Can You Have 2 Numerical, Identical Values To Represent the nth Percentile?
For an assignment, I am required to find the value of a piece of data in the 70th
percentile using mean and standard deviation.
Here is my organized data in ascending order: 0, 1, -4, 0, -3, 0, -4, -2, 0, 1, -1, 2, 0, -4, 5, -2, 0, 3, -3, 0.
The image link attached below called 'Percentiles With Normal Distribution'
is the work I have done to find the value. (For some reason I can`t seem to upload the actual image here...)
Percentiles with Normal Distribution
Just in case you cannot access the image, I will explain what I did.
I created the normal distribution graph and shaded approximately 70% of it, leaving a little part on the right side empty.
I am finding b, where P(X > b) = p, where p = 0.7
. I reversed this and it is nowP(X > b) = 1 - p (where p = 0.7).
This means to find the (1-p)Th percentile for X.Next, I found the corresponding percentile for Z by looking in the body of the Z-Score Table, and finding the probability that is closest to p = 0.7, to which I did this:
(1-0.7) = 0.3 so the closest value to this is 0.3015, which falls under row = -0.5 and column = 0.02.
This means the70th percentile for Z is equal to -0.52.
Lastly, I just changed the Z-Score value back into an x-value (original units).
x = Mean + Z(Standard Deviation).
I substiuted my mean value of -0.55, Z-Score value of -0.52, and standard deviation of 2.4 and solved for x.x = -2.
Now, if you look at the organized data set I provided above, youd see that there are two -2
s. This is confusing me because I`m not sure whether there can be two numerical values to represent the value of a certain percentile.
probability normal-distribution standard-deviation percentile
New contributor
add a comment |
For an assignment, I am required to find the value of a piece of data in the 70th
percentile using mean and standard deviation.
Here is my organized data in ascending order: 0, 1, -4, 0, -3, 0, -4, -2, 0, 1, -1, 2, 0, -4, 5, -2, 0, 3, -3, 0.
The image link attached below called 'Percentiles With Normal Distribution'
is the work I have done to find the value. (For some reason I can`t seem to upload the actual image here...)
Percentiles with Normal Distribution
Just in case you cannot access the image, I will explain what I did.
I created the normal distribution graph and shaded approximately 70% of it, leaving a little part on the right side empty.
I am finding b, where P(X > b) = p, where p = 0.7
. I reversed this and it is nowP(X > b) = 1 - p (where p = 0.7).
This means to find the (1-p)Th percentile for X.Next, I found the corresponding percentile for Z by looking in the body of the Z-Score Table, and finding the probability that is closest to p = 0.7, to which I did this:
(1-0.7) = 0.3 so the closest value to this is 0.3015, which falls under row = -0.5 and column = 0.02.
This means the70th percentile for Z is equal to -0.52.
Lastly, I just changed the Z-Score value back into an x-value (original units).
x = Mean + Z(Standard Deviation).
I substiuted my mean value of -0.55, Z-Score value of -0.52, and standard deviation of 2.4 and solved for x.x = -2.
Now, if you look at the organized data set I provided above, youd see that there are two -2
s. This is confusing me because I`m not sure whether there can be two numerical values to represent the value of a certain percentile.
probability normal-distribution standard-deviation percentile
New contributor
add a comment |
For an assignment, I am required to find the value of a piece of data in the 70th
percentile using mean and standard deviation.
Here is my organized data in ascending order: 0, 1, -4, 0, -3, 0, -4, -2, 0, 1, -1, 2, 0, -4, 5, -2, 0, 3, -3, 0.
The image link attached below called 'Percentiles With Normal Distribution'
is the work I have done to find the value. (For some reason I can`t seem to upload the actual image here...)
Percentiles with Normal Distribution
Just in case you cannot access the image, I will explain what I did.
I created the normal distribution graph and shaded approximately 70% of it, leaving a little part on the right side empty.
I am finding b, where P(X > b) = p, where p = 0.7
. I reversed this and it is nowP(X > b) = 1 - p (where p = 0.7).
This means to find the (1-p)Th percentile for X.Next, I found the corresponding percentile for Z by looking in the body of the Z-Score Table, and finding the probability that is closest to p = 0.7, to which I did this:
(1-0.7) = 0.3 so the closest value to this is 0.3015, which falls under row = -0.5 and column = 0.02.
This means the70th percentile for Z is equal to -0.52.
Lastly, I just changed the Z-Score value back into an x-value (original units).
x = Mean + Z(Standard Deviation).
I substiuted my mean value of -0.55, Z-Score value of -0.52, and standard deviation of 2.4 and solved for x.x = -2.
Now, if you look at the organized data set I provided above, youd see that there are two -2
s. This is confusing me because I`m not sure whether there can be two numerical values to represent the value of a certain percentile.
probability normal-distribution standard-deviation percentile
New contributor
For an assignment, I am required to find the value of a piece of data in the 70th
percentile using mean and standard deviation.
Here is my organized data in ascending order: 0, 1, -4, 0, -3, 0, -4, -2, 0, 1, -1, 2, 0, -4, 5, -2, 0, 3, -3, 0.
The image link attached below called 'Percentiles With Normal Distribution'
is the work I have done to find the value. (For some reason I can`t seem to upload the actual image here...)
Percentiles with Normal Distribution
Just in case you cannot access the image, I will explain what I did.
I created the normal distribution graph and shaded approximately 70% of it, leaving a little part on the right side empty.
I am finding b, where P(X > b) = p, where p = 0.7
. I reversed this and it is nowP(X > b) = 1 - p (where p = 0.7).
This means to find the (1-p)Th percentile for X.Next, I found the corresponding percentile for Z by looking in the body of the Z-Score Table, and finding the probability that is closest to p = 0.7, to which I did this:
(1-0.7) = 0.3 so the closest value to this is 0.3015, which falls under row = -0.5 and column = 0.02.
This means the70th percentile for Z is equal to -0.52.
Lastly, I just changed the Z-Score value back into an x-value (original units).
x = Mean + Z(Standard Deviation).
I substiuted my mean value of -0.55, Z-Score value of -0.52, and standard deviation of 2.4 and solved for x.x = -2.
Now, if you look at the organized data set I provided above, youd see that there are two -2
s. This is confusing me because I`m not sure whether there can be two numerical values to represent the value of a certain percentile.
probability normal-distribution standard-deviation percentile
probability normal-distribution standard-deviation percentile
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Jan 3 at 21:34
Yashvi Shah
124
124
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Three points:
If you look at your picture, you want $+0.52$ for the $70$th percentile of a standard normal distribution, but you used $-0.52$ which in fact corresponds to the $30$th percentile. Correcting this would have given you about $0.7$ rather than $-1.8$
There is no problem with a percentile corresponding to a value from the sample which happens multiple times. For example with the data
3, 5, 5, 5, 7
it is obvious that the $50$th percentile or median is $5$I am not sure why you need to fit a normal distribution unless it is to fit the question's "using mean and standard deviation". As an alternative, sorting your $20$ data points to
-4, -4, -4, -3, -3, -2, -2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5
, you have $25%$ of the values below $-2$ and $65%$ of the values above $-2$ so you could say $-2$ is the $30$th percentile. Similarly you have $40%$ of the values below $0$ and $25%$ above $0$ so you could say $0$ is the $70$th percentile.
This really helps! Thank you! But, is there a mathematical calculation way to prove that 0 is the 70th percentile? My teacher demands mathematical calculations. The way I’ve done it, I’m getting -2.
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
@YashviShah: all my comments were mathematical. You should not be getting $-2$ but about $0.7$ from your calculations.
– Henry
2 days ago
To justify $0$ you could draw an empirical cumulative distribution graph perhaps like the one I have added to my answer
– Henry
2 days ago
Im not quite sure how you
re getting 0 as the 70th percentile through the calculations. Did you calculate the same way I did up there? What did you do? Im trying to get the result of 0 being the 70th percentile. And as for the empirical cumulative distribution graph, I don
t think we learnt that. Is there a way to justify using a normal distribution graph or something?
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
Also, I used this link to help me with getting the percentile value using mean and standard deviation - dummies.com/education/math/statistics/…
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Yashvi Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061025%2fcan-you-have-2-numerical-identical-values-to-represent-the-nth-percentile%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Three points:
If you look at your picture, you want $+0.52$ for the $70$th percentile of a standard normal distribution, but you used $-0.52$ which in fact corresponds to the $30$th percentile. Correcting this would have given you about $0.7$ rather than $-1.8$
There is no problem with a percentile corresponding to a value from the sample which happens multiple times. For example with the data
3, 5, 5, 5, 7
it is obvious that the $50$th percentile or median is $5$I am not sure why you need to fit a normal distribution unless it is to fit the question's "using mean and standard deviation". As an alternative, sorting your $20$ data points to
-4, -4, -4, -3, -3, -2, -2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5
, you have $25%$ of the values below $-2$ and $65%$ of the values above $-2$ so you could say $-2$ is the $30$th percentile. Similarly you have $40%$ of the values below $0$ and $25%$ above $0$ so you could say $0$ is the $70$th percentile.
