For a function defined by parts study continuity, and differentiability at two points












5














For the function defined by $$F(x)=begin{cases}displaystyleint_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt,&xneq0\0,&x=0end{cases}$$ analyze continuity and derivability at the origin. Is $F$ derivable at point $x_0=sqrt{pi/2}$? Justify the answer, and if possible, calculate $F'(x_0)$.





I have been told that I must use the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus but I do not know how to apply it to this case.



For the function to be continuous at the origin, it must happen that $F(0)=lim_{xto0}F(x)$. We know that $F(0)=0$, and $$lim_{xto0}F(x)=lim_{xto0}int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt;{bfcolor{red}=}int_0^{2cdot0}sin t^2,mathrm dt=0,$$ so the statement holds, but here I do now how to justify the $bfcolor{red}=$.



To find the derivative at $x_0=0$ I tried the differentiate directly $F(x)$ but it is wrong, so I have been told that I must use the definition. So we have to find $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x.$$ Why we have to bound $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$? How can we do that?



Finally, I do not know how to use the aforementioned theorem to justify that the function is derivable in $sqrt{pi/2}$. Using the definition again:



begin{align*}
F'left(sqrt{fracpi2}right)&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{F(x)-Fleft(sqrt{fracpi2}right)}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}sin t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&leqlim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&underbrace=_{A=sqrt{pi/2}}lim_{xto A}frac{1/3((2x)^3-x^3)-1/3((2A)^3-(A^3))}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{x^3-A^3}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{(x-A)(x^2+Ax+A^2)}{x-A}\
&=frac73(A^2+A^2+A^2)\
&=7A^2\
&=frac{7pi}2,
end{align*}



but it is wrong.



How can we solve the statement?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Would it help if you write $int_x^{2x}=int_0^{2x}-int_0^x$?
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 3 at 23:59










  • @A.Γ. probably. Can we separate it into two integrals because the limits of integrations are continuous?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:01










  • It is because the integral is additive. Or if you wish $int_a^b=F(b)-F(a)$ where $F(y)$ is antiderivative, which is e.g. $int_0^y$.
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 4 at 0:05












  • @A.Γ. how do you know that $0in[x,2x]$ for all $xneq0$? Because for example if $xin(0,infty)$ then $0notin[x,2x]$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:29








  • 1




    One does not need $0in[x,2x]$. Integral is additive and if $f$ is Riemann integrable on some closed interval containing $a, b, c$ then $$int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx+int_{b} ^{c} f(x) , dx=int_{a} ^{c} f(x) , dx$$ irrespective of the linear order of $a, b, c$. This assumes that we have by definition $int_{a} ^{a}f(x),dx=0$ and $int_{b} ^{a} f(x) , dx=-int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx$.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Jan 4 at 7:23
















5














For the function defined by $$F(x)=begin{cases}displaystyleint_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt,&xneq0\0,&x=0end{cases}$$ analyze continuity and derivability at the origin. Is $F$ derivable at point $x_0=sqrt{pi/2}$? Justify the answer, and if possible, calculate $F'(x_0)$.





I have been told that I must use the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus but I do not know how to apply it to this case.



For the function to be continuous at the origin, it must happen that $F(0)=lim_{xto0}F(x)$. We know that $F(0)=0$, and $$lim_{xto0}F(x)=lim_{xto0}int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt;{bfcolor{red}=}int_0^{2cdot0}sin t^2,mathrm dt=0,$$ so the statement holds, but here I do now how to justify the $bfcolor{red}=$.



To find the derivative at $x_0=0$ I tried the differentiate directly $F(x)$ but it is wrong, so I have been told that I must use the definition. So we have to find $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x.$$ Why we have to bound $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$? How can we do that?



Finally, I do not know how to use the aforementioned theorem to justify that the function is derivable in $sqrt{pi/2}$. Using the definition again:



begin{align*}
F'left(sqrt{fracpi2}right)&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{F(x)-Fleft(sqrt{fracpi2}right)}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}sin t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&leqlim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&underbrace=_{A=sqrt{pi/2}}lim_{xto A}frac{1/3((2x)^3-x^3)-1/3((2A)^3-(A^3))}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{x^3-A^3}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{(x-A)(x^2+Ax+A^2)}{x-A}\
&=frac73(A^2+A^2+A^2)\
&=7A^2\
&=frac{7pi}2,
end{align*}



but it is wrong.



How can we solve the statement?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    Would it help if you write $int_x^{2x}=int_0^{2x}-int_0^x$?
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 3 at 23:59










  • @A.Γ. probably. Can we separate it into two integrals because the limits of integrations are continuous?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:01










  • It is because the integral is additive. Or if you wish $int_a^b=F(b)-F(a)$ where $F(y)$ is antiderivative, which is e.g. $int_0^y$.
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 4 at 0:05












  • @A.Γ. how do you know that $0in[x,2x]$ for all $xneq0$? Because for example if $xin(0,infty)$ then $0notin[x,2x]$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:29








  • 1




    One does not need $0in[x,2x]$. Integral is additive and if $f$ is Riemann integrable on some closed interval containing $a, b, c$ then $$int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx+int_{b} ^{c} f(x) , dx=int_{a} ^{c} f(x) , dx$$ irrespective of the linear order of $a, b, c$. This assumes that we have by definition $int_{a} ^{a}f(x),dx=0$ and $int_{b} ^{a} f(x) , dx=-int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx$.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Jan 4 at 7:23














5












5








5







For the function defined by $$F(x)=begin{cases}displaystyleint_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt,&xneq0\0,&x=0end{cases}$$ analyze continuity and derivability at the origin. Is $F$ derivable at point $x_0=sqrt{pi/2}$? Justify the answer, and if possible, calculate $F'(x_0)$.





I have been told that I must use the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus but I do not know how to apply it to this case.



For the function to be continuous at the origin, it must happen that $F(0)=lim_{xto0}F(x)$. We know that $F(0)=0$, and $$lim_{xto0}F(x)=lim_{xto0}int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt;{bfcolor{red}=}int_0^{2cdot0}sin t^2,mathrm dt=0,$$ so the statement holds, but here I do now how to justify the $bfcolor{red}=$.



To find the derivative at $x_0=0$ I tried the differentiate directly $F(x)$ but it is wrong, so I have been told that I must use the definition. So we have to find $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x.$$ Why we have to bound $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$? How can we do that?



Finally, I do not know how to use the aforementioned theorem to justify that the function is derivable in $sqrt{pi/2}$. Using the definition again:



begin{align*}
F'left(sqrt{fracpi2}right)&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{F(x)-Fleft(sqrt{fracpi2}right)}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}sin t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&leqlim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&underbrace=_{A=sqrt{pi/2}}lim_{xto A}frac{1/3((2x)^3-x^3)-1/3((2A)^3-(A^3))}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{x^3-A^3}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{(x-A)(x^2+Ax+A^2)}{x-A}\
&=frac73(A^2+A^2+A^2)\
&=7A^2\
&=frac{7pi}2,
end{align*}



but it is wrong.



How can we solve the statement?



Thanks!










share|cite|improve this question













For the function defined by $$F(x)=begin{cases}displaystyleint_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt,&xneq0\0,&x=0end{cases}$$ analyze continuity and derivability at the origin. Is $F$ derivable at point $x_0=sqrt{pi/2}$? Justify the answer, and if possible, calculate $F'(x_0)$.





I have been told that I must use the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus but I do not know how to apply it to this case.



For the function to be continuous at the origin, it must happen that $F(0)=lim_{xto0}F(x)$. We know that $F(0)=0$, and $$lim_{xto0}F(x)=lim_{xto0}int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt;{bfcolor{red}=}int_0^{2cdot0}sin t^2,mathrm dt=0,$$ so the statement holds, but here I do now how to justify the $bfcolor{red}=$.



To find the derivative at $x_0=0$ I tried the differentiate directly $F(x)$ but it is wrong, so I have been told that I must use the definition. So we have to find $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x.$$ Why we have to bound $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$? How can we do that?



Finally, I do not know how to use the aforementioned theorem to justify that the function is derivable in $sqrt{pi/2}$. Using the definition again:



begin{align*}
F'left(sqrt{fracpi2}right)&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{F(x)-Fleft(sqrt{fracpi2}right)}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&=lim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}sin t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&leqlim_{xtosqrt{fracpi2}}frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt-int_{sqrt{pi/2}}^{2sqrt{pi/2}}t^2,mathrm dt}{x-sqrt{fracpi2}}\
&underbrace=_{A=sqrt{pi/2}}lim_{xto A}frac{1/3((2x)^3-x^3)-1/3((2A)^3-(A^3))}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{x^3-A^3}{x-A}\
&=frac73lim_{xto A}frac{(x-A)(x^2+Ax+A^2)}{x-A}\
&=frac73(A^2+A^2+A^2)\
&=7A^2\
&=frac{7pi}2,
end{align*}



but it is wrong.



How can we solve the statement?



