Science fiction story: asymptotic drive the empire lost out to low tech rebels due to focusing on new and...












8














In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.



It is at least 50 years old.










share|improve this question









New contributor




dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
    – David
    2 days ago










  • Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
    – Neo Darwin
    2 days ago










  • Not a dupe unless OP confirms
    – amflare
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Sounds almost like Star Wars.
    – Mad Physicist
    2 days ago
















8














In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.



It is at least 50 years old.










share|improve this question









New contributor




dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
    – David
    2 days ago










  • Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
    – Neo Darwin
    2 days ago










  • Not a dupe unless OP confirms
    – amflare
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Sounds almost like Star Wars.
    – Mad Physicist
    2 days ago














8












8








8


1





In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.



It is at least 50 years old.










share|improve this question









New contributor




dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.



It is at least 50 years old.







story-identification






share|improve this question









New contributor




dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









TheLethalCarrot

39.4k15214261




39.4k15214261






New contributor




dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









dave andrewsdave andrews

412




412




New contributor




dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






dave andrews is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
    – David
    2 days ago










  • Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
    – Neo Darwin
    2 days ago










  • Not a dupe unless OP confirms
    – amflare
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Sounds almost like Star Wars.
    – Mad Physicist
    2 days ago














  • 1




    Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
    – David
    2 days ago










  • Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
    – Neo Darwin
    2 days ago










  • Not a dupe unless OP confirms
    – amflare
    2 days ago






  • 1




    Sounds almost like Star Wars.
    – Mad Physicist
    2 days ago








1




1




Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
2 days ago




Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
2 days ago












Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
2 days ago




Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
2 days ago












Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
2 days ago




Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
2 days ago




1




1




Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
2 days ago




Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
2 days ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















23














This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?



The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":




Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.




After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":




We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.




The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":




The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.



It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.



As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.




In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.



The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.



The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






dave andrews is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203028%2fscience-fiction-story-asymptotic-drive-the-empire-lost-out-to-low-tech-rebels-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









23














This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?



The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":




Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.




After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":




We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.




The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":




The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.



It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.



As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.




In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.



The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.



The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago
















23














This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?



The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":




Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.




After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":




We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.




The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":




The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.



It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.



As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.




In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.



The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.



The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?






share|improve this answer



















  • 2




    If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago














23












23








23






This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?



The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":




Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.




After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":




We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.




The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":




The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.



It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.



As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.




In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.



The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.



The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?






share|improve this answer














This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?



The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":




Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.




After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":




We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.




The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":




The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.



It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.



As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.




In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.



The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.



The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









OtisOtis

5,7862260




5,7862260








  • 2




    If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago














  • 2




    If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
    – FuzzyBoots
    2 days ago








2




2




If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
2 days ago




If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
2 days ago










dave andrews is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















dave andrews is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













dave andrews is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












dave andrews is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203028%2fscience-fiction-story-asymptotic-drive-the-empire-lost-out-to-low-tech-rebels-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

An IMO inspired problem

Management

Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?