Canon EOS 800D vs 80D | Which one is better for macro photography?












3














I am looking to buy a new camera body primarily for Macro photography. I am currently shooting on a 2008 spec Canon EOS 450D, but want to upgrade. I have a budget of AUD$1000 and am looking at either a Canon EOS 800D or EOS 80D.



Which one is better for Macro photography and are there any other Canon models that are better at the sub $1000 AUD price point?










share|improve this question









New contributor




O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I already have a Canon EF 100mm macro lens with IS.
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 5




    So what about 450D + EF 100mm macro is not working for you?
    – xiota
    yesterday






  • 3




    @OBhavsar please include all relevant information in your question, rather than stringing a few extra bits into the comments.
    – osullic
    yesterday






  • 1




    @osullic Noted. I'm still pretty new to stack exchange
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 2




    @OBhavsar you can edit your question with the info from the comments. Comments can then be deleted. And welcome to StackExchange!
    – osullic
    yesterday


















3














I am looking to buy a new camera body primarily for Macro photography. I am currently shooting on a 2008 spec Canon EOS 450D, but want to upgrade. I have a budget of AUD$1000 and am looking at either a Canon EOS 800D or EOS 80D.



Which one is better for Macro photography and are there any other Canon models that are better at the sub $1000 AUD price point?










share|improve this question









New contributor




O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 1




    I already have a Canon EF 100mm macro lens with IS.
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 5




    So what about 450D + EF 100mm macro is not working for you?
    – xiota
    yesterday






  • 3




    @OBhavsar please include all relevant information in your question, rather than stringing a few extra bits into the comments.
    – osullic
    yesterday






  • 1




    @osullic Noted. I'm still pretty new to stack exchange
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 2




    @OBhavsar you can edit your question with the info from the comments. Comments can then be deleted. And welcome to StackExchange!
    – osullic
    yesterday
















3












3








3







I am looking to buy a new camera body primarily for Macro photography. I am currently shooting on a 2008 spec Canon EOS 450D, but want to upgrade. I have a budget of AUD$1000 and am looking at either a Canon EOS 800D or EOS 80D.



Which one is better for Macro photography and are there any other Canon models that are better at the sub $1000 AUD price point?










share|improve this question









New contributor




O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I am looking to buy a new camera body primarily for Macro photography. I am currently shooting on a 2008 spec Canon EOS 450D, but want to upgrade. I have a budget of AUD$1000 and am looking at either a Canon EOS 800D or EOS 80D.



Which one is better for Macro photography and are there any other Canon models that are better at the sub $1000 AUD price point?







canon dslr macro canon-450d canon-80d






share|improve this question









New contributor




O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









xiota

8,56321449




8,56321449






New contributor




O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









O BhavsarO Bhavsar

183




183




New contributor




O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






O Bhavsar is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 1




    I already have a Canon EF 100mm macro lens with IS.
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 5




    So what about 450D + EF 100mm macro is not working for you?
    – xiota
    yesterday






  • 3




    @OBhavsar please include all relevant information in your question, rather than stringing a few extra bits into the comments.
    – osullic
    yesterday






  • 1




    @osullic Noted. I'm still pretty new to stack exchange
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 2




    @OBhavsar you can edit your question with the info from the comments. Comments can then be deleted. And welcome to StackExchange!
    – osullic
    yesterday
















  • 1




    I already have a Canon EF 100mm macro lens with IS.
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 5




    So what about 450D + EF 100mm macro is not working for you?
    – xiota
    yesterday






  • 3




    @OBhavsar please include all relevant information in your question, rather than stringing a few extra bits into the comments.
    – osullic
    yesterday






  • 1




    @osullic Noted. I'm still pretty new to stack exchange
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 2




    @OBhavsar you can edit your question with the info from the comments. Comments can then be deleted. And welcome to StackExchange!
    – osullic
    yesterday










1




1




I already have a Canon EF 100mm macro lens with IS.
– O Bhavsar
yesterday




I already have a Canon EF 100mm macro lens with IS.
– O Bhavsar
yesterday




5




5




So what about 450D + EF 100mm macro is not working for you?
– xiota
yesterday




So what about 450D + EF 100mm macro is not working for you?
– xiota
yesterday




3




3




@OBhavsar please include all relevant information in your question, rather than stringing a few extra bits into the comments.
– osullic
yesterday




@OBhavsar please include all relevant information in your question, rather than stringing a few extra bits into the comments.
– osullic
yesterday




1




1




@osullic Noted. I'm still pretty new to stack exchange
– O Bhavsar
yesterday




@osullic Noted. I'm still pretty new to stack exchange
– O Bhavsar
yesterday




2




2




@OBhavsar you can edit your question with the info from the comments. Comments can then be deleted. And welcome to StackExchange!
– osullic
yesterday






@OBhavsar you can edit your question with the info from the comments. Comments can then be deleted. And welcome to StackExchange!
– osullic
yesterday












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11














Macro and close-up photography require having the correct lenses. Upgrading the body won't do much good. If you don't already have suitable lenses, the money would be better spent getting one.



Before upgrading the body, it would be helpful to first identify what is unsatisfactory about your current setup. Otherwise, you risk getting another camera with the same problems as your current one.



Personally, when I do closeup work, I prefer "Live View" with focus peaking. As far as I'm aware, Canon DSLRs do not have focus peaking without installing unsupported third-party firmware. So if I were in your situation, it would do no good to switch to another Canon DSLR. You can consider a mirrorless camera, where focus peaking is standard. However, because of the need for new lenses, it would likely be outside of your current budget.



If you are determined to get another Canon DSLR, you can decide by flipping a coin. As far as macro is concerned, you would be equally likely to be satisfied by either of the cameras you are currently considering.






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your help. Which mirrorless camera would you recommend for a budget under AUD$1000
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 1




    If you want focus peaking in live view with Canon cameras, you can install the "Magic Lantern" third-party firmware.
    – Logan Pickup
    yesterday










  • Thanks Logan. Is there a website listing the steps to flashing it and a link to the download?
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday










  • Magic Lantern
    – xiota
    yesterday










  • There have been many masterful macro photos taken without focus peaking. There will be many more. Focus peaking is nice, but it is far from necessary for top notch macro work.
    – Michael C
    yesterday



















19














Macro photography is all about the skill of the photographer, lenses, and lighting - in that order.



Only after the former have been considered should the differences between two APS-C cameras from the same manufacturer that appear to both use the same sensor be considered as a relatively minor difference.



