i know application but want proof of following definite integration property .
Question: prove
(a) If $f(x)=f(-x)$ and $f(x+pi)=-f(x)$ then,
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{dfrac{pi}{2}}f(x) cos x dx$$
Then, use this identity in proving result (b):
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
My attempt: I easily solved part (b) as follows
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx$$
Now using identity (a) because $sec(-x)= sec x$ and $sec(x+pi)=-sec x$ we get:
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{pi/2}sec xcos x dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
But I don't know how to prove identity (a) and how can I use identity to evaluate some famous definite integrals.
real-analysis integration definite-integrals improper-integrals contest-math
|
show 4 more comments
Question: prove
(a) If $f(x)=f(-x)$ and $f(x+pi)=-f(x)$ then,
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{dfrac{pi}{2}}f(x) cos x dx$$
Then, use this identity in proving result (b):
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
My attempt: I easily solved part (b) as follows
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx$$
Now using identity (a) because $sec(-x)= sec x$ and $sec(x+pi)=-sec x$ we get:
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{pi/2}sec xcos x dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
But I don't know how to prove identity (a) and how can I use identity to evaluate some famous definite integrals.
real-analysis integration definite-integrals improper-integrals contest-math
2
How do you even define $int_0^infty frac{tan x}{x},dx$?
– Zachary
2 days ago
@Zachary What's wrong with that?
– Andrei
2 days ago
yes $dfrac{tanx}{x} $is undefined at $x=0$
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
2
$f(x)=frac{tan(x)}{x}$ is undefined at $x=frac{pi}{2}+kpi, kinmathbb{Z}$ and $x=0$.
– Ixion
2 days ago
4
Well, it has limit $1$ there, but I think @Zachary was more worried about the infinite areas of alternating sign either side of all the other asymptotes.
– J.G.
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Question: prove
(a) If $f(x)=f(-x)$ and $f(x+pi)=-f(x)$ then,
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{dfrac{pi}{2}}f(x) cos x dx$$
Then, use this identity in proving result (b):
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
My attempt: I easily solved part (b) as follows
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx$$
Now using identity (a) because $sec(-x)= sec x$ and $sec(x+pi)=-sec x$ we get:
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{pi/2}sec xcos x dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
But I don't know how to prove identity (a) and how can I use identity to evaluate some famous definite integrals.
real-analysis integration definite-integrals improper-integrals contest-math
Question: prove
(a) If $f(x)=f(-x)$ and $f(x+pi)=-f(x)$ then,
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{dfrac{pi}{2}}f(x) cos x dx$$
Then, use this identity in proving result (b):
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
My attempt: I easily solved part (b) as follows
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}dfrac{tan x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx$$
Now using identity (a) because $sec(-x)= sec x$ and $sec(x+pi)=-sec x$ we get:
$$int_{0_{+}}^{infty}sec x dfrac{sin x}{x}dx=int_{0_{+}}^{pi/2}sec xcos x dx=dfrac{pi}{2}$$
But I don't know how to prove identity (a) and how can I use identity to evaluate some famous definite integrals.
real-analysis integration definite-integrals improper-integrals contest-math
real-analysis integration definite-integrals improper-integrals contest-math
edited yesterday
Mutantoe
582412
582412
asked 2 days ago
deleteprofiledeleteprofile
1,148316
1,148316
2
How do you even define $int_0^infty frac{tan x}{x},dx$?
– Zachary
2 days ago
@Zachary What's wrong with that?
– Andrei
2 days ago
yes $dfrac{tanx}{x} $is undefined at $x=0$
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
2
$f(x)=frac{tan(x)}{x}$ is undefined at $x=frac{pi}{2}+kpi, kinmathbb{Z}$ and $x=0$.
– Ixion
2 days ago
4
Well, it has limit $1$ there, but I think @Zachary was more worried about the infinite areas of alternating sign either side of all the other asymptotes.
– J.G.
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
2
How do you even define $int_0^infty frac{tan x}{x},dx$?
– Zachary
2 days ago
@Zachary What's wrong with that?