This really helps! Thank you! But, is there a mathematical calculation way to prove that 0 is the 70th percentile? My teacher demands mathematical calculations. The way I’ve done it, I’m getting -2.
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
@YashviShah: all my comments were mathematical. You should not be getting $-2$ but about $0.7$ from your calculations.
– Henry
2 days ago
To justify $0$ you could draw an empirical cumulative distribution graph perhaps like the one I have added to my answer
– Henry
2 days ago
Im not quite sure how you
re getting 0 as the 70th percentile through the calculations. Did you calculate the same way I did up there? What did you do? Im trying to get the result of 0 being the 70th percentile. And as for the empirical cumulative distribution graph, I don
t think we learnt that. Is there a way to justify using a normal distribution graph or something?
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
Also, I used this link to help me with getting the percentile value using mean and standard deviation - dummies.com/education/math/statistics/…
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
add a comment |
Three points:
If you look at your picture, you want $+0.52$ for the $70$th percentile of a standard normal distribution, but you used $-0.52$ which in fact corresponds to the $30$th percentile. Correcting this would have given you about $0.7$ rather than $-1.8$
There is no problem with a percentile corresponding to a value from the sample which happens multiple times. For example with the data
3, 5, 5, 5, 7
it is obvious that the $50$th percentile or median is $5$I am not sure why you need to fit a normal distribution unless it is to fit the question's "using mean and standard deviation". As an alternative, sorting your $20$ data points to
-4, -4, -4, -3, -3, -2, -2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5
, you have $25%$ of the values below $-2$ and $65%$ of the values above $-2$ so you could say $-2$ is the $30$th percentile. Similarly you have $40%$ of the values below $0$ and $25%$ above $0$ so you could say $0$ is the $70$th percentile.
This really helps! Thank you! But, is there a mathematical calculation way to prove that 0 is the 70th percentile? My teacher demands mathematical calculations. The way I’ve done it, I’m getting -2.
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
@YashviShah: all my comments were mathematical. You should not be getting $-2$ but about $0.7$ from your calculations.
– Henry
2 days ago
To justify $0$ you could draw an empirical cumulative distribution graph perhaps like the one I have added to my answer
– Henry
2 days ago
Im not quite sure how you
re getting 0 as the 70th percentile through the calculations. Did you calculate the same way I did up there? What did you do? Im trying to get the result of 0 being the 70th percentile. And as for the empirical cumulative distribution graph, I don
t think we learnt that. Is there a way to justify using a normal distribution graph or something?
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
Also, I used this link to help me with getting the percentile value using mean and standard deviation - dummies.com/education/math/statistics/…
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
add a comment |
Three points:
If you look at your picture, you want $+0.52$ for the $70$th percentile of a standard normal distribution, but you used $-0.52$ which in fact corresponds to the $30$th percentile. Correcting this would have given you about $0.7$ rather than $-1.8$
There is no problem with a percentile corresponding to a value from the sample which happens multiple times. For example with the data
3, 5, 5, 5, 7
it is obvious that the $50$th percentile or median is $5$I am not sure why you need to fit a normal distribution unless it is to fit the question's "using mean and standard deviation". As an alternative, sorting your $20$ data points to
-4, -4, -4, -3, -3, -2, -2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5
, you have $25%$ of the values below $-2$ and $65%$ of the values above $-2$ so you could say $-2$ is the $30$th percentile. Similarly you have $40%$ of the values below $0$ and $25%$ above $0$ so you could say $0$ is the $70$th percentile.
