Reversing a Queue and converting it into an int array












8














I have a Queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



Collections.reverse((List)queue);
int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


This code has two problems:




  1. the explict casting (List)queue;

  2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





Clearification of the problem:



Whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.










share|improve this question





























    8














    I have a Queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



    Collections.reverse((List)queue);
    int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


    This code has two problems:




    1. the explict casting (List)queue;

    2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


    So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





    Clearification of the problem:



    Whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.










    share|improve this question



























      8












      8








      8


      3





      I have a Queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



      Collections.reverse((List)queue);
      int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


      This code has two problems:




      1. the explict casting (List)queue;

      2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


      So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





      Clearification of the problem:



      Whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.










      share|improve this question















      I have a Queue<Integer> declared as Queue<Integer> queue=new LinkedList();, I need to reverse the elments order in it, and then convert it into an int array. I wrote below code:



      Collections.reverse((List)queue);
      int res=queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


      This code has two problems:




      1. the explict casting (List)queue;

      2. I wonder if there is a one line solution.


      So do we have any more elegant way to do this?





      Clearification of the problem:



      Whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the reversed elements is what I need.







      java collections queue






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Moira

      5,25221937




      5,25221937










      asked yesterday









      ZhaoGang

      1,6181015




      1,6181015
























          8 Answers
          8






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



          Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
          // ...
          int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
          ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


          You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



          public static int reverse(int arr) {
          for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
          int temp = arr[i];
          arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
          arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
          }
          return arr;
          }


          And then



          int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





          share|improve this answer





















          • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
            – nullpointer
            yesterday








          • 2




            @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
            – Elliott Frisch
            yesterday



















          6














          No need to get fancy here.



          static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
          int i = queue.size();
          int array = new int[i];
          for (int element : queue) {
          array[--i] = element;
          }
          return array;
          }


          Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






          share|improve this answer





























            5














            The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



            Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


            Details:



            I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



            Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
            while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
            stack.add(queue.remove());
            }
            while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
            queue.add(stack.pop());
            }


            and then convert to an array as you will



            int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




            On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



            LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
            Collections.reverse(dequeue);
            int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





            whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
            reversed elements is what I need.




            Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



            Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
            int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


            This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



            @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
            static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
            Object temp = input.toArray();
            return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
            .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
            }





            share|improve this answer























            • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
              – Marcono1234
              yesterday






            • 1




              If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
              – Slaw
              yesterday












            • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
              – nullpointer
              yesterday












            • @Marcono1234 actualy, the JVM does away with the synchronized blocks within the Vector class is its most recent versions when it detects they're are not shared and their aquisition cost is negligible :) but yeah, on principle you shouldn't do that as Vector is not recommended to be used anymore.
              – João Rebelo
              yesterday



















            3














            In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



            The skeleton of code like this:



            int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
            .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
            .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





            share|improve this answer





















            • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
              – Marcono1234
              yesterday










            • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
              – TongChen
              yesterday










            • it does not matter in this case probably since (if I understand it correctly) the combiner is only used for parallel streams. However, you should probably comment that the implementation is not correct, to prevent bugs in the future in case someone uses this code for a parallel stream. It should probably be (a, b) -> {b.addAll(a); return b;}.
              – Marcono1234
              14 hours ago



















            2














            Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



            Integer intArray = queue.stream()
            .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
            .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


            the int version should like



            int intArray = queue.stream()
            .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
            .stream()
            .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
            .toArray();





            share|improve this answer























            • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
              – Keijack
              yesterday



















            1














            You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



            int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
            .collectInt(i -> i)
            .toList()
            .asReversed()
            .toArray();


            You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



            int ints = queue.stream()
            .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
            .asReversed()
            .toArray();


            You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



            int ints =
            IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


            Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



            int ints =
            IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


            Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






            share|improve this answer































              1














              This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



              int res = queue.stream()
              .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
              .stream()
              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
              .toArray();


              If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






              share|improve this answer























              • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                – Marcono1234
                yesterday



















              0














              Here is a different solution using Stream and Collections.reverse() in one line of code:



              Integer reversedArray = queue.stream()
              .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
              list -> {
              Collections.reverse(list);
              return list.toArray(new Integer[0]);
              }
              ));