The primary differences between the EOS Rebel T7i/800D and the EOS 80D are:




  • The 80D has an additional control wheel on the back that allows faster handling, particularly in Manual exposure mode.

  • The 80D allows AFMA (Autofocus Micro Adjustment), the Rebel T7i/800D does not.

  • The 80D has a minimum exposure time of 1/8000 second, the Rebel T7i/700D has a minimum exposure time of 1/4000 second.

  • The 80D has a larger viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.95X magnification, compared to the Rebel T7i/800D's 95% coverage with only 0.82X magnification. In other words the 80D viewfinder will appear to be about 16% larger (21.375 x 14.155 mm) while showing the camera's full field of view, compared to the smaller viewfinder of the Rebel T7i/800D (18.45 x 12.29 mm) that only shows 95% of the camera's FoV. The 80D's viewfinder also has a brighter pentaprism vs the dimmer pentamirror of the Rebel T7i/800D and 3mm longer eye relief (22mm vs. 19mm).

  • The 80D can shoot at 7 fps in burst mode, the Rebel T7i/800D maxes out at 6 fps.

  • Both cameras have built-in Wi-Fi with NFC, only the Rebel T7i/800D also has Bluetooth.

  • The 80D uses the 1865 mAh LP-E6N battery (shared by most of Canon's xD series cameras other than the 1D series) and has a higher battery rating than the Rebel T7i/800D that uses the 1040 mAh LP-E17 battery.

  • The 80D has a shutter durability rating of 100,000 actuations. The Rebel T7i/800D does not have a published shutter durability rating.


None of these differences are directly applicable to shooting Macro photography in any significant way.




  • Macro photography tends to be done very methodically, so the extra control wheel doesn't really make much of a difference.

  • Most macro photography is done from a tripod using careful manual focus or Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View, so the lack of AFMA when doing PDAF via the viewfinder is a moot point. Much Macro photography is done using the lens' MFD (minimum focus distance) and then adjusting the camera to subject distance via a macro rail to bring the subject into focus.

  • Macro photography usually struggles with having enough light, so the lack of 1/8000 second shutter time is not an issue.

  • The differences between the viewfinders is not a consideration if you plan to use Live View, as many macro photographers do, since both cameras have the same rear LCD screen.

  • Burst mode doesn't usually apply to macro photography unless one is photographing skittish insects or other moving subjects.

  • Bluetooth (or lack thereof), battery life, and shutter durability ratings are not direct considerations for macro photography, but may be considerations for the total value of a camera to a buyer.


For doing Macro photography the way it is practiced by those who do the best Macro work, there's no real difference between the Canon EOS 80D and the Canon EOS Rebel T7i/800D.






share|improve this answer























  • I shoot Nikon, but another consideration is frame size. Both the 80D and 800D are crop sensors and macro is one place where, at least personally, I actually prefer to shoot crop over full frame. For the same composition you can shoot with a larger subject distance which gives you more depth of field at any given aperture, saving you precious light. It actually does get you better IQ over FF at the same sensor resolution if the lens itself is sufficiently sharp.
    – J...
    14 hours ago












  • @J... Well, sort of. MFD (minimum focus distance) of any particular lens will be the same whether it is mounted on a crop or FF camera. What changes is the angle of view. With a crop sensor you need a lens with a wider AoV to get the same framing at the same subject distance. If you are backing up to get the same framing as you would get with the same lens on a FF body then you are not using the MFD, and you're not getting MM and true 1:1 macro reproduction ratios. You're getting greater DoF because you are increasing the subject distance, but you're also decreasing magnification.
    – Michael C
    14 hours ago










  • Yes, but 1:1 isn't the whole story. I'll use my example of the D7100 (24MP DX) vs the D750 (24MP FF). 1:1 only tells you that the image at the sensor will be the same size as the real object. A 10mm spider will make a 10mm image. On a 36mm FF sensor that's 27% of the frame width. On a 24mm sensor it's 46% of the frame - and both sensors have the same number of pixels. The DX pixels are just smaller. At MFD the DX sensor gives you more magnification and more composition options (assuming the glass is good enough to not limit resolution). At the same FF comp, you just get more light.
    – J...
    11 hours ago












  • In other words, to get the same composition as the FF at MFD, the DX body actually has to back up - the DX can frame any macro shot that the FF can, and more. Backing up can also make lighting easier - a shot you might only have been able to light with ring on FF you might be able to clamshell with DX, for example. In natural light you get more angles to shoot from without being in your own shadow. It's the complete opposite of almost every other type of photography where the compositional advantages are all on DX instead of the other way around.
    – J...
    11 hours ago










  • @J... But you've also got to account for the higher enlargement ratio to get DX images to the same display size as FF images, which gives back much, but not all, of the DoF advantage from shooting from further away (or with a shorter focal length lens from the same distance).
    – Michael C
    4 hours ago



















-1














The very general rule with Canon is that lower numbered models and higher numbered "marks" are better (and therefore more expensive). So 500D < 50D < 5D, and 5D Mark III < 5D Mark IV.



On the other hand, whether for example 7D Mark II is better than 5D Mark I is a much more complicated question, because some aspects of a recent model will typically have some better hardware than an older model with a lower number.



As a caveat I'd like to include some advice I got from a good photographer: unless your budget is massive you should prioritize spending your money on good lenses rather than a good body.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    It might be worth saying that lower being better is true in so far as 80D being higher spec than 800D, but within the tens, hundreds and thousands higher numbers are newer models (e.g. 800D is newer and better than 700D). For single digit models like the 1D and 5D, the smaller numbers are generally more expensive/higher spec and newer releases are indicated by the mark number. expertreviews.co.uk/dslrs/1405777/… has a better explanation than I can fit in a comment.
    – Nick Kennedy
    yesterday








  • 2




    This is simply wrong, as it implies that the asker's existing 450D is better than the 800D they're considering buying as a replacement. And, really, it does nothing at all to answer the question. The question asks about suitability for macro work and you don't mention that at all.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday










  • Hence why I stated it as a "general rule," rather than an absolute. The vast majority of models are better than all the ones with higher numbers in Canon's case. As for macro work, like the accepted answer I mention that OP should prioritize lenses over cameras.
    – l0b0
    18 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "61"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






O Bhavsar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104041%2fcanon-eos-800d-vs-80d-which-one-is-better-for-macro-photography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









11














Macro and close-up photography require having the correct lenses. Upgrading the body won't do much good. If you don't already have suitable lenses, the money would be better spent getting one.



Before upgrading the body, it would be helpful to first identify what is unsatisfactory about your current setup. Otherwise, you risk getting another camera with the same problems as your current one.



Personally, when I do closeup work, I prefer "Live View" with focus peaking. As far as I'm aware, Canon DSLRs do not have focus peaking without installing unsupported third-party firmware. So if I were in your situation, it would do no good to switch to another Canon DSLR. You can consider a mirrorless camera, where focus peaking is standard. However, because of the need for new lenses, it would likely be outside of your current budget.



If you are determined to get another Canon DSLR, you can decide by flipping a coin. As far as macro is concerned, you would be equally likely to be satisfied by either of the cameras you are currently considering.






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your help. Which mirrorless camera would you recommend for a budget under AUD$1000
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 1




    If you want focus peaking in live view with Canon cameras, you can install the "Magic Lantern" third-party firmware.
    – Logan Pickup
    yesterday










  • Thanks Logan. Is there a website listing the steps to flashing it and a link to the download?
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday










  • Magic Lantern
    – xiota
    yesterday










  • There have been many masterful macro photos taken without focus peaking. There will be many more. Focus peaking is nice, but it is far from necessary for top notch macro work.
    – Michael C
    yesterday
















11














Macro and close-up photography require having the correct lenses. Upgrading the body won't do much good. If you don't already have suitable lenses, the money would be better spent getting one.



Before upgrading the body, it would be helpful to first identify what is unsatisfactory about your current setup. Otherwise, you risk getting another camera with the same problems as your current one.



Personally, when I do closeup work, I prefer "Live View" with focus peaking. As far as I'm aware, Canon DSLRs do not have focus peaking without installing unsupported third-party firmware. So if I were in your situation, it would do no good to switch to another Canon DSLR. You can consider a mirrorless camera, where focus peaking is standard. However, because of the need for new lenses, it would likely be outside of your current budget.



If you are determined to get another Canon DSLR, you can decide by flipping a coin. As far as macro is concerned, you would be equally likely to be satisfied by either of the cameras you are currently considering.






share|improve this answer























  • Thank you for your help. Which mirrorless camera would you recommend for a budget under AUD$1000
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 1




    If you want focus peaking in live view with Canon cameras, you can install the "Magic Lantern" third-party firmware.
    – Logan Pickup
    yesterday










  • Thanks Logan. Is there a website listing the steps to flashing it and a link to the download?
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday










  • Magic Lantern
    – xiota
    yesterday










  • There have been many masterful macro photos taken without focus peaking. There will be many more. Focus peaking is nice, but it is far from necessary for top notch macro work.
    – Michael C
    yesterday














11












11








11






Macro and close-up photography require having the correct lenses. Upgrading the body won't do much good. If you don't already have suitable lenses, the money would be better spent getting one.



Before upgrading the body, it would be helpful to first identify what is unsatisfactory about your current setup. Otherwise, you risk getting another camera with the same problems as your current one.



Personally, when I do closeup work, I prefer "Live View" with focus peaking. As far as I'm aware, Canon DSLRs do not have focus peaking without installing unsupported third-party firmware. So if I were in your situation, it would do no good to switch to another Canon DSLR. You can consider a mirrorless camera, where focus peaking is standard. However, because of the need for new lenses, it would likely be outside of your current budget.



If you are determined to get another Canon DSLR, you can decide by flipping a coin. As far as macro is concerned, you would be equally likely to be satisfied by either of the cameras you are currently considering.






share|improve this answer














Macro and close-up photography require having the correct lenses. Upgrading the body won't do much good. If you don't already have suitable lenses, the money would be better spent getting one.



Before upgrading the body, it would be helpful to first identify what is unsatisfactory about your current setup. Otherwise, you risk getting another camera with the same problems as your current one.



Personally, when I do closeup work, I prefer "Live View" with focus peaking. As far as I'm aware, Canon DSLRs do not have focus peaking without installing unsupported third-party firmware. So if I were in your situation, it would do no good to switch to another Canon DSLR. You can consider a mirrorless camera, where focus peaking is standard. However, because of the need for new lenses, it would likely be outside of your current budget.



If you are determined to get another Canon DSLR, you can decide by flipping a coin. As far as macro is concerned, you would be equally likely to be satisfied by either of the cameras you are currently considering.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 9 hours ago

























answered yesterday









xiotaxiota

8,56321449




8,56321449












  • Thank you for your help. Which mirrorless camera would you recommend for a budget under AUD$1000
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 1




    If you want focus peaking in live view with Canon cameras, you can install the "Magic Lantern" third-party firmware.
    – Logan Pickup
    yesterday










  • Thanks Logan. Is there a website listing the steps to flashing it and a link to the download?
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday










  • Magic Lantern
    – xiota
    yesterday










  • There have been many masterful macro photos taken without focus peaking. There will be many more. Focus peaking is nice, but it is far from necessary for top notch macro work.
    – Michael C
    yesterday


















  • Thank you for your help. Which mirrorless camera would you recommend for a budget under AUD$1000
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday






  • 1




    If you want focus peaking in live view with Canon cameras, you can install the "Magic Lantern" third-party firmware.
    – Logan Pickup
    yesterday










  • Thanks Logan. Is there a website listing the steps to flashing it and a link to the download?
    – O Bhavsar
    yesterday










  • Magic Lantern
    – xiota
    yesterday










  • There have been many masterful macro photos taken without focus peaking. There will be many more. Focus peaking is nice, but it is far from necessary for top notch macro work.
    – Michael C
    yesterday
















Thank you for your help. Which mirrorless camera would you recommend for a budget under AUD$1000
– O Bhavsar
yesterday




Thank you for your help. Which mirrorless camera would you recommend for a budget under AUD$1000
– O Bhavsar
yesterday




1




1




If you want focus peaking in live view with Canon cameras, you can install the "Magic Lantern" third-party firmware.
– Logan Pickup
yesterday




If you want focus peaking in live view with Canon cameras, you can install the "Magic Lantern" third-party firmware.
– Logan Pickup
yesterday












Thanks Logan. Is there a website listing the steps to flashing it and a link to the download?
– O Bhavsar
yesterday




Thanks Logan. Is there a website listing the steps to flashing it and a link to the download?
– O Bhavsar
yesterday












Magic Lantern
– xiota
yesterday




Magic Lantern
– xiota
yesterday












There have been many masterful macro photos taken without focus peaking. There will be many more. Focus peaking is nice, but it is far from necessary for top notch macro work.
– Michael C
yesterday




There have been many masterful macro photos taken without focus peaking. There will be many more. Focus peaking is nice, but it is far from necessary for top notch macro work.
– Michael C
yesterday













19














Macro photography is all about the skill of the photographer, lenses, and lighting - in that order.



Only after the former have been considered should the differences between two APS-C cameras from the same manufacturer that appear to both use the same sensor be considered as a relatively minor difference.



The primary differences between the EOS Rebel T7i/800D and the EOS 80D are:




  • The 80D has an additional control wheel on the back that allows faster handling, particularly in Manual exposure mode.

  • The 80D allows AFMA (Autofocus Micro Adjustment), the Rebel T7i/800D does not.

  • The 80D has a minimum exposure time of 1/8000 second, the Rebel T7i/700D has a minimum exposure time of 1/4000 second.

  • The 80D has a larger viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.95X magnification, compared to the Rebel T7i/800D's 95% coverage with only 0.82X magnification. In other words the 80D viewfinder will appear to be about 16% larger (21.375 x 14.155 mm) while showing the camera's full field of view, compared to the smaller viewfinder of the Rebel T7i/800D (18.45 x 12.29 mm) that only shows 95% of the camera's FoV. The 80D's viewfinder also has a brighter pentaprism vs the dimmer pentamirror of the Rebel T7i/800D and 3mm longer eye relief (22mm vs. 19mm).

  • The 80D can shoot at 7 fps in burst mode, the Rebel T7i/800D maxes out at 6 fps.

  • Both cameras have built-in Wi-Fi with NFC, only the Rebel T7i/800D also has Bluetooth.

  • The 80D uses the 1865 mAh LP-E6N battery (shared by most of Canon's xD series cameras other than the 1D series) and has a higher battery rating than the Rebel T7i/800D that uses the 1040 mAh LP-E17 battery.

  • The 80D has a shutter durability rating of 100,000 actuations. The Rebel T7i/800D does not have a published shutter durability rating.


None of these differences are directly applicable to shooting Macro photography in any significant way.




  • Macro photography tends to be done very methodically, so the extra control wheel doesn't really make much of a difference.

  • Most macro photography is done from a tripod using careful manual focus or Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View, so the lack of AFMA when doing PDAF via the viewfinder is a moot point. Much Macro photography is done using the lens' MFD (minimum focus distance) and then adjusting the camera to subject distance via a macro rail to bring the subject into focus.

  • Macro photography usually struggles with having enough light, so the lack of 1/8000 second shutter time is not an issue.

  • The differences between the viewfinders is not a consideration if you plan to use Live View, as many macro photographers do, since both cameras have the same rear LCD screen.

  • Burst mode doesn't usually apply to macro photography unless one is photographing skittish insects or other moving subjects.

  • Bluetooth (or lack thereof), battery life, and shutter durability ratings are not direct considerations for macro photography, but may be considerations for the total value of a camera to a buyer.


For doing Macro photography the way it is practiced by those who do the best Macro work, there's no real difference between the Canon EOS 80D and the Canon EOS Rebel T7i/800D.






share|improve this answer























  • I shoot Nikon, but another consideration is frame size. Both the 80D and 800D are crop sensors and macro is one place where, at least personally, I actually prefer to shoot crop over full frame. For the same composition you can shoot with a larger subject distance which gives you more depth of field at any given aperture, saving you precious light. It actually does get you better IQ over FF at the same sensor resolution if the lens itself is sufficiently sharp.
    – J...
    14 hours ago












  • @J... Well, sort of. MFD (minimum focus distance) of any particular lens will be the same whether it is mounted on a crop or FF camera. What changes is the angle of view. With a crop sensor you need a lens with a wider AoV to get the same framing at the same subject distance. If you are backing up to get the same framing as you would get with the same lens on a FF body then you are not using the MFD, and you're not getting MM and true 1:1 macro reproduction ratios. You're getting greater DoF because you are increasing the subject distance, but you're also decreasing magnification.
    – Michael C
    14 hours ago










  • Yes, but 1:1 isn't the whole story. I'll use my example of the D7100 (24MP DX) vs the D750 (24MP FF). 1:1 only tells you that the image at the sensor will be the same size as the real object. A 10mm spider will make a 10mm image. On a 36mm FF sensor that's 27% of the frame width. On a 24mm sensor it's 46% of the frame - and both sensors have the same number of pixels. The DX pixels are just smaller. At MFD the DX sensor gives you more magnification and more composition options (assuming the glass is good enough to not limit resolution). At the same FF comp, you just get more light.
    – J...
    11 hours ago












  • In other words, to get the same composition as the FF at MFD, the DX body actually has to back up - the DX can frame any macro shot that the FF can, and more. Backing up can also make lighting easier - a shot you might only have been able to light with ring on FF you might be able to clamshell with DX, for example. In natural light you get more angles to shoot from without being in your own shadow. It's the complete opposite of almost every other type of photography where the compositional advantages are all on DX instead of the other way around.
    – J...
    11 hours ago










  • @J... But you've also got to account for the higher enlargement ratio to get DX images to the same display size as FF images, which gives back much, but not all, of the DoF advantage from shooting from further away (or with a shorter focal length lens from the same distance).
    – Michael C
    4 hours ago
















19














Macro photography is all about the skill of the photographer, lenses, and lighting - in that order.



Only after the former have been considered should the differences between two APS-C cameras from the same manufacturer that appear to both use the same sensor be considered as a relatively minor difference.



The primary differences between the EOS Rebel T7i/800D and the EOS 80D are:




  • The 80D has an additional control wheel on the back that allows faster handling, particularly in Manual exposure mode.

  • The 80D allows AFMA (Autofocus Micro Adjustment), the Rebel T7i/800D does not.

  • The 80D has a minimum exposure time of 1/8000 second, the Rebel T7i/700D has a minimum exposure time of 1/4000 second.

  • The 80D has a larger viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.95X magnification, compared to the Rebel T7i/800D's 95% coverage with only 0.82X magnification. In other words the 80D viewfinder will appear to be about 16% larger (21.375 x 14.155 mm) while showing the camera's full field of view, compared to the smaller viewfinder of the Rebel T7i/800D (18.45 x 12.29 mm) that only shows 95% of the camera's FoV. The 80D's viewfinder also has a brighter pentaprism vs the dimmer pentamirror of the Rebel T7i/800D and 3mm longer eye relief (22mm vs. 19mm).

  • The 80D can shoot at 7 fps in burst mode, the Rebel T7i/800D maxes out at 6 fps.

