Physical meaning of potential in heat equation












7














I'm working on the mathematical theory of parabolic equations. The prototype of such equations is heat equation given as follows :
Let $Omega$ be a bounded region of the space and $T>0$ a fixed time. In $Omega_T=(0,T)times Omega$ we consider the following equation
$$u_t =alphaDelta u -a(x)u,$$
$$u(0,x)=f(x),$$
where $f$ is the initial condition, $a$ a bounded potential, $alpha>0$ is a constant, and $Delta$ is the Laplacian. I'm wondering to know the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$ (and may be $alpha$) and it's role in the heat process? Any reference or suggestion would be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Could you tell us where you're studying this from? Are there assumptions made about the form of the equations (i.e. small radiation losses, etc...)?
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday












  • From a mathematical point of vue, we use this form in abstract way without precising the physical statement of the equation.
    – S. Cho
    yesterday










  • Your title asks about a potential? What potential are you talking about?
    – Drew
    20 hours ago










  • We call the coefficient $a$ a potential
    – S. Cho
    9 hours ago
















7














I'm working on the mathematical theory of parabolic equations. The prototype of such equations is heat equation given as follows :
Let $Omega$ be a bounded region of the space and $T>0$ a fixed time. In $Omega_T=(0,T)times Omega$ we consider the following equation
$$u_t =alphaDelta u -a(x)u,$$
$$u(0,x)=f(x),$$
where $f$ is the initial condition, $a$ a bounded potential, $alpha>0$ is a constant, and $Delta$ is the Laplacian. I'm wondering to know the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$ (and may be $alpha$) and it's role in the heat process? Any reference or suggestion would be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Could you tell us where you're studying this from? Are there assumptions made about the form of the equations (i.e. small radiation losses, etc...)?
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday












  • From a mathematical point of vue, we use this form in abstract way without precising the physical statement of the equation.
    – S. Cho
    yesterday










  • Your title asks about a potential? What potential are you talking about?
    – Drew
    20 hours ago










  • We call the coefficient $a$ a potential
    – S. Cho
    9 hours ago














7












7








7







I'm working on the mathematical theory of parabolic equations. The prototype of such equations is heat equation given as follows :
Let $Omega$ be a bounded region of the space and $T>0$ a fixed time. In $Omega_T=(0,T)times Omega$ we consider the following equation
$$u_t =alphaDelta u -a(x)u,$$
$$u(0,x)=f(x),$$
where $f$ is the initial condition, $a$ a bounded potential, $alpha>0$ is a constant, and $Delta$ is the Laplacian. I'm wondering to know the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$ (and may be $alpha$) and it's role in the heat process? Any reference or suggestion would be helpful.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I'm working on the mathematical theory of parabolic equations. The prototype of such equations is heat equation given as follows :
Let $Omega$ be a bounded region of the space and $T>0$ a fixed time. In $Omega_T=(0,T)times Omega$ we consider the following equation
$$u_t =alphaDelta u -a(x)u,$$
$$u(0,x)=f(x),$$
where $f$ is the initial condition, $a$ a bounded potential, $alpha>0$ is a constant, and $Delta$ is the Laplacian. I'm wondering to know the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$ (and may be $alpha$) and it's role in the heat process? Any reference or suggestion would be helpful.







thermodynamics potential diffusion heat-conduction






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 21 hours ago









Qmechanic

102k121831156




102k121831156






New contributor




S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









S. ChoS. Cho

1385




1385




New contributor




S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






S. Cho is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Could you tell us where you're studying this from? Are there assumptions made about the form of the equations (i.e. small radiation losses, etc...)?
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday












  • From a mathematical point of vue, we use this form in abstract way without precising the physical statement of the equation.
    – S. Cho
    yesterday










  • Your title asks about a potential? What potential are you talking about?
    – Drew
    20 hours ago










  • We call the coefficient $a$ a potential
    – S. Cho
    9 hours ago


















  • Could you tell us where you're studying this from? Are there assumptions made about the form of the equations (i.e. small radiation losses, etc...)?
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday












  • From a mathematical point of vue, we use this form in abstract way without precising the physical statement of the equation.
    – S. Cho
    yesterday










  • Your title asks about a potential? What potential are you talking about?
    – Drew
    20 hours ago










  • We call the coefficient $a$ a potential
    – S. Cho
    9 hours ago
















Could you tell us where you're studying this from? Are there assumptions made about the form of the equations (i.e. small radiation losses, etc...)?
– N. Steinle
yesterday






Could you tell us where you're studying this from? Are there assumptions made about the form of the equations (i.e. small radiation losses, etc...)?
– N. Steinle
yesterday














From a mathematical point of vue, we use this form in abstract way without precising the physical statement of the equation.
– S. Cho
yesterday




From a mathematical point of vue, we use this form in abstract way without precising the physical statement of the equation.
– S. Cho
yesterday












Your title asks about a potential? What potential are you talking about?
– Drew
20 hours ago




Your title asks about a potential? What potential are you talking about?
– Drew
20 hours ago












We call the coefficient $a$ a potential
– S. Cho
9 hours ago




We call the coefficient $a$ a potential
– S. Cho
9 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














As discussed here under "Incorporating lateral heat transfer" (disclaimer: my site), if you're considering a 1-D transient heat transfer problem as suggested by the variables $x$ and $t$, then the equation $$kDelta T(x,t)-h(x)T(x,t)=crhodot T(x,t)$$



represents axial conduction with thermal conductivity $k$, linear lateral heat dissipation (through conduction, convection, and/or slight radiation) with spatially dependent coefficient $h(x)$, and energy storage with specific heat capacity $c$ and density $rho$. $T(x,t)$ is the temperature excursion from some ambient value.



The qualification of "slight" radiation is to ensure linearity of $T(x,t)$ in that term. For convection, $h$ is simply a convection coefficient. As discussed in the link, $h$ might also represent lateral conduction to an adjacent temperature sink (for a suspended microfabricated beam, say).



If we change variables from $T(x,t)$ to $u$ and divide by $crho$, then we have



$$alpha Delta u-left(frac{h(x)}{crho}right)u=u_t,$$



with $alpha$ being the thermal diffusivity, which matches your equation and indicates that $a(x)$ corresponds to a spatially varying lateral heat coefficient divided by the specific heat capacity and the density. This is the physical interpretation of that parameter for this type of system (I solve the equation here).






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Is it the same for the parameters appearing in the dynamic boundary conditions ? More precisely, if $Gamma=partial Omega$ is the boundary of the domain, the dynamic boundary conditions on $Gamma$ is $partial_t y_Gamma =beta Delta_Gamma y_Gamma +alpha partial_nu y -b(x) y_Gamma$, on $Gamma$. I mean the parameters $beta$ and $b$, ($alpha$ is the same as the first equation).
    – S. Cho
    9 hours ago












  • What is $partial_nu$ in this case?
    – Chemomechanics
    1 hour ago



















6














The heat equation, as you've written it, models the flow of energy via thermal conduction (heat) through some region with well defined boundary conditions. You have yet to provide the specifics of the boundary region, so my answer will remain general and vague.



The $alpha$ is the "diffusion coefficient" which is the isotropic form (diagonal terms only) of the diffusion tensor - alas the heat equation is a special case of the diffusion equation. So this coefficient tells us about how thermally diffuse the material that composes the region is (how diffusely distributed is the matter that the heat flows through?).




the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$




Sorry, at first I misread the equation (I thought it was merely a forcing term at first). And then secondly I mistook it for a convective term, but that's not correct since a convective term is typically proportional to $frac{partial u}{partial x}$ (see equation 27 here). I have found that the term, $a(x)u$, could represent an approximative radiative term that is position dependent (for small radiative losses), i.e. see the last equation here. In which case, $a$ determines the strength of the radiation emitted from the conductor as a function of position. This radiation term is only meaningful for temperature variations in the rod that are small compared to the temperature of the surroundings, and in the case of larger fluctuations one must use a $u^4$ dependence instead (in accordance with Stefan-Boltzmann Law).



