Proving a set is closed but not open












0















Suppose we have that set $S = { (x,y) in R^2 : x>0, y = sin(1/x)
}$
. Prove that $S$ is closed but not open.




${bf Relevant ; definitions:}$ A set $S$ is open if for every $s in S$, one can find an $r>0$ so that $|x-s| < r$ for all $x in mathbb{R}^n$. $S$ is closed if $S^c$ is open.



Attempt:



Now, the problem here is to make an $r>0$ so that the ball $B(r,x)$ is in the complement of $S$ for all $x in S^c$. (here x =(x,y)) Now, if $x in S^c$, then $x < 0$ and $y neq sin (1/x)$. Here is where I get stuck. I dont know how to construct such an $r$. Any help?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What about at $(x=0,y)inmathbb{R}^2$? Can you construct such a ball?
    – Yadati Kiran
    Jan 4 at 8:12












  • no because there can be found some (x',y') where ball intersects sin(1/x)
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    I think this is wrong. $(0,0)$ is a counterexample. Any ball contains a point in $S$ in $x$-axis at least.
    – W. mu
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    In general, once you see strict inequality in a set "closed" is probably not true (unless one considers unbounded constructs or something similar).
    – Math_QED
    Jan 4 at 8:51
















0















Suppose we have that set $S = { (x,y) in R^2 : x>0, y = sin(1/x)
}$
. Prove that $S$ is closed but not open.




${bf Relevant ; definitions:}$ A set $S$ is open if for every $s in S$, one can find an $r>0$ so that $|x-s| < r$ for all $x in mathbb{R}^n$. $S$ is closed if $S^c$ is open.



Attempt:



Now, the problem here is to make an $r>0$ so that the ball $B(r,x)$ is in the complement of $S$ for all $x in S^c$. (here x =(x,y)) Now, if $x in S^c$, then $x < 0$ and $y neq sin (1/x)$. Here is where I get stuck. I dont know how to construct such an $r$. Any help?










share|cite|improve this question






















  • What about at $(x=0,y)inmathbb{R}^2$? Can you construct such a ball?
    – Yadati Kiran
    Jan 4 at 8:12












  • no because there can be found some (x',y') where ball intersects sin(1/x)
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    I think this is wrong. $(0,0)$ is a counterexample. Any ball contains a point in $S$ in $x$-axis at least.
    – W. mu
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    In general, once you see strict inequality in a set "closed" is probably not true (unless one considers unbounded constructs or something similar).
    – Math_QED
    Jan 4 at 8:51














0












0








0








Suppose we have that set $S = { (x,y) in R^2 : x>0, y = sin(1/x)
}$
. Prove that $S$ is closed but not open.




${bf Relevant ; definitions:}$ A set $S$ is open if for every $s in S$, one can find an $r>0$ so that $|x-s| < r$ for all $x in mathbb{R}^n$. $S$ is closed if $S^c$ is open.



Attempt:



Now, the problem here is to make an $r>0$ so that the ball $B(r,x)$ is in the complement of $S$ for all $x in S^c$. (here x =(x,y)) Now, if $x in S^c$, then $x < 0$ and $y neq sin (1/x)$. Here is where I get stuck. I dont know how to construct such an $r$. Any help?










share|cite|improve this question














Suppose we have that set $S = { (x,y) in R^2 : x>0, y = sin(1/x)
}$
. Prove that $S$ is closed but not open.




${bf Relevant ; definitions:}$ A set $S$ is open if for every $s in S$, one can find an $r>0$ so that $|x-s| < r$ for all $x in mathbb{R}^n$. $S$ is closed if $S^c$ is open.



Attempt:



Now, the problem here is to make an $r>0$ so that the ball $B(r,x)$ is in the complement of $S$ for all $x in S^c$. (here x =(x,y)) Now, if $x in S^c$, then $x < 0$ and $y neq sin (1/x)$. Here is where I get stuck. I dont know how to construct such an $r$. Any help?







real-analysis calculus






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 4 at 8:01









Jimmy SabaterJimmy Sabater

1,980219




1,980219












  • What about at $(x=0,y)inmathbb{R}^2$? Can you construct such a ball?
    – Yadati Kiran
    Jan 4 at 8:12












  • no because there can be found some (x',y') where ball intersects sin(1/x)
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    I think this is wrong. $(0,0)$ is a counterexample. Any ball contains a point in $S$ in $x$-axis at least.
    – W. mu
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    In general, once you see strict inequality in a set "closed" is probably not true (unless one considers unbounded constructs or something similar).
    – Math_QED
    Jan 4 at 8:51


















