Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of the limit of the following diagram?
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
add a comment |
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
add a comment |
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
Let $M_0$ be an R-module, and suppose $M_{n+1}$ is the pushout of the diagram below as shown, for all $n in mathbb{N}$:
$$begin{array}{ccc}M_n&to& M_{n+1}\uparrow &&uparrow\A&to& Bend{array}$$
Define $M:= colim(M_0 rightarrow M_1 rightarrow M_2 rightarrow.....)$
Can we deduce that $M_0$ is a submodule of $M$? What about if the left arrow is surjective and the bottom arrow is injective? Would this help?
I am asking this in order to complete my understanding of the proof that $R-mod$ has enough injectives. In this proof, A and B are given, however there is no justification given for the claim which I am inquiring about, it is just stated to be obvious. Thanks.
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
category-theory homological-algebra limits-colimits diagram-chasing
asked yesterday
Daven
33319
33319
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
– Daven
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060633%2fcan-we-deduce-that-m-0-is-a-submodule-of-the-limit-of-the-following-diagram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
– Daven
yesterday
add a comment |
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
– Daven
yesterday
add a comment |
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
If not yet done, convince yourself (by element chasing) that the pushout of an injective module homomorphism is injective.
Then, if $Ato B$ is injective, then $M_i$ embeds to $M_{i+1}$, and it's easy to see that $M':=bigcup_iM_i$ satisfies the universal property of the colimit, hence $Mcong M'$ and the natural arrow $M_ito M$ is injective for all $i$.
answered yesterday
Berci
59.7k23672
59.7k23672
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
– Daven
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
– Daven
yesterday
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
– Daven
yesterday
Thanks, this is exactly what I was looking for!
– Daven
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060633%2fcan-we-deduce-that-m-0-is-a-submodule-of-the-limit-of-the-following-diagram%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown