Prove that a group with $3$ elements is cyclic?












1















Prove that a group with $3$ elements is cyclic.




I tried the case where $G={e,a,b}
$

and I kept trying multiplication
and finally I found that
$a^2$ must equal to $b$ and $b^2$ must equal to $a$.
Then $a^3=e$.



Are there any other methods
?
I have another question :




Prove that a group with $4$ elements may or may not be cyclic.











share|cite|improve this question
























  • Another method is to use the Lagrange's Theorem. Using Lagrange Theorem, you can prove that any group of prime order is cyclic.
    – Thomas Shelby
    2 days ago










  • I think that it doesn't take a lot of work to prove that any group of order $4$ (note that I omitted the word “finite”; are you aware of some infinite group of order $4$?) may by cyclic or not.
    – José Carlos Santos
    2 days ago












  • I recommend to read my answer here math.stackexchange.com/questions/1570641/…. A similar method works for a group of 4 elements.
    – Nicky Hekster
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: you mean Cauchy's theorem, right? Lagrange's theorem only gives $o(g)mid o(G)$, while Cauchy's theorem ensures $o(G)=pLongrightarrowexists g:o(g)=p$.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: all right, I get it. Since the identity is unique and $o(g)mid o(G)$, in a group with prime order all the elements except the identity are generators, fine.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago
















1















Prove that a group with $3$ elements is cyclic.




I tried the case where $G={e,a,b}
$

and I kept trying multiplication
and finally I found that
$a^2$ must equal to $b$ and $b^2$ must equal to $a$.
Then $a^3=e$.



Are there any other methods
?
I have another question :




Prove that a group with $4$ elements may or may not be cyclic.











share|cite|improve this question
























  • Another method is to use the Lagrange's Theorem. Using Lagrange Theorem, you can prove that any group of prime order is cyclic.
    – Thomas Shelby
    2 days ago










  • I think that it doesn't take a lot of work to prove that any group of order $4$ (note that I omitted the word “finite”; are you aware of some infinite group of order $4$?) may by cyclic or not.
    – José Carlos Santos
    2 days ago












  • I recommend to read my answer here math.stackexchange.com/questions/1570641/…. A similar method works for a group of 4 elements.
    – Nicky Hekster
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: you mean Cauchy's theorem, right? Lagrange's theorem only gives $o(g)mid o(G)$, while Cauchy's theorem ensures $o(G)=pLongrightarrowexists g:o(g)=p$.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: all right, I get it. Since the identity is unique and $o(g)mid o(G)$, in a group with prime order all the elements except the identity are generators, fine.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago














1












1








1








Prove that a group with $3$ elements is cyclic.




I tried the case where $G={e,a,b}
$

and I kept trying multiplication
and finally I found that
$a^2$ must equal to $b$ and $b^2$ must equal to $a$.
Then $a^3=e$.



Are there any other methods
?
I have another question :




Prove that a group with $4$ elements may or may not be cyclic.











share|cite|improve this question
















Prove that a group with $3$ elements is cyclic.




I tried the case where $G={e,a,b}
$

and I kept trying multiplication
and finally I found that
$a^2$ must equal to $b$ and $b^2$ must equal to $a$.
Then $a^3=e$.



Are there any other methods
?
I have another question :




Prove that a group with $4$ elements may or may not be cyclic.








group-theory cyclic-groups






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Thomas Shelby

1,820217




1,820217










asked 2 days ago









El Mouden

1039




1039












  • Another method is to use the Lagrange's Theorem. Using Lagrange Theorem, you can prove that any group of prime order is cyclic.
    – Thomas Shelby
    2 days ago










  • I think that it doesn't take a lot of work to prove that any group of order $4$ (note that I omitted the word “finite”; are you aware of some infinite group of order $4$?) may by cyclic or not.
    – José Carlos Santos
    2 days ago












  • I recommend to read my answer here math.stackexchange.com/questions/1570641/…. A similar method works for a group of 4 elements.
    – Nicky Hekster
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: you mean Cauchy's theorem, right? Lagrange's theorem only gives $o(g)mid o(G)$, while Cauchy's theorem ensures $o(G)=pLongrightarrowexists g:o(g)=p$.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: all right, I get it. Since the identity is unique and $o(g)mid o(G)$, in a group with prime order all the elements except the identity are generators, fine.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago


















