About the Bessel function
I was looking at this Bessel function, we got these two sums
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{{4n choose 2n}{2n choose n}}{[(2n-1)!!]^2}=cosleft(frac{4}{x}right)J_0left(frac{4}{x}right)tag1$$
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{H_{n,k}}{(n!)^2}=zeta(k)J_0left(frac{2}{x}right)tag2$$
Where $H_{n,k}$ and $zeta(k)$
Just out of curiosity.
How does one show that the sums are correct?
sequences-and-series
add a comment |
I was looking at this Bessel function, we got these two sums
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{{4n choose 2n}{2n choose n}}{[(2n-1)!!]^2}=cosleft(frac{4}{x}right)J_0left(frac{4}{x}right)tag1$$
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{H_{n,k}}{(n!)^2}=zeta(k)J_0left(frac{2}{x}right)tag2$$
Where $H_{n,k}$ and $zeta(k)$
Just out of curiosity.
How does one show that the sums are correct?
sequences-and-series
add a comment |
I was looking at this Bessel function, we got these two sums
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{{4n choose 2n}{2n choose n}}{[(2n-1)!!]^2}=cosleft(frac{4}{x}right)J_0left(frac{4}{x}right)tag1$$
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{H_{n,k}}{(n!)^2}=zeta(k)J_0left(frac{2}{x}right)tag2$$
Where $H_{n,k}$ and $zeta(k)$
Just out of curiosity.
How does one show that the sums are correct?
sequences-and-series
I was looking at this Bessel function, we got these two sums
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{{4n choose 2n}{2n choose n}}{[(2n-1)!!]^2}=cosleft(frac{4}{x}right)J_0left(frac{4}{x}right)tag1$$
$$sum_{n=0}^{infty}left(-frac{1}{x^2}right)^nfrac{H_{n,k}}{(n!)^2}=zeta(k)J_0left(frac{2}{x}right)tag2$$
Where $H_{n,k}$ and $zeta(k)$
Just out of curiosity.
How does one show that the sums are correct?
sequences-and-series
sequences-and-series
asked Jan 4 at 9:41
user583851user583851
4117
4117
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
About $(2)$: we may replace $x$ by $frac{1}{x}$, then consider the Laplace transform of both sides.
The problem boils down to showing
$$sum_{ngeq 0}binom{2n}{n}frac{(-1)^nH_{n}^{(k)}}{s^{2n+1}} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
where
$$ H_n^{(k)}=sum_{m=1}^{n}frac{1}{m^k}=zeta(k)-int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}e^{-nz}}{(k-1)!}cdotfrac{dz}{e^z-1}$$
allows to state the previous (conjectural) identity as
$$ frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}}-frac{1}{(k-1)!}color{blue}{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}}{(e^z-1)sqrt{s^2+4 e^{-z}}},dz} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
or in the form: the $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ integral is constantly zero for any $s$. This is not true, since the blue integral is a decreasing function with respect to the parameter $s$. In particular $(2)$ is not correct.
$(1)$ is correct: it is enough to consider the Cauchy product between the Maclaurin series of $cos(4x)$ and $J_0(4x)$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061464%2fabout-the-bessel-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
About $(2)$: we may replace $x$ by $frac{1}{x}$, then consider the Laplace transform of both sides.
The problem boils down to showing
$$sum_{ngeq 0}binom{2n}{n}frac{(-1)^nH_{n}^{(k)}}{s^{2n+1}} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
where
$$ H_n^{(k)}=sum_{m=1}^{n}frac{1}{m^k}=zeta(k)-int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}e^{-nz}}{(k-1)!}cdotfrac{dz}{e^z-1}$$
allows to state the previous (conjectural) identity as
$$ frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}}-frac{1}{(k-1)!}color{blue}{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}}{(e^z-1)sqrt{s^2+4 e^{-z}}},dz} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
or in the form: the $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ integral is constantly zero for any $s$. This is not true, since the blue integral is a decreasing function with respect to the parameter $s$. In particular $(2)$ is not correct.
$(1)$ is correct: it is enough to consider the Cauchy product between the Maclaurin series of $cos(4x)$ and $J_0(4x)$.
add a comment |
About $(2)$: we may replace $x$ by $frac{1}{x}$, then consider the Laplace transform of both sides.
The problem boils down to showing
$$sum_{ngeq 0}binom{2n}{n}frac{(-1)^nH_{n}^{(k)}}{s^{2n+1}} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
where
$$ H_n^{(k)}=sum_{m=1}^{n}frac{1}{m^k}=zeta(k)-int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}e^{-nz}}{(k-1)!}cdotfrac{dz}{e^z-1}$$
allows to state the previous (conjectural) identity as
$$ frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}}-frac{1}{(k-1)!}color{blue}{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}}{(e^z-1)sqrt{s^2+4 e^{-z}}},dz} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
or in the form: the $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ integral is constantly zero for any $s$. This is not true, since the blue integral is a decreasing function with respect to the parameter $s$. In particular $(2)$ is not correct.
$(1)$ is correct: it is enough to consider the Cauchy product between the Maclaurin series of $cos(4x)$ and $J_0(4x)$.
add a comment |
About $(2)$: we may replace $x$ by $frac{1}{x}$, then consider the Laplace transform of both sides.
The problem boils down to showing
$$sum_{ngeq 0}binom{2n}{n}frac{(-1)^nH_{n}^{(k)}}{s^{2n+1}} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
where
$$ H_n^{(k)}=sum_{m=1}^{n}frac{1}{m^k}=zeta(k)-int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}e^{-nz}}{(k-1)!}cdotfrac{dz}{e^z-1}$$
allows to state the previous (conjectural) identity as
$$ frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}}-frac{1}{(k-1)!}color{blue}{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}}{(e^z-1)sqrt{s^2+4 e^{-z}}},dz} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
or in the form: the $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ integral is constantly zero for any $s$. This is not true, since the blue integral is a decreasing function with respect to the parameter $s$. In particular $(2)$ is not correct.
$(1)$ is correct: it is enough to consider the Cauchy product between the Maclaurin series of $cos(4x)$ and $J_0(4x)$.
About $(2)$: we may replace $x$ by $frac{1}{x}$, then consider the Laplace transform of both sides.
The problem boils down to showing
$$sum_{ngeq 0}binom{2n}{n}frac{(-1)^nH_{n}^{(k)}}{s^{2n+1}} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
where
$$ H_n^{(k)}=sum_{m=1}^{n}frac{1}{m^k}=zeta(k)-int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}e^{-nz}}{(k-1)!}cdotfrac{dz}{e^z-1}$$
allows to state the previous (conjectural) identity as
$$ frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}}-frac{1}{(k-1)!}color{blue}{int_{0}^{+infty}frac{z^{k-1}}{(e^z-1)sqrt{s^2+4 e^{-z}}},dz} = frac{zeta(k)}{sqrt{4+s^2}} $$
or in the form: the $color{blue}{text{blue}}$ integral is constantly zero for any $s$. This is not true, since the blue integral is a decreasing function with respect to the parameter $s$. In particular $(2)$ is not correct.
$(1)$ is correct: it is enough to consider the Cauchy product between the Maclaurin series of $cos(4x)$ and $J_0(4x)$.
answered Jan 4 at 17:47
Jack D'AurizioJack D'Aurizio
287k33280658
287k33280658
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061464%2fabout-the-bessel-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown