Set theory and Logic Question: How would you write the solutions out for these two questions.. [on hold]












-2














Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:



iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.



iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    2 days ago
















-2














Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:



iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.



iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    2 days ago














-2












-2








-2







Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:



iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.



iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:



iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.



iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.







logic






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Mauro ALLEGRANZA

64.5k448112




64.5k448112






New contributor




UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Jan 3 at 21:20









UnknownKid

1




1




New contributor




UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.












  • Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    2 days ago


















  • Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
    – Mauro ALLEGRANZA
    2 days ago
















Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago




Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago










0






active

oldest

votes

















0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes

Popular posts from this blog

An IMO inspired problem

Management

Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?