– Andrei
2 days ago
yes $dfrac{tanx}{x} $is undefined at $x=0$
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
2
$f(x)=frac{tan(x)}{x}$ is undefined at $x=frac{pi}{2}+kpi, kinmathbb{Z}$ and $x=0$.
– Ixion
2 days ago
4
Well, it has limit $1$ there, but I think @Zachary was more worried about the infinite areas of alternating sign either side of all the other asymptotes.
– J.G.
2 days ago
2
2
How do you even define $int_0^infty frac{tan x}{x},dx$?
– Zachary
2 days ago
How do you even define $int_0^infty frac{tan x}{x},dx$?
– Zachary
2 days ago
@Zachary What's wrong with that?
– Andrei
2 days ago
@Zachary What's wrong with that?
– Andrei
2 days ago
yes $dfrac{tanx}{x} $is undefined at $x=0$
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
yes $dfrac{tanx}{x} $is undefined at $x=0$
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
2
2
$f(x)=frac{tan(x)}{x}$ is undefined at $x=frac{pi}{2}+kpi, kinmathbb{Z}$ and $x=0$.
– Ixion
2 days ago
$f(x)=frac{tan(x)}{x}$ is undefined at $x=frac{pi}{2}+kpi, kinmathbb{Z}$ and $x=0$.
– Ixion
2 days ago
4
4
Well, it has limit $1$ there, but I think @Zachary was more worried about the infinite areas of alternating sign either side of all the other asymptotes.
– J.G.
2 days ago
Well, it has limit $1$ there, but I think @Zachary was more worried about the infinite areas of alternating sign either side of all the other asymptotes.
– J.G.
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
The conditions imposed on $f$ imply its Fourier series is a linear combination of the $cos nx$ with $n$ odd, so by linearity we need only check that case. Note for $nne 1$ that $$int_0^inftyfrac{sin xcos nx}{x}dx=int_0^inftyfrac{sin (n+1)x-sin (n-1)x}{2x}dx=0$$ and $$int_0^{pi/2}cos xcos nxdx=frac{1}{2}int_0^{pi/2} (cos(n+1)x+cos(n-1)x)dx=0.$$By contrast, in the $n=1$ case the first integral reduces to $int_0^inftyfrac{sin 2x dx}{2x}=frac{pi}{4}$ and the second to $int_0^{pi/2}cos^2 xdx=frac{pi}{4}$.
+1.. ..can we say that since $f(x)$ is an even function and also posses half wave symmetry so, it's fourier series contains only odd harmonics with zero dc component .....i think you used this ...
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
1
@deleteprofile Yes. The second property implies the period is $2pi$, and in the most general series satisfying that said property also eliminates the even-$n$ case, and parity removes sines.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
HINTS rather than a complete solution
It appears from the question that small issues like whether the integral converges at all, domains of definition, etc., are not your concern. So employing every possible form of what a friend used to call "engineer's prerogative" (i.e., swapping integrals, taking sums inside and outside integrals, rearranging series, etc.), here's a suggestion or two:
We have
$$
f(x)=f(-x)\
f(x+pi)=-f(x)
$$
so the value of $f$ is entirely determined by its values on the interval $[0, pi/2]$. So let's take the big integral and break it into pieces:
begin{align}
int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^pi f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_pi^{frac{3pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
end{align}
by subsituting $x = u - pi$ in the 2nd and third integrals of the first line, and then $u = -x$ in the second integral of the second line, and then swapping limits on the integral, and replacing $sin -x$ with $-sin x$. If you keep at this, you end up with something where all terms integrate from $0$ to $pi/2$.
So then you combine them all under one big integral (!), and factor out the $f(x) sin x$ part to get something that looks like
$$
int_0^frac{pi}{2} f(x) sin x sum frac{1}{pm x pm kpi} ~ dx
$$
where you'll now have to fiddle to get the signs and the values for $k$ right, and then observe that the stuff in the sum turns out to be $cot x$. Indeed, maybe it's obvious from some power series that I won't know off the top of my head.
