Solution to the parabolic cylinder equation
In the Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (7th ed.) the differential equation (9.255) leading to parabolic cylinder functions is $$frac{d^2u}{dz^2}+(p+frac{1}{2}-frac{z^2}{4})u=0.$$ The solutions are $u=D_p(z),D_p(-z),D_{-p-1}(iz),D_{-p-1}(-iz)$, where $D_p(z)$ is the parabolic cylinder function. These four solutions are linearly dependent. My question is why is there four solutions to the second order ODE? In my case $p$ is complex, and Mathematica gives solution in the form $C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$.
differential-equations special-functions
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
add a comment |
In the Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (7th ed.) the differential equation (9.255) leading to parabolic cylinder functions is $$frac{d^2u}{dz^2}+(p+frac{1}{2}-frac{z^2}{4})u=0.$$ The solutions are $u=D_p(z),D_p(-z),D_{-p-1}(iz),D_{-p-1}(-iz)$, where $D_p(z)$ is the parabolic cylinder function. These four solutions are linearly dependent. My question is why is there four solutions to the second order ODE? In my case $p$ is complex, and Mathematica gives solution in the form $C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$.
differential-equations special-functions
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
add a comment |
In the Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (7th ed.) the differential equation (9.255) leading to parabolic cylinder functions is $$frac{d^2u}{dz^2}+(p+frac{1}{2}-frac{z^2}{4})u=0.$$ The solutions are $u=D_p(z),D_p(-z),D_{-p-1}(iz),D_{-p-1}(-iz)$, where $D_p(z)$ is the parabolic cylinder function. These four solutions are linearly dependent. My question is why is there four solutions to the second order ODE? In my case $p$ is complex, and Mathematica gives solution in the form $C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$.
differential-equations special-functions
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
In the Gradshteyn & Ryzhik (7th ed.) the differential equation (9.255) leading to parabolic cylinder functions is $$frac{d^2u}{dz^2}+(p+frac{1}{2}-frac{z^2}{4})u=0.$$ The solutions are $u=D_p(z),D_p(-z),D_{-p-1}(iz),D_{-p-1}(-iz)$, where $D_p(z)$ is the parabolic cylinder function. These four solutions are linearly dependent. My question is why is there four solutions to the second order ODE? In my case $p$ is complex, and Mathematica gives solution in the form $C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$.
differential-equations special-functions
differential-equations special-functions
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
asked 2 days ago
Galkina
412
412
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This second order ODE has not four solutions as you wrote, but has an infinity of solutions.
Don't write
<< The solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1}(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >> ,
better write
<< Some solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1 }(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >>.
For example $u_5=3u_1-7u_3$ is also a solution of the ODE. You will not say "Why is there five solutions to the second order ODE ? ".
In fact, among the infinity of solutions we can only find COUPLES of linearly INDEPENDENT solutions. Not TRIPLET.
All solutions can be defined on the form of a linear combination of any couple of independent solution.
Thus the general solution expressed on the form $$u(z)=C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ is equivalent to $$u(z)=C_3 D_p(-z)+C_4 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ or equivalent to $$u(z)=C_5 D_p(-z)+C_6 D_{-p-1}(-iz)$$
Etc.
Of course the coefficients are generally not the same: For example $C_2neq C_6$.
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060919%2fsolution-to-the-parabolic-cylinder-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This second order ODE has not four solutions as you wrote, but has an infinity of solutions.
Don't write
<< The solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1}(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >> ,
better write
<< Some solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1 }(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >>.
For example $u_5=3u_1-7u_3$ is also a solution of the ODE. You will not say "Why is there five solutions to the second order ODE ? ".
In fact, among the infinity of solutions we can only find COUPLES of linearly INDEPENDENT solutions. Not TRIPLET.
All solutions can be defined on the form of a linear combination of any couple of independent solution.
Thus the general solution expressed on the form $$u(z)=C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ is equivalent to $$u(z)=C_3 D_p(-z)+C_4 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ or equivalent to $$u(z)=C_5 D_p(-z)+C_6 D_{-p-1}(-iz)$$
Etc.
Of course the coefficients are generally not the same: For example $C_2neq C_6$.
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
add a comment |
This second order ODE has not four solutions as you wrote, but has an infinity of solutions.
Don't write
<< The solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1}(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >> ,
better write
<< Some solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1 }(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >>.
For example $u_5=3u_1-7u_3$ is also a solution of the ODE. You will not say "Why is there five solutions to the second order ODE ? ".
In fact, among the infinity of solutions we can only find COUPLES of linearly INDEPENDENT solutions. Not TRIPLET.
All solutions can be defined on the form of a linear combination of any couple of independent solution.
Thus the general solution expressed on the form $$u(z)=C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ is equivalent to $$u(z)=C_3 D_p(-z)+C_4 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ or equivalent to $$u(z)=C_5 D_p(-z)+C_6 D_{-p-1}(-iz)$$
Etc.
Of course the coefficients are generally not the same: For example $C_2neq C_6$.
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
add a comment |
This second order ODE has not four solutions as you wrote, but has an infinity of solutions.
Don't write
<< The solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1}(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >> ,
better write
<< Some solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1 }(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >>.
For example $u_5=3u_1-7u_3$ is also a solution of the ODE. You will not say "Why is there five solutions to the second order ODE ? ".
In fact, among the infinity of solutions we can only find COUPLES of linearly INDEPENDENT solutions. Not TRIPLET.
All solutions can be defined on the form of a linear combination of any couple of independent solution.
Thus the general solution expressed on the form $$u(z)=C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ is equivalent to $$u(z)=C_3 D_p(-z)+C_4 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ or equivalent to $$u(z)=C_5 D_p(-z)+C_6 D_{-p-1}(-iz)$$
Etc.
Of course the coefficients are generally not the same: For example $C_2neq C_6$.
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
This second order ODE has not four solutions as you wrote, but has an infinity of solutions.
Don't write
<< The solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1}(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >> ,
better write
<< Some solutions are $u_1=D_p(z),u_2=D_p(-z),u_3=D_{-p-1 }(iz),u_4=D_{-p-1}(-iz)$ >>.
For example $u_5=3u_1-7u_3$ is also a solution of the ODE. You will not say "Why is there five solutions to the second order ODE ? ".
In fact, among the infinity of solutions we can only find COUPLES of linearly INDEPENDENT solutions. Not TRIPLET.
All solutions can be defined on the form of a linear combination of any couple of independent solution.
Thus the general solution expressed on the form $$u(z)=C_1 D_p(z)+C_2 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ is equivalent to $$u(z)=C_3 D_p(-z)+C_4 D_{-p-1}(iz)$$ or equivalent to $$u(z)=C_5 D_p(-z)+C_6 D_{-p-1}(-iz)$$
Etc.
Of course the coefficients are generally not the same: For example $C_2neq C_6$.
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
answered yesterday
JJacquelin
42.6k21750
42.6k21750
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060919%2fsolution-to-the-parabolic-cylinder-equation%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
