Gaussian Integers form an Euclidean Ring












3














A Ring $R$ is called euclidean if a map $f:Rbackslash {0} rightarrow mathbb{N}$ exists with the following properties: For two elements $a,b in R$ with $bneq 0$ there exist $q,rin R$ with:



(i) $a=qb+r$ and



(ii) $r=0$ or $fleft(r right)<fleft(bright)$.



The Gaussian Integers are a Ring $G:= {a+bi:a,b inmathbb{Z}}$. I want to show that $G$ is an euclidean Ring. Because $G$ is obviously an Integral domain, I would be able to show that $G$ is a Principal ideal domain.



My problem is with the second part (ii). I saw that such a mapping can be defined with $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$. Here is what I don't get: In our case the $b$ in (ii) is i, so I want to find a $f$ with $fleft(a right)<fleft(iright)$ for the Gaussian Integers right? How is $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$ helping here? I am sorry if the notation is a bit odd. For the Gaussian integers I get (to put them into the frame like in (i)) that $a=q$, $b=i$ and $r=a$ right?



Appreciate your help, KingDingeling










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I get the impression that you're confusing two different things. The $a$ and $b$ in (i) are two complex numbers, and have nothing to do with the $a$ and $b$ in $a^2+b^2$ which are two real numbers.
    – saulspatz
    yesterday






  • 1




    You have to find $qinmathbf Z[i]$ such that the norm of $a-qb$ is less that the norm of $b$.
    – Bernard
    yesterday






  • 1




    I don't know if you want to do this as an exercise. If not I can also post a complete solution.
    – 0x539
    yesterday






  • 1




    You are using $b$ in two different ways. One is as an element of the ring in the first paragraph and one is as the imaginary component of an element in the second paragraph. In neither case is $b$ given to be $i$
    – Ross Millikan
    yesterday








  • 1




    @KingDingeling A complete solution can also be found in the book by Dummit & Foote, somewhere in chapter $8$. The outline goes like this: if you're trying to divide $a+bi$ by $c+di$, first compute $dfrac {a+bi}{c+di} = r+qi$ where $r, q$ are rational (you can do this by multiplying the top and bottom of the LHS by $c-di$). So we can write $a+bi = (c+di)(r+qi)$. Now let $x$ be the closest integer to $r$ and $y$ be the closest integer to $q$. We can write then $a+bi = (c+di)(x+yi) + remainder$. Your job now is to show that $|remainder| < |c+di|$.
    – Ovi
    yesterday


















3














A Ring $R$ is called euclidean if a map $f:Rbackslash {0} rightarrow mathbb{N}$ exists with the following properties: For two elements $a,b in R$ with $bneq 0$ there exist $q,rin R$ with:



(i) $a=qb+r$ and



(ii) $r=0$ or $fleft(r right)<fleft(bright)$.



The Gaussian Integers are a Ring $G:= {a+bi:a,b inmathbb{Z}}$. I want to show that $G$ is an euclidean Ring. Because $G$ is obviously an Integral domain, I would be able to show that $G$ is a Principal ideal domain.



My problem is with the second part (ii). I saw that such a mapping can be defined with $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$. Here is what I don't get: In our case the $b$ in (ii) is i, so I want to find a $f$ with $fleft(a right)<fleft(iright)$ for the Gaussian Integers right? How is $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$ helping here? I am sorry if the notation is a bit odd. For the Gaussian integers I get (to put them into the frame like in (i)) that $a=q$, $b=i$ and $r=a$ right?



Appreciate your help, KingDingeling










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I get the impression that you're confusing two different things. The $a$ and $b$ in (i) are two complex numbers, and have nothing to do with the $a$ and $b$ in $a^2+b^2$ which are two real numbers.
    – saulspatz
    yesterday






  • 1




    You have to find $qinmathbf Z[i]$ such that the norm of $a-qb$ is less that the norm of $b$.
    – Bernard
    yesterday






  • 1




    I don't know if you want to do this as an exercise. If not I can also post a complete solution.
    – 0x539
    yesterday






  • 1




    You are using $b$ in two different ways. One is as an element of the ring in the first paragraph and one is as the imaginary component of an element in the second paragraph. In neither case is $b$ given to be $i$
    – Ross Millikan
    yesterday








  • 1




    @KingDingeling A complete solution can also be found in the book by Dummit & Foote, somewhere in chapter $8$. The outline goes like this: if you're trying to divide $a+bi$ by $c+di$, first compute $dfrac {a+bi}{c+di} = r+qi$ where $r, q$ are rational (you can do this by multiplying the top and bottom of the LHS by $c-di$). So we can write $a+bi = (c+di)(r+qi)$. Now let $x$ be the closest integer to $r$ and $y$ be the closest integer to $q$. We can write then $a+bi = (c+di)(x+yi) + remainder$. Your job now is to show that $|remainder| < |c+di|$.
    – Ovi
    yesterday
















3












3








3


1





A Ring $R$ is called euclidean if a map $f:Rbackslash {0} rightarrow mathbb{N}$ exists with the following properties: For two elements $a,b in R$ with $bneq 0$ there exist $q,rin R$ with:



(i) $a=qb+r$ and



(ii) $r=0$ or $fleft(r right)<fleft(bright)$.



The Gaussian Integers are a Ring $G:= {a+bi:a,b inmathbb{Z}}$. I want to show that $G$ is an euclidean Ring. Because $G$ is obviously an Integral domain, I would be able to show that $G$ is a Principal ideal domain.



My problem is with the second part (ii). I saw that such a mapping can be defined with $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$. Here is what I don't get: In our case the $b$ in (ii) is i, so I want to find a $f$ with $fleft(a right)<fleft(iright)$ for the Gaussian Integers right? How is $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$ helping here? I am sorry if the notation is a bit odd. For the Gaussian integers I get (to put them into the frame like in (i)) that $a=q$, $b=i$ and $r=a$ right?



Appreciate your help, KingDingeling










share|cite|improve this question















A Ring $R$ is called euclidean if a map $f:Rbackslash {0} rightarrow mathbb{N}$ exists with the following properties: For two elements $a,b in R$ with $bneq 0$ there exist $q,rin R$ with:



(i) $a=qb+r$ and



(ii) $r=0$ or $fleft(r right)<fleft(bright)$.



The Gaussian Integers are a Ring $G:= {a+bi:a,b inmathbb{Z}}$. I want to show that $G$ is an euclidean Ring. Because $G$ is obviously an Integral domain, I would be able to show that $G$ is a Principal ideal domain.



My problem is with the second part (ii). I saw that such a mapping can be defined with $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$. Here is what I don't get: In our case the $b$ in (ii) is i, so I want to find a $f$ with $fleft(a right)<fleft(iright)$ for the Gaussian Integers right? How is $a+bi mapsto a^2 + b^2$ helping here? I am sorry if the notation is a bit odd. For the Gaussian integers I get (to put them into the frame like in (i)) that $a=q$, $b=i$ and $r=a$ right?



Appreciate your help, KingDingeling







abstract-algebra ring-theory ideals principal-ideal-domains euclidean-domain






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday

























asked yesterday









KingDingeling

806




806








  • 1




    I get the impression that you're confusing two different things. The $a$ and $b$ in (i) are two complex numbers, and have nothing to do with the $a$ and $b$ in $a^2+b^2$ which are two real numbers.
    – saulspatz
    yesterday






  • 1




    You have to find $qinmathbf Z[i]$ such that the norm of $a-qb$ is less that the norm of $b$.
    – Bernard
    yesterday






  • 1




    I don't know if you want to do this as an exercise. If not I can also post a complete solution.
    – 0x539
    yesterday






  • 1




    You are using $b$ in two different ways. One is as an element of the ring in the first paragraph and one is as the imaginary component of an element in the second paragraph. In neither case is $b$ given to be $i$
    – Ross Millikan
    yesterday








  • 1




    @KingDingeling A complete solution can also be found in the book by Dummit & Foote, somewhere in chapter $8$. The outline goes like this: if you're trying to divide $a+bi$ by $c+di$, first compute $dfrac {a+bi}{c+di} = r+qi$ where $r, q$ are rational (you can do this by multiplying the top and bottom of the LHS by $c-di$). So we can write $a+bi = (c+di)(r+qi)$. Now let $x$ be the closest integer to $r$ and $y$ be the closest integer to $q$. We can write then $a+bi = (c+di)(x+yi) + remainder$. Your job now is to show that $|remainder| < |c+di|$.
    – Ovi
    yesterday
















  • 1




    I get the impression that you're confusing two different things. The $a$ and $b$ in (i) are two complex numbers, and have nothing to do with the $a$ and $b$ in $a^2+b^2$ which are two real numbers.
    – saulspatz
    yesterday






  • 1




    You have to find $qinmathbf Z[i]$ such that the norm of $a-qb$ is less that the norm of $b$.
    – Bernard
    yesterday






  • 1




    I don't know if you want to do this as an exercise. If not I can also post a complete solution.
    – 0x539
    yesterday






  • 1




    You are using $b$ in two different ways. One is as an element of the ring in the first paragraph and one is as the imaginary component of an element in the second paragraph. In neither case is $b$ given to be $i$
    – Ross Millikan
    yesterday








  • 1




    @KingDingeling A complete solution can also be found in the book by Dummit & Foote, somewhere in chapter $8$. The outline goes like this: if you're trying to divide $a+bi$ by $c+di$, first compute $dfrac {a+bi}{c+di} = r+qi$ where $r, q$ are rational (you can do this by multiplying the top and bottom of the LHS by $c-di$). So we can write $a+bi = (c+di)(r+qi)$. Now let $x$ be the closest integer to $r$ and $y$ be the closest integer to $q$. We can write then $a+bi = (c+di)(x+yi) + remainder$. Your job now is to show that $|remainder| < |c+di|$.
    – Ovi
    yesterday










1




1




I get the impression that you're confusing two different things. The $a$ and $b$ in (i) are two complex numbers, and have nothing to do with the $a$ and $b$ in $a^2+b^2$ which are two real numbers.
– saulspatz
yesterday




I get the impression that you're confusing two different things. The $a$ and $b$ in (i) are two complex numbers, and have nothing to do with the $a$ and $b$ in $a^2+b^2$ which are two real numbers.
– saulspatz
yesterday




1




1




You have to find $qinmathbf Z[i]$ such that the norm of $a-qb$ is less that the norm of $b$.
– Bernard
yesterday




You have to find $qinmathbf Z[i]$ such that the norm of $a-qb$ is less that the norm of $b$.
– Bernard
yesterday




1




1




I don't know if you want to do this as an exercise. If not I can also post a complete solution.
– 0x539
yesterday




I don't know if you want to do this as an exercise. If not I can also post a complete solution.
– 0x539
yesterday




1




1




You are using $b$ in two different ways. One is as an element of the ring in the first paragraph and one is as the imaginary component of an element in the second paragraph. In neither case is $b$ given to be $i$
– Ross Millikan
yesterday






You are using $b$ in two different ways. One is as an element of the ring in the first paragraph and one is as the imaginary component of an element in the second paragraph. In neither case is $b$ given to be $i$
– Ross Millikan
yesterday






1




1




@KingDingeling A complete solution can also be found in the book by Dummit & Foote, somewhere in chapter $8$. The outline goes like this: if you're trying to divide $a+bi$ by $c+di$, first compute $dfrac {a+bi}{c+di} = r+qi$ where $r, q$ are rational (you can do this by multiplying the top and bottom of the LHS by $c-di$). So we can write $a+bi = (c+di)(r+qi)$. Now let $x$ be the closest integer to $r$ and $y$ be the closest integer to $q$. We can write then $a+bi = (c+di)(x+yi) + remainder$. Your job now is to show that $|remainder| < |c+di|$.
– Ovi
yesterday






@KingDingeling A complete solution can also be found in the book by Dummit & Foote, somewhere in chapter $8$. The outline goes like this: if you're trying to divide $a+bi$ by $c+di$, first compute $dfrac {a+bi}{c+di} = r+qi$ where $r, q$ are rational (you can do this by multiplying the top and bottom of the LHS by $c-di$). So we can write $a+bi = (c+di)(r+qi)$. Now let $x$ be the closest integer to $r$ and $y$ be the closest integer to $q$. We can write then $a+bi = (c+di)(x+yi) + remainder$. Your job now is to show that $|remainder| < |c+di|$.
– Ovi
yesterday












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














You seem to be a bit confused. $b$ could be any element of $G$ except $0$. You have already found a good choice for $f$ so the only part left is, given arbitrary $a, b, in G$ with $b neq 0$, to find $q, r in G$ satisfying (i) and (ii).






share|cite|improve this answer





























    3














    It might help you to understand what can happen when a ring is not Euclidean. For example, consider $mathbb Z[sqrt{-5}]$, consisting of all numbers of the form $m + n sqrt{-5}$, with $m, n in mathbb Z$.



    The natural choice of Euclidean function is $$f(m + n sqrt{-5}) = m^2 + 5n^2.$$ Note that $f(m + n sqrt{-5})$ can never be negative, but it can be 0. Now try $gcd(2, 1 + sqrt{-5})$.



    Since $f(1 + sqrt{-5}) > f(2)$, we assign $a = 1 + sqrt{-5}$ and $b = 2$. Now we wish to express $a = qb + r$ with $f(r) < f(b)$, meaning $f(r) < 4$. Then the only possibilities for $r$ are $-1$, 0 and 1, as all other numbers in this ring have norms of at least 4.



    But then we see that none of the numbers $sqrt{-5}$, $1 + sqrt{-5}$, $2 + sqrt{-5}$ are divisible by 2. Therefore the Euclidean algorithm has failed in this ring, and therefore this domain is not Euclidean for the function $f$.



    Your task then is to prove that this can never happen in $G$, or $mathbb G$, or $mathbb Z[sqrt{-1}]$, or as it's more commonly notated, $mathbb Z[i]$, to prove that a suitable choice of $r$ can always be found. The Euclidean function is $f(m + ni) = m^2 + 1n^2$.



    A complete solution is to be found in certain number theory books, such as An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers by Ivan Niven and Herb Zuckermann.






    share|cite|improve this answer





























      1














      "$f(a+bmathrm{i}) = a^2 + b^2$" is what "$a+bmathrm{i} mapsto a^2+b^2$" means. So $f(mathrm{i}) = f(0+1mathrm{i}) = 0^2+1^2 = 1$. So, among other things, we find that $mathrm{i}$ is a unit in $mathbb{Z}[mathrm{i}]$.



      This means in your quotient and remainder expression in (ii), if $b = mathrm{i}$, you are dividing by a unit, so you expect the remainder to be zero, which is the case : $a = q mathrm{i} + 0$, where $q = -mathrm{i}a$.






      share|cite|improve this answer





















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        });
        });
        }, "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function() {
        var channelOptions = {
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        };
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
        createEditor();
        });
        }
        else {
        createEditor();
        }
        });

        function createEditor() {
        StackExchange.prepareEditor({
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader: {
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        },
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        });


        }
        });














        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function () {
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062868%2fgaussian-integers-form-an-euclidean-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
        }
        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        3














        You seem to be a bit confused. $b$ could be any element of $G$ except $0$. You have already found a good choice for $f$ so the only part left is, given arbitrary $a, b, in G$ with $b neq 0$, to find $q, r in G$ satisfying (i) and (ii).






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          3














          You seem to be a bit confused. $b$ could be any element of $G$ except $0$. You have already found a good choice for $f$ so the only part left is, given arbitrary $a, b, in G$ with $b neq 0$, to find $q, r in G$ satisfying (i) and (ii).






          share|cite|improve this answer
























            3












            3








            3






            You seem to be a bit confused. $b$ could be any element of $G$ except $0$. You have already found a good choice for $f$ so the only part left is, given arbitrary $a, b, in G$ with $b neq 0$, to find $q, r in G$ satisfying (i) and (ii).






            share|cite|improve this answer












            You seem to be a bit confused. $b$ could be any element of $G$ except $0$. You have already found a good choice for $f$ so the only part left is, given arbitrary $a, b, in G$ with $b neq 0$, to find $q, r in G$ satisfying (i) and (ii).







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            0x539

            1,047316




            1,047316























                3














                It might help you to understand what can happen when a ring is not Euclidean. For example, consider $mathbb Z[sqrt{-5}]$, consisting of all numbers of the form $m + n sqrt{-5}$, with $m, n in mathbb Z$.



                The natural choice of Euclidean function is $$f(m + n sqrt{-5}) = m^2 + 5n^2.$$ Note that $f(m + n sqrt{-5})$ can never be negative, but it can be 0. Now try $gcd(2, 1 + sqrt{-5})$.



                Since $f(1 + sqrt{-5}) > f(2)$, we assign $a = 1 + sqrt{-5}$ and $b = 2$. Now we wish to express $a = qb + r$ with $f(r) < f(b)$, meaning $f(r) < 4$. Then the only possibilities for $r$ are $-1$, 0 and 1, as all other numbers in this ring have norms of at least 4.



                But then we see that none of the numbers $sqrt{-5}$, $1 + sqrt{-5}$, $2 + sqrt{-5}$ are divisible by 2. Therefore the Euclidean algorithm has failed in this ring, and therefore this domain is not Euclidean for the function $f$.



                Your task then is to prove that this can never happen in $G$, or $mathbb G$, or $mathbb Z[sqrt{-1}]$, or as it's more commonly notated, $mathbb Z[i]$, to prove that a suitable choice of $r$ can always be found. The Euclidean function is $f(m + ni) = m^2 + 1n^2$.



                A complete solution is to be found in certain number theory books, such as An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers by Ivan Niven and Herb Zuckermann.






                share|cite|improve this answer


























                  3














                  It might help you to understand what can happen when a ring is not Euclidean. For example, consider $mathbb Z[sqrt{-5}]$, consisting of all numbers of the form $m + n sqrt{-5}$, with $m, n in mathbb Z$.



                  The natural choice of Euclidean function is $$f(m + n sqrt{-5}) = m^2 + 5n^2.$$ Note that $f(m + n sqrt{-5})$ can never be negative, but it can be 0. Now try $gcd(2, 1 + sqrt{-5})$.



                  Since $f(1 + sqrt{-5}) > f(2)$, we assign $a = 1 + sqrt{-5}$ and $b = 2$. Now we wish to express $a = qb + r$ with $f(r) < f(b)$, meaning $f(r) < 4$. Then the only possibilities for $r$ are $-1$, 0 and 1, as all other numbers in this ring have norms of at least 4.



                  But then we see that none of the numbers $sqrt{-5}$, $1 + sqrt{-5}$, $2 + sqrt{-5}$ are divisible by 2. Therefore the Euclidean algorithm has failed in this ring, and therefore this domain is not Euclidean for the function $f$.



                  Your task then is to prove that this can never happen in $G$, or $mathbb G$, or $mathbb Z[sqrt{-1}]$, or as it's more commonly notated, $mathbb Z[i]$, to prove that a suitable choice of $r$ can always be found. The Euclidean function is $f(m + ni) = m^2 + 1n^2$.



                  A complete solution is to be found in certain number theory books, such as An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers by Ivan Niven and Herb Zuckermann.






                  share|cite|improve this answer
























                    3












                    3








                    3






                    It might help you to understand what can happen when a ring is not Euclidean. For example, consider $mathbb Z[sqrt{-5}]$, consisting of all numbers of the form $m + n sqrt{-5}$, with $m, n in mathbb Z$.



                    The natural choice of Euclidean function is $$f(m + n sqrt{-5}) = m^2 + 5n^2.$$ Note that $f(m + n sqrt{-5})$ can never be negative, but it can be 0. Now try $gcd(2, 1 + sqrt{-5})$.



                    Since $f(1 + sqrt{-5}) > f(2)$, we assign $a = 1 + sqrt{-5}$ and $b = 2$. Now we wish to express $a = qb + r$ with $f(r) < f(b)$, meaning $f(r) < 4$. Then the only possibilities for $r$ are $-1$, 0 and 1, as all other numbers in this ring have norms of at least 4.



                    But then we see that none of the numbers $sqrt{-5}$, $1 + sqrt{-5}$, $2 + sqrt{-5}$ are divisible by 2. Therefore the Euclidean algorithm has failed in this ring, and therefore this domain is not Euclidean for the function $f$.



                    Your task then is to prove that this can never happen in $G$, or $mathbb G$, or $mathbb Z[sqrt{-1}]$, or as it's more commonly notated, $mathbb Z[i]$, to prove that a suitable choice of $r$ can always be found. The Euclidean function is $f(m + ni) = m^2 + 1n^2$.



