Fredholm integral - degenerate kernel method












0














I have started answering a fredholm integral equation of the second kind and do not know where to go from here.



The answer has to be written in the form
$$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



The Fredholm integral equation is



$$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = g(x) + int_0^1(x^2y+xy^2) f(y) dy$$.



My method so far:



Let: $$C_1 = int_0^1yf(y)dy$$ and $$C_2 = int_0^1y^2f(y)dy$$



Then
$$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = (C_1x^2 +C_2x) + g(x)$$.



Eliminating f(y) to get
$$C_1 = (frac14C_1 + frac13C_2) + int_0^1yg(y)dy$$
and
$$C_2 = (frac15C_1 + frac14C_2) + int_0^1y^2g(y)dy$$



I don't know where to go from here to get it into the form
$$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



Do I put it into matrix form, and solve simultaneously, (not sure how to do this)
If I have gotten anything wrong here please let me know.
Or if you need any more information I may be able to provide. (Like how I got to a specific equation)
Any help will be appreciated



Thank you very much










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    I have started answering a fredholm integral equation of the second kind and do not know where to go from here.



    The answer has to be written in the form
    $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



    The Fredholm integral equation is



    $$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = g(x) + int_0^1(x^2y+xy^2) f(y) dy$$.



    My method so far:



    Let: $$C_1 = int_0^1yf(y)dy$$ and $$C_2 = int_0^1y^2f(y)dy$$



    Then
    $$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = (C_1x^2 +C_2x) + g(x)$$.



    Eliminating f(y) to get
    $$C_1 = (frac14C_1 + frac13C_2) + int_0^1yg(y)dy$$
    and
    $$C_2 = (frac15C_1 + frac14C_2) + int_0^1y^2g(y)dy$$



    I don't know where to go from here to get it into the form
    $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



    Do I put it into matrix form, and solve simultaneously, (not sure how to do this)
    If I have gotten anything wrong here please let me know.
    Or if you need any more information I may be able to provide. (Like how I got to a specific equation)
    Any help will be appreciated



    Thank you very much










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      I have started answering a fredholm integral equation of the second kind and do not know where to go from here.



      The answer has to be written in the form
      $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



      The Fredholm integral equation is



      $$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = g(x) + int_0^1(x^2y+xy^2) f(y) dy$$.



      My method so far:



      Let: $$C_1 = int_0^1yf(y)dy$$ and $$C_2 = int_0^1y^2f(y)dy$$



      Then
      $$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = (C_1x^2 +C_2x) + g(x)$$.



      Eliminating f(y) to get
      $$C_1 = (frac14C_1 + frac13C_2) + int_0^1yg(y)dy$$
      and
      $$C_2 = (frac15C_1 + frac14C_2) + int_0^1y^2g(y)dy$$



      I don't know where to go from here to get it into the form
      $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



      Do I put it into matrix form, and solve simultaneously, (not sure how to do this)
      If I have gotten anything wrong here please let me know.
      Or if you need any more information I may be able to provide. (Like how I got to a specific equation)
      Any help will be appreciated



      Thank you very much










      share|cite|improve this question















      I have started answering a fredholm integral equation of the second kind and do not know where to go from here.



      The answer has to be written in the form
      $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



      The Fredholm integral equation is



      $$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = g(x) + int_0^1(x^2y+xy^2) f(y) dy$$.



      My method so far:



      Let: $$C_1 = int_0^1yf(y)dy$$ and $$C_2 = int_0^1y^2f(y)dy$$



      Then
      $$ x^3+frac16x^2+frac15x = (C_1x^2 +C_2x) + g(x)$$.



      Eliminating f(y) to get
      $$C_1 = (frac14C_1 + frac13C_2) + int_0^1yg(y)dy$$
      and
      $$C_2 = (frac15C_1 + frac14C_2) + int_0^1y^2g(y)dy$$



      I don't know where to go from here to get it into the form
      $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$



      Do I put it into matrix form, and solve simultaneously, (not sure how to do this)
      If I have gotten anything wrong here please let me know.
      Or if you need any more information I may be able to provide. (Like how I got to a specific equation)
      Any help will be appreciated



      Thank you very much







      linear-algebra integration definite-integrals






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 3 at 23:03









      Bernard

      118k639112




      118k639112










      asked Jan 3 at 22:53









      p s

      357




      357






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          $$g(x) = x^3 - frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795} x$$



          By rearranging the original equation we can see that g(x) = x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx. This is because both of the integrals on the right evaluate to a constant multiple of x^2 or x respectively. By using this formula for g(x) in each of the integrals we get:



