Usage of the phrase “I clutched my pearls”, esp. for males?












6














I came across with a phrase, “clutch one’s pearls” in the headline of the Hill (January 6).
It reads :




“Dem lawmaker: ‘Kind of odd’ for GOP to be ‘clutching their pearls
over profane call to impeach Trump” and followed by the following
paragraph: Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I) on Sunday scoffed at the
controversy surrounding Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-Mich.) profane vow to
impeach President Trump, accusing Republicans critical of the freshman
lawmaker’s comment of hypocrisy.




I was unfamiliar with the phrase, “clutch one’s pearls,” and I found the definition of
“clutch your pearls” in Cambridge Dictionary as follows:




Disapproving to behave as if you are very shocked, especially when you show more shock than you really feel in order to show that you think something is morally bad.




Google Ngram doesn’t accommodate neither clutch your pearls or one’s pearls.



So my questions:




  1. From around what time this phrase started to be in use?


  2. What is the origin of this phrase?


  3. Is it a popular phrase?

  4. Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from his office yesterday”?










share|improve this question




















  • 16




    I don't think anybody would say "I clutched my pearls". It is one of those expressions which convey a judgment on the person said to be doing it .
    – Colin Fine
    yesterday






  • 6




    Neither men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my pearls when…”: this expression is exclusively (or at least almost exclusively) used in progressive or non-finite constructions. It’s also more used to describe other people than oneself because it’s somewhat belittling. You might hear, “Tom getting fired had Sheila clutching her pearls”. You might also hear it used to describe a man, though it tends to carry sexist overtones then: its pejorativeness makes it imply that he’s weak/over-sensitive/anything else stereotypically seen as negative female traits.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 1




    I am male and there was at least one occasion when I should have said it. A friend of mine was working for the designer, Vivienne Westwood and he had a lot of her jewelry at his place. One day I picked up a necklace featuring 12 drop pearls and 12 drop garnets and we popped across the street to the French bakery to buy some bread. The woman at the counter took one look at me in my pearls and quipped to her colleague - "Peut-etre il part au grand voyage". Now if that's not grounds for clutching ones pearls, then tell me what is.
    – UserEpsilon
    yesterday








  • 2




    @UserEpsilon Yes, well, I fail to see how this adds anything here. Why would going on a long journey mean you wear your pearls? I guess in the old days people went on ocean voyages, and in first class wore all their finery. The baker's quip in no way implied she was looking to grab them....so why would you clutch them?
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 2




    Generally, one says this of others. Especially, men about men. It's like in the armed services where the sergeants call the soldiers "ladies". Same idea.
    – Lambie
    yesterday
















6














I came across with a phrase, “clutch one’s pearls” in the headline of the Hill (January 6).
It reads :




“Dem lawmaker: ‘Kind of odd’ for GOP to be ‘clutching their pearls
over profane call to impeach Trump” and followed by the following
paragraph: Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I) on Sunday scoffed at the
controversy surrounding Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-Mich.) profane vow to
impeach President Trump, accusing Republicans critical of the freshman
lawmaker’s comment of hypocrisy.




I was unfamiliar with the phrase, “clutch one’s pearls,” and I found the definition of
“clutch your pearls” in Cambridge Dictionary as follows:




Disapproving to behave as if you are very shocked, especially when you show more shock than you really feel in order to show that you think something is morally bad.




Google Ngram doesn’t accommodate neither clutch your pearls or one’s pearls.



So my questions:




  1. From around what time this phrase started to be in use?


  2. What is the origin of this phrase?


  3. Is it a popular phrase?

  4. Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from his office yesterday”?










share|improve this question




















  • 16




    I don't think anybody would say "I clutched my pearls". It is one of those expressions which convey a judgment on the person said to be doing it .
    – Colin Fine
    yesterday






  • 6




    Neither men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my pearls when…”: this expression is exclusively (or at least almost exclusively) used in progressive or non-finite constructions. It’s also more used to describe other people than oneself because it’s somewhat belittling. You might hear, “Tom getting fired had Sheila clutching her pearls”. You might also hear it used to describe a man, though it tends to carry sexist overtones then: its pejorativeness makes it imply that he’s weak/over-sensitive/anything else stereotypically seen as negative female traits.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 1




    I am male and there was at least one occasion when I should have said it. A friend of mine was working for the designer, Vivienne Westwood and he had a lot of her jewelry at his place. One day I picked up a necklace featuring 12 drop pearls and 12 drop garnets and we popped across the street to the French bakery to buy some bread. The woman at the counter took one look at me in my pearls and quipped to her colleague - "Peut-etre il part au grand voyage". Now if that's not grounds for clutching ones pearls, then tell me what is.
    – UserEpsilon
    yesterday








  • 2




    @UserEpsilon Yes, well, I fail to see how this adds anything here. Why would going on a long journey mean you wear your pearls? I guess in the old days people went on ocean voyages, and in first class wore all their finery. The baker's quip in no way implied she was looking to grab them....so why would you clutch them?
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 2




    Generally, one says this of others. Especially, men about men. It's like in the armed services where the sergeants call the soldiers "ladies". Same idea.
    – Lambie
    yesterday














6












6








6


2





I came across with a phrase, “clutch one’s pearls” in the headline of the Hill (January 6).
It reads :




“Dem lawmaker: ‘Kind of odd’ for GOP to be ‘clutching their pearls
over profane call to impeach Trump” and followed by the following
paragraph: Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I) on Sunday scoffed at the
controversy surrounding Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-Mich.) profane vow to
impeach President Trump, accusing Republicans critical of the freshman
lawmaker’s comment of hypocrisy.




I was unfamiliar with the phrase, “clutch one’s pearls,” and I found the definition of
“clutch your pearls” in Cambridge Dictionary as follows:




Disapproving to behave as if you are very shocked, especially when you show more shock than you really feel in order to show that you think something is morally bad.




Google Ngram doesn’t accommodate neither clutch your pearls or one’s pearls.



So my questions:




  1. From around what time this phrase started to be in use?


  2. What is the origin of this phrase?


  3. Is it a popular phrase?

  4. Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from his office yesterday”?










share|improve this question















I came across with a phrase, “clutch one’s pearls” in the headline of the Hill (January 6).
It reads :




“Dem lawmaker: ‘Kind of odd’ for GOP to be ‘clutching their pearls
over profane call to impeach Trump” and followed by the following
paragraph: Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I) on Sunday scoffed at the
controversy surrounding Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s (D-Mich.) profane vow to
impeach President Trump, accusing Republicans critical of the freshman
lawmaker’s comment of hypocrisy.




I was unfamiliar with the phrase, “clutch one’s pearls,” and I found the definition of
“clutch your pearls” in Cambridge Dictionary as follows:




Disapproving to behave as if you are very shocked, especially when you show more shock than you really feel in order to show that you think something is morally bad.




Google Ngram doesn’t accommodate neither clutch your pearls or one’s pearls.