  • Another method is to use the Lagrange's Theorem. Using Lagrange Theorem, you can prove that any group of prime order is cyclic.
    – Thomas Shelby
    2 days ago










  • I think that it doesn't take a lot of work to prove that any group of order $4$ (note that I omitted the word “finite”; are you aware of some infinite group of order $4$?) may by cyclic or not.
    – José Carlos Santos
    2 days ago












  • I recommend to read my answer here math.stackexchange.com/questions/1570641/…. A similar method works for a group of 4 elements.
    – Nicky Hekster
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: you mean Cauchy's theorem, right? Lagrange's theorem only gives $o(g)mid o(G)$, while Cauchy's theorem ensures $o(G)=pLongrightarrowexists g:o(g)=p$.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @ThomasShelby: all right, I get it. Since the identity is unique and $o(g)mid o(G)$, in a group with prime order all the elements except the identity are generators, fine.
    – Jack D'Aurizio
    2 days ago
















Another method is to use the Lagrange's Theorem. Using Lagrange Theorem, you can prove that any group of prime order is cyclic.
– Thomas Shelby
2 days ago




Another method is to use the Lagrange's Theorem. Using Lagrange Theorem, you can prove that any group of prime order is cyclic.
– Thomas Shelby
2 days ago












I think that it doesn't take a lot of work to prove that any group of order $4$ (note that I omitted the word “finite”; are you aware of some infinite group of order $4$?) may by cyclic or not.
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago






I think that it doesn't take a lot of work to prove that any group of order $4$ (note that I omitted the word “finite”; are you aware of some infinite group of order $4$?) may by cyclic or not.
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago














I recommend to read my answer here math.stackexchange.com/questions/1570641/…. A similar method works for a group of 4 elements.
– Nicky Hekster
2 days ago




I recommend to read my answer here math.stackexchange.com/questions/1570641/…. A similar method works for a group of 4 elements.
– Nicky Hekster
2 days ago




1




1




@ThomasShelby: you mean Cauchy's theorem, right? Lagrange's theorem only gives $o(g)mid o(G)$, while Cauchy's theorem ensures $o(G)=pLongrightarrowexists g:o(g)=p$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
2 days ago




@ThomasShelby: you mean Cauchy's theorem, right? Lagrange's theorem only gives $o(g)mid o(G)$, while Cauchy's theorem ensures $o(G)=pLongrightarrowexists g:o(g)=p$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
2 days ago




1




1




@ThomasShelby: all right, I get it. Since the identity is unique and $o(g)mid o(G)$, in a group with prime order all the elements except the identity are generators, fine.
– Jack D'Aurizio
2 days ago




@ThomasShelby: all right, I get it. Since the identity is unique and $o(g)mid o(G)$, in a group with prime order all the elements except the identity are generators, fine.
– Jack D'Aurizio
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Instead of “keeping multiplying” it's easier to fill the Cayley diagram: in every row and column every element must appear.



begin{array}{c|ccc}
& e & a & b \ hline
e & e & a & b \
a & a & \
b & b & \
end{array}

In the slot corresponding to $a^2$ you cannot put $e$, because otherwise the slot for $ab$ would contain $b$. Hence $a^2=b$
begin{array}{c|ccc}
& e & a & b \ hline
e & e & a & b \
a & a & b\
b & b & \
end{array}

and now the diagram has a unique completion
begin{array}{c|ccc}
& e & a & b \ hline
e & e & a & b \
a & a & b & e \
b & b & e & a\
end{array}

Then $a^3=a^2a=ba=e$.



You can try your hand with a four element group and see that the diagram admits different completions.



begin{array}{c|cccc}
& e & a & b & c \ hline
e & e & a & b & c \
a & a & \
b & b & \
c & c &
end{array}

In the slot for $a^2$ we can put any of $e$, $b$ or $c$. Let's try with $e$:
begin{array}{c|cccc}
& e & a & b & c \ hline
e & e & a & b & c \
a & a & e\
b & b & \
c & c &
end{array}

Then we are forced to put in the following
begin{array}{c|cccc}
& e & a & b & c \ hline
e & e & a & b & c \
a & a & e & c & b \
b & b & c\
c & c & b
end{array}

For $b^2$ we can have either $e$ or $c$. Let's try $e$:
begin{array}{c|cccc}
& e & a & b & c \ hline
e & e & a & b & c \
a & a & e & c & b \
b & b & c & e\
c & c & b &
end{array}

Now we can complete:
begin{array}{c|cccc}
& e & a & b & c \ hline
e & e & a & b & c \
a & a & e & c & b \
b & b & c & e & a\
c & c & b & a & e
end{array}

It would be very tedious to verify that this diagram indeed produces a group. It does and is the product of two cyclic groups of order two; it is also the subgroup of $S_4$ given by ${id,(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)}$.






share|cite|improve this answer































    0














    According to Lagrange's theorem, a group with 3 elements can have only the trivial subgroups. Because 3 is prime only 1 and 3 divide it. So, only possible subgroups are ${e}$ with one element and $G$ with three. For $x in G$ that is not $e$ a group generated with this element,
    $<x>$ must be whole $G$. So $G$ is cyclic.



    A group with 4 elements can have untrivial subgroups as 4 isn't prime. For instance $mathbb{Z_4} = {0, 1, 2, 3}$ with $+$ is cyclic. It is generated with the element $1$. But group $mathbb{Z_2} times mathbb{Z_2} = {(0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1)}$ with $+$ defined as $(a, b) + (a', b') = (a + a', b + b')$ is not cyclic.






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060789%2fprove-that-a-group-with-3-elements-is-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Instead of “keeping multiplying” it's easier to fill the Cayley diagram: in every row and column every element must appear.



      begin{array}{c|ccc}
      & e & a & b \ hline
      e & e & a & b \
      a & a & \
      b & b & \
      end{array}

      In the slot corresponding to $a^2$ you cannot put $e$, because otherwise the slot for $ab$ would contain $b$. Hence $a^2=b$
      begin{array}{c|ccc}
      & e & a & b \ hline
      e & e & a & b \
      a & a & b\
      b & b & \
      end{array}

      and now the diagram has a unique completion
      begin{array}{c|ccc}
      & e & a & b \ hline
      e & e & a & b \
      a & a & b & e \
      b & b & e & a\
      end{array}

      Then $a^3=a^2a=ba=e$.



      You can try your hand with a four element group and see that the diagram admits different completions.



      begin{array}{c|cccc}
      & e & a & b & c \ hline
      e & e & a & b & c \
      a & a & \
      b & b & \
      c & c &
      end{array}

      In the slot for $a^2$ we can put any of $e$, $b$ or $c$. Let's try with $e$:
      begin{array}{c|cccc}
      & e & a & b & c \ hline
      e & e & a & b & c \
      a & a & e\
      b & b & \
      c & c &
      end{array}

      Then we are forced to put in the following
      begin{array}{c|cccc}
      & e & a & b & c \ hline
      e & e & a & b & c \
      a & a & e & c & b \
      b & b & c\
      c & c & b
      end{array}

      For $b^2$ we can have either $e$ or $c$. Let's try $e$:
      begin{array}{c|cccc}
      & e & a & b & c \ hline
      e & e & a & b & c \
      a & a & e & c & b \
      b & b & c & e\
      c & c & b &
      end{array}

      Now we can complete:
      begin{array}{c|cccc}
      & e & a & b & c \ hline
      e & e & a & b & c \
      a & a & e & c & b \
      b & b & c & e & a\
      c & c & b & a & e
      end{array}

      It would be very tedious to verify that this diagram indeed produces a group. It does and is the product of two cyclic groups of order two; it is also the subgroup of $S_4$ given by ${id,(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)}$.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        3














        Instead of “keeping multiplying” it's easier to fill the Cayley diagram: in every row and column every element must appear.



        begin{array}{c|ccc}
        & e & a & b \ hline
        e & e & a & b \
        a & a & \
        b & b & \
        end{array}

        In the slot corresponding to $a^2$ you cannot put $e$, because otherwise the slot for $ab$ would contain $b$. Hence $a^2=b$
        begin{array}{c|ccc}
        & e & a & b \ hline
        e & e & a & b \
        a & a & b\
        b & b & \
        end{array}

        and now the diagram has a unique completion
        begin{array}{c|ccc}
        & e & a & b \ hline
        e & e & a & b \
        a & a & b & e \
        b & b & e & a\
        end{array}

        Then $a^3=a^2a=ba=e$.



        You can try your hand with a four element group and see that the diagram admits different completions.



        begin{array}{c|cccc}
        & e & a & b & c \ hline
        e & e & a & b & c \
        a & a & \
        b & b & \
        c & c &
        end{array}

        In the slot for $a^2$ we can put any of $e$, $b$ or $c$. Let's try with $e$:
        begin{array}{c|cccc}
        & e & a & b & c \ hline
        e & e & a & b & c \
        a & a & e\
        b & b & \
        c & c &
        end{array}

        Then we are forced to put in the following
        begin{array}{c|cccc}
        & e & a & b & c \ hline
        e & e & a & b & c \
        a & a & e & c & b \
        b & b & c\
        c & c & b
        end{array}

        For $b^2$ we can have either $e$ or $c$. Let's try $e$:
        begin{array}{c|cccc}
        & e & a & b & c \ hline
        e & e & a & b & c \
        a & a & e & c & b \
        b & b & c & e\
        c & c & b &
        end{array}

        Now we can complete:
        begin{array}{c|cccc}
        & e & a & b & c \ hline
        e & e & a & b & c \
        a & a & e & c & b \
        b & b & c & e & a\
        c & c & b & a & e
        end{array}

        It would be very tedious to verify that this diagram indeed produces a group. It does and is the product of two cyclic groups of order two; it is also the subgroup of $S_4$ given by ${id,(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)}$.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          3












          3








          3






          Instead of “keeping multiplying” it's easier to fill the Cayley diagram: in every row and column every element must appear.



          begin{array}{c|ccc}
          & e & a & b \ hline
          e & e & a & b \
          a & a & \
          b & b & \
          end{array}

          In the slot corresponding to $a^2$ you cannot put $e$, because otherwise the slot for $ab$ would contain $b$. Hence $a^2=b$
          begin{array}{c|ccc}
          & e & a & b \ hline
          e & e & a & b \
          a & a & b\
          b & b & \
          end{array}

          and now the diagram has a unique completion
          begin{array}{c|ccc}
          & e & a & b \ hline
          e & e & a & b \
          a & a & b & e \
          b & b & e & a\
          end{array}

          Then $a^3=a^2a=ba=e$.



          You can try your hand with a four element group and see that the diagram admits different completions.



          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & \
          b & b & \
          c & c &
          end{array}

          In the slot for $a^2$ we can put any of $e$, $b$ or $c$. Let's try with $e$:
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e\
          b & b & \
          c & c &
          end{array}

          Then we are forced to put in the following
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e & c & b \
          b & b & c\
          c & c & b
          end{array}

          For $b^2$ we can have either $e$ or $c$. Let's try $e$:
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e & c & b \
          b & b & c & e\
          c & c & b &
          end{array}

          Now we can complete:
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e & c & b \
          b & b & c & e & a\
          c & c & b & a & e
          end{array}

          It would be very tedious to verify that this diagram indeed produces a group. It does and is the product of two cyclic groups of order two; it is also the subgroup of $S_4$ given by ${id,(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)}$.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Instead of “keeping multiplying” it's easier to fill the Cayley diagram: in every row and column every element must appear.



          begin{array}{c|ccc}
          & e & a & b \ hline
          e & e & a & b \
          a & a & \
          b & b & \
          end{array}

          In the slot corresponding to $a^2$ you cannot put $e$, because otherwise the slot for $ab$ would contain $b$. Hence $a^2=b$
          begin{array}{c|ccc}
          & e & a & b \ hline
          e & e & a & b \
          a & a & b\
          b & b & \
          end{array}

          and now the diagram has a unique completion
          begin{array}{c|ccc}
          & e & a & b \ hline
          e & e & a & b \
          a & a & b & e \
          b & b & e & a\
          end{array}

          Then $a^3=a^2a=ba=e$.



          You can try your hand with a four element group and see that the diagram admits different completions.



          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & \
          b & b & \
          c & c &
          end{array}

          In the slot for $a^2$ we can put any of $e$, $b$ or $c$. Let's try with $e$:
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e\
          b & b & \
          c & c &
          end{array}

          Then we are forced to put in the following
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e & c & b \
          b & b & c\
          c & c & b
          end{array}

          For $b^2$ we can have either $e$ or $c$. Let's try $e$:
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e & c & b \
          b & b & c & e\
          c & c & b &
          end{array}

          Now we can complete:
          begin{array}{c|cccc}
          & e & a & b & c \ hline
          e & e & a & b & c \
          a & a & e & c & b \
          b & b & c & e & a\
          c & c & b & a & e
          end{array}

          It would be very tedious to verify that this diagram indeed produces a group. It does and is the product of two cyclic groups of order two; it is also the subgroup of $S_4$ given by ${id,(12)(34),(13)(24),(14)(23)}$.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          egreg

          178k1484201




          178k1484201























              0














              According to Lagrange's theorem, a group with 3 elements can have only the trivial subgroups. Because 3 is prime only 1 and 3 divide it. So, only possible subgroups are ${e}$ with one element and $G$ with three. For $x in G$ that is not $e$ a group generated with this element,
              $<x>$ must be whole $G$. So $G$ is cyclic.



              A group with 4 elements can have untrivial subgroups as 4 isn't prime. For instance $mathbb{Z_4} = {0, 1, 2, 3}$ with $+$ is cyclic. It is generated with the element $1$. But group $mathbb{Z_2} times mathbb{Z_2} = {(0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1)}$ with $+$ defined as $(a, b) + (a', b') = (a + a', b + b')$ is not cyclic.






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                0














                According to Lagrange's theorem, a group with 3 elements can have only the trivial subgroups. Because 3 is prime only 1 and 3 divide it. So, only possible subgroups are ${e}$ with one element and $G$ with three. For $x in G$ that is not $e$ a group generated with this element,
                $<x>$ must be whole $G$. So $G$ is cyclic.



                A group with 4 elements can have untrivial subgroups as 4 isn't prime. For instance $mathbb{Z_4} = {0, 1, 2, 3}$ with $+$ is cyclic. It is generated with the element $1$. But group $mathbb{Z_2} times mathbb{Z_2} = {(0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1)}$ with $+$ defined as $(a, b) + (a', b') = (a + a', b + b')$ is not cyclic.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  According to Lagrange's theorem, a group with 3 elements can have only the trivial subgroups. Because 3 is prime only 1 and 3 divide it. So, only possible subgroups are ${e}$ with one element and $G$ with three. For $x in G$ that is not $e$ a group generated with this element,
                  $<x>$ must be whole $G$. So $G$ is cyclic.



                  A group with 4 elements can have untrivial subgroups as 4 isn't prime. For instance $mathbb{Z_4} = {0, 1, 2, 3}$ with $+$ is cyclic. It is generated with the element $1$. But group $mathbb{Z_2} times mathbb{Z_2} = {(0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1)}$ with $+$ defined as $(a, b) + (a', b') = (a + a', b + b')$ is not cyclic.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  According to Lagrange's theorem, a group with 3 elements can have only the trivial subgroups. Because 3 is prime only 1 and 3 divide it. So, only possible subgroups are ${e}$ with one element and $G$ with three. For $x in G$ that is not $e$ a group generated with this element,
                  $<x>$ must be whole $G$. So $G$ is cyclic.



                  A group with 4 elements can have untrivial subgroups as 4 isn't prime. For instance $mathbb{Z_4} = {0, 1, 2, 3}$ with $+$ is cyclic. It is generated with the element $1$. But group $mathbb{Z_2} times mathbb{Z_2} = {(0, 0), (1, 0), (0, 1), (1, 1)}$ with $+$ defined as $(a, b) + (a', b') = (a + a', b + b')$ is not cyclic.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Coupeau

                  876




                  876






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060789%2fprove-that-a-group-with-3-elements-is-cyclic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      An IMO inspired problem

                      Management

                      Investment