  • What about at $(x=0,y)inmathbb{R}^2$? Can you construct such a ball?
    – Yadati Kiran
    Jan 4 at 8:12












  • no because there can be found some (x',y') where ball intersects sin(1/x)
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    I think this is wrong. $(0,0)$ is a counterexample. Any ball contains a point in $S$ in $x$-axis at least.
    – W. mu
    Jan 4 at 8:13








  • 1




    In general, once you see strict inequality in a set "closed" is probably not true (unless one considers unbounded constructs or something similar).
    – Math_QED
    Jan 4 at 8:51
















What about at $(x=0,y)inmathbb{R}^2$? Can you construct such a ball?
– Yadati Kiran
Jan 4 at 8:12






What about at $(x=0,y)inmathbb{R}^2$? Can you construct such a ball?
– Yadati Kiran
Jan 4 at 8:12














no because there can be found some (x',y') where ball intersects sin(1/x)
– Jimmy Sabater
Jan 4 at 8:13






no because there can be found some (x',y') where ball intersects sin(1/x)
– Jimmy Sabater
Jan 4 at 8:13






1




1




I think this is wrong. $(0,0)$ is a counterexample. Any ball contains a point in $S$ in $x$-axis at least.
– W. mu
Jan 4 at 8:13






I think this is wrong. $(0,0)$ is a counterexample. Any ball contains a point in $S$ in $x$-axis at least.
– W. mu
Jan 4 at 8:13






1




1




In general, once you see strict inequality in a set "closed" is probably not true (unless one considers unbounded constructs or something similar).
– Math_QED
Jan 4 at 8:51




In general, once you see strict inequality in a set "closed" is probably not true (unless one considers unbounded constructs or something similar).
– Math_QED
Jan 4 at 8:51










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














$(frac 1 {npi},0) in S$ for each $n$ and $(frac 1 {npi},0) to (0,0)$ so the set is not closed. It is not open either. $(1,sin, 1)$ is in $S$ but there is no $r>0$ such that $B((1,sin, 1),r) subset S$?: if there is such an $r$ we get a contradiction as follows: let $0<|y-sin (1)| <r$. Then $(1,y) in B((1,sin, 1),r)$ but $(1,sin (1))$ is not in $S$. (If it is in $S$ then we must have $y =sin(1)$ which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Yes, using this definition is easy. The challenge here is to use first principles.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:23










  • @JimmySabater In your attempt you are trying to prove that $S^{c}$ is open. This is not true. First principles or otherwise you cannot prove a wrong statement. I have shown you why $S^{c}$ is not open.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 8:26










  • Kavi.Kindly elaborate on your last line: B( (1, sin 1), r), r >0, not a subset of S, I do not get it. Thanks.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:16










  • @PeterSzilas I have given the details now.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 9:25










  • Kavi.Thank you.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:38











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061411%2fproving-a-set-is-closed-but-not-open%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














$(frac 1 {npi},0) in S$ for each $n$ and $(frac 1 {npi},0) to (0,0)$ so the set is not closed. It is not open either. $(1,sin, 1)$ is in $S$ but there is no $r>0$ such that $B((1,sin, 1),r) subset S$?: if there is such an $r$ we get a contradiction as follows: let $0<|y-sin (1)| <r$. Then $(1,y) in B((1,sin, 1),r)$ but $(1,sin (1))$ is not in $S$. (If it is in $S$ then we must have $y =sin(1)$ which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Yes, using this definition is easy. The challenge here is to use first principles.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:23










  • @JimmySabater In your attempt you are trying to prove that $S^{c}$ is open. This is not true. First principles or otherwise you cannot prove a wrong statement. I have shown you why $S^{c}$ is not open.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 8:26










  • Kavi.Kindly elaborate on your last line: B( (1, sin 1), r), r >0, not a subset of S, I do not get it. Thanks.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:16










  • @PeterSzilas I have given the details now.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 9:25










  • Kavi.Thank you.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:38
















1














$(frac 1 {npi},0) in S$ for each $n$ and $(frac 1 {npi},0) to (0,0)$ so the set is not closed. It is not open either. $(1,sin, 1)$ is in $S$ but there is no $r>0$ such that $B((1,sin, 1),r) subset S$?: if there is such an $r$ we get a contradiction as follows: let $0<|y-sin (1)| <r$. Then $(1,y) in B((1,sin, 1),r)$ but $(1,sin (1))$ is not in $S$. (If it is in $S$ then we must have $y =sin(1)$ which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Yes, using this definition is easy. The challenge here is to use first principles.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:23










  • @JimmySabater In your attempt you are trying to prove that $S^{c}$ is open. This is not true. First principles or otherwise you cannot prove a wrong statement. I have shown you why $S^{c}$ is not open.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 8:26










  • Kavi.Kindly elaborate on your last line: B( (1, sin 1), r), r >0, not a subset of S, I do not get it. Thanks.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:16










  • @PeterSzilas I have given the details now.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 9:25










  • Kavi.Thank you.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:38














1












1








1






$(frac 1 {npi},0) in S$ for each $n$ and $(frac 1 {npi},0) to (0,0)$ so the set is not closed. It is not open either. $(1,sin, 1)$ is in $S$ but there is no $r>0$ such that $B((1,sin, 1),r) subset S$?: if there is such an $r$ we get a contradiction as follows: let $0<|y-sin (1)| <r$. Then $(1,y) in B((1,sin, 1),r)$ but $(1,sin (1))$ is not in $S$. (If it is in $S$ then we must have $y =sin(1)$ which is a contradiction.






share|cite|improve this answer














$(frac 1 {npi},0) in S$ for each $n$ and $(frac 1 {npi},0) to (0,0)$ so the set is not closed. It is not open either. $(1,sin, 1)$ is in $S$ but there is no $r>0$ such that $B((1,sin, 1),r) subset S$?: if there is such an $r$ we get a contradiction as follows: let $0<|y-sin (1)| <r$. Then $(1,y) in B((1,sin, 1),r)$ but $(1,sin (1))$ is not in $S$. (If it is in $S$ then we must have $y =sin(1)$ which is a contradiction.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 4 at 9:25

























answered Jan 4 at 8:18









Kavi Rama MurthyKavi Rama Murthy

51.7k32055




51.7k32055












  • Yes, using this definition is easy. The challenge here is to use first principles.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:23










  • @JimmySabater In your attempt you are trying to prove that $S^{c}$ is open. This is not true. First principles or otherwise you cannot prove a wrong statement. I have shown you why $S^{c}$ is not open.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 8:26










  • Kavi.Kindly elaborate on your last line: B( (1, sin 1), r), r >0, not a subset of S, I do not get it. Thanks.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:16










  • @PeterSzilas I have given the details now.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 9:25










  • Kavi.Thank you.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:38


















  • Yes, using this definition is easy. The challenge here is to use first principles.
    – Jimmy Sabater
    Jan 4 at 8:23










  • @JimmySabater In your attempt you are trying to prove that $S^{c}$ is open. This is not true. First principles or otherwise you cannot prove a wrong statement. I have shown you why $S^{c}$ is not open.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 8:26










  • Kavi.Kindly elaborate on your last line: B( (1, sin 1), r), r >0, not a subset of S, I do not get it. Thanks.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:16










  • @PeterSzilas I have given the details now.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 9:25










  • Kavi.Thank you.
    – Peter Szilas
    Jan 4 at 9:38
















Yes, using this definition is easy. The challenge here is to use first principles.
– Jimmy Sabater
Jan 4 at 8:23




Yes, using this definition is easy. The challenge here is to use first principles.
– Jimmy Sabater
Jan 4 at 8:23












@JimmySabater In your attempt you are trying to prove that $S^{c}$ is open. This is not true. First principles or otherwise you cannot prove a wrong statement. I have shown you why $S^{c}$ is not open.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 8:26




@JimmySabater In your attempt you are trying to prove that $S^{c}$ is open. This is not true. First principles or otherwise you cannot prove a wrong statement. I have shown you why $S^{c}$ is not open.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 8:26












Kavi.Kindly elaborate on your last line: B( (1, sin 1), r), r >0, not a subset of S, I do not get it. Thanks.
– Peter Szilas
Jan 4 at 9:16




Kavi.Kindly elaborate on your last line: B( (1, sin 1), r), r >0, not a subset of S, I do not get it. Thanks.
– Peter Szilas
Jan 4 at 9:16












@PeterSzilas I have given the details now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 9:25




@PeterSzilas I have given the details now.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 9:25












Kavi.Thank you.
– Peter Szilas
Jan 4 at 9:38




Kavi.Thank you.
– Peter Szilas
Jan 4 at 9:38


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061411%2fproving-a-set-is-closed-but-not-open%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

1300-talet

1300-talet

Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8