So my questions:




  1. From around what time this phrase started to be in use?


  2. What is the origin of this phrase?


  3. Is it a popular phrase?

  4. Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from his office yesterday”?







etymology idioms phrase-usage






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Matt E. Эллен

25.2k1486151




25.2k1486151










asked yesterday









Yoichi OishiYoichi Oishi

34.7k110364739




34.7k110364739








  • 16




    I don't think anybody would say "I clutched my pearls". It is one of those expressions which convey a judgment on the person said to be doing it .
    – Colin Fine
    yesterday






  • 6




    Neither men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my pearls when…”: this expression is exclusively (or at least almost exclusively) used in progressive or non-finite constructions. It’s also more used to describe other people than oneself because it’s somewhat belittling. You might hear, “Tom getting fired had Sheila clutching her pearls”. You might also hear it used to describe a man, though it tends to carry sexist overtones then: its pejorativeness makes it imply that he’s weak/over-sensitive/anything else stereotypically seen as negative female traits.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 1




    I am male and there was at least one occasion when I should have said it. A friend of mine was working for the designer, Vivienne Westwood and he had a lot of her jewelry at his place. One day I picked up a necklace featuring 12 drop pearls and 12 drop garnets and we popped across the street to the French bakery to buy some bread. The woman at the counter took one look at me in my pearls and quipped to her colleague - "Peut-etre il part au grand voyage". Now if that's not grounds for clutching ones pearls, then tell me what is.
    – UserEpsilon
    yesterday








  • 2




    @UserEpsilon Yes, well, I fail to see how this adds anything here. Why would going on a long journey mean you wear your pearls? I guess in the old days people went on ocean voyages, and in first class wore all their finery. The baker's quip in no way implied she was looking to grab them....so why would you clutch them?
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 2




    Generally, one says this of others. Especially, men about men. It's like in the armed services where the sergeants call the soldiers "ladies". Same idea.
    – Lambie
    yesterday














  • 16




    I don't think anybody would say "I clutched my pearls". It is one of those expressions which convey a judgment on the person said to be doing it .
    – Colin Fine
    yesterday






  • 6




    Neither men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my pearls when…”: this expression is exclusively (or at least almost exclusively) used in progressive or non-finite constructions. It’s also more used to describe other people than oneself because it’s somewhat belittling. You might hear, “Tom getting fired had Sheila clutching her pearls”. You might also hear it used to describe a man, though it tends to carry sexist overtones then: its pejorativeness makes it imply that he’s weak/over-sensitive/anything else stereotypically seen as negative female traits.
    – Janus Bahs Jacquet
    yesterday






  • 1




    I am male and there was at least one occasion when I should have said it. A friend of mine was working for the designer, Vivienne Westwood and he had a lot of her jewelry at his place. One day I picked up a necklace featuring 12 drop pearls and 12 drop garnets and we popped across the street to the French bakery to buy some bread. The woman at the counter took one look at me in my pearls and quipped to her colleague - "Peut-etre il part au grand voyage". Now if that's not grounds for clutching ones pearls, then tell me what is.
    – UserEpsilon
    yesterday








  • 2




    @UserEpsilon Yes, well, I fail to see how this adds anything here. Why would going on a long journey mean you wear your pearls? I guess in the old days people went on ocean voyages, and in first class wore all their finery. The baker's quip in no way implied she was looking to grab them....so why would you clutch them?
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 2




    Generally, one says this of others. Especially, men about men. It's like in the armed services where the sergeants call the soldiers "ladies". Same idea.
    – Lambie
    yesterday








16




16




I don't think anybody would say "I clutched my pearls". It is one of those expressions which convey a judgment on the person said to be doing it .
– Colin Fine
yesterday




I don't think anybody would say "I clutched my pearls". It is one of those expressions which convey a judgment on the person said to be doing it .
– Colin Fine
yesterday




6




6




Neither men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my pearls when…”: this expression is exclusively (or at least almost exclusively) used in progressive or non-finite constructions. It’s also more used to describe other people than oneself because it’s somewhat belittling. You might hear, “Tom getting fired had Sheila clutching her pearls”. You might also hear it used to describe a man, though it tends to carry sexist overtones then: its pejorativeness makes it imply that he’s weak/over-sensitive/anything else stereotypically seen as negative female traits.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday




Neither men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my pearls when…”: this expression is exclusively (or at least almost exclusively) used in progressive or non-finite constructions. It’s also more used to describe other people than oneself because it’s somewhat belittling. You might hear, “Tom getting fired had Sheila clutching her pearls”. You might also hear it used to describe a man, though it tends to carry sexist overtones then: its pejorativeness makes it imply that he’s weak/over-sensitive/anything else stereotypically seen as negative female traits.
– Janus Bahs Jacquet
yesterday




1




1




I am male and there was at least one occasion when I should have said it. A friend of mine was working for the designer, Vivienne Westwood and he had a lot of her jewelry at his place. One day I picked up a necklace featuring 12 drop pearls and 12 drop garnets and we popped across the street to the French bakery to buy some bread. The woman at the counter took one look at me in my pearls and quipped to her colleague - "Peut-etre il part au grand voyage". Now if that's not grounds for clutching ones pearls, then tell me what is.
– UserEpsilon
yesterday






I am male and there was at least one occasion when I should have said it. A friend of mine was working for the designer, Vivienne Westwood and he had a lot of her jewelry at his place. One day I picked up a necklace featuring 12 drop pearls and 12 drop garnets and we popped across the street to the French bakery to buy some bread. The woman at the counter took one look at me in my pearls and quipped to her colleague - "Peut-etre il part au grand voyage". Now if that's not grounds for clutching ones pearls, then tell me what is.
– UserEpsilon
yesterday






2




2




@UserEpsilon Yes, well, I fail to see how this adds anything here. Why would going on a long journey mean you wear your pearls? I guess in the old days people went on ocean voyages, and in first class wore all their finery. The baker's quip in no way implied she was looking to grab them....so why would you clutch them?
– Lambie
yesterday




@UserEpsilon Yes, well, I fail to see how this adds anything here. Why would going on a long journey mean you wear your pearls? I guess in the old days people went on ocean voyages, and in first class wore all their finery. The baker's quip in no way implied she was looking to grab them....so why would you clutch them?
– Lambie
yesterday




2




2




Generally, one says this of others. Especially, men about men. It's like in the armed services where the sergeants call the soldiers "ladies". Same idea.
– Lambie
yesterday




Generally, one says this of others. Especially, men about men. It's like in the armed services where the sergeants call the soldiers "ladies". Same idea.
– Lambie
yesterday










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















7














The phrase “clutch one’s pearls” is always used derisively or sarcastically. Basically, it’s a put-down. It suggests a hysterical woman on the verge of a swoon. Moreover, it has an added flavor of an old-time caricature from movies of a bygone generation. Cf. Margaret Dumont in a Marx Brothers movie from the ‘30s:



enter image description here



You see Dumont on the left, prim and proper, ready to play the straight role to the comedians’ shenanigans. That might include shock, outrage, or even obliviousness. She might even fall on a couch clutching her pearls.



A man would never say this about himself, except to make a self-deprecatory joke. To say it about him would be tantamount to calling him a hysterical old lady (which is offensive not only to him but to elderly women as well). To say it about a woman would be a sexist put down.



Any way you slice it, utilizing that image to describe anybody is extremely derogatory.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Happy new year! It's a pretty long time to hear from you. Thanks for an intrguing input. I'm still well with this site.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 5




    "males seldom wear a pearl necklace" -- Er, no, Mike, don't make that comment you were thinking of!
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    For the record, the expression is not really about oneself. So, either a man or woman can say it. That said, it is always sarcastic. And also somewhat macho....
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 1




    @YoichiOishi: 明けましておめでとうございます!
    – Robusto
    yesterday






  • 2




    Pearl necklace has also another meaning...in pornography. I think Michael H was only teasing himself :)
    – Mari-Lou A
    23 hours ago





















6














As noted in the following article by Grammarphobia:




People have been literally clutching their pearls in shock or otherwise for a long time. Here, for example, is a citation from a 1910 issue of the Chambers Journal, a weekly magazine that published fiction and nonfiction:




  • “Without being aware that I had stirred, I found myself close to the table. I drew a gasping breath, and my hand went out without any conscious volition and clutched the pearls.”




But the phrase itself became popular years later mainly as a mocking metaphor, meaning “being ostentatiously shocked by something not all that shocking,” especially if the “shock” was feigned or reflected outdated social prejudices:





  • a gay character on the Fox TV show In Living Color is responsible for the earliest example of the usage mentioned in discussions over the last six months on the American Dialect Society’s Linguist List.


  • In an April 15, 1990, sketch, the flamboyant cultural critic Blaine Edwards (played by Damon Wayans) gushes over how daring the producers were to cast a male actor as the female lead in Dangerous Liaisons.


  • When told that Glenn Close is actually a woman, Edwards squeals in mock shock and says, “Well, clutch the pearls! What a sneaky thing to do.”





As suggested in the following extract, the expression is now dated and its usage has largely declined in recent years:




Judging from the instances of “clutch the pearls” and “pearl clutching” that I found in a Nexis search, the expression showed up only periodically through about 2004, almost always as a pun about wealthy women and literal pearls. Take a 2000 episode of World News Tonight in which co-anchor Alison Stewart said there was “a lot of pearl-clutching going on” in the high-end auction business following accusations of criminal price-fixing. The expression then went largely dormant. There are only 16 Google results for “pearl clutching” between Jan. 1, 2000, and Jan. 1, 2004, though it did appear in a 2003 academic work called Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language.




(https://slate.com)






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    Metaphors are no respecters of gender conventions. Here in Britain we can say that someone who is confused or upset to the point of incoherence has got his or her "knickers in a twist". I think that Americans might say "don't get your panties in a wad" or something similar. These sayings are definitely not restricted to the sex that conventionally wears knickers or panties. I have heard office workers in Britain say of an annoying male manager that he must be "on the rag" (having a period).
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Michael It would have a different meaning for a female though, possibly a literal one. Whether it's used on a male or female, "on the rag" is misogynistic.
    – Matt Samuel
    yesterday










  • Matt Samuel, I think that the very notion that attribution of a female stereotype to a man is an insult is misogynistic.
    – Michael Harvey
    13 hours ago



















3
















  • From around what time this phrase started to be in use?



    It now appears in OED as a draft addition:






  • Draft additions June 2018


  • Chiefly U.S. to clutch one's pearls and variants: to react with shock or dismay, esp. in response to something considered immoral,
    underhand, or vulgar. Frequently ironic or humorous.






  • What is the origin of this phrase?


The OED cites this sentence as in its draft. It is dated 1990:




1990 F. Ajaye et al. In Living Color (transcribed from TV programme)
1st Ser. Episode 1 Clutch the pearls, what a sneaky thing to do!





  • Is it a popular phrase?


It appears to be increasing in popularity and usage.




  • Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in
    such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from
    his office yesterday”?


enter image description here



It's gender neutral as it is a metaphor for humorously or ironically "shocked!" In the cited article, the entire Republican party is accused of clutching their pearls!






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    This answer is wrong as shown by the other answers. The phrase is far older than the suggested origin of 1990.
    – Bent
    yesterday










  • @Bent so edited. tks
    – lbf
    yesterday






  • 2




    The answer is not wrong. It's used by media pundit types discussing politics. To react with shock or dismay is somewhat recent. It's usually used by one person describing another's reaction to something. One doesn't go round using it in the first person generally. Though a humorous-minded person might.
    – Lambie
    yesterday



















0














In a comment, Janus Bahs Jacquet wrote:




Nei­ther men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my
pearls when…”: this ex­pres­sion is ex­clu­sively (or at least
al­most ex­clu­sively) used in pro­gres­sive or non-fi­nite
con­struc­tions. It’s also more used to de­scribe other peo­ple
than one­self be­cause it’s some­what be­lit­tling. You might hear,
“Tom get­ting fired had Sheila clutch­ing her pearls”. You might
also hear it used to de­scribe a man, though it tends to carry
sex­ist over­tones then: its pe­jo­ra­tive­ness makes it im­ply
that he’s weak/over-sen­si­tive/any­thing else stereo­typ­i­cally
seen as neg­a­tive fe­male traits.




And in another comment, Lambie wrote:




Gen­er­ally, one says this of oth­ers. Espe­cially, men about men. It's like in the armed ser­vices where the sergeants call the sol­diers "ladies". Same idea.







share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    So, I'm interested in what's you are gonna say.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 3




    @YoichiOishiI had not planned to say any­thing my­self. I just wanted to pre­serve both their re­lated com­ments to ren­der them find­able by searches, be­cause al­though they don’t ad­dress your first three sub­ques­tions, they do ad­dress your fourth and fi­nal sub­ques­tion, the one about whether men could say it and why. It was the most in­ter­est­ing of your set of four, or so it seemed to me, so these seemed worth pre­serv­ing. Should ei­ther au­thor care to de­velop their own an­swer, I shall gladly delete this post, but un­til such time, it is more search­able this way.
    – tchrist
    yesterday












  • Thanks, understood.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday



















-3














I find the many erudite answers compelling, but wrong.



I believe the meaning is much more vulgar. I think it is a euphemism for a fearful attempt to protect a man's genitals (the family jewels) from harm, or for anyone to fearfully protect one's wealth or status (pearl jewelry) from loss or theft.



It suggests that something has triggered a fight or flight response, or a knee jerk reaction.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 5




    "I believe" is not compelling evidence :) Besides, as you correctly pointed out, men's testicles are sometimes referred to as "the family jewels". I think, "squeezing" or "grabbing" are the more common collocations
    – Mari-Lou A
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    That's the meaning I assumed when I saw the question! Which indicates that 1) the phrase isn't at all common (in the UK at least); and 2) its real meaning isn't obvious if you don't already know it.
    – gidds
    18 hours ago










  • Do you know of any references to this interpretation? If you had a source, it would lend your answer more credibility.
    – SuperBiasedMan
    17 hours ago










  • One does NOT show disapproval by protecting their genitals.
    – michael.hor257k
    17 hours ago






  • 1




    I doubt any living man would compare their "jewels" to that of pearls. Although spherical, pearls tend to be quite small...
    – Mari-Lou A
    14 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "97"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480140%2fusage-of-the-phrase-i-clutched-my-pearls-esp-for-males%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes








5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









7














The phrase “clutch one’s pearls” is always used derisively or sarcastically. Basically, it’s a put-down. It suggests a hysterical woman on the verge of a swoon. Moreover, it has an added flavor of an old-time caricature from movies of a bygone generation. Cf. Margaret Dumont in a Marx Brothers movie from the ‘30s:



enter image description here



You see Dumont on the left, prim and proper, ready to play the straight role to the comedians’ shenanigans. That might include shock, outrage, or even obliviousness. She might even fall on a couch clutching her pearls.



A man would never say this about himself, except to make a self-deprecatory joke. To say it about him would be tantamount to calling him a hysterical old lady (which is offensive not only to him but to elderly women as well). To say it about a woman would be a sexist put down.



Any way you slice it, utilizing that image to describe anybody is extremely derogatory.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Happy new year! It's a pretty long time to hear from you. Thanks for an intrguing input. I'm still well with this site.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 5




    "males seldom wear a pearl necklace" -- Er, no, Mike, don't make that comment you were thinking of!
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    For the record, the expression is not really about oneself. So, either a man or woman can say it. That said, it is always sarcastic. And also somewhat macho....
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 1




    @YoichiOishi: 明けましておめでとうございます!
    – Robusto
    yesterday






  • 2




    Pearl necklace has also another meaning...in pornography. I think Michael H was only teasing himself :)
    – Mari-Lou A
    23 hours ago


















7














The phrase “clutch one’s pearls” is always used derisively or sarcastically. Basically, it’s a put-down. It suggests a hysterical woman on the verge of a swoon. Moreover, it has an added flavor of an old-time caricature from movies of a bygone generation. Cf. Margaret Dumont in a Marx Brothers movie from the ‘30s:



enter image description here



You see Dumont on the left, prim and proper, ready to play the straight role to the comedians’ shenanigans. That might include shock, outrage, or even obliviousness. She might even fall on a couch clutching her pearls.