              OR



              int reversedArray = queue.stream()
              .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
              list -> {
              Collections.reverse(list);
              return list.stream()
              .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
              .toArray();
              }
              ));





              share|improve this answer























                Your Answer






                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function () {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function () {
                StackExchange.snippets.init();
                });
                });
                }, "code-snippets");

                StackExchange.ready(function() {
                var channelOptions = {
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "1"
                };
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
                createEditor();
                });
                }
                else {
                createEditor();
                }
                });

                function createEditor() {
                StackExchange.prepareEditor({
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader: {
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                },
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                });


                }
                });














                draft saved

                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function () {
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54031994%2freversing-a-queueinteger-and-converting-it-into-an-int-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                }
                );

                Post as a guest















                Required, but never shown

























                8 Answers
                8






                active

                oldest

                votes








                8 Answers
                8






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes









                4














                First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



                Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                // ...
                int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
                ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


                You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



                public static int reverse(int arr) {
                for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
                int temp = arr[i];
                arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
                arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
                }
                return arr;
                }


                And then



                int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





                share|improve this answer





















                • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                  – nullpointer
                  yesterday








                • 2




                  @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                  – Elliott Frisch
                  yesterday
















                4














                First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



                Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                // ...
                int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
                ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


                You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



                public static int reverse(int arr) {
                for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
                int temp = arr[i];
                arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
                arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
                }
                return arr;
                }


                And then



                int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





                share|improve this answer





















                • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                  – nullpointer
                  yesterday








                • 2




                  @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                  – Elliott Frisch
                  yesterday














                4












                4








                4






                First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



                Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                // ...
                int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
                ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


                You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



                public static int reverse(int arr) {
                for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
                int temp = arr[i];
                arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
                arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
                }
                return arr;
                }


                And then



                int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());





                share|improve this answer












                First, please don't use raw types (do use the diamond operator). Not quite a one liner, but you could first convert to an int and then use commons lang ArrayUtils.reverse(int) like



                Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                // ...
                int arr = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();
                ArrayUtils.reverse(arr);


                You could also write your own int reverse method that allowed for a fluent interface (e.g. return the int) then you could make it a one liner. Like,



                public static int reverse(int arr) {
                for (int i = 0; i < arr.length / 2; i++) {
                int temp = arr[i];
                arr[i] = arr[arr.length - i - 1];
                arr[arr.length - i - 1] = temp;
                }
                return arr;
                }


                And then



                int arr = reverse(queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray());






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                Elliott Frisch

                153k1389178




                153k1389178












                • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                  – nullpointer
                  yesterday








                • 2




                  @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                  – Elliott Frisch
                  yesterday


















                • but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                  – nullpointer
                  yesterday








                • 2




                  @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                  – Elliott Frisch
                  yesterday
















                but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                – nullpointer
                yesterday






                but this wouldn't reverse the queue.
                – nullpointer
                yesterday






                2




                2




                @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                – Elliott Frisch
                yesterday




                @nullpointer True. But, if the goal is a reversed int then it isn't clear that the queue must also be reversed. In fact, I would assume the queue goes out of scope and the int is returned to the caller.
                – Elliott Frisch
                yesterday













                6














                No need to get fancy here.



                static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
                int i = queue.size();
                int array = new int[i];
                for (int element : queue) {
                array[--i] = element;
                }
                return array;
                }


                Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






                share|improve this answer


























                  6














                  No need to get fancy here.



                  static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
                  int i = queue.size();
                  int array = new int[i];
                  for (int element : queue) {
                  array[--i] = element;
                  }
                  return array;
                  }


                  Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






                  share|improve this answer
























                    6












                    6








                    6






                    No need to get fancy here.



                    static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
                    int i = queue.size();
                    int array = new int[i];
                    for (int element : queue) {
                    array[--i] = element;
                    }
                    return array;
                    }


                    Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.






                    share|improve this answer












                    No need to get fancy here.



                    static int toReversedArray(Queue<Integer> queue) {
                    int i = queue.size();
                    int array = new int[i];
                    for (int element : queue) {
                    array[--i] = element;
                    }
                    return array;
                    }


                    Not a one-liner, but easy to read and fast.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    xehpuk

                    4,3072335




                    4,3072335























                        5














                        The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



                        Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


                        Details:



                        I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



                        Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
                        while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
                        stack.add(queue.remove());
                        }
                        while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
                        queue.add(stack.pop());
                        }


                        and then convert to an array as you will



                        int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




                        On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



                        LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
                        Collections.reverse(dequeue);
                        int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





                        whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
                        reversed elements is what I need.




                        Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



                        Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                        int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


                        This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



                        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
                        static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
                        Object temp = input.toArray();
                        return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
                        .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
                        }





                        share|improve this answer























                        • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                          – Slaw
                          yesterday












                        • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                          – nullpointer
                          yesterday












                        • @Marcono1234 actualy, the JVM does away with the synchronized blocks within the Vector class is its most recent versions when it detects they're are not shared and their aquisition cost is negligible :) but yeah, on principle you shouldn't do that as Vector is not recommended to be used anymore.
                          – João Rebelo
                          yesterday
















                        5














                        The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



                        Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


                        Details:



                        I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



                        Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
                        while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
                        stack.add(queue.remove());
                        }
                        while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
                        queue.add(stack.pop());
                        }


                        and then convert to an array as you will



                        int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




                        On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



                        LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
                        Collections.reverse(dequeue);
                        int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





                        whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
                        reversed elements is what I need.




                        Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



                        Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                        int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


                        This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



                        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
                        static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
                        Object temp = input.toArray();
                        return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
                        .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
                        }





                        share|improve this answer























                        • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                          – Slaw
                          yesterday












                        • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                          – nullpointer
                          yesterday












                        • @Marcono1234 actualy, the JVM does away with the synchronized blocks within the Vector class is its most recent versions when it detects they're are not shared and their aquisition cost is negligible :) but yeah, on principle you shouldn't do that as Vector is not recommended to be used anymore.
                          – João Rebelo
                          yesterday














                        5












                        5








                        5






                        The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



                        Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


                        Details:



                        I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



                        Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
                        while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
                        stack.add(queue.remove());
                        }
                        while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
                        queue.add(stack.pop());
                        }


                        and then convert to an array as you will



                        int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




                        On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



                        LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
                        Collections.reverse(dequeue);
                        int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





                        whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
                        reversed elements is what I need.




                        Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



                        Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                        int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


                        This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



                        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
                        static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
                        Object temp = input.toArray();
                        return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
                        .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
                        }





                        share|improve this answer














                        The Collections.reverse implies only to List which is just one type of Collection, you cannot cast a Queue to a List. But you can try casting it to a LinkedList as:



                        Collections.reverse((LinkedList)queue);


                        Details:



                        I doubt that there is a built-in API for reversing the queue. You could still follow a conventional way of doing that using a Stack as :



                        Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
                        while (!queue.isEmpty()) {
                        stack.add(queue.remove());
                        }
                        while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
                        queue.add(stack.pop());
                        }


                        and then convert to an array as you will



                        int res = queue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();




                        On the other hand, if a Deque satisfies your needs currently, you can simply rely on the LinkedList itself since it implements a Deque as well. Then your current implementation would be as simple as :



                        LinkedList<Integer> dequeue = new LinkedList<>();
                        Collections.reverse(dequeue);
                        int res = dequeue.stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





                        whether the queue is reversed is not important. An int array of the
                        reversed elements is what I need.




                        Another solution from what others have already suggested is to reverse the Stream of the queue and then mapToInt to convert to an array as :



                        Queue<Integer> queue = new LinkedList<>();
                        int res = reverse(queue.stream()).mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();


                        This uses a utility reverse suggested by Stuart Marks in this answer such that:



                        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
                        static <T> Stream<T> reverse(Stream<T> input) {
                        Object temp = input.toArray();
                        return (Stream<T>) IntStream.range(0, temp.length)
                        .mapToObj(i -> temp[temp.length - i - 1]);
                        }






                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited yesterday

























                        answered yesterday









                        nullpointer

                        43.3k1093178




                        43.3k1093178












                        • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                          – Slaw
                          yesterday












                        • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                          – nullpointer
                          yesterday












