New bounds for $int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt}$












0














I have revised this interesting stackexchange question with solution, $int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt} tag{1}$
in the form of this approximation :



$frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)} tag{2}$



now the rational it seems behind using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ outside the LogIntegral seems to ensure a bound in one direction but I'd like to get tighter bounds in both directions.



The question is how do I 'tighten' up the bounds on this particular approximation (2)?



What are the strategies for going about this sort of thing?










share|cite|improve this question





























    0














    I have revised this interesting stackexchange question with solution, $int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt} tag{1}$
    in the form of this approximation :



    $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)} tag{2}$



    now the rational it seems behind using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ outside the LogIntegral seems to ensure a bound in one direction but I'd like to get tighter bounds in both directions.



    The question is how do I 'tighten' up the bounds on this particular approximation (2)?



    What are the strategies for going about this sort of thing?










    share|cite|improve this question



























      0












      0








      0







      I have revised this interesting stackexchange question with solution, $int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt} tag{1}$
      in the form of this approximation :



      $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)} tag{2}$



      now the rational it seems behind using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ outside the LogIntegral seems to ensure a bound in one direction but I'd like to get tighter bounds in both directions.



      The question is how do I 'tighten' up the bounds on this particular approximation (2)?



      What are the strategies for going about this sort of thing?










      share|cite|improve this question















      I have revised this interesting stackexchange question with solution, $int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt} tag{1}$
      in the form of this approximation :



      $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)} tag{2}$



      now the rational it seems behind using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ outside the LogIntegral seems to ensure a bound in one direction but I'd like to get tighter bounds in both directions.



      The question is how do I 'tighten' up the bounds on this particular approximation (2)?



      What are the strategies for going about this sort of thing?







      integration definite-integrals asymptotics approximation






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 4 at 14:27







      onepound

















      asked Jan 4 at 14:08









      onepoundonepound

      331216




      331216






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          To help get things along since posting the question a couple of days ago, I've considered a loose bound as a first attempt. Maybe somebody can improve or tighten the bounds by some other method.



          Using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ (as suggested by @Jack D'Aurizio ) outside the Log Integral one bound can be established and looking at the plot of $frac{x}{log(x)}$ and $frac{x}{log(x-t)}$, $frac{x}{log(x/2)}$ ensures the other bound such that:



          $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)}<int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt}<frac{x}{log(x/2)}int_{2}^{x-2}frac{dt}{log(t)}$



          w






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061676%2fnew-bounds-for-int-2x-2-fract-logt-frac1-logx-t-mathrmdt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            To help get things along since posting the question a couple of days ago, I've considered a loose bound as a first attempt. Maybe somebody can improve or tighten the bounds by some other method.



            Using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ (as suggested by @Jack D'Aurizio ) outside the Log Integral one bound can be established and looking at the plot of $frac{x}{log(x)}$ and $frac{x}{log(x-t)}$, $frac{x}{log(x/2)}$ ensures the other bound such that:



            $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)}<int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt}<frac{x}{log(x/2)}int_{2}^{x-2}frac{dt}{log(t)}$



            w






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              0














              To help get things along since posting the question a couple of days ago, I've considered a loose bound as a first attempt. Maybe somebody can improve or tighten the bounds by some other method.



              Using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ (as suggested by @Jack D'Aurizio ) outside the Log Integral one bound can be established and looking at the plot of $frac{x}{log(x)}$ and $frac{x}{log(x-t)}$, $frac{x}{log(x/2)}$ ensures the other bound such that:



              $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)}<int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt}<frac{x}{log(x/2)}int_{2}^{x-2}frac{dt}{log(t)}$



              w






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                0












                0








                0






                To help get things along since posting the question a couple of days ago, I've considered a loose bound as a first attempt. Maybe somebody can improve or tighten the bounds by some other method.



                Using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ (as suggested by @Jack D'Aurizio ) outside the Log Integral one bound can be established and looking at the plot of $frac{x}{log(x)}$ and $frac{x}{log(x-t)}$, $frac{x}{log(x/2)}$ ensures the other bound such that:



                $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)}<int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt}<frac{x}{log(x/2)}int_{2}^{x-2}frac{dt}{log(t)}$



                w






                share|cite|improve this answer












                To help get things along since posting the question a couple of days ago, I've considered a loose bound as a first attempt. Maybe somebody can improve or tighten the bounds by some other method.



                Using $frac{x}{log(x-2)}$ (as suggested by @Jack D'Aurizio ) outside the Log Integral one bound can be established and looking at the plot of $frac{x}{log(x)}$ and $frac{x}{log(x-t)}$, $frac{x}{log(x/2)}$ ensures the other bound such that:



                $frac{x}{log(x-2)}int_{2}^{x/2}frac{dt}{log(t)}<int_{2}^{x-2}frac{t}{log(t)}frac{1}{log(x-t)}mathrm{dt}<frac{x}{log(x/2)}int_{2}^{x-2}frac{dt}{log(t)}$



                w







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 4 at 14:09









                onepoundonepound

                331216




                331216






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061676%2fnew-bounds-for-int-2x-2-fract-logt-frac1-logx-t-mathrmdt%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    An IMO inspired problem

                    Management

                    Investment