Elementary matrix to produce row reduction operation. [on hold]












1














Consider the matrix below.



(a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
3 & 2 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}

Which I think would become:
begin{pmatrix}
1 & 1 \
0 & -1 \
0 & 3
end{pmatrix}



(b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.



This part I don't know how to do.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.


















    1














    Consider the matrix below.



    (a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
    begin{pmatrix}
    1 & 1 \
    3 & 2 \
    0 & 3
    end{pmatrix}

    Which I think would become:
    begin{pmatrix}
    1 & 1 \
    0 & -1 \
    0 & 3
    end{pmatrix}



    (b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.



    This part I don't know how to do.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.











    put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago


    This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


    • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx

    If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
















      1












      1








      1







      Consider the matrix below.



      (a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
      begin{pmatrix}
      1 & 1 \
      3 & 2 \
      0 & 3
      end{pmatrix}

      Which I think would become:
      begin{pmatrix}
      1 & 1 \
      0 & -1 \
      0 & 3
      end{pmatrix}



      (b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.



      This part I don't know how to do.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      Consider the matrix below.



      (a) Apply the elementary row operation R2 ← R2 − 3R1.
      begin{pmatrix}
      1 & 1 \
      3 & 2 \
      0 & 3
      end{pmatrix}

      Which I think would become:
      begin{pmatrix}
      1 & 1 \
      0 & -1 \
      0 & 3
      end{pmatrix}



      (b) Express the application of the row operation from part (a) as the multiplication of an elementary matrix with A.



      This part I don't know how to do.







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked Jan 3 at 20:34









      Ryan Reynolds

      61




      61




      New contributor




      Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Ryan Reynolds is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




      put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




      put on hold as off-topic by Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx 2 days ago


      This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


      • "This question is missing context or other details: Please provide additional context, which ideally explains why the question is relevant to you and our community. Some forms of context include: background and motivation, relevant definitions, source, possible strategies, your current progress, why the question is interesting or important, etc." – Adrian Keister, KReiser, max_zorn, user91500, fonfonx

      If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          2














          Your part (a) looks good.



          The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$






          share|cite|improve this answer





























            0














            When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.



            Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.



            One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.






            share|cite|improve this answer




























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              2














              Your part (a) looks good.



              The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                2














                Your part (a) looks good.



                The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  2












                  2








                  2






                  Your part (a) looks good.



                  The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Your part (a) looks good.



                  The elementary matrix corresponding to this will be the identity matrix with a $-3$ in the $(2,1)$ entry since you're adding $-3$ times the first row to the second row. So the elementary matrix is $$E=begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ -3&1&0 \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}$$ Then this corresponds to the row operation in $A$ by multiplying $$EA=begin{bmatrix}1&1 \ 0&-1 \ 0&3end{bmatrix}$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 days ago









                  Dave

                  8,72411033




                  8,72411033























                      0














                      When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.



                      Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.



                      One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        0














                        When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.



                        Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.



                        One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          0












                          0








                          0






                          When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.



                          Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.



                          One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          When you multiply two matrices, the rows of the result are linear combinations of the rows of the right-hand matrix, with the coefficients coming from the corresponding row of the left-hand matrix.



                          Here, the first and third rows of the given matrix are unchanged, so the elementary matrix will have the form $$begin{bmatrix}1&0&0 \ *&*&* \ 0&0&1end{bmatrix}.$$ The second row of the result is supposed to be $R_2-3R_1$, from which we can read that the second row of the elementary matrix must be $(-3,1,0)$.



                          One way to see why this is the case is to write the right-hand matrix of the matrix product $AB$ in block form, so that it looks like you’re multiplying a vector by a matrix: $$Abegin{bmatrix}B_1\B_2\vdots\B_nend{bmatrix}.$$ The $i$th row of the product is then formally just the dot product of the $i$th row of $A$ with this vector: $a_{i1}B_1+a_{i2}B_2+dots+a_{in}B_n$, a linear combination of the rows of $B$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 days ago









                          amd

                          29.3k21050




                          29.3k21050















                              Popular posts from this blog

                              1300-talet

                              1300-talet

                              Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8