                        • @Marcono1234 actualy, the JVM does away with the synchronized blocks within the Vector class is its most recent versions when it detects they're are not shared and their aquisition cost is negligible :) but yeah, on principle you shouldn't do that as Vector is not recommended to be used anymore.
                          – João Rebelo
                          yesterday


















                        • You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday






                        • 1




                          If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                          – Slaw
                          yesterday












                        • @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                          – nullpointer
                          yesterday












                        • @Marcono1234 actualy, the JVM does away with the synchronized blocks within the Vector class is its most recent versions when it detects they're are not shared and their aquisition cost is negligible :) but yeah, on principle you shouldn't do that as Vector is not recommended to be used anymore.
                          – João Rebelo
                          yesterday
















                        You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                        – Marcono1234
                        yesterday




                        You should probably not be using the Stack class since it extends Vector and is therefore synchronized, which is not needed here and only decreases performance.
                        – Marcono1234
                        yesterday




                        1




                        1




                        If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                        – Slaw
                        yesterday






                        If using a Deque it might be more efficient to use Deque.descendingIterator() combined with Spliterators and StreamSupport, assuming only the reversed array is needed and not the reversed Deque. The code will be more verbose, however.
                        – Slaw
                        yesterday














                        @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                        – nullpointer
                        yesterday






                        @Slaw It would be sure. Just that the intention of when I wrote the answer was to ensure the original store is reversed, but later the OP clarified that the reversed output is what matters eventually.
                        – nullpointer
                        yesterday














                        @Marcono1234 actualy, the JVM does away with the synchronized blocks within the Vector class is its most recent versions when it detects they're are not shared and their aquisition cost is negligible :) but yeah, on principle you shouldn't do that as Vector is not recommended to be used anymore.
                        – João Rebelo
                        yesterday




                        @Marcono1234 actualy, the JVM does away with the synchronized blocks within the Vector class is its most recent versions when it detects they're are not shared and their aquisition cost is negligible :) but yeah, on principle you shouldn't do that as Vector is not recommended to be used anymore.
                        – João Rebelo
                        yesterday











                        3














                        In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



                        The skeleton of code like this:



                        int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
                        .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
                        .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





                        share|improve this answer





















                        • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday










                        • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                          – TongChen
                          yesterday










                        • it does not matter in this case probably since (if I understand it correctly) the combiner is only used for parallel streams. However, you should probably comment that the implementation is not correct, to prevent bugs in the future in case someone uses this code for a parallel stream. It should probably be (a, b) -> {b.addAll(a); return b;}.
                          – Marcono1234
                          14 hours ago
















                        3














                        In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



                        The skeleton of code like this:



                        int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
                        .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
                        .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





                        share|improve this answer





















                        • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday










                        • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                          – TongChen
                          yesterday










                        • it does not matter in this case probably since (if I understand it correctly) the combiner is only used for parallel streams. However, you should probably comment that the implementation is not correct, to prevent bugs in the future in case someone uses this code for a parallel stream. It should probably be (a, b) -> {b.addAll(a); return b;}.
                          – Marcono1234
                          14 hours ago














                        3












                        3








                        3






                        In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



                        The skeleton of code like this:



                        int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
                        .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
                        .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();





                        share|improve this answer












                        In Java8 version you can use Stream API to help you.



                        The skeleton of code like this:



                        int reversedQueue = queue.stream()
                        .collect(Collector.of(() -> new ArrayDeque<Integer>(), ArrayDeque::addFirst, (a,b)->a))
                        .stream().mapToInt(Integer::intValue).toArray();






                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered yesterday









                        TongChen

                        1958




                        1958












                        • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday










                        • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                          – TongChen
                          yesterday










                        • it does not matter in this case probably since (if I understand it correctly) the combiner is only used for parallel streams. However, you should probably comment that the implementation is not correct, to prevent bugs in the future in case someone uses this code for a parallel stream. It should probably be (a, b) -> {b.addAll(a); return b;}.
                          – Marcono1234
                          14 hours ago


















                        • It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                          – Marcono1234
                          yesterday










                        • @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                          – TongChen
                          yesterday










