Finding number of homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $N$












5














There is a scene in Goodwill Hunting where professor challenges students with task of finding all homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $10$. This is discussed in many places, such as here and is by itself a relatively easy to solve puzzle.



The most tricky part in that task, at least for me, is to decide if I have already found every such tree or something is missing. So here comes the question: how to calculate, how much homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $N$ there are?



I've tried to find if such problem is already solved, but I was finding only various variants of Goodwill Hunting discussions. Is there a formula or algorithm for it? How to cope with that task?










share|cite|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    What do you mean by the "degree" of a tree? If you mean the maximum degree, there are infinitely many homeomorphically irreducible trees of maximum degree $3.$
    – bof
    Feb 10 '17 at 20:52
















5














There is a scene in Goodwill Hunting where professor challenges students with task of finding all homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $10$. This is discussed in many places, such as here and is by itself a relatively easy to solve puzzle.



The most tricky part in that task, at least for me, is to decide if I have already found every such tree or something is missing. So here comes the question: how to calculate, how much homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $N$ there are?



I've tried to find if such problem is already solved, but I was finding only various variants of Goodwill Hunting discussions. Is there a formula or algorithm for it? How to cope with that task?










share|cite|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.











  • 1




    What do you mean by the "degree" of a tree? If you mean the maximum degree, there are infinitely many homeomorphically irreducible trees of maximum degree $3.$
    – bof
    Feb 10 '17 at 20:52














5












5








5


3





There is a scene in Goodwill Hunting where professor challenges students with task of finding all homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $10$. This is discussed in many places, such as here and is by itself a relatively easy to solve puzzle.



The most tricky part in that task, at least for me, is to decide if I have already found every such tree or something is missing. So here comes the question: how to calculate, how much homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $N$ there are?



I've tried to find if such problem is already solved, but I was finding only various variants of Goodwill Hunting discussions. Is there a formula or algorithm for it? How to cope with that task?










share|cite|improve this question















There is a scene in Goodwill Hunting where professor challenges students with task of finding all homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $10$. This is discussed in many places, such as here and is by itself a relatively easy to solve puzzle.



The most tricky part in that task, at least for me, is to decide if I have already found every such tree or something is missing. So here comes the question: how to calculate, how much homeomorphically irreducible trees of degree $N$ there are?



I've tried to find if such problem is already solved, but I was finding only various variants of Goodwill Hunting discussions. Is there a formula or algorithm for it? How to cope with that task?







trees






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 9 '17 at 10:03









Cettt

1,749621




1,749621










asked May 9 '13 at 17:24









Danubian Sailor

12615




12615





bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 2 days ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.










  • 1




    What do you mean by the "degree" of a tree? If you mean the maximum degree, there are infinitely many homeomorphically irreducible trees of maximum degree $3.$
    – bof
    Feb 10 '17 at 20:52














  • 1




    What do you mean by the "degree" of a tree? If you mean the maximum degree, there are infinitely many homeomorphically irreducible trees of maximum degree $3.$
    – bof
    Feb 10 '17 at 20:52








1




1




What do you mean by the "degree" of a tree? If you mean the maximum degree, there are infinitely many homeomorphically irreducible trees of maximum degree $3.$
– bof
Feb 10 '17 at 20:52




What do you mean by the "degree" of a tree? If you mean the maximum degree, there are infinitely many homeomorphically irreducible trees of maximum degree $3.$
– bof
Feb 10 '17 at 20:52










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















0














Yes there is, but I must admit that I don't fully understand it (http://oeis.org/A000014), as I am not a Mathematician. I found the number of trees for n=11 to be 14, and I discovered a way to grind through determining all trees using a method invented by me in under 4 minutes specifically for the task, but these mathematicians already came up with the formula.
I found the site with the formula from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Series-ReducedTree.html



The method I used was fun in and of itself. I listed the trees for n=11 as follows:

1(10)

2(2,7); 2(3,6); 2(4,5)

3(2,1,5); 3(2,2,4); 3(2,3,3); 3(2,4,2); 3(3,1,4); 3(3,2,3)

4(2,1,1,3); 4(2,2,1,2)

H(0)3(2,2,3)

H(1)3(2,2,2)


Where H(1)3(2,2,2)=



 >+<
^


H(1) means a hub from which only 1 branch is a direct end
a hub is a node from which >2 branches are not direct ends



Using this method I was able to easily deduce that there were 14 trees for n=11, and induce that there must be a formula.






