Is this list of conditions enough for the existence for the envelope for the given family?












0














Suppose $f(x,y,c)=0$ be represented by the family of surfaces. When does the envelop exist for the family of surfaces?



My attempt:-



For finding the envelope, I need to consider two equations $f(x,y,c)=0$ and $f_c(x,y,c)=0.$ For finding the envelope we need to find a relation between $x$ and $y$. Right?. For that, I apply implicit function theorem. For applying implicit function theorem I need the function $F=(f,f_c)$ must be first continuously differentiable. If jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$, we can write $x=x(c)$ and $y=y(c)$. If either $x$ or $y$ invertible. We can write $y=y(x)$.



So I found two conditions:- 1. $F(x,y,c)=(f,f_a)$ must be continuously differentiable up to first order.




  1. jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$


  2. Either $x$ or $y$ functions are invertible.



Is this list of conditions enough for the existence of the envelope for the given family? Or can we find the envelope with fewer conditions than this?
Please help me.










share|cite|improve this question



























    0














    Suppose $f(x,y,c)=0$ be represented by the family of surfaces. When does the envelop exist for the family of surfaces?



    My attempt:-



    For finding the envelope, I need to consider two equations $f(x,y,c)=0$ and $f_c(x,y,c)=0.$ For finding the envelope we need to find a relation between $x$ and $y$. Right?. For that, I apply implicit function theorem. For applying implicit function theorem I need the function $F=(f,f_c)$ must be first continuously differentiable. If jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$, we can write $x=x(c)$ and $y=y(c)$. If either $x$ or $y$ invertible. We can write $y=y(x)$.



    So I found two conditions:- 1. $F(x,y,c)=(f,f_a)$ must be continuously differentiable up to first order.




    1. jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$


    2. Either $x$ or $y$ functions are invertible.



    Is this list of conditions enough for the existence of the envelope for the given family? Or can we find the envelope with fewer conditions than this?
    Please help me.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0







      Suppose $f(x,y,c)=0$ be represented by the family of surfaces. When does the envelop exist for the family of surfaces?



      My attempt:-



      For finding the envelope, I need to consider two equations $f(x,y,c)=0$ and $f_c(x,y,c)=0.$ For finding the envelope we need to find a relation between $x$ and $y$. Right?. For that, I apply implicit function theorem. For applying implicit function theorem I need the function $F=(f,f_c)$ must be first continuously differentiable. If jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$, we can write $x=x(c)$ and $y=y(c)$. If either $x$ or $y$ invertible. We can write $y=y(x)$.



      So I found two conditions:- 1. $F(x,y,c)=(f,f_a)$ must be continuously differentiable up to first order.




      1. jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$


      2. Either $x$ or $y$ functions are invertible.



      Is this list of conditions enough for the existence of the envelope for the given family? Or can we find the envelope with fewer conditions than this?
      Please help me.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Suppose $f(x,y,c)=0$ be represented by the family of surfaces. When does the envelop exist for the family of surfaces?



      My attempt:-



      For finding the envelope, I need to consider two equations $f(x,y,c)=0$ and $f_c(x,y,c)=0.$ For finding the envelope we need to find a relation between $x$ and $y$. Right?. For that, I apply implicit function theorem. For applying implicit function theorem I need the function $F=(f,f_c)$ must be first continuously differentiable. If jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$, we can write $x=x(c)$ and $y=y(c)$. If either $x$ or $y$ invertible. We can write $y=y(x)$.



      So I found two conditions:- 1. $F(x,y,c)=(f,f_a)$ must be continuously differentiable up to first order.




      1. jacobian $frac{partial(f,f_c)}{partial(x,y)} neq 0$


      2. Either $x$ or $y$ functions are invertible.



      Is this list of conditions enough for the existence of the envelope for the given family? Or can we find the envelope with fewer conditions than this?
      Please help me.







      implicit-function-theorem envelope






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked yesterday









      Unknown x

      2,50011026




      2,50011026






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060624%2fis-this-list-of-conditions-enough-for-the-existence-for-the-envelope-for-the-giv%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060624%2fis-this-list-of-conditions-enough-for-the-existence-for-the-envelope-for-the-giv%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          1300-talet

          1300-talet

          Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8