Prove that function is totally computable

Multi tool use
The problem that I'm working on is
Graph of function $f : mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}$ is set {$(x, f(x))$, $x in mathbb{N}$ and $f(x)$ $neq perp$} $subseteq mathbb{N}^{2}$. Prove that function $f$ is totally computable when $f(x)$ is defined for every $x $ $in $ $mathbb{N}$ and his graph is recursively enumerable set.
Do you have any suggestions how to prove it?
I have recently started learning theory of computability so some easy to understand answers would be appreciated.
computability
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The problem that I'm working on is
Graph of function $f : mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}$ is set {$(x, f(x))$, $x in mathbb{N}$ and $f(x)$ $neq perp$} $subseteq mathbb{N}^{2}$. Prove that function $f$ is totally computable when $f(x)$ is defined for every $x $ $in $ $mathbb{N}$ and his graph is recursively enumerable set.
Do you have any suggestions how to prove it?
I have recently started learning theory of computability so some easy to understand answers would be appreciated.
computability
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
The problem that I'm working on is
Graph of function $f : mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}$ is set {$(x, f(x))$, $x in mathbb{N}$ and $f(x)$ $neq perp$} $subseteq mathbb{N}^{2}$. Prove that function $f$ is totally computable when $f(x)$ is defined for every $x $ $in $ $mathbb{N}$ and his graph is recursively enumerable set.
Do you have any suggestions how to prove it?
I have recently started learning theory of computability so some easy to understand answers would be appreciated.
computability
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
The problem that I'm working on is
Graph of function $f : mathbb{N}rightarrow mathbb{N}$ is set {$(x, f(x))$, $x in mathbb{N}$ and $f(x)$ $neq perp$} $subseteq mathbb{N}^{2}$. Prove that function $f$ is totally computable when $f(x)$ is defined for every $x $ $in $ $mathbb{N}$ and his graph is recursively enumerable set.
Do you have any suggestions how to prove it?
I have recently started learning theory of computability so some easy to understand answers would be appreciated.
computability
computability
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked yesterday


Bedřich Kletorný
102
102
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Fix a computable enumeration of the graph of the function. On input $n$, wait for a pair $(n,y)$ to appear in the graph. When you find such a pair, output $y$. This is a computable procedure that computes $f$.
The totality of the function is irrelevant to this argument. What the procedure shows is that a function $f$ is computable if and only if the graph of $f$ is computably enumerable.
But if you also know (by your hypothesis) that the function is total, then you've got a total computable function.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060550%2fprove-that-function-is-totally-computable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Fix a computable enumeration of the graph of the function. On input $n$, wait for a pair $(n,y)$ to appear in the graph. When you find such a pair, output $y$. This is a computable procedure that computes $f$.
The totality of the function is irrelevant to this argument. What the procedure shows is that a function $f$ is computable if and only if the graph of $f$ is computably enumerable.
But if you also know (by your hypothesis) that the function is total, then you've got a total computable function.
add a comment |
Fix a computable enumeration of the graph of the function. On input $n$, wait for a pair $(n,y)$ to appear in the graph. When you find such a pair, output $y$. This is a computable procedure that computes $f$.
The totality of the function is irrelevant to this argument. What the procedure shows is that a function $f$ is computable if and only if the graph of $f$ is computably enumerable.
But if you also know (by your hypothesis) that the function is total, then you've got a total computable function.
add a comment |
Fix a computable enumeration of the graph of the function. On input $n$, wait for a pair $(n,y)$ to appear in the graph. When you find such a pair, output $y$. This is a computable procedure that computes $f$.
The totality of the function is irrelevant to this argument. What the procedure shows is that a function $f$ is computable if and only if the graph of $f$ is computably enumerable.
But if you also know (by your hypothesis) that the function is total, then you've got a total computable function.
Fix a computable enumeration of the graph of the function. On input $n$, wait for a pair $(n,y)$ to appear in the graph. When you find such a pair, output $y$. This is a computable procedure that computes $f$.
The totality of the function is irrelevant to this argument. What the procedure shows is that a function $f$ is computable if and only if the graph of $f$ is computably enumerable.
But if you also know (by your hypothesis) that the function is total, then you've got a total computable function.
answered yesterday


JDH
32.4k679145
32.4k679145
add a comment |
add a comment |
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Bedřich Kletorný is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060550%2fprove-that-function-is-totally-computable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
s i4YCGNBf0wVZc9SKd,M3Md7XnJspmlm4 de DV X8b m75s9GVT5QDd10