Elementary matrix to produce row reduction operation. [on hold]
Consider the matrix below.
(a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
3 & 2 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
Which I think would become:
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
0 & -1 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
(b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.
This part I don't know how to do.
linear-algebra
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Consider the matrix below.
(a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
3 & 2 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
Which I think would become:
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
0 & -1 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
(b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.
This part I don't know how to do.
linear-algebra
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
Consider the matrix below.
(a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
3 & 2 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
Which I think would become:
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
0 & -1 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
(b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.
This part I don't know how to do.
linear-algebra
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Consider the matrix below.
(a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
3 & 2 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
Which I think would become:
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
0 & -1 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}
(b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.
This part I don't know how to do.
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 3 at 20:34
Ryan Reynolds
61
61
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Your part (a) looks good.
The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$
add a comment |
When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.
Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.
One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your part (a) looks good.
The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$
add a comment |
Your part (a) looks good.
The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$
add a comment |
Your part (a) looks good.
The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$
Your part (a) looks good.
The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$
answered 2 days ago
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a2f/79a2f61e6a02d266b41dfcb9150bc8c524cd8e64" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79a2f/79a2f61e6a02d266b41dfcb9150bc8c524cd8e64" alt=""
Dave
8,72411033
8,72411033
add a comment |
add a comment |
When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.
Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.
One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.
add a comment |
When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.
Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.
One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.
add a comment |
When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.
Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.
One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.
When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.
Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.
One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.
answered 2 days ago
amd
29.3k21050
29.3k21050
add a comment |
add a comment |