                        • it does not matter in this case probably since (if I understand it correctly) the combiner is only used for parallel streams. However, you should probably comment that the implementation is not correct, to prevent bugs in the future in case someone uses this code for a parallel stream. It should probably be (a, b) -> {b.addAll(a); return b;}.
                          – Marcono1234
                          14 hours ago
















                        It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                        – Marcono1234
                        yesterday




                        It looks like your combiner ((a,b)->a) is missing b in the result
                        – Marcono1234
                        yesterday












                        @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                        – TongChen
                        yesterday




                        @Marcono1234 There is no problem.The third parameter of Collector.of method is one BinaryOperator it's the combiner function for the new collector. In our code there only one collector,so can't miss any element in collector.
                        – TongChen
                        yesterday












                        it does not matter in this case probably since (if I understand it correctly) the combiner is only used for parallel streams. However, you should probably comment that the implementation is not correct, to prevent bugs in the future in case someone uses this code for a parallel stream. It should probably be (a, b) -> {b.addAll(a); return b;}.
                        – Marcono1234
                        14 hours ago




                        it does not matter in this case probably since (if I understand it correctly) the combiner is only used for parallel streams. However, you should probably comment that the implementation is not correct, to prevent bugs in the future in case someone uses this code for a parallel stream. It should probably be (a, b) -> {b.addAll(a); return b;}.
                        – Marcono1234
                        14 hours ago











                        2














                        Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                        Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                        the int version should like



                        int intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .stream()
                        .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                        .toArray();





                        share|improve this answer























                        • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                          – Keijack
                          yesterday
















                        2














                        Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                        Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                        the int version should like



                        int intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .stream()
                        .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                        .toArray();





                        share|improve this answer























                        • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                          – Keijack
                          yesterday














                        2












                        2








                        2






                        Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                        Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                        the int version should like



                        int intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .stream()
                        .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                        .toArray();





                        share|improve this answer














                        Finally, I figure out this one line solution.



                        Integer intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .toArray(new Integer[queue.size()]);


                        the int version should like



                        int intArray = queue.stream()
                        .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, LinkedList::addFirst, LinkedList::addAll)
                        .stream()
                        .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                        .toArray();






                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited yesterday

























                        answered yesterday









                        Keijack

                        1666




                        1666












                        • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                          – Keijack
                          yesterday


















                        • Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                          – Keijack
                          yesterday
















                        Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                        – Keijack
                        yesterday




                        Thanks @Hulk, add the int version, but I think I like the Integer version, simpler.
                        – Keijack
                        yesterday











                        1














                        You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                        int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                        .collectInt(i -> i)
                        .toList()
                        .asReversed()
                        .toArray();


                        You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                        int ints = queue.stream()
                        .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                        .asReversed()
                        .toArray();


                        You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                        int ints =
                        IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                        Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                        int ints =
                        IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                        Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          1














                          You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                          int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                          .collectInt(i -> i)
                          .toList()
                          .asReversed()
                          .toArray();


                          You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                          int ints = queue.stream()
                          .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                          .asReversed()
                          .toArray();


                          You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                          int ints =
                          IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                          Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                          int ints =
                          IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                          Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






                          share|improve this answer


























                            1












                            1








                            1






                            You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                            int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                            .collectInt(i -> i)
                            .toList()
                            .asReversed()
                            .toArray();


                            You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                            int ints = queue.stream()
                            .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                            .asReversed()
                            .toArray();


                            You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                            int ints =
                            IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                            Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                            int ints =
                            IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                            Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.






                            share|improve this answer














                            You can use the LazyIterate utility from Eclipse Collections as follows.



                            int res = LazyIterate.adapt(queue)
                            .collectInt(i -> i)
                            .toList()
                            .asReversed()
                            .toArray();


                            You can also use the Collectors2 class with a Java Stream.



                            int ints = queue.stream()
                            .collect(Collectors2.collectInt(i -> i, IntLists.mutable::empty))
                            .asReversed()
                            .toArray();


                            You can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntList, reverse it, and then convert it to an int array.



                            int ints =
                            IntLists.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).asReversed().toArray();


                            Finally, you can stream the int values directly into a MutableIntStack and convert it to an int array.



                            int ints =
                            IntStacks.mutable.ofAll(queue.stream().mapToInt(i -> i)).toArray();


                            Note: I am a committer for Eclipse Collections.







                            share|improve this answer














                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer








                            edited yesterday

























                            answered yesterday









                            Donald Raab

                            4,21112029




                            4,21112029























                                1














                                This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                                int res = queue.stream()
                                .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                                .stream()
                                .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                .toArray();


                                If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






                                share|improve this answer























                                • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                  – Marcono1234
                                  yesterday
















                                1














                                This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                                int res = queue.stream()
                                .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                                .stream()
                                .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                .toArray();


                                If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






                                share|improve this answer























                                • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                  – Marcono1234
                                  yesterday














                                1












                                1








                                1






                                This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                                int res = queue.stream()
                                .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                                .stream()
                                .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                .toArray();


                                If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.






                                share|improve this answer














                                This is one line, but it may not be very efficient:



                                int res = queue.stream()
                                .collect(LinkedList<Integer>::new, (l, e) -> l.addFirst(e), (l1, l2) -> l1.addAll(l2))
                                .stream()
                                .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                .toArray();


                                If you want to be efficient and readable, you should continue using what you have now.







                                share|improve this answer














                                share|improve this answer



                                share|improve this answer








                                edited yesterday









                                ZhaoGang

                                1,6181015




                                1,6181015










                                answered yesterday









                                Jai

                                5,73311231




                                5,73311231












                                • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                  – Marcono1234
                                  yesterday


















                                • This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                  – Marcono1234
                                  yesterday
















                                This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                – Marcono1234
                                yesterday




                                This does not reverse the queue (or its values)
                                – Marcono1234
                                yesterday











                                0














                                Here is a different solution using Stream and Collections.reverse() in one line of code:



                                Integer reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                list -> {
                                Collections.reverse(list);
                                return list.toArray(new Integer[0]);
                                }
                                ));


                                OR



                                int reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                list -> {
                                Collections.reverse(list);
                                return list.stream()
                                .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                .toArray();
                                }
                                ));





                                share|improve this answer




























                                  0














                                  Here is a different solution using Stream and Collections.reverse() in one line of code:



                                  Integer reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                  .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                  list -> {
                                  Collections.reverse(list);
                                  return list.toArray(new Integer[0]);
                                  }
                                  ));


                                  OR



                                  int reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                  .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                  list -> {
                                  Collections.reverse(list);
                                  return list.stream()
                                  .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                  .toArray();
                                  }
                                  ));





                                  share|improve this answer


























                                    0












                                    0








                                    0






                                    Here is a different solution using Stream and Collections.reverse() in one line of code:



                                    Integer reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                    .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                    list -> {
                                    Collections.reverse(list);
                                    return list.toArray(new Integer[0]);
                                    }
                                    ));


                                    OR



                                    int reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                    .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                    list -> {
                                    Collections.reverse(list);
                                    return list.stream()
                                    .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                    .toArray();
                                    }
                                    ));





                                    share|improve this answer














                                    Here is a different solution using Stream and Collections.reverse() in one line of code:



                                    Integer reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                    .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                    list -> {
                                    Collections.reverse(list);
                                    return list.toArray(new Integer[0]);
                                    }
                                    ));


                                    OR



                                    int reversedArray = queue.stream()
                                    .collect(Collectors.collectingAndThen(Collectors.toList(),
                                    list -> {
                                    Collections.reverse(list);
                                    return list.stream()
                                    .mapToInt(Integer::intValue)
                                    .toArray();
                                    }
                                    ));






                                    share|improve this answer














                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer








                                    edited yesterday

























                                    answered yesterday









                                    aminography

                                    5,51821130




                                    5,51821130






























                                        draft saved

                                        draft discarded




















































                                        Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                        Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                        Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                        • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                        But avoid



                                        • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                        • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                        To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function () {
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f54031994%2freversing-a-queueinteger-and-converting-it-into-an-int-array%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                        }
                                        );

                                        Post as a guest















                                        Required, but never shown





















































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown

































                                        Required, but never shown














                                        Required, but never shown












                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Required, but never shown







                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        1300-talet

                                        1300-talet

                                        Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8