Set theory and Logic Question: How would you write the solutions out for these two questions.. [on hold]
Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:
iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.
iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.
logic
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:
iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.
iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.
logic
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago
add a comment |
Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:
iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.
iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.
logic
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Let P stand for the set of people and let p ∈ P. C(p) is a propositional function that is
true when person p plays cricket; R(p) is a propositional function that is true when p
plays rugby; and F(p) is true when p plays football. Formalise the following statements:
iii) If someone plays cricket, then that person also plays either football or rugby.
iv) Everyone either plays cricket and football, or they play no sport at all.
logic
logic
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
edited 2 days ago
Mauro ALLEGRANZA
64.5k448112
64.5k448112
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
asked Jan 3 at 21:20
UnknownKid
1
1
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
UnknownKid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin yesterday
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Scientifica, Graham Kemp, Saad, mrtaurho, Lord_Farin
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago
add a comment |
Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago
Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago
Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Someone is $exists p in P$ while Everyone is $forall p in P$.
– Mauro ALLEGRANZA
2 days ago