Anyhow, that'll get you started. When you've done all the algebra, you can go back and worry about convergence and whether the stuff you've written down is well-defined or not.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066327%2fi-know-application-but-want-proof-of-following-definite-integration-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The conditions imposed on $f$ imply its Fourier series is a linear combination of the $cos nx$ with $n$ odd, so by linearity we need only check that case. Note for $nne 1$ that $$int_0^inftyfrac{sin xcos nx}{x}dx=int_0^inftyfrac{sin (n+1)x-sin (n-1)x}{2x}dx=0$$ and $$int_0^{pi/2}cos xcos nxdx=frac{1}{2}int_0^{pi/2} (cos(n+1)x+cos(n-1)x)dx=0.$$By contrast, in the $n=1$ case the first integral reduces to $int_0^inftyfrac{sin 2x dx}{2x}=frac{pi}{4}$ and the second to $int_0^{pi/2}cos^2 xdx=frac{pi}{4}$.
+1.. ..can we say that since $f(x)$ is an even function and also posses half wave symmetry so, it's fourier series contains only odd harmonics with zero dc component .....i think you used this ...
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
1
@deleteprofile Yes. The second property implies the period is $2pi$, and in the most general series satisfying that said property also eliminates the even-$n$ case, and parity removes sines.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
The conditions imposed on $f$ imply its Fourier series is a linear combination of the $cos nx$ with $n$ odd, so by linearity we need only check that case. Note for $nne 1$ that $$int_0^inftyfrac{sin xcos nx}{x}dx=int_0^inftyfrac{sin (n+1)x-sin (n-1)x}{2x}dx=0$$ and $$int_0^{pi/2}cos xcos nxdx=frac{1}{2}int_0^{pi/2} (cos(n+1)x+cos(n-1)x)dx=0.$$By contrast, in the $n=1$ case the first integral reduces to $int_0^inftyfrac{sin 2x dx}{2x}=frac{pi}{4}$ and the second to $int_0^{pi/2}cos^2 xdx=frac{pi}{4}$.
+1.. ..can we say that since $f(x)$ is an even function and also posses half wave symmetry so, it's fourier series contains only odd harmonics with zero dc component .....i think you used this ...
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
1
@deleteprofile Yes. The second property implies the period is $2pi$, and in the most general series satisfying that said property also eliminates the even-$n$ case, and parity removes sines.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
The conditions imposed on $f$ imply its Fourier series is a linear combination of the $cos nx$ with $n$ odd, so by linearity we need only check that case. Note for $nne 1$ that $$int_0^inftyfrac{sin xcos nx}{x}dx=int_0^inftyfrac{sin (n+1)x-sin (n-1)x}{2x}dx=0$$ and $$int_0^{pi/2}cos xcos nxdx=frac{1}{2}int_0^{pi/2} (cos(n+1)x+cos(n-1)x)dx=0.$$By contrast, in the $n=1$ case the first integral reduces to $int_0^inftyfrac{sin 2x dx}{2x}=frac{pi}{4}$ and the second to $int_0^{pi/2}cos^2 xdx=frac{pi}{4}$.
The conditions imposed on $f$ imply its Fourier series is a linear combination of the $cos nx$ with $n$ odd, so by linearity we need only check that case. Note for $nne 1$ that $$int_0^inftyfrac{sin xcos nx}{x}dx=int_0^inftyfrac{sin (n+1)x-sin (n-1)x}{2x}dx=0$$ and $$int_0^{pi/2}cos xcos nxdx=frac{1}{2}int_0^{pi/2} (cos(n+1)x+cos(n-1)x)dx=0.$$By contrast, in the $n=1$ case the first integral reduces to $int_0^inftyfrac{sin 2x dx}{2x}=frac{pi}{4}$ and the second to $int_0^{pi/2}cos^2 xdx=frac{pi}{4}$.
answered 2 days ago
J.G.J.G.
23.4k22237
23.4k22237
+1.. ..can we say that since $f(x)$ is an even function and also posses half wave symmetry so, it's fourier series contains only odd harmonics with zero dc component .....i think you used this ...
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
1
@deleteprofile Yes. The second property implies the period is $2pi$, and in the most general series satisfying that said property also eliminates the even-$n$ case, and parity removes sines.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
+1.. ..can we say that since $f(x)$ is an even function and also posses half wave symmetry so, it's fourier series contains only odd harmonics with zero dc component .....i think you used this ...
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
1
@deleteprofile Yes. The second property implies the period is $2pi$, and in the most general series satisfying that said property also eliminates the even-$n$ case, and parity removes sines.
– J.G.
2 days ago
+1.. ..can we say that since $f(x)$ is an even function and also posses half wave symmetry so, it's fourier series contains only odd harmonics with zero dc component .....i think you used this ...
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
+1.. ..can we say that since $f(x)$ is an even function and also posses half wave symmetry so, it's fourier series contains only odd harmonics with zero dc component .....i think you used this ...
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
1
1
@deleteprofile Yes. The second property implies the period is $2pi$, and in the most general series satisfying that said property also eliminates the even-$n$ case, and parity removes sines.
– J.G.
2 days ago
@deleteprofile Yes. The second property implies the period is $2pi$, and in the most general series satisfying that said property also eliminates the even-$n$ case, and parity removes sines.
– J.G.
2 days ago
add a comment |
HINTS rather than a complete solution
It appears from the question that small issues like whether the integral converges at all, domains of definition, etc., are not your concern. So employing every possible form of what a friend used to call "engineer's prerogative" (i.e., swapping integrals, taking sums inside and outside integrals, rearranging series, etc.), here's a suggestion or two:
We have
$$
f(x)=f(-x)\
f(x+pi)=-f(x)
$$
so the value of $f$ is entirely determined by its values on the interval $[0, pi/2]$. So let's take the big integral and break it into pieces:
begin{align}
int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^pi f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_pi^{frac{3pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
end{align}
by subsituting $x = u - pi$ in the 2nd and third integrals of the first line, and then $u = -x$ in the second integral of the second line, and then swapping limits on the integral, and replacing $sin -x$ with $-sin x$. If you keep at this, you end up with something where all terms integrate from $0$ to $pi/2$.
So then you combine them all under one big integral (!), and factor out the $f(x) sin x$ part to get something that looks like
$$
int_0^frac{pi}{2} f(x) sin x sum frac{1}{pm x pm kpi} ~ dx
$$
where you'll now have to fiddle to get the signs and the values for $k$ right, and then observe that the stuff in the sum turns out to be $cot x$. Indeed, maybe it's obvious from some power series that I won't know off the top of my head.
Anyhow, that'll get you started. When you've done all the algebra, you can go back and worry about convergence and whether the stuff you've written down is well-defined or not.
add a comment |
HINTS rather than a complete solution
It appears from the question that small issues like whether the integral converges at all, domains of definition, etc., are not your concern. So employing every possible form of what a friend used to call "engineer's prerogative" (i.e., swapping integrals, taking sums inside and outside integrals, rearranging series, etc.), here's a suggestion or two:
We have
$$
f(x)=f(-x)\
f(x+pi)=-f(x)
$$
so the value of $f$ is entirely determined by its values on the interval $[0, pi/2]$. So let's take the big integral and break it into pieces:
begin{align}
int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^pi f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_pi^{frac{3pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
end{align}
by subsituting $x = u - pi$ in the 2nd and third integrals of the first line, and then $u = -x$ in the second integral of the second line, and then swapping limits on the integral, and replacing $sin -x$ with $-sin x$. If you keep at this, you end up with something where all terms integrate from $0$ to $pi/2$.
So then you combine them all under one big integral (!), and factor out the $f(x) sin x$ part to get something that looks like
$$
int_0^frac{pi}{2} f(x) sin x sum frac{1}{pm x pm kpi} ~ dx
$$
where you'll now have to fiddle to get the signs and the values for $k$ right, and then observe that the stuff in the sum turns out to be $cot x$. Indeed, maybe it's obvious from some power series that I won't know off the top of my head.
Anyhow, that'll get you started. When you've done all the algebra, you can go back and worry about convergence and whether the stuff you've written down is well-defined or not.
add a comment |
HINTS rather than a complete solution
It appears from the question that small issues like whether the integral converges at all, domains of definition, etc., are not your concern. So employing every possible form of what a friend used to call "engineer's prerogative" (i.e., swapping integrals, taking sums inside and outside integrals, rearranging series, etc.), here's a suggestion or two:
We have
$$
f(x)=f(-x)\
f(x+pi)=-f(x)
$$
so the value of $f$ is entirely determined by its values on the interval $[0, pi/2]$. So let's take the big integral and break it into pieces:
begin{align}
int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^pi f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_pi^{frac{3pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
end{align}
by subsituting $x = u - pi$ in the 2nd and third integrals of the first line, and then $u = -x$ in the second integral of the second line, and then swapping limits on the integral, and replacing $sin -x$ with $-sin x$. If you keep at this, you end up with something where all terms integrate from $0$ to $pi/2$.
So then you combine them all under one big integral (!), and factor out the $f(x) sin x$ part to get something that looks like
$$
int_0^frac{pi}{2} f(x) sin x sum frac{1}{pm x pm kpi} ~ dx
$$
where you'll now have to fiddle to get the signs and the values for $k$ right, and then observe that the stuff in the sum turns out to be $cot x$. Indeed, maybe it's obvious from some power series that I won't know off the top of my head.
Anyhow, that'll get you started. When you've done all the algebra, you can go back and worry about convergence and whether the stuff you've written down is well-defined or not.
HINTS rather than a complete solution
It appears from the question that small issues like whether the integral converges at all, domains of definition, etc., are not your concern. So employing every possible form of what a friend used to call "engineer's prerogative" (i.e., swapping integrals, taking sums inside and outside integrals, rearranging series, etc.), here's a suggestion or two:
We have
$$
f(x)=f(-x)\
f(x+pi)=-f(x)
$$
so the value of $f$ is entirely determined by its values on the interval $[0, pi/2]$. So let's take the big integral and break it into pieces:
begin{align}
int_{0_{+}}^{infty} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^pi f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_pi^{frac{3pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_{-frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_{frac{pi}{2}}^0 f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin (-x)}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
&= int_{0}^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{x}~dx
+ int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(-x+pi)}~dx
- int_0^{frac{pi}{2}} f(x)dfrac{sin x}{(x+pi)}~dx + ldots\
end{align}
by subsituting $x = u - pi$ in the 2nd and third integrals of the first line, and then $u = -x$ in the second integral of the second line, and then swapping limits on the integral, and replacing $sin -x$ with $-sin x$. If you keep at this, you end up with something where all terms integrate from $0$ to $pi/2$.
So then you combine them all under one big integral (!), and factor out the $f(x) sin x$ part to get something that looks like
$$
int_0^frac{pi}{2} f(x) sin x sum frac{1}{pm x pm kpi} ~ dx
$$
where you'll now have to fiddle to get the signs and the values for $k$ right, and then observe that the stuff in the sum turns out to be $cot x$. Indeed, maybe it's obvious from some power series that I won't know off the top of my head.
Anyhow, that'll get you started. When you've done all the algebra, you can go back and worry about convergence and whether the stuff you've written down is well-defined or not.
answered 2 days ago
John HughesJohn Hughes
62.6k24090
62.6k24090
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066327%2fi-know-application-but-want-proof-of-following-definite-integration-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
How do you even define $int_0^infty frac{tan x}{x},dx$?
– Zachary
2 days ago
@Zachary What's wrong with that?
– Andrei
2 days ago
yes $dfrac{tanx}{x} $is undefined at $x=0$
– deleteprofile
2 days ago
2
$f(x)=frac{tan(x)}{x}$ is undefined at $x=frac{pi}{2}+kpi, kinmathbb{Z}$ and $x=0$.
– Ixion
2 days ago
4
Well, it has limit $1$ there, but I think @Zachary was more worried about the infinite areas of alternating sign either side of all the other asymptotes.
– J.G.
2 days ago