share|cite|improve this answer































    0














    There is actually an easier way to do this; if we use notation such as {2,1,1,2,5} means:
    ">-<" with one of the nodes on the right side linked to five more nodes, we can list these as;
    {1, 10}
    {2, 1, 1, 7}
    {2, 1, 1, 2, 5}
    {2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3}
    {2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2}
    {2, 1, 1, 3, 4}
    {2, 1, 1, 3, 2, 2}
    {2, 1, 1, 4, 3}
    {3, 1, 1, 6}
    {3, 1, 1, 2, 4}
    {3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2}
    {3, 1, 1, 3, 3}
    {3, 1, 1, 4, 2}
    {4, 1, 1, 5}



    All possible trees except one have a {1, 1} group, meaning a [(1, 1),(1, 1)] tree with other trees substituted in for the two nodes. Also, I'm sure someone could write an algorithm for my method (if nobody has already discovered it.)






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f386804%2ffinding-number-of-homeomorphically-irreducible-trees-of-degree-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      Yes there is, but I must admit that I don't fully understand it (http://oeis.org/A000014), as I am not a Mathematician. I found the number of trees for n=11 to be 14, and I discovered a way to grind through determining all trees using a method invented by me in under 4 minutes specifically for the task, but these mathematicians already came up with the formula.
      I found the site with the formula from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Series-ReducedTree.html



      The method I used was fun in and of itself. I listed the trees for n=11 as follows:

      1(10)

      2(2,7); 2(3,6); 2(4,5)

      3(2,1,5); 3(2,2,4); 3(2,3,3); 3(2,4,2); 3(3,1,4); 3(3,2,3)

      4(2,1,1,3); 4(2,2,1,2)

      H(0)3(2,2,3)

      H(1)3(2,2,2)


      Where H(1)3(2,2,2)=



       >+<
      ^


      H(1) means a hub from which only 1 branch is a direct end
      a hub is a node from which >2 branches are not direct ends



      Using this method I was able to easily deduce that there were 14 trees for n=11, and induce that there must be a formula.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        0














        Yes there is, but I must admit that I don't fully understand it (http://oeis.org/A000014), as I am not a Mathematician. I found the number of trees for n=11 to be 14, and I discovered a way to grind through determining all trees using a method invented by me in under 4 minutes specifically for the task, but these mathematicians already came up with the formula.
        I found the site with the formula from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Series-ReducedTree.html



        The method I used was fun in and of itself. I listed the trees for n=11 as follows:

        1(10)

        2(2,7); 2(3,6); 2(4,5)

        3(2,1,5); 3(2,2,4); 3(2,3,3); 3(2,4,2); 3(3,1,4); 3(3,2,3)

        4(2,1,1,3); 4(2,2,1,2)

        H(0)3(2,2,3)

        H(1)3(2,2,2)


        Where H(1)3(2,2,2)=



         >+<
        ^


        H(1) means a hub from which only 1 branch is a direct end
        a hub is a node from which >2 branches are not direct ends



        Using this method I was able to easily deduce that there were 14 trees for n=11, and induce that there must be a formula.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          0












          0








          0






          Yes there is, but I must admit that I don't fully understand it (http://oeis.org/A000014), as I am not a Mathematician. I found the number of trees for n=11 to be 14, and I discovered a way to grind through determining all trees using a method invented by me in under 4 minutes specifically for the task, but these mathematicians already came up with the formula.
          I found the site with the formula from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Series-ReducedTree.html



          The method I used was fun in and of itself. I listed the trees for n=11 as follows:

          1(10)

          2(2,7); 2(3,6); 2(4,5)

          3(2,1,5); 3(2,2,4); 3(2,3,3); 3(2,4,2); 3(3,1,4); 3(3,2,3)

          4(2,1,1,3); 4(2,2,1,2)

          H(0)3(2,2,3)

          H(1)3(2,2,2)


          Where H(1)3(2,2,2)=



           >+<
          ^


          H(1) means a hub from which only 1 branch is a direct end
          a hub is a node from which >2 branches are not direct ends



          Using this method I was able to easily deduce that there were 14 trees for n=11, and induce that there must be a formula.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Yes there is, but I must admit that I don't fully understand it (http://oeis.org/A000014), as I am not a Mathematician. I found the number of trees for n=11 to be 14, and I discovered a way to grind through determining all trees using a method invented by me in under 4 minutes specifically for the task, but these mathematicians already came up with the formula.
          I found the site with the formula from http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Series-ReducedTree.html



          The method I used was fun in and of itself. I listed the trees for n=11 as follows:

          1(10)

          2(2,7); 2(3,6); 2(4,5)

          3(2,1,5); 3(2,2,4); 3(2,3,3); 3(2,4,2); 3(3,1,4); 3(3,2,3)

          4(2,1,1,3); 4(2,2,1,2)

          H(0)3(2,2,3)

          H(1)3(2,2,2)


          Where H(1)3(2,2,2)=



           >+<
          ^


          H(1) means a hub from which only 1 branch is a direct end
          a hub is a node from which >2 branches are not direct ends



          Using this method I was able to easily deduce that there were 14 trees for n=11, and induce that there must be a formula.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jun 20 '13 at 17:55

























          answered Jun 20 '13 at 17:45









          Seth

          11




          11























              0














              There is actually an easier way to do this; if we use notation such as {2,1,1,2,5} means:
              ">-<" with one of the nodes on the right side linked to five more nodes, we can list these as;
              {1, 10}
              {2, 1, 1, 7}
              {2, 1, 1, 2, 5}
              {2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3}
              {2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2}
              {2, 1, 1, 3, 4}
              {2, 1, 1, 3, 2, 2}
              {2, 1, 1, 4, 3}
              {3, 1, 1, 6}
              {3, 1, 1, 2, 4}
              {3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2}
              {3, 1, 1, 3, 3}
              {3, 1, 1, 4, 2}
              {4, 1, 1, 5}



              All possible trees except one have a {1, 1} group, meaning a [(1, 1),(1, 1)] tree with other trees substituted in for the two nodes. Also, I'm sure someone could write an algorithm for my method (if nobody has already discovered it.)






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                0














                There is actually an easier way to do this; if we use notation such as {2,1,1,2,5} means:
                ">-<" with one of the nodes on the right side linked to five more nodes, we can list these as;
                {1, 10}
                {2, 1, 1, 7}
                {2, 1, 1, 2, 5}
                {2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3}
                {2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2}
                {2, 1, 1, 3, 4}
                {2, 1, 1, 3, 2, 2}
                {2, 1, 1, 4, 3}
                {3, 1, 1, 6}
                {3, 1, 1, 2, 4}
                {3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2}
                {3, 1, 1, 3, 3}
                {3, 1, 1, 4, 2}
                {4, 1, 1, 5}



                All possible trees except one have a {1, 1} group, meaning a [(1, 1),(1, 1)] tree with other trees substituted in for the two nodes. Also, I'm sure someone could write an algorithm for my method (if nobody has already discovered it.)






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  There is actually an easier way to do this; if we use notation such as {2,1,1,2,5} means:
                  ">-<" with one of the nodes on the right side linked to five more nodes, we can list these as;
                  {1, 10}
                  {2, 1, 1, 7}
                  {2, 1, 1, 2, 5}
                  {2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3}
                  {2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2}
                  {2, 1, 1, 3, 4}
                  {2, 1, 1, 3, 2, 2}
                  {2, 1, 1, 4, 3}
                  {3, 1, 1, 6}
                  {3, 1, 1, 2, 4}
                  {3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2}
                  {3, 1, 1, 3, 3}
                  {3, 1, 1, 4, 2}
                  {4, 1, 1, 5}



                  All possible trees except one have a {1, 1} group, meaning a [(1, 1),(1, 1)] tree with other trees substituted in for the two nodes. Also, I'm sure someone could write an algorithm for my method (if nobody has already discovered it.)






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  There is actually an easier way to do this; if we use notation such as {2,1,1,2,5} means:
                  ">-<" with one of the nodes on the right side linked to five more nodes, we can list these as;
                  {1, 10}
                  {2, 1, 1, 7}
                  {2, 1, 1, 2, 5}
                  {2, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3}
                  {2, 1, 1, 2, 3, 2}
                  {2, 1, 1, 3, 4}
                  {2, 1, 1, 3, 2, 2}
                  {2, 1, 1, 4, 3}
                  {3, 1, 1, 6}
                  {3, 1, 1, 2, 4}
                  {3, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2}
                  {3, 1, 1, 3, 3}
                  {3, 1, 1, 4, 2}
                  {4, 1, 1, 5}



                  All possible trees except one have a {1, 1} group, meaning a [(1, 1),(1, 1)] tree with other trees substituted in for the two nodes. Also, I'm sure someone could write an algorithm for my method (if nobody has already discovered it.)







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jul 11 '13 at 10:47









                  Ryan Devanandan

                  563




                  563






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f386804%2ffinding-number-of-homeomorphically-irreducible-trees-of-degree-n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      An IMO inspired problem

                      Management

                      Investment