Infinitesimal generator : what is it exactly?












1














Let $(X_t)$ an diffusion Itô process, i.e. a solution of $$dX_t=b(X_t)dt+sigma (X_t)dB_t.$$ The infinitesimal generator of $(X_t)$ is $$Af(x)=lim_{tto 0^+}frac{mathbb E^x[f(X_t)]-f(x)}{t},$$
where $mathbb E^x$ is the expectation wrt $mathbb P^x$.



Q1) What represent exactly $Af(x)$ for $X_t$ ? For example, for a Brownian motion, if $f$ is $C^2$ then $$A f(x)=frac{1}{2}Delta f(x).$$



But I don't really understand which information does $A$ give is. Is it a sort of derivative of $X_t$ ?



Q2) What is exactely the measure $mathbb P^x$ ? I know it is $mathbb P^x{X_tin A}=mathbb P({X_tin A}mid {X_0=x}),$ But does it mean that on $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P^x)$ we have that $mathbb P{X_0=x}=1$ ? (i.e. is deterministic).










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    (1) Intuitively, if $X_t$ is a deterministic function of $t$, $Af(x)$ is exactly $frac{rm d}{{rm d}t}|_{t=0}f(X_t)$. When $X_t$ is an Ito process, $Af(x)$ measures how "fast" $f(X_t)$ changes with respect to $t$ in the sense of expectation. (2) $mathbb{P}^x$ is a conditional probability, which conditions on $X_0=x$. That is, $X_t$ has a fixed, deterministic starting point $x$. In this sense, yes, $mathbb{P}left{X_0=xright}=1$, which, rigorously, should be $mathbb{P}left(left{X_0=xright}|left{X_0=xright}right)=1$. This is trivially true.
    – hypernova
    yesterday








  • 1




    You might want to take a look at this question and this question
    – saz
    yesterday












  • @saz : Very nice links. Thank you for this contribution, it's very helpful. I'll probably comment them in the future.
    – NewMath
    yesterday


















1














Let $(X_t)$ an diffusion Itô process, i.e. a solution of $$dX_t=b(X_t)dt+sigma (X_t)dB_t.$$ The infinitesimal generator of $(X_t)$ is $$Af(x)=lim_{tto 0^+}frac{mathbb E^x[f(X_t)]-f(x)}{t},$$
where $mathbb E^x$ is the expectation wrt $mathbb P^x$.



Q1) What represent exactly $Af(x)$ for $X_t$ ? For example, for a Brownian motion, if $f$ is $C^2$ then $$A f(x)=frac{1}{2}Delta f(x).$$



But I don't really understand which information does $A$ give is. Is it a sort of derivative of $X_t$ ?



Q2) What is exactely the measure $mathbb P^x$ ? I know it is $mathbb P^x{X_tin A}=mathbb P({X_tin A}mid {X_0=x}),$ But does it mean that on $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P^x)$ we have that $mathbb P{X_0=x}=1$ ? (i.e. is deterministic).










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    (1) Intuitively, if $X_t$ is a deterministic function of $t$, $Af(x)$ is exactly $frac{rm d}{{rm d}t}|_{t=0}f(X_t)$. When $X_t$ is an Ito process, $Af(x)$ measures how "fast" $f(X_t)$ changes with respect to $t$ in the sense of expectation. (2) $mathbb{P}^x$ is a conditional probability, which conditions on $X_0=x$. That is, $X_t$ has a fixed, deterministic starting point $x$. In this sense, yes, $mathbb{P}left{X_0=xright}=1$, which, rigorously, should be $mathbb{P}left(left{X_0=xright}|left{X_0=xright}right)=1$. This is trivially true.
    – hypernova
    yesterday








  • 1




    You might want to take a look at this question and this question
    – saz
    yesterday












  • @saz : Very nice links. Thank you for this contribution, it's very helpful. I'll probably comment them in the future.
    – NewMath
    yesterday
















1












1








1


1





Let $(X_t)$ an diffusion Itô process, i.e. a solution of $$dX_t=b(X_t)dt+sigma (X_t)dB_t.$$ The infinitesimal generator of $(X_t)$ is $$Af(x)=lim_{tto 0^+}frac{mathbb E^x[f(X_t)]-f(x)}{t},$$
where $mathbb E^x$ is the expectation wrt $mathbb P^x$.



Q1) What represent exactly $Af(x)$ for $X_t$ ? For example, for a Brownian motion, if $f$ is $C^2$ then $$A f(x)=frac{1}{2}Delta f(x).$$



But I don't really understand which information does $A$ give is. Is it a sort of derivative of $X_t$ ?



Q2) What is exactely the measure $mathbb P^x$ ? I know it is $mathbb P^x{X_tin A}=mathbb P({X_tin A}mid {X_0=x}),$ But does it mean that on $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P^x)$ we have that $mathbb P{X_0=x}=1$ ? (i.e. is deterministic).










share|cite|improve this question













Let $(X_t)$ an diffusion Itô process, i.e. a solution of $$dX_t=b(X_t)dt+sigma (X_t)dB_t.$$ The infinitesimal generator of $(X_t)$ is $$Af(x)=lim_{tto 0^+}frac{mathbb E^x[f(X_t)]-f(x)}{t},$$
where $mathbb E^x$ is the expectation wrt $mathbb P^x$.



Q1) What represent exactly $Af(x)$ for $X_t$ ? For example, for a Brownian motion, if $f$ is $C^2$ then $$A f(x)=frac{1}{2}Delta f(x).$$



But I don't really understand which information does $A$ give is. Is it a sort of derivative of $X_t$ ?



Q2) What is exactely the measure $mathbb P^x$ ? I know it is $mathbb P^x{X_tin A}=mathbb P({X_tin A}mid {X_0=x}),$ But does it mean that on $(Omega ,mathcal F,mathbb P^x)$ we have that $mathbb P{X_0=x}=1$ ? (i.e. is deterministic).







probability measure-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked yesterday









NewMath

3338




3338








  • 1




    (1) Intuitively, if $X_t$ is a deterministic function of $t$, $Af(x)$ is exactly $frac{rm d}{{rm d}t}|_{t=0}f(X_t)$. When $X_t$ is an Ito process, $Af(x)$ measures how "fast" $f(X_t)$ changes with respect to $t$ in the sense of expectation. (2) $mathbb{P}^x$ is a conditional probability, which conditions on $X_0=x$. That is, $X_t$ has a fixed, deterministic starting point $x$. In this sense, yes, $mathbb{P}left{X_0=xright}=1$, which, rigorously, should be $mathbb{P}left(left{X_0=xright}|left{X_0=xright}right)=1$. This is trivially true.
    – hypernova
    yesterday








  • 1




    You might want to take a look at this question and this question
    – saz
    yesterday












  • @saz : Very nice links. Thank you for this contribution, it's very helpful. I'll probably comment them in the future.
    – NewMath
    yesterday
















  • 1




    (1) Intuitively, if $X_t$ is a deterministic function of $t$, $Af(x)$ is exactly $frac{rm d}{{rm d}t}|_{t=0}f(X_t)$. When $X_t$ is an Ito process, $Af(x)$ measures how "fast" $f(X_t)$ changes with respect to $t$ in the sense of expectation. (2) $mathbb{P}^x$ is a conditional probability, which conditions on $X_0=x$. That is, $X_t$ has a fixed, deterministic starting point $x$. In this sense, yes, $mathbb{P}left{X_0=xright}=1$, which, rigorously, should be $mathbb{P}left(left{X_0=xright}|left{X_0=xright}right)=1$. This is trivially true.
    – hypernova
    yesterday








  • 1




    You might want to take a look at this question and this question
    – saz
    yesterday












  • @saz : Very nice links. Thank you for this contribution, it's very helpful. I'll probably comment them in the future.
    – NewMath
    yesterday










1




1




(1) Intuitively, if $X_t$ is a deterministic function of $t$, $Af(x)$ is exactly $frac{rm d}{{rm d}t}|_{t=0}f(X_t)$. When $X_t$ is an Ito process, $Af(x)$ measures how "fast" $f(X_t)$ changes with respect to $t$ in the sense of expectation. (2) $mathbb{P}^x$ is a conditional probability, which conditions on $X_0=x$. That is, $X_t$ has a fixed, deterministic starting point $x$. In this sense, yes, $mathbb{P}left{X_0=xright}=1$, which, rigorously, should be $mathbb{P}left(left{X_0=xright}|left{X_0=xright}right)=1$. This is trivially true.
– hypernova
yesterday






(1) Intuitively, if $X_t$ is a deterministic function of $t$, $Af(x)$ is exactly $frac{rm d}{{rm d}t}|_{t=0}f(X_t)$. When $X_t$ is an Ito process, $Af(x)$ measures how "fast" $f(X_t)$ changes with respect to $t$ in the sense of expectation. (2) $mathbb{P}^x$ is a conditional probability, which conditions on $X_0=x$. That is, $X_t$ has a fixed, deterministic starting point $x$. In this sense, yes, $mathbb{P}left{X_0=xright}=1$, which, rigorously, should be $mathbb{P}left(left{X_0=xright}|left{X_0=xright}right)=1$. This is trivially true.
– hypernova
yesterday






1




1




You might want to take a look at this question and this question
– saz
yesterday






You might want to take a look at this question and this question
– saz
yesterday














@saz : Very nice links. Thank you for this contribution, it's very helpful. I'll probably comment them in the future.
– NewMath
yesterday






@saz : Very nice links. Thank you for this contribution, it's very helpful. I'll probably comment them in the future.
– NewMath
yesterday












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Q1) It seems that this link could help.



Q2) Also see this link for a formal definition of conditional probability. Even, the existence of regular conditional probabilities is a non-trivial fact even for simple cases like $mathbb{R}^2$ equipped with Borel sigma algebra.






share|cite|improve this answer








New contributor




Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060561%2finfinitesimal-generator-what-is-it-exactly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    1














    Q1) It seems that this link could help.



    Q2) Also see this link for a formal definition of conditional probability. Even, the existence of regular conditional probabilities is a non-trivial fact even for simple cases like $mathbb{R}^2$ equipped with Borel sigma algebra.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      1














      Q1) It seems that this link could help.



      Q2) Also see this link for a formal definition of conditional probability. Even, the existence of regular conditional probabilities is a non-trivial fact even for simple cases like $mathbb{R}^2$ equipped with Borel sigma algebra.






      share|cite|improve this answer








      New contributor




      Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















        1












        1








        1






        Q1) It seems that this link could help.



        Q2) Also see this link for a formal definition of conditional probability. Even, the existence of regular conditional probabilities is a non-trivial fact even for simple cases like $mathbb{R}^2$ equipped with Borel sigma algebra.






        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        Q1) It seems that this link could help.



        Q2) Also see this link for a formal definition of conditional probability. Even, the existence of regular conditional probabilities is a non-trivial fact even for simple cases like $mathbb{R}^2$ equipped with Borel sigma algebra.







        share|cite|improve this answer








        New contributor




        Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer






        New contributor




        Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered yesterday









        Aragon

        112




        112




        New contributor




        Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Aragon is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060561%2finfinitesimal-generator-what-is-it-exactly%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            An IMO inspired problem

            Management

            Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?