  • Both cameras have built-in Wi-Fi with NFC, only the Rebel T7i/800D also has Bluetooth.

  • The 80D uses the 1865 mAh LP-E6N battery (shared by most of Canon's xD series cameras other than the 1D series) and has a higher battery rating than the Rebel T7i/800D that uses the 1040 mAh LP-E17 battery.

  • The 80D has a shutter durability rating of 100,000 actuations. The Rebel T7i/800D does not have a published shutter durability rating.


None of these differences are directly applicable to shooting Macro photography in any significant way.




  • Macro photography tends to be done very methodically, so the extra control wheel doesn't really make much of a difference.

  • Most macro photography is done from a tripod using careful manual focus or Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View, so the lack of AFMA when doing PDAF via the viewfinder is a moot point. Much Macro photography is done using the lens' MFD (minimum focus distance) and then adjusting the camera to subject distance via a macro rail to bring the subject into focus.

  • Macro photography usually struggles with having enough light, so the lack of 1/8000 second shutter time is not an issue.

  • The differences between the viewfinders is not a consideration if you plan to use Live View, as many macro photographers do, since both cameras have the same rear LCD screen.

  • Burst mode doesn't usually apply to macro photography unless one is photographing skittish insects or other moving subjects.

  • Bluetooth (or lack thereof), battery life, and shutter durability ratings are not direct considerations for macro photography, but may be considerations for the total value of a camera to a buyer.


For doing Macro photography the way it is practiced by those who do the best Macro work, there's no real difference between the Canon EOS 80D and the Canon EOS Rebel T7i/800D.






share|improve this answer























  • I shoot Nikon, but another consideration is frame size. Both the 80D and 800D are crop sensors and macro is one place where, at least personally, I actually prefer to shoot crop over full frame. For the same composition you can shoot with a larger subject distance which gives you more depth of field at any given aperture, saving you precious light. It actually does get you better IQ over FF at the same sensor resolution if the lens itself is sufficiently sharp.
    – J...
    14 hours ago












  • @J... Well, sort of. MFD (minimum focus distance) of any particular lens will be the same whether it is mounted on a crop or FF camera. What changes is the angle of view. With a crop sensor you need a lens with a wider AoV to get the same framing at the same subject distance. If you are backing up to get the same framing as you would get with the same lens on a FF body then you are not using the MFD, and you're not getting MM and true 1:1 macro reproduction ratios. You're getting greater DoF because you are increasing the subject distance, but you're also decreasing magnification.
    – Michael C
    14 hours ago










  • Yes, but 1:1 isn't the whole story. I'll use my example of the D7100 (24MP DX) vs the D750 (24MP FF). 1:1 only tells you that the image at the sensor will be the same size as the real object. A 10mm spider will make a 10mm image. On a 36mm FF sensor that's 27% of the frame width. On a 24mm sensor it's 46% of the frame - and both sensors have the same number of pixels. The DX pixels are just smaller. At MFD the DX sensor gives you more magnification and more composition options (assuming the glass is good enough to not limit resolution). At the same FF comp, you just get more light.
    – J...
    11 hours ago












  • In other words, to get the same composition as the FF at MFD, the DX body actually has to back up - the DX can frame any macro shot that the FF can, and more. Backing up can also make lighting easier - a shot you might only have been able to light with ring on FF you might be able to clamshell with DX, for example. In natural light you get more angles to shoot from without being in your own shadow. It's the complete opposite of almost every other type of photography where the compositional advantages are all on DX instead of the other way around.
    – J...
    11 hours ago










  • @J... But you've also got to account for the higher enlargement ratio to get DX images to the same display size as FF images, which gives back much, but not all, of the DoF advantage from shooting from further away (or with a shorter focal length lens from the same distance).
    – Michael C
    4 hours ago














19












19








19






Macro photography is all about the skill of the photographer, lenses, and lighting - in that order.



Only after the former have been considered should the differences between two APS-C cameras from the same manufacturer that appear to both use the same sensor be considered as a relatively minor difference.



The primary differences between the EOS Rebel T7i/800D and the EOS 80D are:




  • The 80D has an additional control wheel on the back that allows faster handling, particularly in Manual exposure mode.

  • The 80D allows AFMA (Autofocus Micro Adjustment), the Rebel T7i/800D does not.

  • The 80D has a minimum exposure time of 1/8000 second, the Rebel T7i/700D has a minimum exposure time of 1/4000 second.

  • The 80D has a larger viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.95X magnification, compared to the Rebel T7i/800D's 95% coverage with only 0.82X magnification. In other words the 80D viewfinder will appear to be about 16% larger (21.375 x 14.155 mm) while showing the camera's full field of view, compared to the smaller viewfinder of the Rebel T7i/800D (18.45 x 12.29 mm) that only shows 95% of the camera's FoV. The 80D's viewfinder also has a brighter pentaprism vs the dimmer pentamirror of the Rebel T7i/800D and 3mm longer eye relief (22mm vs. 19mm).

  • The 80D can shoot at 7 fps in burst mode, the Rebel T7i/800D maxes out at 6 fps.

  • Both cameras have built-in Wi-Fi with NFC, only the Rebel T7i/800D also has Bluetooth.

  • The 80D uses the 1865 mAh LP-E6N battery (shared by most of Canon's xD series cameras other than the 1D series) and has a higher battery rating than the Rebel T7i/800D that uses the 1040 mAh LP-E17 battery.

  • The 80D has a shutter durability rating of 100,000 actuations. The Rebel T7i/800D does not have a published shutter durability rating.


None of these differences are directly applicable to shooting Macro photography in any significant way.




  • Macro photography tends to be done very methodically, so the extra control wheel doesn't really make much of a difference.

  • Most macro photography is done from a tripod using careful manual focus or Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View, so the lack of AFMA when doing PDAF via the viewfinder is a moot point. Much Macro photography is done using the lens' MFD (minimum focus distance) and then adjusting the camera to subject distance via a macro rail to bring the subject into focus.

  • Macro photography usually struggles with having enough light, so the lack of 1/8000 second shutter time is not an issue.

  • The differences between the viewfinders is not a consideration if you plan to use Live View, as many macro photographers do, since both cameras have the same rear LCD screen.

  • Burst mode doesn't usually apply to macro photography unless one is photographing skittish insects or other moving subjects.

  • Bluetooth (or lack thereof), battery life, and shutter durability ratings are not direct considerations for macro photography, but may be considerations for the total value of a camera to a buyer.


For doing Macro photography the way it is practiced by those who do the best Macro work, there's no real difference between the Canon EOS 80D and the Canon EOS Rebel T7i/800D.






share|improve this answer














Macro photography is all about the skill of the photographer, lenses, and lighting - in that order.



Only after the former have been considered should the differences between two APS-C cameras from the same manufacturer that appear to both use the same sensor be considered as a relatively minor difference.



The primary differences between the EOS Rebel T7i/800D and the EOS 80D are:




  • The 80D has an additional control wheel on the back that allows faster handling, particularly in Manual exposure mode.

  • The 80D allows AFMA (Autofocus Micro Adjustment), the Rebel T7i/800D does not.

  • The 80D has a minimum exposure time of 1/8000 second, the Rebel T7i/700D has a minimum exposure time of 1/4000 second.

  • The 80D has a larger viewfinder with 100% coverage and 0.95X magnification, compared to the Rebel T7i/800D's 95% coverage with only 0.82X magnification. In other words the 80D viewfinder will appear to be about 16% larger (21.375 x 14.155 mm) while showing the camera's full field of view, compared to the smaller viewfinder of the Rebel T7i/800D (18.45 x 12.29 mm) that only shows 95% of the camera's FoV. The 80D's viewfinder also has a brighter pentaprism vs the dimmer pentamirror of the Rebel T7i/800D and 3mm longer eye relief (22mm vs. 19mm).

  • The 80D can shoot at 7 fps in burst mode, the Rebel T7i/800D maxes out at 6 fps.

  • Both cameras have built-in Wi-Fi with NFC, only the Rebel T7i/800D also has Bluetooth.

  • The 80D uses the 1865 mAh LP-E6N battery (shared by most of Canon's xD series cameras other than the 1D series) and has a higher battery rating than the Rebel T7i/800D that uses the 1040 mAh LP-E17 battery.

  • The 80D has a shutter durability rating of 100,000 actuations. The Rebel T7i/800D does not have a published shutter durability rating.


None of these differences are directly applicable to shooting Macro photography in any significant way.




  • Macro photography tends to be done very methodically, so the extra control wheel doesn't really make much of a difference.

  • Most macro photography is done from a tripod using careful manual focus or Dual Pixel CMOS AF in Live View, so the lack of AFMA when doing PDAF via the viewfinder is a moot point. Much Macro photography is done using the lens' MFD (minimum focus distance) and then adjusting the camera to subject distance via a macro rail to bring the subject into focus.

  • Macro photography usually struggles with having enough light, so the lack of 1/8000 second shutter time is not an issue.

  • The differences between the viewfinders is not a consideration if you plan to use Live View, as many macro photographers do, since both cameras have the same rear LCD screen.

  • Burst mode doesn't usually apply to macro photography unless one is photographing skittish insects or other moving subjects.

  • Bluetooth (or lack thereof), battery life, and shutter durability ratings are not direct considerations for macro photography, but may be considerations for the total value of a camera to a buyer.


For doing Macro photography the way it is practiced by those who do the best Macro work, there's no real difference between the Canon EOS 80D and the Canon EOS Rebel T7i/800D.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









Michael CMichael C

128k7142362




128k7142362












  • I shoot Nikon, but another consideration is frame size. Both the 80D and 800D are crop sensors and macro is one place where, at least personally, I actually prefer to shoot crop over full frame. For the same composition you can shoot with a larger subject distance which gives you more depth of field at any given aperture, saving you precious light. It actually does get you better IQ over FF at the same sensor resolution if the lens itself is sufficiently sharp.
    – J...
    14 hours ago












  • @J... Well, sort of. MFD (minimum focus distance) of any particular lens will be the same whether it is mounted on a crop or FF camera. What changes is the angle of view. With a crop sensor you need a lens with a wider AoV to get the same framing at the same subject distance. If you are backing up to get the same framing as you would get with the same lens on a FF body then you are not using the MFD, and you're not getting MM and true 1:1 macro reproduction ratios. You're getting greater DoF because you are increasing the subject distance, but you're also decreasing magnification.
    – Michael C
    14 hours ago










  • Yes, but 1:1 isn't the whole story. I'll use my example of the D7100 (24MP DX) vs the D750 (24MP FF). 1:1 only tells you that the image at the sensor will be the same size as the real object. A 10mm spider will make a 10mm image. On a 36mm FF sensor that's 27% of the frame width. On a 24mm sensor it's 46% of the frame - and both sensors have the same number of pixels. The DX pixels are just smaller. At MFD the DX sensor gives you more magnification and more composition options (assuming the glass is good enough to not limit resolution). At the same FF comp, you just get more light.
    – J...
    11 hours ago












  • In other words, to get the same composition as the FF at MFD, the DX body actually has to back up - the DX can frame any macro shot that the FF can, and more. Backing up can also make lighting easier - a shot you might only have been able to light with ring on FF you might be able to clamshell with DX, for example. In natural light you get more angles to shoot from without being in your own shadow. It's the complete opposite of almost every other type of photography where the compositional advantages are all on DX instead of the other way around.
    – J...
    11 hours ago










  • @J... But you've also got to account for the higher enlargement ratio to get DX images to the same display size as FF images, which gives back much, but not all, of the DoF advantage from shooting from further away (or with a shorter focal length lens from the same distance).
    – Michael C
    4 hours ago


















  • I shoot Nikon, but another consideration is frame size. Both the 80D and 800D are crop sensors and macro is one place where, at least personally, I actually prefer to shoot crop over full frame. For the same composition you can shoot with a larger subject distance which gives you more depth of field at any given aperture, saving you precious light. It actually does get you better IQ over FF at the same sensor resolution if the lens itself is sufficiently sharp.
    – J...
    14 hours ago












  • @J... Well, sort of. MFD (minimum focus distance) of any particular lens will be the same whether it is mounted on a crop or FF camera. What changes is the angle of view. With a crop sensor you need a lens with a wider AoV to get the same framing at the same subject distance. If you are backing up to get the same framing as you would get with the same lens on a FF body then you are not using the MFD, and you're not getting MM and true 1:1 macro reproduction ratios. You're getting greater DoF because you are increasing the subject distance, but you're also decreasing magnification.
    – Michael C
    14 hours ago










  • Yes, but 1:1 isn't the whole story. I'll use my example of the D7100 (24MP DX) vs the D750 (24MP FF). 1:1 only tells you that the image at the sensor will be the same size as the real object. A 10mm spider will make a 10mm image. On a 36mm FF sensor that's 27% of the frame width. On a 24mm sensor it's 46% of the frame - and both sensors have the same number of pixels. The DX pixels are just smaller. At MFD the DX sensor gives you more magnification and more composition options (assuming the glass is good enough to not limit resolution). At the same FF comp, you just get more light.
    – J...
    11 hours ago












  • In other words, to get the same composition as the FF at MFD, the DX body actually has to back up - the DX can frame any macro shot that the FF can, and more. Backing up can also make lighting easier - a shot you might only have been able to light with ring on FF you might be able to clamshell with DX, for example. In natural light you get more angles to shoot from without being in your own shadow. It's the complete opposite of almost every other type of photography where the compositional advantages are all on DX instead of the other way around.
    – J...
    11 hours ago










  • @J... But you've also got to account for the higher enlargement ratio to get DX images to the same display size as FF images, which gives back much, but not all, of the DoF advantage from shooting from further away (or with a shorter focal length lens from the same distance).
    – Michael C
    4 hours ago
















I shoot Nikon, but another consideration is frame size. Both the 80D and 800D are crop sensors and macro is one place where, at least personally, I actually prefer to shoot crop over full frame. For the same composition you can shoot with a larger subject distance which gives you more depth of field at any given aperture, saving you precious light. It actually does get you better IQ over FF at the same sensor resolution if the lens itself is sufficiently sharp.
– J...
14 hours ago






I shoot Nikon, but another consideration is frame size. Both the 80D and 800D are crop sensors and macro is one place where, at least personally, I actually prefer to shoot crop over full frame. For the same composition you can shoot with a larger subject distance which gives you more depth of field at any given aperture, saving you precious light. It actually does get you better IQ over FF at the same sensor resolution if the lens itself is sufficiently sharp.
– J...
14 hours ago














@J... Well, sort of. MFD (minimum focus distance) of any particular lens will be the same whether it is mounted on a crop or FF camera. What changes is the angle of view. With a crop sensor you need a lens with a wider AoV to get the same framing at the same subject distance. If you are backing up to get the same framing as you would get with the same lens on a FF body then you are not using the MFD, and you're not getting MM and true 1:1 macro reproduction ratios. You're getting greater DoF because you are increasing the subject distance, but you're also decreasing magnification.
– Michael C
14 hours ago




@J... Well, sort of. MFD (minimum focus distance) of any particular lens will be the same whether it is mounted on a crop or FF camera. What changes is the angle of view. With a crop sensor you need a lens with a wider AoV to get the same framing at the same subject distance. If you are backing up to get the same framing as you would get with the same lens on a FF body then you are not using the MFD, and you're not getting MM and true 1:1 macro reproduction ratios. You're getting greater DoF because you are increasing the subject distance, but you're also decreasing magnification.
– Michael C
14 hours ago












Yes, but 1:1 isn't the whole story. I'll use my example of the D7100 (24MP DX) vs the D750 (24MP FF). 1:1 only tells you that the image at the sensor will be the same size as the real object. A 10mm spider will make a 10mm image. On a 36mm FF sensor that's 27% of the frame width. On a 24mm sensor it's 46% of the frame - and both sensors have the same number of pixels. The DX pixels are just smaller. At MFD the DX sensor gives you more magnification and more composition options (assuming the glass is good enough to not limit resolution). At the same FF comp, you just get more light.
– J...
11 hours ago






Yes, but 1:1 isn't the whole story. I'll use my example of the D7100 (24MP DX) vs the D750 (24MP FF). 1:1 only tells you that the image at the sensor will be the same size as the real object. A 10mm spider will make a 10mm image. On a 36mm FF sensor that's 27% of the frame width. On a 24mm sensor it's 46% of the frame - and both sensors have the same number of pixels. The DX pixels are just smaller. At MFD the DX sensor gives you more magnification and more composition options (assuming the glass is good enough to not limit resolution). At the same FF comp, you just get more light.
– J...
11 hours ago














In other words, to get the same composition as the FF at MFD, the DX body actually has to back up - the DX can frame any macro shot that the FF can, and more. Backing up can also make lighting easier - a shot you might only have been able to light with ring on FF you might be able to clamshell with DX, for example. In natural light you get more angles to shoot from without being in your own shadow. It's the complete opposite of almost every other type of photography where the compositional advantages are all on DX instead of the other way around.
– J...
11 hours ago




In other words, to get the same composition as the FF at MFD, the DX body actually has to back up - the DX can frame any macro shot that the FF can, and more. Backing up can also make lighting easier - a shot you might only have been able to light with ring on FF you might be able to clamshell with DX, for example. In natural light you get more angles to shoot from without being in your own shadow. It's the complete opposite of almost every other type of photography where the compositional advantages are all on DX instead of the other way around.
– J...
11 hours ago












@J... But you've also got to account for the higher enlargement ratio to get DX images to the same display size as FF images, which gives back much, but not all, of the DoF advantage from shooting from further away (or with a shorter focal length lens from the same distance).
– Michael C
4 hours ago




@J... But you've also got to account for the higher enlargement ratio to get DX images to the same display size as FF images, which gives back much, but not all, of the DoF advantage from shooting from further away (or with a shorter focal length lens from the same distance).
– Michael C
4 hours ago











-1














The very general rule with Canon is that lower numbered models and higher numbered "marks" are better (and therefore more expensive). So 500D < 50D < 5D, and 5D Mark III < 5D Mark IV.



On the other hand, whether for example 7D Mark II is better than 5D Mark I is a much more complicated question, because some aspects of a recent model will typically have some better hardware than an older model with a lower number.



As a caveat I'd like to include some advice I got from a good photographer: unless your budget is massive you should prioritize spending your money on good lenses rather than a good body.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    It might be worth saying that lower being better is true in so far as 80D being higher spec than 800D, but within the tens, hundreds and thousands higher numbers are newer models (e.g. 800D is newer and better than 700D). For single digit models like the 1D and 5D, the smaller numbers are generally more expensive/higher spec and newer releases are indicated by the mark number. expertreviews.co.uk/dslrs/1405777/… has a better explanation than I can fit in a comment.
    – Nick Kennedy
    yesterday








  • 2




    This is simply wrong, as it implies that the asker's existing 450D is better than the 800D they're considering buying as a replacement. And, really, it does nothing at all to answer the question. The question asks about suitability for macro work and you don't mention that at all.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday










  • Hence why I stated it as a "general rule," rather than an absolute. The vast majority of models are better than all the ones with higher numbers in Canon's case. As for macro work, like the accepted answer I mention that OP should prioritize lenses over cameras.
    – l0b0
    18 hours ago
















-1














The very general rule with Canon is that lower numbered models and higher numbered "marks" are better (and therefore more expensive). So 500D < 50D < 5D, and 5D Mark III < 5D Mark IV.



On the other hand, whether for example 7D Mark II is better than 5D Mark I is a much more complicated question, because some aspects of a recent model will typically have some better hardware than an older model with a lower number.



As a caveat I'd like to include some advice I got from a good photographer: unless your budget is massive you should prioritize spending your money on good lenses rather than a good body.






share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    It might be worth saying that lower being better is true in so far as 80D being higher spec than 800D, but within the tens, hundreds and thousands higher numbers are newer models (e.g. 800D is newer and better than 700D). For single digit models like the 1D and 5D, the smaller numbers are generally more expensive/higher spec and newer releases are indicated by the mark number. expertreviews.co.uk/dslrs/1405777/… has a better explanation than I can fit in a comment.
    – Nick Kennedy
    yesterday








  • 2




    This is simply wrong, as it implies that the asker's existing 450D is better than the 800D they're considering buying as a replacement. And, really, it does nothing at all to answer the question. The question asks about suitability for macro work and you don't mention that at all.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday










  • Hence why I stated it as a "general rule," rather than an absolute. The vast majority of models are better than all the ones with higher numbers in Canon's case. As for macro work, like the accepted answer I mention that OP should prioritize lenses over cameras.
    – l0b0
    18 hours ago














-1












-1








-1






The very general rule with Canon is that lower numbered models and higher numbered "marks" are better (and therefore more expensive). So 500D < 50D < 5D, and 5D Mark III < 5D Mark IV.



On the other hand, whether for example 7D Mark II is better than 5D Mark I is a much more complicated question, because some aspects of a recent model will typically have some better hardware than an older model with a lower number.



As a caveat I'd like to include some advice I got from a good photographer: unless your budget is massive you should prioritize spending your money on good lenses rather than a good body.






share|improve this answer












The very general rule with Canon is that lower numbered models and higher numbered "marks" are better (and therefore more expensive). So 500D < 50D < 5D, and 5D Mark III < 5D Mark IV.



On the other hand, whether for example 7D Mark II is better than 5D Mark I is a much more complicated question, because some aspects of a recent model will typically have some better hardware than an older model with a lower number.



As a caveat I'd like to include some advice I got from a good photographer: unless your budget is massive you should prioritize spending your money on good lenses rather than a good body.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









l0b0l0b0

18713




18713








  • 1




    It might be worth saying that lower being better is true in so far as 80D being higher spec than 800D, but within the tens, hundreds and thousands higher numbers are newer models (e.g. 800D is newer and better than 700D). For single digit models like the 1D and 5D, the smaller numbers are generally more expensive/higher spec and newer releases are indicated by the mark number. expertreviews.co.uk/dslrs/1405777/… has a better explanation than I can fit in a comment.
    – Nick Kennedy
    yesterday








  • 2




    This is simply wrong, as it implies that the asker's existing 450D is better than the 800D they're considering buying as a replacement. And, really, it does nothing at all to answer the question. The question asks about suitability for macro work and you don't mention that at all.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday










  • Hence why I stated it as a "general rule," rather than an absolute. The vast majority of models are better than all the ones with higher numbers in Canon's case. As for macro work, like the accepted answer I mention that OP should prioritize lenses over cameras.
    – l0b0
    18 hours ago














  • 1




    It might be worth saying that lower being better is true in so far as 80D being higher spec than 800D, but within the tens, hundreds and thousands higher numbers are newer models (e.g. 800D is newer and better than 700D). For single digit models like the 1D and 5D, the smaller numbers are generally more expensive/higher spec and newer releases are indicated by the mark number. expertreviews.co.uk/dslrs/1405777/… has a better explanation than I can fit in a comment.
    – Nick Kennedy
    yesterday








  • 2




    This is simply wrong, as it implies that the asker's existing 450D is better than the 800D they're considering buying as a replacement. And, really, it does nothing at all to answer the question. The question asks about suitability for macro work and you don't mention that at all.
    – David Richerby
    yesterday










  • Hence why I stated it as a "general rule," rather than an absolute. The vast majority of models are better than all the ones with higher numbers in Canon's case. As for macro work, like the accepted answer I mention that OP should prioritize lenses over cameras.
    – l0b0
    18 hours ago








1




1




It might be worth saying that lower being better is true in so far as 80D being higher spec than 800D, but within the tens, hundreds and thousands higher numbers are newer models (e.g. 800D is newer and better than 700D). For single digit models like the 1D and 5D, the smaller numbers are generally more expensive/higher spec and newer releases are indicated by the mark number. expertreviews.co.uk/dslrs/1405777/… has a better explanation than I can fit in a comment.
– Nick Kennedy
yesterday






It might be worth saying that lower being better is true in so far as 80D being higher spec than 800D, but within the tens, hundreds and thousands higher numbers are newer models (e.g. 800D is newer and better than 700D). For single digit models like the 1D and 5D, the smaller numbers are generally more expensive/higher spec and newer releases are indicated by the mark number. expertreviews.co.uk/dslrs/1405777/… has a better explanation than I can fit in a comment.
– Nick Kennedy
yesterday






2




2




This is simply wrong, as it implies that the asker's existing 450D is better than the 800D they're considering buying as a replacement. And, really, it does nothing at all to answer the question. The question asks about suitability for macro work and you don't mention that at all.
– David Richerby
yesterday




This is simply wrong, as it implies that the asker's existing 450D is better than the 800D they're considering buying as a replacement. And, really, it does nothing at all to answer the question. The question asks about suitability for macro work and you don't mention that at all.
– David Richerby
yesterday












Hence why I stated it as a "general rule," rather than an absolute. The vast majority of models are better than all the ones with higher numbers in Canon's case. As for macro work, like the accepted answer I mention that OP should prioritize lenses over cameras.
– l0b0
18 hours ago




Hence why I stated it as a "general rule," rather than an absolute. The vast majority of models are better than all the ones with higher numbers in Canon's case. As for macro work, like the accepted answer I mention that OP should prioritize lenses over cameras.
– l0b0
18 hours ago










O Bhavsar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















O Bhavsar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













O Bhavsar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












O Bhavsar is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Photography Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphoto.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104041%2fcanon-eos-800d-vs-80d-which-one-is-better-for-macro-photography%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

An IMO inspired problem

Management

Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?