A man would never say this about himself, except to make a self-deprecatory joke. To say it about him would be tantamount to calling him a hysterical old lady (which is offensive not only to him but to elderly women as well). To say it about a woman would be a sexist put down.



Any way you slice it, utilizing that image to describe anybody is extremely derogatory.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    Happy new year! It's a pretty long time to hear from you. Thanks for an intrguing input. I'm still well with this site.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 5




    "males seldom wear a pearl necklace" -- Er, no, Mike, don't make that comment you were thinking of!
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    For the record, the expression is not really about oneself. So, either a man or woman can say it. That said, it is always sarcastic. And also somewhat macho....
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 1




    @YoichiOishi: 明けましておめでとうございます!
    – Robusto
    yesterday






  • 2




    Pearl necklace has also another meaning...in pornography. I think Michael H was only teasing himself :)
    – Mari-Lou A
    23 hours ago
















7












7








7






The phrase “clutch one’s pearls” is always used derisively or sarcastically. Basically, it’s a put-down. It suggests a hysterical woman on the verge of a swoon. Moreover, it has an added flavor of an old-time caricature from movies of a bygone generation. Cf. Margaret Dumont in a Marx Brothers movie from the ‘30s:



enter image description here



You see Dumont on the left, prim and proper, ready to play the straight role to the comedians’ shenanigans. That might include shock, outrage, or even obliviousness. She might even fall on a couch clutching her pearls.



A man would never say this about himself, except to make a self-deprecatory joke. To say it about him would be tantamount to calling him a hysterical old lady (which is offensive not only to him but to elderly women as well). To say it about a woman would be a sexist put down.



Any way you slice it, utilizing that image to describe anybody is extremely derogatory.






share|improve this answer












The phrase “clutch one’s pearls” is always used derisively or sarcastically. Basically, it’s a put-down. It suggests a hysterical woman on the verge of a swoon. Moreover, it has an added flavor of an old-time caricature from movies of a bygone generation. Cf. Margaret Dumont in a Marx Brothers movie from the ‘30s:



enter image description here



You see Dumont on the left, prim and proper, ready to play the straight role to the comedians’ shenanigans. That might include shock, outrage, or even obliviousness. She might even fall on a couch clutching her pearls.



A man would never say this about himself, except to make a self-deprecatory joke. To say it about him would be tantamount to calling him a hysterical old lady (which is offensive not only to him but to elderly women as well). To say it about a woman would be a sexist put down.



Any way you slice it, utilizing that image to describe anybody is extremely derogatory.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









RobustoRobusto

128k28303514




128k28303514








  • 1




    Happy new year! It's a pretty long time to hear from you. Thanks for an intrguing input. I'm still well with this site.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 5




    "males seldom wear a pearl necklace" -- Er, no, Mike, don't make that comment you were thinking of!
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    For the record, the expression is not really about oneself. So, either a man or woman can say it. That said, it is always sarcastic. And also somewhat macho....
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 1




    @YoichiOishi: 明けましておめでとうございます!
    – Robusto
    yesterday






  • 2




    Pearl necklace has also another meaning...in pornography. I think Michael H was only teasing himself :)
    – Mari-Lou A
    23 hours ago
















  • 1




    Happy new year! It's a pretty long time to hear from you. Thanks for an intrguing input. I'm still well with this site.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 5




    "males seldom wear a pearl necklace" -- Er, no, Mike, don't make that comment you were thinking of!
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    For the record, the expression is not really about oneself. So, either a man or woman can say it. That said, it is always sarcastic. And also somewhat macho....
    – Lambie
    yesterday






  • 1




    @YoichiOishi: 明けましておめでとうございます!
    – Robusto
    yesterday






  • 2




    Pearl necklace has also another meaning...in pornography. I think Michael H was only teasing himself :)
    – Mari-Lou A
    23 hours ago










1




1




Happy new year! It's a pretty long time to hear from you. Thanks for an intrguing input. I'm still well with this site.
– Yoichi Oishi
yesterday




Happy new year! It's a pretty long time to hear from you. Thanks for an intrguing input. I'm still well with this site.
– Yoichi Oishi
yesterday




5




5




"males seldom wear a pearl necklace" -- Er, no, Mike, don't make that comment you were thinking of!
– Michael Harvey
yesterday






"males seldom wear a pearl necklace" -- Er, no, Mike, don't make that comment you were thinking of!
– Michael Harvey
yesterday






1




1




For the record, the expression is not really about oneself. So, either a man or woman can say it. That said, it is always sarcastic. And also somewhat macho....
– Lambie
yesterday




For the record, the expression is not really about oneself. So, either a man or woman can say it. That said, it is always sarcastic. And also somewhat macho....
– Lambie
yesterday




1




1




@YoichiOishi: 明けましておめでとうございます!
– Robusto
yesterday




@YoichiOishi: 明けましておめでとうございます!
– Robusto
yesterday




2




2




Pearl necklace has also another meaning...in pornography. I think Michael H was only teasing himself :)
– Mari-Lou A
23 hours ago






Pearl necklace has also another meaning...in pornography. I think Michael H was only teasing himself :)
– Mari-Lou A
23 hours ago















6














As noted in the following article by Grammarphobia:




People have been literally clutching their pearls in shock or otherwise for a long time. Here, for example, is a citation from a 1910 issue of the Chambers Journal, a weekly magazine that published fiction and nonfiction:




  • “Without being aware that I had stirred, I found myself close to the table. I drew a gasping breath, and my hand went out without any conscious volition and clutched the pearls.”




But the phrase itself became popular years later mainly as a mocking metaphor, meaning “being ostentatiously shocked by something not all that shocking,” especially if the “shock” was feigned or reflected outdated social prejudices:





  • a gay character on the Fox TV show In Living Color is responsible for the earliest example of the usage mentioned in discussions over the last six months on the American Dialect Society’s Linguist List.


  • In an April 15, 1990, sketch, the flamboyant cultural critic Blaine Edwards (played by Damon Wayans) gushes over how daring the producers were to cast a male actor as the female lead in Dangerous Liaisons.


  • When told that Glenn Close is actually a woman, Edwards squeals in mock shock and says, “Well, clutch the pearls! What a sneaky thing to do.”





As suggested in the following extract, the expression is now dated and its usage has largely declined in recent years:




Judging from the instances of “clutch the pearls” and “pearl clutching” that I found in a Nexis search, the expression showed up only periodically through about 2004, almost always as a pun about wealthy women and literal pearls. Take a 2000 episode of World News Tonight in which co-anchor Alison Stewart said there was “a lot of pearl-clutching going on” in the high-end auction business following accusations of criminal price-fixing. The expression then went largely dormant. There are only 16 Google results for “pearl clutching” between Jan. 1, 2000, and Jan. 1, 2004, though it did appear in a 2003 academic work called Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language.




(https://slate.com)






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    Metaphors are no respecters of gender conventions. Here in Britain we can say that someone who is confused or upset to the point of incoherence has got his or her "knickers in a twist". I think that Americans might say "don't get your panties in a wad" or something similar. These sayings are definitely not restricted to the sex that conventionally wears knickers or panties. I have heard office workers in Britain say of an annoying male manager that he must be "on the rag" (having a period).
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Michael It would have a different meaning for a female though, possibly a literal one. Whether it's used on a male or female, "on the rag" is misogynistic.
    – Matt Samuel
    yesterday










  • Matt Samuel, I think that the very notion that attribution of a female stereotype to a man is an insult is misogynistic.
    – Michael Harvey
    13 hours ago
















6














As noted in the following article by Grammarphobia:




People have been literally clutching their pearls in shock or otherwise for a long time. Here, for example, is a citation from a 1910 issue of the Chambers Journal, a weekly magazine that published fiction and nonfiction:




  • “Without being aware that I had stirred, I found myself close to the table. I drew a gasping breath, and my hand went out without any conscious volition and clutched the pearls.”




But the phrase itself became popular years later mainly as a mocking metaphor, meaning “being ostentatiously shocked by something not all that shocking,” especially if the “shock” was feigned or reflected outdated social prejudices:





  • a gay character on the Fox TV show In Living Color is responsible for the earliest example of the usage mentioned in discussions over the last six months on the American Dialect Society’s Linguist List.


  • In an April 15, 1990, sketch, the flamboyant cultural critic Blaine Edwards (played by Damon Wayans) gushes over how daring the producers were to cast a male actor as the female lead in Dangerous Liaisons.


  • When told that Glenn Close is actually a woman, Edwards squeals in mock shock and says, “Well, clutch the pearls! What a sneaky thing to do.”





As suggested in the following extract, the expression is now dated and its usage has largely declined in recent years:




Judging from the instances of “clutch the pearls” and “pearl clutching” that I found in a Nexis search, the expression showed up only periodically through about 2004, almost always as a pun about wealthy women and literal pearls. Take a 2000 episode of World News Tonight in which co-anchor Alison Stewart said there was “a lot of pearl-clutching going on” in the high-end auction business following accusations of criminal price-fixing. The expression then went largely dormant. There are only 16 Google results for “pearl clutching” between Jan. 1, 2000, and Jan. 1, 2004, though it did appear in a 2003 academic work called Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language.




(https://slate.com)






share|improve this answer



















  • 5




    Metaphors are no respecters of gender conventions. Here in Britain we can say that someone who is confused or upset to the point of incoherence has got his or her "knickers in a twist". I think that Americans might say "don't get your panties in a wad" or something similar. These sayings are definitely not restricted to the sex that conventionally wears knickers or panties. I have heard office workers in Britain say of an annoying male manager that he must be "on the rag" (having a period).
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Michael It would have a different meaning for a female though, possibly a literal one. Whether it's used on a male or female, "on the rag" is misogynistic.
    – Matt Samuel
    yesterday










  • Matt Samuel, I think that the very notion that attribution of a female stereotype to a man is an insult is misogynistic.
    – Michael Harvey
    13 hours ago














6












6








6






As noted in the following article by Grammarphobia:




People have been literally clutching their pearls in shock or otherwise for a long time. Here, for example, is a citation from a 1910 issue of the Chambers Journal, a weekly magazine that published fiction and nonfiction:




  • “Without being aware that I had stirred, I found myself close to the table. I drew a gasping breath, and my hand went out without any conscious volition and clutched the pearls.”




But the phrase itself became popular years later mainly as a mocking metaphor, meaning “being ostentatiously shocked by something not all that shocking,” especially if the “shock” was feigned or reflected outdated social prejudices:





  • a gay character on the Fox TV show In Living Color is responsible for the earliest example of the usage mentioned in discussions over the last six months on the American Dialect Society’s Linguist List.


  • In an April 15, 1990, sketch, the flamboyant cultural critic Blaine Edwards (played by Damon Wayans) gushes over how daring the producers were to cast a male actor as the female lead in Dangerous Liaisons.


  • When told that Glenn Close is actually a woman, Edwards squeals in mock shock and says, “Well, clutch the pearls! What a sneaky thing to do.”





As suggested in the following extract, the expression is now dated and its usage has largely declined in recent years:




Judging from the instances of “clutch the pearls” and “pearl clutching” that I found in a Nexis search, the expression showed up only periodically through about 2004, almost always as a pun about wealthy women and literal pearls. Take a 2000 episode of World News Tonight in which co-anchor Alison Stewart said there was “a lot of pearl-clutching going on” in the high-end auction business following accusations of criminal price-fixing. The expression then went largely dormant. There are only 16 Google results for “pearl clutching” between Jan. 1, 2000, and Jan. 1, 2004, though it did appear in a 2003 academic work called Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language.




(https://slate.com)






share|improve this answer














As noted in the following article by Grammarphobia:




People have been literally clutching their pearls in shock or otherwise for a long time. Here, for example, is a citation from a 1910 issue of the Chambers Journal, a weekly magazine that published fiction and nonfiction:




  • “Without being aware that I had stirred, I found myself close to the table. I drew a gasping breath, and my hand went out without any conscious volition and clutched the pearls.”




But the phrase itself became popular years later mainly as a mocking metaphor, meaning “being ostentatiously shocked by something not all that shocking,” especially if the “shock” was feigned or reflected outdated social prejudices:





  • a gay character on the Fox TV show In Living Color is responsible for the earliest example of the usage mentioned in discussions over the last six months on the American Dialect Society’s Linguist List.


  • In an April 15, 1990, sketch, the flamboyant cultural critic Blaine Edwards (played by Damon Wayans) gushes over how daring the producers were to cast a male actor as the female lead in Dangerous Liaisons.


  • When told that Glenn Close is actually a woman, Edwards squeals in mock shock and says, “Well, clutch the pearls! What a sneaky thing to do.”





As suggested in the following extract, the expression is now dated and its usage has largely declined in recent years:




Judging from the instances of “clutch the pearls” and “pearl clutching” that I found in a Nexis search, the expression showed up only periodically through about 2004, almost always as a pun about wealthy women and literal pearls. Take a 2000 episode of World News Tonight in which co-anchor Alison Stewart said there was “a lot of pearl-clutching going on” in the high-end auction business following accusations of criminal price-fixing. The expression then went largely dormant. There are only 16 Google results for “pearl clutching” between Jan. 1, 2000, and Jan. 1, 2004, though it did appear in a 2003 academic work called Speaking in Queer Tongues: Globalization and Gay Language.




(https://slate.com)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 21 hours ago









Mari-Lou A

61.8k55218456




61.8k55218456










answered yesterday









user240918user240918

25.2k1068149




25.2k1068149








  • 5




    Metaphors are no respecters of gender conventions. Here in Britain we can say that someone who is confused or upset to the point of incoherence has got his or her "knickers in a twist". I think that Americans might say "don't get your panties in a wad" or something similar. These sayings are definitely not restricted to the sex that conventionally wears knickers or panties. I have heard office workers in Britain say of an annoying male manager that he must be "on the rag" (having a period).
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Michael It would have a different meaning for a female though, possibly a literal one. Whether it's used on a male or female, "on the rag" is misogynistic.
    – Matt Samuel
    yesterday










  • Matt Samuel, I think that the very notion that attribution of a female stereotype to a man is an insult is misogynistic.
    – Michael Harvey
    13 hours ago














  • 5




    Metaphors are no respecters of gender conventions. Here in Britain we can say that someone who is confused or upset to the point of incoherence has got his or her "knickers in a twist". I think that Americans might say "don't get your panties in a wad" or something similar. These sayings are definitely not restricted to the sex that conventionally wears knickers or panties. I have heard office workers in Britain say of an annoying male manager that he must be "on the rag" (having a period).
    – Michael Harvey
    yesterday








  • 1




    @Michael It would have a different meaning for a female though, possibly a literal one. Whether it's used on a male or female, "on the rag" is misogynistic.
    – Matt Samuel
    yesterday










  • Matt Samuel, I think that the very notion that attribution of a female stereotype to a man is an insult is misogynistic.
    – Michael Harvey
    13 hours ago








5




5




Metaphors are no respecters of gender conventions. Here in Britain we can say that someone who is confused or upset to the point of incoherence has got his or her "knickers in a twist". I think that Americans might say "don't get your panties in a wad" or something similar. These sayings are definitely not restricted to the sex that conventionally wears knickers or panties. I have heard office workers in Britain say of an annoying male manager that he must be "on the rag" (having a period).
– Michael Harvey
yesterday






Metaphors are no respecters of gender conventions. Here in Britain we can say that someone who is confused or upset to the point of incoherence has got his or her "knickers in a twist". I think that Americans might say "don't get your panties in a wad" or something similar. These sayings are definitely not restricted to the sex that conventionally wears knickers or panties. I have heard office workers in Britain say of an annoying male manager that he must be "on the rag" (having a period).
– Michael Harvey
yesterday






1




1




@Michael It would have a different meaning for a female though, possibly a literal one. Whether it's used on a male or female, "on the rag" is misogynistic.
– Matt Samuel
yesterday




@Michael It would have a different meaning for a female though, possibly a literal one. Whether it's used on a male or female, "on the rag" is misogynistic.
– Matt Samuel
yesterday












Matt Samuel, I think that the very notion that attribution of a female stereotype to a man is an insult is misogynistic.
– Michael Harvey
13 hours ago




Matt Samuel, I think that the very notion that attribution of a female stereotype to a man is an insult is misogynistic.
– Michael Harvey
13 hours ago











3
















  • From around what time this phrase started to be in use?



    It now appears in OED as a draft addition:






  • Draft additions June 2018


  • Chiefly U.S. to clutch one's pearls and variants: to react with shock or dismay, esp. in response to something considered immoral,
    underhand, or vulgar. Frequently ironic or humorous.






  • What is the origin of this phrase?


The OED cites this sentence as in its draft. It is dated 1990:




1990 F. Ajaye et al. In Living Color (transcribed from TV programme)
1st Ser. Episode 1 Clutch the pearls, what a sneaky thing to do!





  • Is it a popular phrase?


It appears to be increasing in popularity and usage.




  • Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in
    such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from
    his office yesterday”?


enter image description here



It's gender neutral as it is a metaphor for humorously or ironically "shocked!" In the cited article, the entire Republican party is accused of clutching their pearls!






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    This answer is wrong as shown by the other answers. The phrase is far older than the suggested origin of 1990.
    – Bent
    yesterday










  • @Bent so edited. tks
    – lbf
    yesterday






  • 2




    The answer is not wrong. It's used by media pundit types discussing politics. To react with shock or dismay is somewhat recent. It's usually used by one person describing another's reaction to something. One doesn't go round using it in the first person generally. Though a humorous-minded person might.
    – Lambie
    yesterday
















3
















  • From around what time this phrase started to be in use?



    It now appears in OED as a draft addition:






  • Draft additions June 2018


  • Chiefly U.S. to clutch one's pearls and variants: to react with shock or dismay, esp. in response to something considered immoral,
    underhand, or vulgar. Frequently ironic or humorous.






  • What is the origin of this phrase?


The OED cites this sentence as in its draft. It is dated 1990:




1990 F. Ajaye et al. In Living Color (transcribed from TV programme)
1st Ser. Episode 1 Clutch the pearls, what a sneaky thing to do!





  • Is it a popular phrase?


It appears to be increasing in popularity and usage.




  • Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in
    such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from
    his office yesterday”?


enter image description here



It's gender neutral as it is a metaphor for humorously or ironically "shocked!" In the cited article, the entire Republican party is accused of clutching their pearls!






share|improve this answer



















  • 3




    This answer is wrong as shown by the other answers. The phrase is far older than the suggested origin of 1990.
    – Bent
    yesterday










  • @Bent so edited. tks
    – lbf
    yesterday






  • 2




    The answer is not wrong. It's used by media pundit types discussing politics. To react with shock or dismay is somewhat recent. It's usually used by one person describing another's reaction to something. One doesn't go round using it in the first person generally. Though a humorous-minded person might.
    – Lambie
    yesterday














3












3








3








  • From around what time this phrase started to be in use?



    It now appears in OED as a draft addition:






  • Draft additions June 2018


  • Chiefly U.S. to clutch one's pearls and variants: to react with shock or dismay, esp. in response to something considered immoral,
    underhand, or vulgar. Frequently ironic or humorous.






  • What is the origin of this phrase?


The OED cites this sentence as in its draft. It is dated 1990:




1990 F. Ajaye et al. In Living Color (transcribed from TV programme)
1st Ser. Episode 1 Clutch the pearls, what a sneaky thing to do!





  • Is it a popular phrase?


It appears to be increasing in popularity and usage.




  • Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in
    such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from
    his office yesterday”?


enter image description here



It's gender neutral as it is a metaphor for humorously or ironically "shocked!" In the cited article, the entire Republican party is accused of clutching their pearls!






share|improve this answer
















  • From around what time this phrase started to be in use?



    It now appears in OED as a draft addition:






  • Draft additions June 2018


  • Chiefly U.S. to clutch one's pearls and variants: to react with shock or dismay, esp. in response to something considered immoral,
    underhand, or vulgar. Frequently ironic or humorous.






  • What is the origin of this phrase?


The OED cites this sentence as in its draft. It is dated 1990:




1990 F. Ajaye et al. In Living Color (transcribed from TV programme)
1st Ser. Episode 1 Clutch the pearls, what a sneaky thing to do!





  • Is it a popular phrase?


It appears to be increasing in popularity and usage.




  • Can a man – males seldom wear a pearl necklace - use this phrase in
    such a way as, “I clutched my pearls when I heard Tom was fired from
    his office yesterday”?


enter image description here



It's gender neutral as it is a metaphor for humorously or ironically "shocked!" In the cited article, the entire Republican party is accused of clutching their pearls!







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 15 hours ago

























answered yesterday









lbflbf

17.9k21864




17.9k21864








  • 3




    This answer is wrong as shown by the other answers. The phrase is far older than the suggested origin of 1990.
    – Bent
    yesterday










  • @Bent so edited. tks
    – lbf
    yesterday






  • 2




    The answer is not wrong. It's used by media pundit types discussing politics. To react with shock or dismay is somewhat recent. It's usually used by one person describing another's reaction to something. One doesn't go round using it in the first person generally. Though a humorous-minded person might.
    – Lambie
    yesterday














  • 3




    This answer is wrong as shown by the other answers. The phrase is far older than the suggested origin of 1990.
    – Bent
    yesterday










  • @Bent so edited. tks
    – lbf
    yesterday






  • 2




    The answer is not wrong. It's used by media pundit types discussing politics. To react with shock or dismay is somewhat recent. It's usually used by one person describing another's reaction to something. One doesn't go round using it in the first person generally. Though a humorous-minded person might.
    – Lambie
    yesterday








3




3




This answer is wrong as shown by the other answers. The phrase is far older than the suggested origin of 1990.
– Bent
yesterday




This answer is wrong as shown by the other answers. The phrase is far older than the suggested origin of 1990.
– Bent
yesterday












@Bent so edited. tks
– lbf
yesterday




@Bent so edited. tks
– lbf
yesterday




2




2




The answer is not wrong. It's used by media pundit types discussing politics. To react with shock or dismay is somewhat recent. It's usually used by one person describing another's reaction to something. One doesn't go round using it in the first person generally. Though a humorous-minded person might.
– Lambie
yesterday




The answer is not wrong. It's used by media pundit types discussing politics. To react with shock or dismay is somewhat recent. It's usually used by one person describing another's reaction to something. One doesn't go round using it in the first person generally. Though a humorous-minded person might.
– Lambie
yesterday











0














In a comment, Janus Bahs Jacquet wrote:




Nei­ther men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my
pearls when…”: this ex­pres­sion is ex­clu­sively (or at least
al­most ex­clu­sively) used in pro­gres­sive or non-fi­nite
con­struc­tions. It’s also more used to de­scribe other peo­ple
than one­self be­cause it’s some­what be­lit­tling. You might hear,
“Tom get­ting fired had Sheila clutch­ing her pearls”. You might
also hear it used to de­scribe a man, though it tends to carry
sex­ist over­tones then: its pe­jo­ra­tive­ness makes it im­ply
that he’s weak/over-sen­si­tive/any­thing else stereo­typ­i­cally
seen as neg­a­tive fe­male traits.




And in another comment, Lambie wrote:




Gen­er­ally, one says this of oth­ers. Espe­cially, men about men. It's like in the armed ser­vices where the sergeants call the sol­diers "ladies". Same idea.







share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    So, I'm interested in what's you are gonna say.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 3




    @YoichiOishiI had not planned to say any­thing my­self. I just wanted to pre­serve both their re­lated com­ments to ren­der them find­able by searches, be­cause al­though they don’t ad­dress your first three sub­ques­tions, they do ad­dress your fourth and fi­nal sub­ques­tion, the one about whether men could say it and why. It was the most in­ter­est­ing of your set of four, or so it seemed to me, so these seemed worth pre­serv­ing. Should ei­ther au­thor care to de­velop their own an­swer, I shall gladly delete this post, but un­til such time, it is more search­able this way.
    – tchrist
    yesterday












  • Thanks, understood.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday
















0














In a comment, Janus Bahs Jacquet wrote:




Nei­ther men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my
pearls when…”: this ex­pres­sion is ex­clu­sively (or at least
al­most ex­clu­sively) used in pro­gres­sive or non-fi­nite
con­struc­tions. It’s also more used to de­scribe other peo­ple
than one­self be­cause it’s some­what be­lit­tling. You might hear,
“Tom get­ting fired had Sheila clutch­ing her pearls”. You might
also hear it used to de­scribe a man, though it tends to carry
sex­ist over­tones then: its pe­jo­ra­tive­ness makes it im­ply
that he’s weak/over-sen­si­tive/any­thing else stereo­typ­i­cally
seen as neg­a­tive fe­male traits.




And in another comment, Lambie wrote:




Gen­er­ally, one says this of oth­ers. Espe­cially, men about men. It's like in the armed ser­vices where the sergeants call the sol­diers "ladies". Same idea.







share|improve this answer



















  • 1




    So, I'm interested in what's you are gonna say.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 3




    @YoichiOishiI had not planned to say any­thing my­self. I just wanted to pre­serve both their re­lated com­ments to ren­der them find­able by searches, be­cause al­though they don’t ad­dress your first three sub­ques­tions, they do ad­dress your fourth and fi­nal sub­ques­tion, the one about whether men could say it and why. It was the most in­ter­est­ing of your set of four, or so it seemed to me, so these seemed worth pre­serv­ing. Should ei­ther au­thor care to de­velop their own an­swer, I shall gladly delete this post, but un­til such time, it is more search­able this way.
    – tchrist
    yesterday












  • Thanks, understood.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday














0












0








0






In a comment, Janus Bahs Jacquet wrote:




Nei­ther men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my
pearls when…”: this ex­pres­sion is ex­clu­sively (or at least
al­most ex­clu­sively) used in pro­gres­sive or non-fi­nite
con­struc­tions. It’s also more used to de­scribe other peo­ple
than one­self be­cause it’s some­what be­lit­tling. You might hear,
“Tom get­ting fired had Sheila clutch­ing her pearls”. You might
also hear it used to de­scribe a man, though it tends to carry
sex­ist over­tones then: its pe­jo­ra­tive­ness makes it im­ply
that he’s weak/over-sen­si­tive/any­thing else stereo­typ­i­cally
seen as neg­a­tive fe­male traits.




And in another comment, Lambie wrote:




Gen­er­ally, one says this of oth­ers. Espe­cially, men about men. It's like in the armed ser­vices where the sergeants call the sol­diers "ladies". Same idea.







share|improve this answer














In a comment, Janus Bahs Jacquet wrote:




Nei­ther men nor women would be likely to ever say, “I clutched my
pearls when…”: this ex­pres­sion is ex­clu­sively (or at least
al­most ex­clu­sively) used in pro­gres­sive or non-fi­nite
con­struc­tions. It’s also more used to de­scribe other peo­ple
than one­self be­cause it’s some­what be­lit­tling. You might hear,
“Tom get­ting fired had Sheila clutch­ing her pearls”. You might
also hear it used to de­scribe a man, though it tends to carry
sex­ist over­tones then: its pe­jo­ra­tive­ness makes it im­ply
that he’s weak/over-sen­si­tive/any­thing else stereo­typ­i­cally
seen as neg­a­tive fe­male traits.




And in another comment, Lambie wrote:




Gen­er­ally, one says this of oth­ers. Espe­cially, men about men. It's like in the armed ser­vices where the sergeants call the sol­diers "ladies". Same idea.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








answered yesterday


























community wiki





tchrist









  • 1




    So, I'm interested in what's you are gonna say.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 3




    @YoichiOishiI had not planned to say any­thing my­self. I just wanted to pre­serve both their re­lated com­ments to ren­der them find­able by searches, be­cause al­though they don’t ad­dress your first three sub­ques­tions, they do ad­dress your fourth and fi­nal sub­ques­tion, the one about whether men could say it and why. It was the most in­ter­est­ing of your set of four, or so it seemed to me, so these seemed worth pre­serv­ing. Should ei­ther au­thor care to de­velop their own an­swer, I shall gladly delete this post, but un­til such time, it is more search­able this way.
    – tchrist
    yesterday












  • Thanks, understood.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday














  • 1




    So, I'm interested in what's you are gonna say.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday






  • 3




    @YoichiOishiI had not planned to say any­thing my­self. I just wanted to pre­serve both their re­lated com­ments to ren­der them find­able by searches, be­cause al­though they don’t ad­dress your first three sub­ques­tions, they do ad­dress your fourth and fi­nal sub­ques­tion, the one about whether men could say it and why. It was the most in­ter­est­ing of your set of four, or so it seemed to me, so these seemed worth pre­serv­ing. Should ei­ther au­thor care to de­velop their own an­swer, I shall gladly delete this post, but un­til such time, it is more search­able this way.
    – tchrist
    yesterday












  • Thanks, understood.
    – Yoichi Oishi
    yesterday








1




1




So, I'm interested in what's you are gonna say.
– Yoichi Oishi
yesterday




So, I'm interested in what's you are gonna say.
– Yoichi Oishi
yesterday




3




3




@YoichiOishiI had not planned to say any­thing my­self. I just wanted to pre­serve both their re­lated com­ments to ren­der them find­able by searches, be­cause al­though they don’t ad­dress your first three sub­ques­tions, they do ad­dress your fourth and fi­nal sub­ques­tion, the one about whether men could say it and why. It was the most in­ter­est­ing of your set of four, or so it seemed to me, so these seemed worth pre­serv­ing. Should ei­ther au­thor care to de­velop their own an­swer, I shall gladly delete this post, but un­til such time, it is more search­able this way.
– tchrist
yesterday






@YoichiOishiI had not planned to say any­thing my­self. I just wanted to pre­serve both their re­lated com­ments to ren­der them find­able by searches, be­cause al­though they don’t ad­dress your first three sub­ques­tions, they do ad­dress your fourth and fi­nal sub­ques­tion, the one about whether men could say it and why. It was the most in­ter­est­ing of your set of four, or so it seemed to me, so these seemed worth pre­serv­ing. Should ei­ther au­thor care to de­velop their own an­swer, I shall gladly delete this post, but un­til such time, it is more search­able this way.
– tchrist
yesterday














Thanks, understood.
– Yoichi Oishi
yesterday




Thanks, understood.
– Yoichi Oishi
yesterday











-3














I find the many erudite answers compelling, but wrong.