                    A complete solution is to be found in certain number theory books, such as An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers by Ivan Niven and Herb Zuckermann.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    It might help you to understand what can happen when a ring is not Euclidean. For example, consider $mathbb Z[sqrt{-5}]$, consisting of all numbers of the form $m + n sqrt{-5}$, with $m, n in mathbb Z$.



                    The natural choice of Euclidean function is $$f(m + n sqrt{-5}) = m^2 + 5n^2.$$ Note that $f(m + n sqrt{-5})$ can never be negative, but it can be 0. Now try $gcd(2, 1 + sqrt{-5})$.



                    Since $f(1 + sqrt{-5}) > f(2)$, we assign $a = 1 + sqrt{-5}$ and $b = 2$. Now we wish to express $a = qb + r$ with $f(r) < f(b)$, meaning $f(r) < 4$. Then the only possibilities for $r$ are $-1$, 0 and 1, as all other numbers in this ring have norms of at least 4.



                    But then we see that none of the numbers $sqrt{-5}$, $1 + sqrt{-5}$, $2 + sqrt{-5}$ are divisible by 2. Therefore the Euclidean algorithm has failed in this ring, and therefore this domain is not Euclidean for the function $f$.



                    Your task then is to prove that this can never happen in $G$, or $mathbb G$, or $mathbb Z[sqrt{-1}]$, or as it's more commonly notated, $mathbb Z[i]$, to prove that a suitable choice of $r$ can always be found. The Euclidean function is $f(m + ni) = m^2 + 1n^2$.



                    A complete solution is to be found in certain number theory books, such as An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers by Ivan Niven and Herb Zuckermann.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    Robert Soupe

                    10.9k21950




                    10.9k21950























                        1














                        "$f(a+bmathrm{i}) = a^2 + b^2$" is what "$a+bmathrm{i} mapsto a^2+b^2$" means. So $f(mathrm{i}) = f(0+1mathrm{i}) = 0^2+1^2 = 1$. So, among other things, we find that $mathrm{i}$ is a unit in $mathbb{Z}[mathrm{i}]$.



                        This means in your quotient and remainder expression in (ii), if $b = mathrm{i}$, you are dividing by a unit, so you expect the remainder to be zero, which is the case : $a = q mathrm{i} + 0$, where $q = -mathrm{i}a$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer


























                          1














                          "$f(a+bmathrm{i}) = a^2 + b^2$" is what "$a+bmathrm{i} mapsto a^2+b^2$" means. So $f(mathrm{i}) = f(0+1mathrm{i}) = 0^2+1^2 = 1$. So, among other things, we find that $mathrm{i}$ is a unit in $mathbb{Z}[mathrm{i}]$.



                          This means in your quotient and remainder expression in (ii), if $b = mathrm{i}$, you are dividing by a unit, so you expect the remainder to be zero, which is the case : $a = q mathrm{i} + 0$, where $q = -mathrm{i}a$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer
























                            1












                            1








                            1






                            "$f(a+bmathrm{i}) = a^2 + b^2$" is what "$a+bmathrm{i} mapsto a^2+b^2$" means. So $f(mathrm{i}) = f(0+1mathrm{i}) = 0^2+1^2 = 1$. So, among other things, we find that $mathrm{i}$ is a unit in $mathbb{Z}[mathrm{i}]$.



                            This means in your quotient and remainder expression in (ii), if $b = mathrm{i}$, you are dividing by a unit, so you expect the remainder to be zero, which is the case : $a = q mathrm{i} + 0$, where $q = -mathrm{i}a$.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            "$f(a+bmathrm{i}) = a^2 + b^2$" is what "$a+bmathrm{i} mapsto a^2+b^2$" means. So $f(mathrm{i}) = f(0+1mathrm{i}) = 0^2+1^2 = 1$. So, among other things, we find that $mathrm{i}$ is a unit in $mathbb{Z}[mathrm{i}]$.



                            This means in your quotient and remainder expression in (ii), if $b = mathrm{i}$, you are dividing by a unit, so you expect the remainder to be zero, which is the case : $a = q mathrm{i} + 0$, where $q = -mathrm{i}a$.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            Eric Towers

                            32k22265




                            32k22265






























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded




















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid



                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function () {
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062868%2fgaussian-integers-form-an-euclidean-ring%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                                }
                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                1300-talet

                                1300-talet

                                Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8