Three points:
If you look at your picture, you want $+0.52$ for the $70$th percentile of a standard normal distribution, but you used $-0.52$ which in fact corresponds to the $30$th percentile. Correcting this would have given you about $0.7$ rather than $-1.8$
There is no problem with a percentile corresponding to a value from the sample which happens multiple times. For example with the data
3, 5, 5, 5, 7
it is obvious that the $50$th percentile or median is $5$I am not sure why you need to fit a normal distribution unless it is to fit the question's "using mean and standard deviation". As an alternative, sorting your $20$ data points to
-4, -4, -4, -3, -3, -2, -2, -1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5
, you have $25%$ of the values below $-2$ and $65%$ of the values above $-2$ so you could say $-2$ is the $30$th percentile. Similarly you have $40%$ of the values below $0$ and $25%$ above $0$ so you could say $0$ is the $70$th percentile.
edited 2 days ago
answered Jan 3 at 22:32
Henry
98.4k475162
98.4k475162
This really helps! Thank you! But, is there a mathematical calculation way to prove that 0 is the 70th percentile? My teacher demands mathematical calculations. The way I’ve done it, I’m getting -2.
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
@YashviShah: all my comments were mathematical. You should not be getting $-2$ but about $0.7$ from your calculations.
– Henry
2 days ago
To justify $0$ you could draw an empirical cumulative distribution graph perhaps like the one I have added to my answer
– Henry
2 days ago
Im not quite sure how you
re getting 0 as the 70th percentile through the calculations. Did you calculate the same way I did up there? What did you do? Im trying to get the result of 0 being the 70th percentile. And as for the empirical cumulative distribution graph, I don
t think we learnt that. Is there a way to justify using a normal distribution graph or something?
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
Also, I used this link to help me with getting the percentile value using mean and standard deviation - dummies.com/education/math/statistics/…
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
add a comment |
This really helps! Thank you! But, is there a mathematical calculation way to prove that 0 is the 70th percentile? My teacher demands mathematical calculations. The way I’ve done it, I’m getting -2.
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
@YashviShah: all my comments were mathematical. You should not be getting $-2$ but about $0.7$ from your calculations.
– Henry
2 days ago
To justify $0$ you could draw an empirical cumulative distribution graph perhaps like the one I have added to my answer
– Henry
2 days ago
Im not quite sure how you
re getting 0 as the 70th percentile through the calculations. Did you calculate the same way I did up there? What did you do? Im trying to get the result of 0 being the 70th percentile. And as for the empirical cumulative distribution graph, I don
t think we learnt that. Is there a way to justify using a normal distribution graph or something?
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
Also, I used this link to help me with getting the percentile value using mean and standard deviation - dummies.com/education/math/statistics/…
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
This really helps! Thank you! But, is there a mathematical calculation way to prove that 0 is the 70th percentile? My teacher demands mathematical calculations. The way I’ve done it, I’m getting -2.
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
This really helps! Thank you! But, is there a mathematical calculation way to prove that 0 is the 70th percentile? My teacher demands mathematical calculations. The way I’ve done it, I’m getting -2.
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
@YashviShah: all my comments were mathematical. You should not be getting $-2$ but about $0.7$ from your calculations.
– Henry
2 days ago
@YashviShah: all my comments were mathematical. You should not be getting $-2$ but about $0.7$ from your calculations.
– Henry
2 days ago
To justify $0$ you could draw an empirical cumulative distribution graph perhaps like the one I have added to my answer
– Henry
2 days ago
To justify $0$ you could draw an empirical cumulative distribution graph perhaps like the one I have added to my answer
– Henry
2 days ago
I
m not quite sure how you
re getting 0 as the 70th percentile through the calculations. Did you calculate the same way I did up there? What did you do? Im trying to get the result of 0 being the 70th percentile. And as for the empirical cumulative distribution graph, I don
t think we learnt that. Is there a way to justify using a normal distribution graph or something?– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
I
m not quite sure how you
re getting 0 as the 70th percentile through the calculations. Did you calculate the same way I did up there? What did you do? Im trying to get the result of 0 being the 70th percentile. And as for the empirical cumulative distribution graph, I don
t think we learnt that. Is there a way to justify using a normal distribution graph or something?– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
Also, I used this link to help me with getting the percentile value using mean and standard deviation - dummies.com/education/math/statistics/…
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
Also, I used this link to help me with getting the percentile value using mean and standard deviation - dummies.com/education/math/statistics/…
– Yashvi Shah
2 days ago
add a comment |
Yashvi Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yashvi Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yashvi Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yashvi Shah is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061025%2fcan-you-have-2-numerical-identical-values-to-represent-the-nth-percentile%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown