independent of $l$.
Black box terminology explanation:
Definition: Let $E_i rightarrow M$ be two vector bundles, $P:Gamma(M,E_0) rightarrow Gamma(M,E_1)$ is an elliptic differential operator of order $k$, if locally $P$ can be written as
$$ Pf = sum_{|alpha| le k } A^alpha(y) frac{partial^alpha}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$
Definition 2: Let $E rightarrow M$ be a complex vector bundle over a compact $n$-dimensional manifold. Then we can give the space of sections $Gamma(M,E)$ a Sobolev norm. We denote $W^k$ be the completion of $Gamma(M,E)$ with respect to this norm.
Let us suppose $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^k$ is well defined and:
Theorem: Let $Pu=f$, $f in W^l$, $u in W^r$ for some integer $r$, then $u in W^{l+k}$.
It is claimed that then we have the kernel is independent of $l$.
How does this follow?
Reference: Pg 48-49.
functional-analysis differential-geometry sobolev-spaces vector-bundles
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
This question is simply applying a theorem. But I do not understand how . One can treat most of the content as black box. I will provide the definitions.
The context:
I want to show
If $M$ is a compact $n$-dimensional manifold, $P$ an ellipitic differential operator of order $k$, then $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^l$ has kernel whose dimension is independent of $l$.
Black box terminology explanation:
Definition: Let $E_i rightarrow M$ be two vector bundles, $P:Gamma(M,E_0) rightarrow Gamma(M,E_1)$ is an elliptic differential operator of order $k$, if locally $P$ can be written as
$$ Pf = sum_{|alpha| le k } A^alpha(y) frac{partial^alpha}{partial x_alpha} f(y).$$
Definition 2: Let $E rightarrow M$ be a complex vector bundle over a compact $n$-dimensional manifold. Then we can give the space of sections $Gamma(M,E)$ a Sobolev norm. We denote $W^k$ be the completion of $Gamma(M,E)$ with respect to this norm.
Let us suppose $P:W^{k+l} rightarrow W^k$ is well defined and:
Theorem: Let $Pu=f$, $f in W^l$, $u in W^r$ for some integer $r$, then $u in W^{l+k}$.
It is claimed that then we have the kernel is independent of $l$.
How does this follow?
Reference: Pg 48-49.
functional-analysis differential-geometry sobolev-spaces vector-bundles
functional-analysis differential-geometry sobolev-spaces vector-bundles
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
edited Jan 4 at 7:39
CL.
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
asked Jan 4 at 7:25
CL.CL.
2,1802822
2,1802822
It may be worth pointing out that your definition for an elliptic operator is wrong (what you wrote is just the definition of a linear differential operator).
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:36
Of course, a linear differential operator is said to be elliptic if its principal symbol satisfies a non-degeneracy condition.
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:37
Oh yes, thanks a lot. I will add this.
– CL.
Jan 4 at 23:12
add a comment |
It may be worth pointing out that your definition for an elliptic operator is wrong (what you wrote is just the definition of a linear differential operator).
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:36
Of course, a linear differential operator is said to be elliptic if its principal symbol satisfies a non-degeneracy condition.
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:37
Oh yes, thanks a lot. I will add this.
– CL.
Jan 4 at 23:12
It may be worth pointing out that your definition for an elliptic operator is wrong (what you wrote is just the definition of a linear differential operator).
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:36
It may be worth pointing out that your definition for an elliptic operator is wrong (what you wrote is just the definition of a linear differential operator).
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:36
Of course, a linear differential operator is said to be elliptic if its principal symbol satisfies a non-degeneracy condition.
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:37
Of course, a linear differential operator is said to be elliptic if its principal symbol satisfies a non-degeneracy condition.
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:37
Oh yes, thanks a lot. I will add this.
– CL.
Jan 4 at 23:12
Oh yes, thanks a lot. I will add this.
– CL.
Jan 4 at 23:12
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Suppose $u in W^{k+r}$ lies in the kernel of $P,$ so $Pu = 0.$ Then as $0 in W^{ell}$ for each $ell,$ so the elliptic regularity theorem gives $u in W^{k+ell}$ for all $ell.$ So if $N_r subset W^{k+r}$ is the null space of $P$ viewed as an operator $W^{k+r} rightarrow W^r,$ we get $N_r subset N_{ell}$ for each $ell.$ As $r$ was also arbitrary, we see that $N_r$ is independent of $r$ and hence its dimension also is.
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061389%2fdimension-of-kernel-of-a-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Suppose $u in W^{k+r}$ lies in the kernel of $P,$ so $Pu = 0.$ Then as $0 in W^{ell}$ for each $ell,$ so the elliptic regularity theorem gives $u in W^{k+ell}$ for all $ell.$ So if $N_r subset W^{k+r}$ is the null space of $P$ viewed as an operator $W^{k+r} rightarrow W^r,$ we get $N_r subset N_{ell}$ for each $ell.$ As $r$ was also arbitrary, we see that $N_r$ is independent of $r$ and hence its dimension also is.
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
add a comment |
Suppose $u in W^{k+r}$ lies in the kernel of $P,$ so $Pu = 0.$ Then as $0 in W^{ell}$ for each $ell,$ so the elliptic regularity theorem gives $u in W^{k+ell}$ for all $ell.$ So if $N_r subset W^{k+r}$ is the null space of $P$ viewed as an operator $W^{k+r} rightarrow W^r,$ we get $N_r subset N_{ell}$ for each $ell.$ As $r$ was also arbitrary, we see that $N_r$ is independent of $r$ and hence its dimension also is.
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
add a comment |
Suppose $u in W^{k+r}$ lies in the kernel of $P,$ so $Pu = 0.$ Then as $0 in W^{ell}$ for each $ell,$ so the elliptic regularity theorem gives $u in W^{k+ell}$ for all $ell.$ So if $N_r subset W^{k+r}$ is the null space of $P$ viewed as an operator $W^{k+r} rightarrow W^r,$ we get $N_r subset N_{ell}$ for each $ell.$ As $r$ was also arbitrary, we see that $N_r$ is independent of $r$ and hence its dimension also is.
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
Suppose $u in W^{k+r}$ lies in the kernel of $P,$ so $Pu = 0.$ Then as $0 in W^{ell}$ for each $ell,$ so the elliptic regularity theorem gives $u in W^{k+ell}$ for all $ell.$ So if $N_r subset W^{k+r}$ is the null space of $P$ viewed as an operator $W^{k+r} rightarrow W^r,$ we get $N_r subset N_{ell}$ for each $ell.$ As $r$ was also arbitrary, we see that $N_r$ is independent of $r$ and hence its dimension also is.
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
answered Jan 4 at 8:44
ktoiktoi
2,3231616
2,3231616
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061389%2fdimension-of-kernel-of-a-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It may be worth pointing out that your definition for an elliptic operator is wrong (what you wrote is just the definition of a linear differential operator).
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:36
Of course, a linear differential operator is said to be elliptic if its principal symbol satisfies a non-degeneracy condition.
– Amitai Yuval
Jan 4 at 20:37
Oh yes, thanks a lot. I will add this.
– CL.
Jan 4 at 23:12