          The integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$x^2y(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x^2[frac{y^5}{5} + frac{Ay^4}{4} + frac{By^3}{3}] = x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3})$$
          and the integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$xy^2(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x[y^6/6 + frac{Ay^5}{5} + frac{By^4}{4}] = x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          So the equality becomes:
          $$x^3 + frac{1}{6} x^2 + frac{1}{5} x = (x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx) + x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          Rearranging gives:
          $$x^2(frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5}- frac{5B}{4}) = 0$$



          So, by comparing coefficients;
          $$frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3} = 0$$ and
          $$frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5} - frac{5B}{4} = 0$$



          Solving simultaneously gives
          $$A = - 38/1077 $$ and
          $$B = frac{58}{1795} $$



          $$ g(x)= x^3-frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















          • If i was to write it in the form of a sum of functions, how would I write it as $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$.
            – p s
            2 days ago












          • If we let $a_1=frac{58}{1795}$, $a_2=0$, $a_3=-frac{38}{1077}$ and $a_4=1$ we have:$$g(x)=sum_{j=1}^4{a_jx^{j-1}}$$
            – Peter Foreman
            2 days ago










          • Thank you for your help
            – p s
            22 hours ago










          • Thank you for your help. If I was to continue my method would I still get the same answer? I didn't know what to do next in my method to get an answer.
            – p s
            22 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061114%2ffredholm-integral-degenerate-kernel-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          $$g(x) = x^3 - frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795} x$$



          By rearranging the original equation we can see that g(x) = x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx. This is because both of the integrals on the right evaluate to a constant multiple of x^2 or x respectively. By using this formula for g(x) in each of the integrals we get:



          The integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$x^2y(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x^2[frac{y^5}{5} + frac{Ay^4}{4} + frac{By^3}{3}] = x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3})$$
          and the integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$xy^2(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x[y^6/6 + frac{Ay^5}{5} + frac{By^4}{4}] = x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          So the equality becomes:
          $$x^3 + frac{1}{6} x^2 + frac{1}{5} x = (x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx) + x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          Rearranging gives:
          $$x^2(frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5}- frac{5B}{4}) = 0$$



          So, by comparing coefficients;
          $$frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3} = 0$$ and
          $$frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5} - frac{5B}{4} = 0$$



          Solving simultaneously gives
          $$A = - 38/1077 $$ and
          $$B = frac{58}{1795} $$



          $$ g(x)= x^3-frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















          • If i was to write it in the form of a sum of functions, how would I write it as $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$.
            – p s
            2 days ago












          • If we let $a_1=frac{58}{1795}$, $a_2=0$, $a_3=-frac{38}{1077}$ and $a_4=1$ we have:$$g(x)=sum_{j=1}^4{a_jx^{j-1}}$$
            – Peter Foreman
            2 days ago










          • Thank you for your help
            – p s
            22 hours ago










          • Thank you for your help. If I was to continue my method would I still get the same answer? I didn't know what to do next in my method to get an answer.
            – p s
            22 hours ago
















          0














          $$g(x) = x^3 - frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795} x$$



          By rearranging the original equation we can see that g(x) = x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx. This is because both of the integrals on the right evaluate to a constant multiple of x^2 or x respectively. By using this formula for g(x) in each of the integrals we get:



          The integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$x^2y(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x^2[frac{y^5}{5} + frac{Ay^4}{4} + frac{By^3}{3}] = x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3})$$
          and the integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$xy^2(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x[y^6/6 + frac{Ay^5}{5} + frac{By^4}{4}] = x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          So the equality becomes:
          $$x^3 + frac{1}{6} x^2 + frac{1}{5} x = (x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx) + x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          Rearranging gives:
          $$x^2(frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5}- frac{5B}{4}) = 0$$



          So, by comparing coefficients;
          $$frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3} = 0$$ and
          $$frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5} - frac{5B}{4} = 0$$



          Solving simultaneously gives
          $$A = - 38/1077 $$ and
          $$B = frac{58}{1795} $$



          $$ g(x)= x^3-frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















          • If i was to write it in the form of a sum of functions, how would I write it as $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$.
            – p s
            2 days ago












          • If we let $a_1=frac{58}{1795}$, $a_2=0$, $a_3=-frac{38}{1077}$ and $a_4=1$ we have:$$g(x)=sum_{j=1}^4{a_jx^{j-1}}$$
            – Peter Foreman
            2 days ago










          • Thank you for your help
            – p s
            22 hours ago










          • Thank you for your help. If I was to continue my method would I still get the same answer? I didn't know what to do next in my method to get an answer.
            – p s
            22 hours ago














          0












          0








          0






          $$g(x) = x^3 - frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795} x$$



          By rearranging the original equation we can see that g(x) = x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx. This is because both of the integrals on the right evaluate to a constant multiple of x^2 or x respectively. By using this formula for g(x) in each of the integrals we get:



          The integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$x^2y(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x^2[frac{y^5}{5} + frac{Ay^4}{4} + frac{By^3}{3}] = x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3})$$
          and the integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$xy^2(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x[y^6/6 + frac{Ay^5}{5} + frac{By^4}{4}] = x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          So the equality becomes:
          $$x^3 + frac{1}{6} x^2 + frac{1}{5} x = (x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx) + x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          Rearranging gives:
          $$x^2(frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5}- frac{5B}{4}) = 0$$



          So, by comparing coefficients;
          $$frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3} = 0$$ and
          $$frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5} - frac{5B}{4} = 0$$



          Solving simultaneously gives
          $$A = - 38/1077 $$ and
          $$B = frac{58}{1795} $$



          $$ g(x)= x^3-frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          $$g(x) = x^3 - frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795} x$$



          By rearranging the original equation we can see that g(x) = x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx. This is because both of the integrals on the right evaluate to a constant multiple of x^2 or x respectively. By using this formula for g(x) in each of the integrals we get:



          The integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$x^2y(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x^2[frac{y^5}{5} + frac{Ay^4}{4} + frac{By^3}{3}] = x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3})$$
          and the integral from 0 to 1 of
          $$xy^2(y^3+Ay^2+By) dy = x[y^6/6 + frac{Ay^5}{5} + frac{By^4}{4}] = x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          So the equality becomes:
          $$x^3 + frac{1}{6} x^2 + frac{1}{5} x = (x^3 + Ax^2 + Bx) + x^2(frac{1}{5} + frac{A}{4} + frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{6} + frac{A}{5} + frac{B}{4})$$



          Rearranging gives:
          $$x^2(frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3}) + x(frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5}- frac{5B}{4}) = 0$$



          So, by comparing coefficients;
          $$frac{-1}{30} - frac{5A}{4} - frac{B}{3} = 0$$ and
          $$frac{1}{30} - frac{A}{5} - frac{5B}{4} = 0$$



          Solving simultaneously gives
          $$A = - 38/1077 $$ and
          $$B = frac{58}{1795} $$



          $$ g(x)= x^3-frac{38}{1077} x^2 + frac{58}{1795}$$







          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago









          p s

          357




          357






          New contributor




          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.









          answered Jan 3 at 23:51









          Peter Foreman

          2056




          2056




          New contributor




          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.





          New contributor





          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.






          Peter Foreman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.












          • If i was to write it in the form of a sum of functions, how would I write it as $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$.
            – p s
            2 days ago












          • If we let $a_1=frac{58}{1795}$, $a_2=0$, $a_3=-frac{38}{1077}$ and $a_4=1$ we have:$$g(x)=sum_{j=1}^4{a_jx^{j-1}}$$
            – Peter Foreman
            2 days ago










          • Thank you for your help
            – p s
            22 hours ago










          • Thank you for your help. If I was to continue my method would I still get the same answer? I didn't know what to do next in my method to get an answer.
            – p s
            22 hours ago


















          • If i was to write it in the form of a sum of functions, how would I write it as $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$.
            – p s
            2 days ago












          • If we let $a_1=frac{58}{1795}$, $a_2=0$, $a_3=-frac{38}{1077}$ and $a_4=1$ we have:$$g(x)=sum_{j=1}^4{a_jx^{j-1}}$$
            – Peter Foreman
            2 days ago










          • Thank you for your help
            – p s
            22 hours ago










          • Thank you for your help. If I was to continue my method would I still get the same answer? I didn't know what to do next in my method to get an answer.
            – p s
            22 hours ago
















          If i was to write it in the form of a sum of functions, how would I write it as $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$.
          – p s
          2 days ago






          If i was to write it in the form of a sum of functions, how would I write it as $$ sum a_jx^{j-1} $$.
          – p s
          2 days ago














          If we let $a_1=frac{58}{1795}$, $a_2=0$, $a_3=-frac{38}{1077}$ and $a_4=1$ we have:$$g(x)=sum_{j=1}^4{a_jx^{j-1}}$$
          – Peter Foreman
          2 days ago




          If we let $a_1=frac{58}{1795}$, $a_2=0$, $a_3=-frac{38}{1077}$ and $a_4=1$ we have:$$g(x)=sum_{j=1}^4{a_jx^{j-1}}$$
          – Peter Foreman
          2 days ago












          Thank you for your help
          – p s
          22 hours ago




          Thank you for your help
          – p s
          22 hours ago












          Thank you for your help. If I was to continue my method would I still get the same answer? I didn't know what to do next in my method to get an answer.
          – p s
          22 hours ago




          Thank you for your help. If I was to continue my method would I still get the same answer? I didn't know what to do next in my method to get an answer.
          – p s
          22 hours ago


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061114%2ffredholm-integral-degenerate-kernel-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          An IMO inspired problem

          Management

          Investment