Centralizer and Normalizer as Group Action
Could someone explain the following to me? I understand all the terms used in the text but have no intuition of what it's saying.
Dummit and Foote Pg. 52
abstract-algebra group-theory group-actions
add a comment |
Could someone explain the following to me? I understand all the terms used in the text but have no intuition of what it's saying.
Dummit and Foote Pg. 52
abstract-algebra group-theory group-actions
1
Remember that a group action of $G$ over $X$ is something of the form $Gtimes Xto X$ that satisfies certain properties? Well, for all $gin G,;Bin mathcal{P}(S)$, we define the action to be $gBg^{-1}inmathcal{P}(S)$. That is the action by conjugation.
– Don Thousand
2 days ago
add a comment |
Could someone explain the following to me? I understand all the terms used in the text but have no intuition of what it's saying.
Dummit and Foote Pg. 52
abstract-algebra group-theory group-actions
Could someone explain the following to me? I understand all the terms used in the text but have no intuition of what it's saying.
Dummit and Foote Pg. 52
abstract-algebra group-theory group-actions
abstract-algebra group-theory group-actions
edited 2 days ago
Shaun
8,810113680
8,810113680
asked 2 days ago
BrianH
637
637
1
Remember that a group action of $G$ over $X$ is something of the form $Gtimes Xto X$ that satisfies certain properties? Well, for all $gin G,;Bin mathcal{P}(S)$, we define the action to be $gBg^{-1}inmathcal{P}(S)$. That is the action by conjugation.
– Don Thousand
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
Remember that a group action of $G$ over $X$ is something of the form $Gtimes Xto X$ that satisfies certain properties? Well, for all $gin G,;Bin mathcal{P}(S)$, we define the action to be $gBg^{-1}inmathcal{P}(S)$. That is the action by conjugation.
– Don Thousand
2 days ago
1
1
Remember that a group action of $G$ over $X$ is something of the form $Gtimes Xto X$ that satisfies certain properties? Well, for all $gin G,;Bin mathcal{P}(S)$, we define the action to be $gBg^{-1}inmathcal{P}(S)$. That is the action by conjugation.
– Don Thousand
2 days ago
Remember that a group action of $G$ over $X$ is something of the form $Gtimes Xto X$ that satisfies certain properties? Well, for all $gin G,;Bin mathcal{P}(S)$, we define the action to be $gBg^{-1}inmathcal{P}(S)$. That is the action by conjugation.
– Don Thousand
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
A (left) group action of a group $G$ on a set $X$ is a map $Gtimes Xto X$ satisfying:
$x^e = x$ for any $xin X$
- $(x^g)^h = x^{hg}$
where the image of $(g,x)$ is denoted as $x^g$.
There are two important subgroups of $G$ that arise from a group action: the kernel and stabilizers. The kernel of the action is the set of all $gin G$ such that $x^g = x$ for all $xin X$. Given a subset $Ssubset X$, the stabilizer of $S$ denoted by $G_S$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $s^gin S$ for all $sin S$.
Note that the kernel collects group elements that stabilize every individual element in $X$, and the stabilizer collects group elements that stabilize a particular set of elements in $X$. You should check for yourself that these are subgroups!
Let’s focus on the particular example where you give me any group $G$, we take $X$ to be $mathcal{P}(G)$, and given any $Ssubseteq G$ and $gin G$ define $S^g = gSg^{-1} = {gsg^{-1}: sin S}$. The stabilizer subgroup we defined above for this action on some set $Asubseteq G$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $gAg^{-1} = A$ — which is exactly the normalizer subgroup $N_G(A)$! Thus we know that the normalizer is a subgroup because stabilizers are.
Now, take our group to be $N_G(A)$ and take $X$ to be $A$, with the same action as above. The kernel of this action is the set of all $gin N_G(A)$ such that $a^g = gag^{-1} = a$ for all $ain A$, i.e. the elements in $N_G(A)$ that commute with all elements in $A$. This is exactly the centralizer $C_G(A)$ of $A$ in $G$, and so it must be a subgroup because kernels are!
Thus $C_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $N_G(A)$ since it is the kernel of our second action, and $N_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $G$ because it is the stabilizer of $A$ in our first action. Thus $C_G(A) le N_G(A) le G$.
This is said in your text, but explain to yourself why $Z(G)$ is a subgroup of $G$ by think of $Z(G)$ as the kernel of a group action!
TL;DR If you understand kernels and stabilizers of group actions, many important objects pop out as having this form.
add a comment |
It's saying that if you want to prove that centralizers, normalizers, and kernels are subgroups of G, it is enough to show that they are stabilizers or kernels of group actions. Then they exhibit a particular group action (conjugation) and show that $N_G(A)$ is the stabilizer of A and Z(G) is the kernel of this action. Thus those two sets are subgroups. Then they let $N_G(A)$ act only on A and show the $C_G(A)$ is the kernel of this second action and thus a subgroup.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060850%2fcentralizer-and-normalizer-as-group-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
A (left) group action of a group $G$ on a set $X$ is a map $Gtimes Xto X$ satisfying:
$x^e = x$ for any $xin X$
- $(x^g)^h = x^{hg}$
where the image of $(g,x)$ is denoted as $x^g$.
There are two important subgroups of $G$ that arise from a group action: the kernel and stabilizers. The kernel of the action is the set of all $gin G$ such that $x^g = x$ for all $xin X$. Given a subset $Ssubset X$, the stabilizer of $S$ denoted by $G_S$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $s^gin S$ for all $sin S$.
Note that the kernel collects group elements that stabilize every individual element in $X$, and the stabilizer collects group elements that stabilize a particular set of elements in $X$. You should check for yourself that these are subgroups!
Let’s focus on the particular example where you give me any group $G$, we take $X$ to be $mathcal{P}(G)$, and given any $Ssubseteq G$ and $gin G$ define $S^g = gSg^{-1} = {gsg^{-1}: sin S}$. The stabilizer subgroup we defined above for this action on some set $Asubseteq G$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $gAg^{-1} = A$ — which is exactly the normalizer subgroup $N_G(A)$! Thus we know that the normalizer is a subgroup because stabilizers are.
Now, take our group to be $N_G(A)$ and take $X$ to be $A$, with the same action as above. The kernel of this action is the set of all $gin N_G(A)$ such that $a^g = gag^{-1} = a$ for all $ain A$, i.e. the elements in $N_G(A)$ that commute with all elements in $A$. This is exactly the centralizer $C_G(A)$ of $A$ in $G$, and so it must be a subgroup because kernels are!
Thus $C_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $N_G(A)$ since it is the kernel of our second action, and $N_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $G$ because it is the stabilizer of $A$ in our first action. Thus $C_G(A) le N_G(A) le G$.
This is said in your text, but explain to yourself why $Z(G)$ is a subgroup of $G$ by think of $Z(G)$ as the kernel of a group action!
TL;DR If you understand kernels and stabilizers of group actions, many important objects pop out as having this form.
add a comment |
A (left) group action of a group $G$ on a set $X$ is a map $Gtimes Xto X$ satisfying:
$x^e = x$ for any $xin X$
- $(x^g)^h = x^{hg}$
where the image of $(g,x)$ is denoted as $x^g$.
There are two important subgroups of $G$ that arise from a group action: the kernel and stabilizers. The kernel of the action is the set of all $gin G$ such that $x^g = x$ for all $xin X$. Given a subset $Ssubset X$, the stabilizer of $S$ denoted by $G_S$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $s^gin S$ for all $sin S$.
Note that the kernel collects group elements that stabilize every individual element in $X$, and the stabilizer collects group elements that stabilize a particular set of elements in $X$. You should check for yourself that these are subgroups!
Let’s focus on the particular example where you give me any group $G$, we take $X$ to be $mathcal{P}(G)$, and given any $Ssubseteq G$ and $gin G$ define $S^g = gSg^{-1} = {gsg^{-1}: sin S}$. The stabilizer subgroup we defined above for this action on some set $Asubseteq G$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $gAg^{-1} = A$ — which is exactly the normalizer subgroup $N_G(A)$! Thus we know that the normalizer is a subgroup because stabilizers are.
Now, take our group to be $N_G(A)$ and take $X$ to be $A$, with the same action as above. The kernel of this action is the set of all $gin N_G(A)$ such that $a^g = gag^{-1} = a$ for all $ain A$, i.e. the elements in $N_G(A)$ that commute with all elements in $A$. This is exactly the centralizer $C_G(A)$ of $A$ in $G$, and so it must be a subgroup because kernels are!
Thus $C_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $N_G(A)$ since it is the kernel of our second action, and $N_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $G$ because it is the stabilizer of $A$ in our first action. Thus $C_G(A) le N_G(A) le G$.
This is said in your text, but explain to yourself why $Z(G)$ is a subgroup of $G$ by think of $Z(G)$ as the kernel of a group action!
TL;DR If you understand kernels and stabilizers of group actions, many important objects pop out as having this form.
add a comment |
A (left) group action of a group $G$ on a set $X$ is a map $Gtimes Xto X$ satisfying:
$x^e = x$ for any $xin X$
- $(x^g)^h = x^{hg}$
where the image of $(g,x)$ is denoted as $x^g$.
There are two important subgroups of $G$ that arise from a group action: the kernel and stabilizers. The kernel of the action is the set of all $gin G$ such that $x^g = x$ for all $xin X$. Given a subset $Ssubset X$, the stabilizer of $S$ denoted by $G_S$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $s^gin S$ for all $sin S$.
Note that the kernel collects group elements that stabilize every individual element in $X$, and the stabilizer collects group elements that stabilize a particular set of elements in $X$. You should check for yourself that these are subgroups!
Let’s focus on the particular example where you give me any group $G$, we take $X$ to be $mathcal{P}(G)$, and given any $Ssubseteq G$ and $gin G$ define $S^g = gSg^{-1} = {gsg^{-1}: sin S}$. The stabilizer subgroup we defined above for this action on some set $Asubseteq G$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $gAg^{-1} = A$ — which is exactly the normalizer subgroup $N_G(A)$! Thus we know that the normalizer is a subgroup because stabilizers are.
Now, take our group to be $N_G(A)$ and take $X$ to be $A$, with the same action as above. The kernel of this action is the set of all $gin N_G(A)$ such that $a^g = gag^{-1} = a$ for all $ain A$, i.e. the elements in $N_G(A)$ that commute with all elements in $A$. This is exactly the centralizer $C_G(A)$ of $A$ in $G$, and so it must be a subgroup because kernels are!
Thus $C_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $N_G(A)$ since it is the kernel of our second action, and $N_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $G$ because it is the stabilizer of $A$ in our first action. Thus $C_G(A) le N_G(A) le G$.
This is said in your text, but explain to yourself why $Z(G)$ is a subgroup of $G$ by think of $Z(G)$ as the kernel of a group action!
TL;DR If you understand kernels and stabilizers of group actions, many important objects pop out as having this form.
A (left) group action of a group $G$ on a set $X$ is a map $Gtimes Xto X$ satisfying:
$x^e = x$ for any $xin X$
- $(x^g)^h = x^{hg}$
where the image of $(g,x)$ is denoted as $x^g$.
There are two important subgroups of $G$ that arise from a group action: the kernel and stabilizers. The kernel of the action is the set of all $gin G$ such that $x^g = x$ for all $xin X$. Given a subset $Ssubset X$, the stabilizer of $S$ denoted by $G_S$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $s^gin S$ for all $sin S$.
Note that the kernel collects group elements that stabilize every individual element in $X$, and the stabilizer collects group elements that stabilize a particular set of elements in $X$. You should check for yourself that these are subgroups!
Let’s focus on the particular example where you give me any group $G$, we take $X$ to be $mathcal{P}(G)$, and given any $Ssubseteq G$ and $gin G$ define $S^g = gSg^{-1} = {gsg^{-1}: sin S}$. The stabilizer subgroup we defined above for this action on some set $Asubseteq G$ is the set of all $gin G$ such that $gAg^{-1} = A$ — which is exactly the normalizer subgroup $N_G(A)$! Thus we know that the normalizer is a subgroup because stabilizers are.
Now, take our group to be $N_G(A)$ and take $X$ to be $A$, with the same action as above. The kernel of this action is the set of all $gin N_G(A)$ such that $a^g = gag^{-1} = a$ for all $ain A$, i.e. the elements in $N_G(A)$ that commute with all elements in $A$. This is exactly the centralizer $C_G(A)$ of $A$ in $G$, and so it must be a subgroup because kernels are!
Thus $C_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $N_G(A)$ since it is the kernel of our second action, and $N_G(A)$ is a subgroup of $G$ because it is the stabilizer of $A$ in our first action. Thus $C_G(A) le N_G(A) le G$.
This is said in your text, but explain to yourself why $Z(G)$ is a subgroup of $G$ by think of $Z(G)$ as the kernel of a group action!
TL;DR If you understand kernels and stabilizers of group actions, many important objects pop out as having this form.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Santana Afton
2,5742629
2,5742629
add a comment |
add a comment |
It's saying that if you want to prove that centralizers, normalizers, and kernels are subgroups of G, it is enough to show that they are stabilizers or kernels of group actions. Then they exhibit a particular group action (conjugation) and show that $N_G(A)$ is the stabilizer of A and Z(G) is the kernel of this action. Thus those two sets are subgroups. Then they let $N_G(A)$ act only on A and show the $C_G(A)$ is the kernel of this second action and thus a subgroup.
add a comment |
It's saying that if you want to prove that centralizers, normalizers, and kernels are subgroups of G, it is enough to show that they are stabilizers or kernels of group actions. Then they exhibit a particular group action (conjugation) and show that $N_G(A)$ is the stabilizer of A and Z(G) is the kernel of this action. Thus those two sets are subgroups. Then they let $N_G(A)$ act only on A and show the $C_G(A)$ is the kernel of this second action and thus a subgroup.
add a comment |
It's saying that if you want to prove that centralizers, normalizers, and kernels are subgroups of G, it is enough to show that they are stabilizers or kernels of group actions. Then they exhibit a particular group action (conjugation) and show that $N_G(A)$ is the stabilizer of A and Z(G) is the kernel of this action. Thus those two sets are subgroups. Then they let $N_G(A)$ act only on A and show the $C_G(A)$ is the kernel of this second action and thus a subgroup.
It's saying that if you want to prove that centralizers, normalizers, and kernels are subgroups of G, it is enough to show that they are stabilizers or kernels of group actions. Then they exhibit a particular group action (conjugation) and show that $N_G(A)$ is the stabilizer of A and Z(G) is the kernel of this action. Thus those two sets are subgroups. Then they let $N_G(A)$ act only on A and show the $C_G(A)$ is the kernel of this second action and thus a subgroup.
answered 2 days ago
Joel Pereira
68819
68819
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060850%2fcentralizer-and-normalizer-as-group-action%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Remember that a group action of $G$ over $X$ is something of the form $Gtimes Xto X$ that satisfies certain properties? Well, for all $gin G,;Bin mathcal{P}(S)$, we define the action to be $gBg^{-1}inmathcal{P}(S)$. That is the action by conjugation.
– Don Thousand
2 days ago