Why can we redefine the definition of a variable during substitution? Or let say assume it has two different...












1














This concept I have asked a few people, but none of them are able to help me understand, so hope that there's a hero can save me from this problem!!!



My question occurs during substitution process, for example, sometimes we let $x = π - u$. Then after some manipulation of numbers, we then let $x = u$ and integrate the guy that we want to integrate. That doesn't seem intuitive to me, isn't that we are changing the definition of x by omiting the rule of arithematic? $x = u implies x = π - x$. Why that operation doesn't affect the integration result?



Here is a concrete example illustrate my question



$$ int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx $$
then we let $x = π - u implies dx = -du$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{(π - u)sin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
And here (downward) is the part that I don't understand!!! (the x in _x_sin(x) in RHS)



we then let $x = u$
$$int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx$$



move the rightmost guy to LHS and integrate RHS, solve the problem.



$$2int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$



Why can we let $x = u$? isn't that we have given it the value $pi - u$ in the beginning?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I was told that this question is about dummy variable?
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:13










  • Hi & welcome to MSE. Note the original $x$ is just a "dummy" variable, as your comment says, that you can replace with $y$ or anything else you like. It only has meaning within the integral, including with the limits. When you do a substitution, you are replacing it with another "dummy" variable. Later, you can reuse the same variable for another substitution, as your example indicates. However, I don't think that's a wise idea as it can cause confusion, like it did with you, so I normally, at least, would not do that.
    – John Omielan
    Jan 4 at 3:15


















1














This concept I have asked a few people, but none of them are able to help me understand, so hope that there's a hero can save me from this problem!!!



My question occurs during substitution process, for example, sometimes we let $x = π - u$. Then after some manipulation of numbers, we then let $x = u$ and integrate the guy that we want to integrate. That doesn't seem intuitive to me, isn't that we are changing the definition of x by omiting the rule of arithematic? $x = u implies x = π - x$. Why that operation doesn't affect the integration result?



Here is a concrete example illustrate my question



$$ int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx $$
then we let $x = π - u implies dx = -du$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{(π - u)sin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
And here (downward) is the part that I don't understand!!! (the x in _x_sin(x) in RHS)



we then let $x = u$
$$int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx$$



move the rightmost guy to LHS and integrate RHS, solve the problem.



$$2int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$



Why can we let $x = u$? isn't that we have given it the value $pi - u$ in the beginning?










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I was told that this question is about dummy variable?
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:13










  • Hi & welcome to MSE. Note the original $x$ is just a "dummy" variable, as your comment says, that you can replace with $y$ or anything else you like. It only has meaning within the integral, including with the limits. When you do a substitution, you are replacing it with another "dummy" variable. Later, you can reuse the same variable for another substitution, as your example indicates. However, I don't think that's a wise idea as it can cause confusion, like it did with you, so I normally, at least, would not do that.
    – John Omielan
    Jan 4 at 3:15
















1












1








1







This concept I have asked a few people, but none of them are able to help me understand, so hope that there's a hero can save me from this problem!!!



My question occurs during substitution process, for example, sometimes we let $x = π - u$. Then after some manipulation of numbers, we then let $x = u$ and integrate the guy that we want to integrate. That doesn't seem intuitive to me, isn't that we are changing the definition of x by omiting the rule of arithematic? $x = u implies x = π - x$. Why that operation doesn't affect the integration result?



Here is a concrete example illustrate my question



$$ int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx $$
then we let $x = π - u implies dx = -du$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{(π - u)sin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
And here (downward) is the part that I don't understand!!! (the x in _x_sin(x) in RHS)



we then let $x = u$
$$int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx$$



move the rightmost guy to LHS and integrate RHS, solve the problem.



$$2int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$



Why can we let $x = u$? isn't that we have given it the value $pi - u$ in the beginning?










share|cite|improve this question















This concept I have asked a few people, but none of them are able to help me understand, so hope that there's a hero can save me from this problem!!!



My question occurs during substitution process, for example, sometimes we let $x = π - u$. Then after some manipulation of numbers, we then let $x = u$ and integrate the guy that we want to integrate. That doesn't seem intuitive to me, isn't that we are changing the definition of x by omiting the rule of arithematic? $x = u implies x = π - x$. Why that operation doesn't affect the integration result?



Here is a concrete example illustrate my question



$$ int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx $$
then we let $x = π - u implies dx = -du$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{(π - u)sin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
$$= int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$
And here (downward) is the part that I don't understand!!! (the x in _x_sin(x) in RHS)



we then let $x = u$
$$int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx$$



move the rightmost guy to LHS and integrate RHS, solve the problem.



$$2int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$$



Why can we let $x = u$? isn't that we have given it the value $pi - u$ in the beginning?







calculus integration definite-integrals substitution






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 4 at 4:26









Mint

5301417




5301417










asked Jan 4 at 3:05









Stephen FongStephen Fong

64




64








  • 1




    I was told that this question is about dummy variable?
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:13










  • Hi & welcome to MSE. Note the original $x$ is just a "dummy" variable, as your comment says, that you can replace with $y$ or anything else you like. It only has meaning within the integral, including with the limits. When you do a substitution, you are replacing it with another "dummy" variable. Later, you can reuse the same variable for another substitution, as your example indicates. However, I don't think that's a wise idea as it can cause confusion, like it did with you, so I normally, at least, would not do that.
    – John Omielan
    Jan 4 at 3:15
















  • 1




    I was told that this question is about dummy variable?
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:13










  • Hi & welcome to MSE. Note the original $x$ is just a "dummy" variable, as your comment says, that you can replace with $y$ or anything else you like. It only has meaning within the integral, including with the limits. When you do a substitution, you are replacing it with another "dummy" variable. Later, you can reuse the same variable for another substitution, as your example indicates. However, I don't think that's a wise idea as it can cause confusion, like it did with you, so I normally, at least, would not do that.
    – John Omielan
    Jan 4 at 3:15










1




1




I was told that this question is about dummy variable?
– Stephen Fong
Jan 4 at 3:13




I was told that this question is about dummy variable?
– Stephen Fong
Jan 4 at 3:13












Hi & welcome to MSE. Note the original $x$ is just a "dummy" variable, as your comment says, that you can replace with $y$ or anything else you like. It only has meaning within the integral, including with the limits. When you do a substitution, you are replacing it with another "dummy" variable. Later, you can reuse the same variable for another substitution, as your example indicates. However, I don't think that's a wise idea as it can cause confusion, like it did with you, so I normally, at least, would not do that.
– John Omielan
Jan 4 at 3:15






Hi & welcome to MSE. Note the original $x$ is just a "dummy" variable, as your comment says, that you can replace with $y$ or anything else you like. It only has meaning within the integral, including with the limits. When you do a substitution, you are replacing it with another "dummy" variable. Later, you can reuse the same variable for another substitution, as your example indicates. However, I don't think that's a wise idea as it can cause confusion, like it did with you, so I normally, at least, would not do that.
– John Omielan
Jan 4 at 3:15












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














This is called, not in the most humble manner, the "abuse" of notations. Let us go step by step in understanding what happened.



First, for the integral $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$, we put $x = pi - u$, where since $x$ varies from $0$ to $pi$, $u$ varies from $pi$ to $0$. And from the exact differential term $dx = -du$, we can reverse the limits of integration so that it becomes $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{left( pi - u right) sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$ (Here, some trigonometric formulae are also used). After this we split the numerator to obtain the two integrals.



Well, this was pretty easy! Now comes the step where problem arises. One of the two integrals is $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$. Now, let us look what we got in this integral. First, the limits are from $0$ to $pi$, just as the original integral. Next, the integrand is the same as the original integral except that we now have the variable $u$ instead of $x$.



But, when it comes to integration, it does not really matter what the variable's "name" is. What matters is that integrand and the limits of integrations. So, the integral will be the same if we call the variable as $u$ or $x$, or for that matter any other name!



Hence, we get $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du = intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$.



In other words, we DO NOT "let $x = u$" in that step. Rather, we use facts from calculus to conclude the above mentioned equality. Since these two integrals are the same, it does not matter what variable we use and we rather replace $u$ by $x$ in the second integral to get the answer.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Not so familiar with the terminology ~ what does it mean by "u varies from π to x"?
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:28










  • I changed it. It varies from $pi$ to $0$ as $x$ goes from $0$ to $pi$.
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Jan 4 at 3:29










  • @John Omielan I find combining you twos opinions make the explanation more clear. Can I think of it in this way? Whenever I do substitution, it's like I draw the same graph (with same size) on the another axis and try to integrate about the new axis (and so don't care the former definition)? So after the substitution, it's like I'm integrating with respect to a new axis. And here comes Aniruddha's idea, since the two graphs have same size, integrating them gives the same result. So for the about example, I can just replace x by u assuming they are the same.
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:53










  • Let me end up with another example to see if my understanding is fine, suppose we have int u+1 du = int x dx + int x + 1 dx, then we can say 2int u+1 du = int x dx
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:54





















0














We have:



$int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



Rather than say "let $u = x$" I think it would be cleaner to say



$int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx =
int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



And then bring it over to the other side



or



$I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - I\
2I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du\
I = frac 12 int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061277%2fwhy-can-we-redefine-the-definition-of-a-variable-during-substitution-or-let-say%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    2














    This is called, not in the most humble manner, the "abuse" of notations. Let us go step by step in understanding what happened.



    First, for the integral $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$, we put $x = pi - u$, where since $x$ varies from $0$ to $pi$, $u$ varies from $pi$ to $0$. And from the exact differential term $dx = -du$, we can reverse the limits of integration so that it becomes $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{left( pi - u right) sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$ (Here, some trigonometric formulae are also used). After this we split the numerator to obtain the two integrals.



    Well, this was pretty easy! Now comes the step where problem arises. One of the two integrals is $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$. Now, let us look what we got in this integral. First, the limits are from $0$ to $pi$, just as the original integral. Next, the integrand is the same as the original integral except that we now have the variable $u$ instead of $x$.



    But, when it comes to integration, it does not really matter what the variable's "name" is. What matters is that integrand and the limits of integrations. So, the integral will be the same if we call the variable as $u$ or $x$, or for that matter any other name!



    Hence, we get $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du = intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$.



    In other words, we DO NOT "let $x = u$" in that step. Rather, we use facts from calculus to conclude the above mentioned equality. Since these two integrals are the same, it does not matter what variable we use and we rather replace $u$ by $x$ in the second integral to get the answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Not so familiar with the terminology ~ what does it mean by "u varies from π to x"?
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:28










    • I changed it. It varies from $pi$ to $0$ as $x$ goes from $0$ to $pi$.
      – Aniruddha Deshmukh
      Jan 4 at 3:29










    • @John Omielan I find combining you twos opinions make the explanation more clear. Can I think of it in this way? Whenever I do substitution, it's like I draw the same graph (with same size) on the another axis and try to integrate about the new axis (and so don't care the former definition)? So after the substitution, it's like I'm integrating with respect to a new axis. And here comes Aniruddha's idea, since the two graphs have same size, integrating them gives the same result. So for the about example, I can just replace x by u assuming they are the same.
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:53










    • Let me end up with another example to see if my understanding is fine, suppose we have int u+1 du = int x dx + int x + 1 dx, then we can say 2int u+1 du = int x dx
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:54


















    2














    This is called, not in the most humble manner, the "abuse" of notations. Let us go step by step in understanding what happened.



    First, for the integral $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$, we put $x = pi - u$, where since $x$ varies from $0$ to $pi$, $u$ varies from $pi$ to $0$. And from the exact differential term $dx = -du$, we can reverse the limits of integration so that it becomes $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{left( pi - u right) sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$ (Here, some trigonometric formulae are also used). After this we split the numerator to obtain the two integrals.



    Well, this was pretty easy! Now comes the step where problem arises. One of the two integrals is $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$. Now, let us look what we got in this integral. First, the limits are from $0$ to $pi$, just as the original integral. Next, the integrand is the same as the original integral except that we now have the variable $u$ instead of $x$.



    But, when it comes to integration, it does not really matter what the variable's "name" is. What matters is that integrand and the limits of integrations. So, the integral will be the same if we call the variable as $u$ or $x$, or for that matter any other name!



    Hence, we get $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du = intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$.



    In other words, we DO NOT "let $x = u$" in that step. Rather, we use facts from calculus to conclude the above mentioned equality. Since these two integrals are the same, it does not matter what variable we use and we rather replace $u$ by $x$ in the second integral to get the answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • Not so familiar with the terminology ~ what does it mean by "u varies from π to x"?
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:28










    • I changed it. It varies from $pi$ to $0$ as $x$ goes from $0$ to $pi$.
      – Aniruddha Deshmukh
      Jan 4 at 3:29










    • @John Omielan I find combining you twos opinions make the explanation more clear. Can I think of it in this way? Whenever I do substitution, it's like I draw the same graph (with same size) on the another axis and try to integrate about the new axis (and so don't care the former definition)? So after the substitution, it's like I'm integrating with respect to a new axis. And here comes Aniruddha's idea, since the two graphs have same size, integrating them gives the same result. So for the about example, I can just replace x by u assuming they are the same.
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:53










    • Let me end up with another example to see if my understanding is fine, suppose we have int u+1 du = int x dx + int x + 1 dx, then we can say 2int u+1 du = int x dx
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:54
















    2












    2








    2






    This is called, not in the most humble manner, the "abuse" of notations. Let us go step by step in understanding what happened.



    First, for the integral $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$, we put $x = pi - u$, where since $x$ varies from $0$ to $pi$, $u$ varies from $pi$ to $0$. And from the exact differential term $dx = -du$, we can reverse the limits of integration so that it becomes $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{left( pi - u right) sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$ (Here, some trigonometric formulae are also used). After this we split the numerator to obtain the two integrals.



    Well, this was pretty easy! Now comes the step where problem arises. One of the two integrals is $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$. Now, let us look what we got in this integral. First, the limits are from $0$ to $pi$, just as the original integral. Next, the integrand is the same as the original integral except that we now have the variable $u$ instead of $x$.



    But, when it comes to integration, it does not really matter what the variable's "name" is. What matters is that integrand and the limits of integrations. So, the integral will be the same if we call the variable as $u$ or $x$, or for that matter any other name!



    Hence, we get $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du = intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$.



    In other words, we DO NOT "let $x = u$" in that step. Rather, we use facts from calculus to conclude the above mentioned equality. Since these two integrals are the same, it does not matter what variable we use and we rather replace $u$ by $x$ in the second integral to get the answer.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    This is called, not in the most humble manner, the "abuse" of notations. Let us go step by step in understanding what happened.



    First, for the integral $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$, we put $x = pi - u$, where since $x$ varies from $0$ to $pi$, $u$ varies from $pi$ to $0$. And from the exact differential term $dx = -du$, we can reverse the limits of integration so that it becomes $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{left( pi - u right) sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$ (Here, some trigonometric formulae are also used). After this we split the numerator to obtain the two integrals.



    Well, this was pretty easy! Now comes the step where problem arises. One of the two integrals is $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du$. Now, let us look what we got in this integral. First, the limits are from $0$ to $pi$, just as the original integral. Next, the integrand is the same as the original integral except that we now have the variable $u$ instead of $x$.



    But, when it comes to integration, it does not really matter what the variable's "name" is. What matters is that integrand and the limits of integrations. So, the integral will be the same if we call the variable as $u$ or $x$, or for that matter any other name!



    Hence, we get $intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{u sin u}{1 + cos^2 u} du = intlimits_{0}^{pi} dfrac{x sin x}{1 + cos^2 x} dx$.



    In other words, we DO NOT "let $x = u$" in that step. Rather, we use facts from calculus to conclude the above mentioned equality. Since these two integrals are the same, it does not matter what variable we use and we rather replace $u$ by $x$ in the second integral to get the answer.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Jan 4 at 3:29

























    answered Jan 4 at 3:18









    Aniruddha DeshmukhAniruddha Deshmukh

    934418




    934418












    • Not so familiar with the terminology ~ what does it mean by "u varies from π to x"?
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:28










    • I changed it. It varies from $pi$ to $0$ as $x$ goes from $0$ to $pi$.
      – Aniruddha Deshmukh
      Jan 4 at 3:29










    • @John Omielan I find combining you twos opinions make the explanation more clear. Can I think of it in this way? Whenever I do substitution, it's like I draw the same graph (with same size) on the another axis and try to integrate about the new axis (and so don't care the former definition)? So after the substitution, it's like I'm integrating with respect to a new axis. And here comes Aniruddha's idea, since the two graphs have same size, integrating them gives the same result. So for the about example, I can just replace x by u assuming they are the same.
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:53










    • Let me end up with another example to see if my understanding is fine, suppose we have int u+1 du = int x dx + int x + 1 dx, then we can say 2int u+1 du = int x dx
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:54




















    • Not so familiar with the terminology ~ what does it mean by "u varies from π to x"?
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:28










    • I changed it. It varies from $pi$ to $0$ as $x$ goes from $0$ to $pi$.
      – Aniruddha Deshmukh
      Jan 4 at 3:29










    • @John Omielan I find combining you twos opinions make the explanation more clear. Can I think of it in this way? Whenever I do substitution, it's like I draw the same graph (with same size) on the another axis and try to integrate about the new axis (and so don't care the former definition)? So after the substitution, it's like I'm integrating with respect to a new axis. And here comes Aniruddha's idea, since the two graphs have same size, integrating them gives the same result. So for the about example, I can just replace x by u assuming they are the same.
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:53










    • Let me end up with another example to see if my understanding is fine, suppose we have int u+1 du = int x dx + int x + 1 dx, then we can say 2int u+1 du = int x dx
      – Stephen Fong
      Jan 4 at 3:54


















    Not so familiar with the terminology ~ what does it mean by "u varies from π to x"?
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:28




    Not so familiar with the terminology ~ what does it mean by "u varies from π to x"?
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:28












    I changed it. It varies from $pi$ to $0$ as $x$ goes from $0$ to $pi$.
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Jan 4 at 3:29




    I changed it. It varies from $pi$ to $0$ as $x$ goes from $0$ to $pi$.
    – Aniruddha Deshmukh
    Jan 4 at 3:29












    @John Omielan I find combining you twos opinions make the explanation more clear. Can I think of it in this way? Whenever I do substitution, it's like I draw the same graph (with same size) on the another axis and try to integrate about the new axis (and so don't care the former definition)? So after the substitution, it's like I'm integrating with respect to a new axis. And here comes Aniruddha's idea, since the two graphs have same size, integrating them gives the same result. So for the about example, I can just replace x by u assuming they are the same.
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:53




    @John Omielan I find combining you twos opinions make the explanation more clear. Can I think of it in this way? Whenever I do substitution, it's like I draw the same graph (with same size) on the another axis and try to integrate about the new axis (and so don't care the former definition)? So after the substitution, it's like I'm integrating with respect to a new axis. And here comes Aniruddha's idea, since the two graphs have same size, integrating them gives the same result. So for the about example, I can just replace x by u assuming they are the same.
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:53












    Let me end up with another example to see if my understanding is fine, suppose we have int u+1 du = int x dx + int x + 1 dx, then we can say 2int u+1 du = int x dx
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:54






    Let me end up with another example to see if my understanding is fine, suppose we have int u+1 du = int x dx + int x + 1 dx, then we can say 2int u+1 du = int x dx
    – Stephen Fong
    Jan 4 at 3:54













    0














    We have:



    $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



    Rather than say "let $u = x$" I think it would be cleaner to say



    $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx =
    int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



    And then bring it over to the other side



    or



    $I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - I\
    2I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du\
    I = frac 12 int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$






    share|cite|improve this answer


























      0














      We have:



      $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



      Rather than say "let $u = x$" I think it would be cleaner to say



      $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx =
      int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



      And then bring it over to the other side



      or



      $I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - I\
      2I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du\
      I = frac 12 int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$






      share|cite|improve this answer
























        0












        0








        0






        We have:



        $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



        Rather than say "let $u = x$" I think it would be cleaner to say



        $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx =
        int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



        And then bring it over to the other side



        or



        $I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - I\
        2I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du\
        I = frac 12 int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$






        share|cite|improve this answer












        We have:



        $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



        Rather than say "let $u = x$" I think it would be cleaner to say



        $int^{π}_{0} frac{xsin(x)}{(1+cos^2(x))} dx =
        int^{π}_{0} frac{usin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$



        And then bring it over to the other side



        or



        $I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du - I\
        2I = int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du\
        I = frac 12 int^{π}_{0} frac{πsin(u)}{(1+cos^2(u))} du$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Jan 4 at 4:41









        Doug MDoug M

        44.2k31854




        44.2k31854






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061277%2fwhy-can-we-redefine-the-definition-of-a-variable-during-substitution-or-let-say%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            1300-talet

            1300-talet

            Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8