I believe the meaning is much more vulgar. I think it is a euphemism for a fearful attempt to protect a man's genitals (the family jewels) from harm, or for anyone to fearfully protect one's wealth or status (pearl jewelry) from loss or theft.



It suggests that something has triggered a fight or flight response, or a knee jerk reaction.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 5




    "I believe" is not compelling evidence :) Besides, as you correctly pointed out, men's testicles are sometimes referred to as "the family jewels". I think, "squeezing" or "grabbing" are the more common collocations
    – Mari-Lou A
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    That's the meaning I assumed when I saw the question! Which indicates that 1) the phrase isn't at all common (in the UK at least); and 2) its real meaning isn't obvious if you don't already know it.
    – gidds
    18 hours ago










  • Do you know of any references to this interpretation? If you had a source, it would lend your answer more credibility.
    – SuperBiasedMan
    17 hours ago










  • One does NOT show disapproval by protecting their genitals.
    – michael.hor257k
    17 hours ago






  • 1




    I doubt any living man would compare their "jewels" to that of pearls. Although spherical, pearls tend to be quite small...
    – Mari-Lou A
    14 hours ago
















-3














I find the many erudite answers compelling, but wrong.



I believe the meaning is much more vulgar. I think it is a euphemism for a fearful attempt to protect a man's genitals (the family jewels) from harm, or for anyone to fearfully protect one's wealth or status (pearl jewelry) from loss or theft.



It suggests that something has triggered a fight or flight response, or a knee jerk reaction.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.














  • 5




    "I believe" is not compelling evidence :) Besides, as you correctly pointed out, men's testicles are sometimes referred to as "the family jewels". I think, "squeezing" or "grabbing" are the more common collocations
    – Mari-Lou A
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    That's the meaning I assumed when I saw the question! Which indicates that 1) the phrase isn't at all common (in the UK at least); and 2) its real meaning isn't obvious if you don't already know it.
    – gidds
    18 hours ago










  • Do you know of any references to this interpretation? If you had a source, it would lend your answer more credibility.
    – SuperBiasedMan
    17 hours ago










  • One does NOT show disapproval by protecting their genitals.
    – michael.hor257k
    17 hours ago






  • 1




    I doubt any living man would compare their "jewels" to that of pearls. Although spherical, pearls tend to be quite small...
    – Mari-Lou A
    14 hours ago














-3












-3








-3






I find the many erudite answers compelling, but wrong.



I believe the meaning is much more vulgar. I think it is a euphemism for a fearful attempt to protect a man's genitals (the family jewels) from harm, or for anyone to fearfully protect one's wealth or status (pearl jewelry) from loss or theft.



It suggests that something has triggered a fight or flight response, or a knee jerk reaction.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









I find the many erudite answers compelling, but wrong.



I believe the meaning is much more vulgar. I think it is a euphemism for a fearful attempt to protect a man's genitals (the family jewels) from harm, or for anyone to fearfully protect one's wealth or status (pearl jewelry) from loss or theft.



It suggests that something has triggered a fight or flight response, or a knee jerk reaction.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 19 hours ago









Doug HendersonDoug Henderson

951




951




New contributor




Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Doug Henderson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 5




    "I believe" is not compelling evidence :) Besides, as you correctly pointed out, men's testicles are sometimes referred to as "the family jewels". I think, "squeezing" or "grabbing" are the more common collocations
    – Mari-Lou A
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    That's the meaning I assumed when I saw the question! Which indicates that 1) the phrase isn't at all common (in the UK at least); and 2) its real meaning isn't obvious if you don't already know it.
    – gidds
    18 hours ago










  • Do you know of any references to this interpretation? If you had a source, it would lend your answer more credibility.
    – SuperBiasedMan
    17 hours ago










  • One does NOT show disapproval by protecting their genitals.
    – michael.hor257k
    17 hours ago






  • 1




    I doubt any living man would compare their "jewels" to that of pearls. Although spherical, pearls tend to be quite small...
    – Mari-Lou A
    14 hours ago














  • 5




    "I believe" is not compelling evidence :) Besides, as you correctly pointed out, men's testicles are sometimes referred to as "the family jewels". I think, "squeezing" or "grabbing" are the more common collocations
    – Mari-Lou A
    19 hours ago








  • 1




    That's the meaning I assumed when I saw the question! Which indicates that 1) the phrase isn't at all common (in the UK at least); and 2) its real meaning isn't obvious if you don't already know it.
    – gidds
    18 hours ago










  • Do you know of any references to this interpretation? If you had a source, it would lend your answer more credibility.
    – SuperBiasedMan
    17 hours ago










  • One does NOT show disapproval by protecting their genitals.
    – michael.hor257k
    17 hours ago






  • 1




    I doubt any living man would compare their "jewels" to that of pearls. Although spherical, pearls tend to be quite small...
    – Mari-Lou A
    14 hours ago








5




5




"I believe" is not compelling evidence :) Besides, as you correctly pointed out, men's testicles are sometimes referred to as "the family jewels". I think, "squeezing" or "grabbing" are the more common collocations
– Mari-Lou A
19 hours ago






"I believe" is not compelling evidence :) Besides, as you correctly pointed out, men's testicles are sometimes referred to as "the family jewels". I think, "squeezing" or "grabbing" are the more common collocations
– Mari-Lou A
19 hours ago






1




1




That's the meaning I assumed when I saw the question! Which indicates that 1) the phrase isn't at all common (in the UK at least); and 2) its real meaning isn't obvious if you don't already know it.
– gidds
18 hours ago




That's the meaning I assumed when I saw the question! Which indicates that 1) the phrase isn't at all common (in the UK at least); and 2) its real meaning isn't obvious if you don't already know it.
– gidds
18 hours ago












Do you know of any references to this interpretation? If you had a source, it would lend your answer more credibility.
– SuperBiasedMan
17 hours ago




Do you know of any references to this interpretation? If you had a source, it would lend your answer more credibility.
– SuperBiasedMan
17 hours ago












One does NOT show disapproval by protecting their genitals.
– michael.hor257k
17 hours ago




One does NOT show disapproval by protecting their genitals.
– michael.hor257k
17 hours ago




1




1




I doubt any living man would compare their "jewels" to that of pearls. Although spherical, pearls tend to be quite small...
– Mari-Lou A
14 hours ago




I doubt any living man would compare their "jewels" to that of pearls. Although spherical, pearls tend to be quite small...
– Mari-Lou A
14 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480140%2fusage-of-the-phrase-i-clutched-my-pearls-esp-for-males%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

An IMO inspired problem

Management

Investment