Here is a very nice write-up for non-homogeneous heat problems.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    @S.Cho My pleasure! Which wiki article, specifically?
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday








  • 1




    In a heat transfer problem like this, the term involving a(x) is not a sink. It represents the convective transport of heat by fluid flow in the x direction.
    – Chester Miller
    yesterday






  • 1




    @S.Cho That's very strange. Radiative losses are usually of the form $u^4$. Unless you make the approximation that u does not vary appreciably, then I guess one can use a linear approximation...
    – t t t t
    yesterday






  • 1




    Interesting. Indeed it's not a sink. I don't think it's a convective term, since convective terms are typically proportional to $u_{x}$. I suspect it is a weak radiation term as @tttt suggests
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday






  • 1




    Oops. You're right. I didn't notice that.
    – Chester Miller
    yesterday



















0














In the study of the thermal transfer within a heat sink, we have a term of the form a * (T-Text) which correspond to the conducto convective exchanges between the heat sink and the air surrounding it: it is proportional to the temperature difference in accordance with Newton's law. The first term, in alpha, corresponds to the thermal conduction within the material. The thermal current density is proportional to the first spatial derivative of the temperature and the variation of this density leads to the second derivative (Laplacian). The alpha in the équation is the thermal diffusivity (conductivity/mu*C)






share|cite|improve this answer










New contributor




Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.


















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });






    S. Cho is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452421%2fphysical-meaning-of-potential-in-heat-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    As discussed here under "Incorporating lateral heat transfer" (disclaimer: my site), if you're considering a 1-D transient heat transfer problem as suggested by the variables $x$ and $t$, then the equation $$kDelta T(x,t)-h(x)T(x,t)=crhodot T(x,t)$$



    represents axial conduction with thermal conductivity $k$, linear lateral heat dissipation (through conduction, convection, and/or slight radiation) with spatially dependent coefficient $h(x)$, and energy storage with specific heat capacity $c$ and density $rho$. $T(x,t)$ is the temperature excursion from some ambient value.



    The qualification of "slight" radiation is to ensure linearity of $T(x,t)$ in that term. For convection, $h$ is simply a convection coefficient. As discussed in the link, $h$ might also represent lateral conduction to an adjacent temperature sink (for a suspended microfabricated beam, say).



    If we change variables from $T(x,t)$ to $u$ and divide by $crho$, then we have



    $$alpha Delta u-left(frac{h(x)}{crho}right)u=u_t,$$



    with $alpha$ being the thermal diffusivity, which matches your equation and indicates that $a(x)$ corresponds to a spatially varying lateral heat coefficient divided by the specific heat capacity and the density. This is the physical interpretation of that parameter for this type of system (I solve the equation here).






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Is it the same for the parameters appearing in the dynamic boundary conditions ? More precisely, if $Gamma=partial Omega$ is the boundary of the domain, the dynamic boundary conditions on $Gamma$ is $partial_t y_Gamma =beta Delta_Gamma y_Gamma +alpha partial_nu y -b(x) y_Gamma$, on $Gamma$. I mean the parameters $beta$ and $b$, ($alpha$ is the same as the first equation).
      – S. Cho
      9 hours ago












    • What is $partial_nu$ in this case?
      – Chemomechanics
      1 hour ago
















    4














    As discussed here under "Incorporating lateral heat transfer" (disclaimer: my site), if you're considering a 1-D transient heat transfer problem as suggested by the variables $x$ and $t$, then the equation $$kDelta T(x,t)-h(x)T(x,t)=crhodot T(x,t)$$



    represents axial conduction with thermal conductivity $k$, linear lateral heat dissipation (through conduction, convection, and/or slight radiation) with spatially dependent coefficient $h(x)$, and energy storage with specific heat capacity $c$ and density $rho$. $T(x,t)$ is the temperature excursion from some ambient value.



    The qualification of "slight" radiation is to ensure linearity of $T(x,t)$ in that term. For convection, $h$ is simply a convection coefficient. As discussed in the link, $h$ might also represent lateral conduction to an adjacent temperature sink (for a suspended microfabricated beam, say).



    If we change variables from $T(x,t)$ to $u$ and divide by $crho$, then we have



    $$alpha Delta u-left(frac{h(x)}{crho}right)u=u_t,$$



    with $alpha$ being the thermal diffusivity, which matches your equation and indicates that $a(x)$ corresponds to a spatially varying lateral heat coefficient divided by the specific heat capacity and the density. This is the physical interpretation of that parameter for this type of system (I solve the equation here).






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • Is it the same for the parameters appearing in the dynamic boundary conditions ? More precisely, if $Gamma=partial Omega$ is the boundary of the domain, the dynamic boundary conditions on $Gamma$ is $partial_t y_Gamma =beta Delta_Gamma y_Gamma +alpha partial_nu y -b(x) y_Gamma$, on $Gamma$. I mean the parameters $beta$ and $b$, ($alpha$ is the same as the first equation).
      – S. Cho
      9 hours ago












    • What is $partial_nu$ in this case?
      – Chemomechanics
      1 hour ago














    4












    4








    4






    As discussed here under "Incorporating lateral heat transfer" (disclaimer: my site), if you're considering a 1-D transient heat transfer problem as suggested by the variables $x$ and $t$, then the equation $$kDelta T(x,t)-h(x)T(x,t)=crhodot T(x,t)$$



    represents axial conduction with thermal conductivity $k$, linear lateral heat dissipation (through conduction, convection, and/or slight radiation) with spatially dependent coefficient $h(x)$, and energy storage with specific heat capacity $c$ and density $rho$. $T(x,t)$ is the temperature excursion from some ambient value.



    The qualification of "slight" radiation is to ensure linearity of $T(x,t)$ in that term. For convection, $h$ is simply a convection coefficient. As discussed in the link, $h$ might also represent lateral conduction to an adjacent temperature sink (for a suspended microfabricated beam, say).



    If we change variables from $T(x,t)$ to $u$ and divide by $crho$, then we have



    $$alpha Delta u-left(frac{h(x)}{crho}right)u=u_t,$$



    with $alpha$ being the thermal diffusivity, which matches your equation and indicates that $a(x)$ corresponds to a spatially varying lateral heat coefficient divided by the specific heat capacity and the density. This is the physical interpretation of that parameter for this type of system (I solve the equation here).






    share|cite|improve this answer












    As discussed here under "Incorporating lateral heat transfer" (disclaimer: my site), if you're considering a 1-D transient heat transfer problem as suggested by the variables $x$ and $t$, then the equation $$kDelta T(x,t)-h(x)T(x,t)=crhodot T(x,t)$$



    represents axial conduction with thermal conductivity $k$, linear lateral heat dissipation (through conduction, convection, and/or slight radiation) with spatially dependent coefficient $h(x)$, and energy storage with specific heat capacity $c$ and density $rho$. $T(x,t)$ is the temperature excursion from some ambient value.



    The qualification of "slight" radiation is to ensure linearity of $T(x,t)$ in that term. For convection, $h$ is simply a convection coefficient. As discussed in the link, $h$ might also represent lateral conduction to an adjacent temperature sink (for a suspended microfabricated beam, say).



    If we change variables from $T(x,t)$ to $u$ and divide by $crho$, then we have



    $$alpha Delta u-left(frac{h(x)}{crho}right)u=u_t,$$



    with $alpha$ being the thermal diffusivity, which matches your equation and indicates that $a(x)$ corresponds to a spatially varying lateral heat coefficient divided by the specific heat capacity and the density. This is the physical interpretation of that parameter for this type of system (I solve the equation here).







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered yesterday









    ChemomechanicsChemomechanics

    4,68131023




    4,68131023












    • Is it the same for the parameters appearing in the dynamic boundary conditions ? More precisely, if $Gamma=partial Omega$ is the boundary of the domain, the dynamic boundary conditions on $Gamma$ is $partial_t y_Gamma =beta Delta_Gamma y_Gamma +alpha partial_nu y -b(x) y_Gamma$, on $Gamma$. I mean the parameters $beta$ and $b$, ($alpha$ is the same as the first equation).
      – S. Cho
      9 hours ago












    • What is $partial_nu$ in this case?
      – Chemomechanics
      1 hour ago


















    • Is it the same for the parameters appearing in the dynamic boundary conditions ? More precisely, if $Gamma=partial Omega$ is the boundary of the domain, the dynamic boundary conditions on $Gamma$ is $partial_t y_Gamma =beta Delta_Gamma y_Gamma +alpha partial_nu y -b(x) y_Gamma$, on $Gamma$. I mean the parameters $beta$ and $b$, ($alpha$ is the same as the first equation).
      – S. Cho
      9 hours ago












    • What is $partial_nu$ in this case?
      – Chemomechanics
      1 hour ago
















    Is it the same for the parameters appearing in the dynamic boundary conditions ? More precisely, if $Gamma=partial Omega$ is the boundary of the domain, the dynamic boundary conditions on $Gamma$ is $partial_t y_Gamma =beta Delta_Gamma y_Gamma +alpha partial_nu y -b(x) y_Gamma$, on $Gamma$. I mean the parameters $beta$ and $b$, ($alpha$ is the same as the first equation).
    – S. Cho
    9 hours ago






    Is it the same for the parameters appearing in the dynamic boundary conditions ? More precisely, if $Gamma=partial Omega$ is the boundary of the domain, the dynamic boundary conditions on $Gamma$ is $partial_t y_Gamma =beta Delta_Gamma y_Gamma +alpha partial_nu y -b(x) y_Gamma$, on $Gamma$. I mean the parameters $beta$ and $b$, ($alpha$ is the same as the first equation).
    – S. Cho
    9 hours ago














    What is $partial_nu$ in this case?
    – Chemomechanics
    1 hour ago




    What is $partial_nu$ in this case?
    – Chemomechanics
    1 hour ago











    6














    The heat equation, as you've written it, models the flow of energy via thermal conduction (heat) through some region with well defined boundary conditions. You have yet to provide the specifics of the boundary region, so my answer will remain general and vague.



    The $alpha$ is the "diffusion coefficient" which is the isotropic form (diagonal terms only) of the diffusion tensor - alas the heat equation is a special case of the diffusion equation. So this coefficient tells us about how thermally diffuse the material that composes the region is (how diffusely distributed is the matter that the heat flows through?).




    the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$




    Sorry, at first I misread the equation (I thought it was merely a forcing term at first). And then secondly I mistook it for a convective term, but that's not correct since a convective term is typically proportional to $frac{partial u}{partial x}$ (see equation 27 here). I have found that the term, $a(x)u$, could represent an approximative radiative term that is position dependent (for small radiative losses), i.e. see the last equation here. In which case, $a$ determines the strength of the radiation emitted from the conductor as a function of position. This radiation term is only meaningful for temperature variations in the rod that are small compared to the temperature of the surroundings, and in the case of larger fluctuations one must use a $u^4$ dependence instead (in accordance with Stefan-Boltzmann Law).



    Here is a very nice write-up for non-homogeneous heat problems.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      @S.Cho My pleasure! Which wiki article, specifically?
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday








    • 1




      In a heat transfer problem like this, the term involving a(x) is not a sink. It represents the convective transport of heat by fluid flow in the x direction.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday






    • 1




      @S.Cho That's very strange. Radiative losses are usually of the form $u^4$. Unless you make the approximation that u does not vary appreciably, then I guess one can use a linear approximation...
      – t t t t
      yesterday






    • 1




      Interesting. Indeed it's not a sink. I don't think it's a convective term, since convective terms are typically proportional to $u_{x}$. I suspect it is a weak radiation term as @tttt suggests
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday






    • 1




      Oops. You're right. I didn't notice that.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday
















    6














    The heat equation, as you've written it, models the flow of energy via thermal conduction (heat) through some region with well defined boundary conditions. You have yet to provide the specifics of the boundary region, so my answer will remain general and vague.



    The $alpha$ is the "diffusion coefficient" which is the isotropic form (diagonal terms only) of the diffusion tensor - alas the heat equation is a special case of the diffusion equation. So this coefficient tells us about how thermally diffuse the material that composes the region is (how diffusely distributed is the matter that the heat flows through?).




    the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$




    Sorry, at first I misread the equation (I thought it was merely a forcing term at first). And then secondly I mistook it for a convective term, but that's not correct since a convective term is typically proportional to $frac{partial u}{partial x}$ (see equation 27 here). I have found that the term, $a(x)u$, could represent an approximative radiative term that is position dependent (for small radiative losses), i.e. see the last equation here. In which case, $a$ determines the strength of the radiation emitted from the conductor as a function of position. This radiation term is only meaningful for temperature variations in the rod that are small compared to the temperature of the surroundings, and in the case of larger fluctuations one must use a $u^4$ dependence instead (in accordance with Stefan-Boltzmann Law).



    Here is a very nice write-up for non-homogeneous heat problems.






    share|cite|improve this answer



















    • 1




      @S.Cho My pleasure! Which wiki article, specifically?
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday








    • 1




      In a heat transfer problem like this, the term involving a(x) is not a sink. It represents the convective transport of heat by fluid flow in the x direction.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday






    • 1




      @S.Cho That's very strange. Radiative losses are usually of the form $u^4$. Unless you make the approximation that u does not vary appreciably, then I guess one can use a linear approximation...
      – t t t t
      yesterday






    • 1




      Interesting. Indeed it's not a sink. I don't think it's a convective term, since convective terms are typically proportional to $u_{x}$. I suspect it is a weak radiation term as @tttt suggests
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday






    • 1




      Oops. You're right. I didn't notice that.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday














    6












    6








    6






    The heat equation, as you've written it, models the flow of energy via thermal conduction (heat) through some region with well defined boundary conditions. You have yet to provide the specifics of the boundary region, so my answer will remain general and vague.



    The $alpha$ is the "diffusion coefficient" which is the isotropic form (diagonal terms only) of the diffusion tensor - alas the heat equation is a special case of the diffusion equation. So this coefficient tells us about how thermally diffuse the material that composes the region is (how diffusely distributed is the matter that the heat flows through?).




    the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$




    Sorry, at first I misread the equation (I thought it was merely a forcing term at first). And then secondly I mistook it for a convective term, but that's not correct since a convective term is typically proportional to $frac{partial u}{partial x}$ (see equation 27 here). I have found that the term, $a(x)u$, could represent an approximative radiative term that is position dependent (for small radiative losses), i.e. see the last equation here. In which case, $a$ determines the strength of the radiation emitted from the conductor as a function of position. This radiation term is only meaningful for temperature variations in the rod that are small compared to the temperature of the surroundings, and in the case of larger fluctuations one must use a $u^4$ dependence instead (in accordance with Stefan-Boltzmann Law).



    Here is a very nice write-up for non-homogeneous heat problems.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    The heat equation, as you've written it, models the flow of energy via thermal conduction (heat) through some region with well defined boundary conditions. You have yet to provide the specifics of the boundary region, so my answer will remain general and vague.



    The $alpha$ is the "diffusion coefficient" which is the isotropic form (diagonal terms only) of the diffusion tensor - alas the heat equation is a special case of the diffusion equation. So this coefficient tells us about how thermally diffuse the material that composes the region is (how diffusely distributed is the matter that the heat flows through?).




    the physical meaning of the coefficient $a$




    Sorry, at first I misread the equation (I thought it was merely a forcing term at first). And then secondly I mistook it for a convective term, but that's not correct since a convective term is typically proportional to $frac{partial u}{partial x}$ (see equation 27 here). I have found that the term, $a(x)u$, could represent an approximative radiative term that is position dependent (for small radiative losses), i.e. see the last equation here. In which case, $a$ determines the strength of the radiation emitted from the conductor as a function of position. This radiation term is only meaningful for temperature variations in the rod that are small compared to the temperature of the surroundings, and in the case of larger fluctuations one must use a $u^4$ dependence instead (in accordance with Stefan-Boltzmann Law).



    Here is a very nice write-up for non-homogeneous heat problems.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 2 hours ago

























    answered yesterday









    N. SteinleN. Steinle

    1,404117




    1,404117








    • 1




      @S.Cho My pleasure! Which wiki article, specifically?
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday








    • 1




      In a heat transfer problem like this, the term involving a(x) is not a sink. It represents the convective transport of heat by fluid flow in the x direction.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday






    • 1




      @S.Cho That's very strange. Radiative losses are usually of the form $u^4$. Unless you make the approximation that u does not vary appreciably, then I guess one can use a linear approximation...
      – t t t t
      yesterday






    • 1




      Interesting. Indeed it's not a sink. I don't think it's a convective term, since convective terms are typically proportional to $u_{x}$. I suspect it is a weak radiation term as @tttt suggests
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday






    • 1




      Oops. You're right. I didn't notice that.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday














    • 1




      @S.Cho My pleasure! Which wiki article, specifically?
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday








    • 1




      In a heat transfer problem like this, the term involving a(x) is not a sink. It represents the convective transport of heat by fluid flow in the x direction.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday






    • 1




      @S.Cho That's very strange. Radiative losses are usually of the form $u^4$. Unless you make the approximation that u does not vary appreciably, then I guess one can use a linear approximation...
      – t t t t
      yesterday






    • 1




      Interesting. Indeed it's not a sink. I don't think it's a convective term, since convective terms are typically proportional to $u_{x}$. I suspect it is a weak radiation term as @tttt suggests
      – N. Steinle
      yesterday






    • 1




      Oops. You're right. I didn't notice that.
      – Chester Miller
      yesterday








    1




    1




    @S.Cho My pleasure! Which wiki article, specifically?
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday






    @S.Cho My pleasure! Which wiki article, specifically?
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday






    1




    1




    In a heat transfer problem like this, the term involving a(x) is not a sink. It represents the convective transport of heat by fluid flow in the x direction.
    – Chester Miller
    yesterday




    In a heat transfer problem like this, the term involving a(x) is not a sink. It represents the convective transport of heat by fluid flow in the x direction.
    – Chester Miller
    yesterday




    1




    1




    @S.Cho That's very strange. Radiative losses are usually of the form $u^4$. Unless you make the approximation that u does not vary appreciably, then I guess one can use a linear approximation...
    – t t t t
    yesterday




    @S.Cho That's very strange. Radiative losses are usually of the form $u^4$. Unless you make the approximation that u does not vary appreciably, then I guess one can use a linear approximation...
    – t t t t
    yesterday




    1




    1




    Interesting. Indeed it's not a sink. I don't think it's a convective term, since convective terms are typically proportional to $u_{x}$. I suspect it is a weak radiation term as @tttt suggests
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday




    Interesting. Indeed it's not a sink. I don't think it's a convective term, since convective terms are typically proportional to $u_{x}$. I suspect it is a weak radiation term as @tttt suggests
    – N. Steinle
    yesterday




    1




    1




    Oops. You're right. I didn't notice that.
    – Chester Miller
    yesterday




    Oops. You're right. I didn't notice that.
    – Chester Miller
    yesterday











    0














    In the study of the thermal transfer within a heat sink, we have a term of the form a * (T-Text) which correspond to the conducto convective exchanges between the heat sink and the air surrounding it: it is proportional to the temperature difference in accordance with Newton's law. The first term, in alpha, corresponds to the thermal conduction within the material. The thermal current density is proportional to the first spatial derivative of the temperature and the variation of this density leads to the second derivative (Laplacian). The alpha in the équation is the thermal diffusivity (conductivity/mu*C)






    share|cite|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0














      In the study of the thermal transfer within a heat sink, we have a term of the form a * (T-Text) which correspond to the conducto convective exchanges between the heat sink and the air surrounding it: it is proportional to the temperature difference in accordance with Newton's law. The first term, in alpha, corresponds to the thermal conduction within the material. The thermal current density is proportional to the first spatial derivative of the temperature and the variation of this density leads to the second derivative (Laplacian). The alpha in the équation is the thermal diffusivity (conductivity/mu*C)






      share|cite|improve this answer










      New contributor




      Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





















        0












        0








        0






        In the study of the thermal transfer within a heat sink, we have a term of the form a * (T-Text) which correspond to the conducto convective exchanges between the heat sink and the air surrounding it: it is proportional to the temperature difference in accordance with Newton's law. The first term, in alpha, corresponds to the thermal conduction within the material. The thermal current density is proportional to the first spatial derivative of the temperature and the variation of this density leads to the second derivative (Laplacian). The alpha in the équation is the thermal diffusivity (conductivity/mu*C)






        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        In the study of the thermal transfer within a heat sink, we have a term of the form a * (T-Text) which correspond to the conducto convective exchanges between the heat sink and the air surrounding it: it is proportional to the temperature difference in accordance with Newton's law. The first term, in alpha, corresponds to the thermal conduction within the material. The thermal current density is proportional to the first spatial derivative of the temperature and the variation of this density leads to the second derivative (Laplacian). The alpha in the équation is the thermal diffusivity (conductivity/mu*C)







        share|cite|improve this answer










        New contributor




        Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday





















        New contributor




        Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.









        answered yesterday









        Vincent FraticelliVincent Fraticelli

        443




        443




        New contributor




        Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.





        New contributor





        Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






        Vincent Fraticelli is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
        Check out our Code of Conduct.






















            S. Cho is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            S. Cho is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













            S. Cho is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            S. Cho is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452421%2fphysical-meaning-of-potential-in-heat-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            An IMO inspired problem

            Management

            Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?