Thanks!







calculus derivatives continuity






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 3 at 23:43









manooooh

5441417




5441417








  • 1




    Would it help if you write $int_x^{2x}=int_0^{2x}-int_0^x$?
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 3 at 23:59










  • @A.Γ. probably. Can we separate it into two integrals because the limits of integrations are continuous?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:01










  • It is because the integral is additive. Or if you wish $int_a^b=F(b)-F(a)$ where $F(y)$ is antiderivative, which is e.g. $int_0^y$.
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 4 at 0:05












  • @A.Γ. how do you know that $0in[x,2x]$ for all $xneq0$? Because for example if $xin(0,infty)$ then $0notin[x,2x]$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:29








  • 1




    One does not need $0in[x,2x]$. Integral is additive and if $f$ is Riemann integrable on some closed interval containing $a, b, c$ then $$int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx+int_{b} ^{c} f(x) , dx=int_{a} ^{c} f(x) , dx$$ irrespective of the linear order of $a, b, c$. This assumes that we have by definition $int_{a} ^{a}f(x),dx=0$ and $int_{b} ^{a} f(x) , dx=-int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx$.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Jan 4 at 7:23














  • 1




    Would it help if you write $int_x^{2x}=int_0^{2x}-int_0^x$?
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 3 at 23:59










  • @A.Γ. probably. Can we separate it into two integrals because the limits of integrations are continuous?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:01










  • It is because the integral is additive. Or if you wish $int_a^b=F(b)-F(a)$ where $F(y)$ is antiderivative, which is e.g. $int_0^y$.
    – A.Γ.
    Jan 4 at 0:05












  • @A.Γ. how do you know that $0in[x,2x]$ for all $xneq0$? Because for example if $xin(0,infty)$ then $0notin[x,2x]$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:29








  • 1




    One does not need $0in[x,2x]$. Integral is additive and if $f$ is Riemann integrable on some closed interval containing $a, b, c$ then $$int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx+int_{b} ^{c} f(x) , dx=int_{a} ^{c} f(x) , dx$$ irrespective of the linear order of $a, b, c$. This assumes that we have by definition $int_{a} ^{a}f(x),dx=0$ and $int_{b} ^{a} f(x) , dx=-int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx$.
    – Paramanand Singh
    Jan 4 at 7:23








1




1




Would it help if you write $int_x^{2x}=int_0^{2x}-int_0^x$?
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 23:59




Would it help if you write $int_x^{2x}=int_0^{2x}-int_0^x$?
– A.Γ.
Jan 3 at 23:59












@A.Γ. probably. Can we separate it into two integrals because the limits of integrations are continuous?
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 0:01




@A.Γ. probably. Can we separate it into two integrals because the limits of integrations are continuous?
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 0:01












It is because the integral is additive. Or if you wish $int_a^b=F(b)-F(a)$ where $F(y)$ is antiderivative, which is e.g. $int_0^y$.
– A.Γ.
Jan 4 at 0:05






It is because the integral is additive. Or if you wish $int_a^b=F(b)-F(a)$ where $F(y)$ is antiderivative, which is e.g. $int_0^y$.
– A.Γ.
Jan 4 at 0:05














@A.Γ. how do you know that $0in[x,2x]$ for all $xneq0$? Because for example if $xin(0,infty)$ then $0notin[x,2x]$.
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 0:29






@A.Γ. how do you know that $0in[x,2x]$ for all $xneq0$? Because for example if $xin(0,infty)$ then $0notin[x,2x]$.
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 0:29






1




1




One does not need $0in[x,2x]$. Integral is additive and if $f$ is Riemann integrable on some closed interval containing $a, b, c$ then $$int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx+int_{b} ^{c} f(x) , dx=int_{a} ^{c} f(x) , dx$$ irrespective of the linear order of $a, b, c$. This assumes that we have by definition $int_{a} ^{a}f(x),dx=0$ and $int_{b} ^{a} f(x) , dx=-int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx$.
– Paramanand Singh
Jan 4 at 7:23




One does not need $0in[x,2x]$. Integral is additive and if $f$ is Riemann integrable on some closed interval containing $a, b, c$ then $$int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx+int_{b} ^{c} f(x) , dx=int_{a} ^{c} f(x) , dx$$ irrespective of the linear order of $a, b, c$. This assumes that we have by definition $int_{a} ^{a}f(x),dx=0$ and $int_{b} ^{a} f(x) , dx=-int_{a} ^{b} f(x) , dx$.
– Paramanand Singh
Jan 4 at 7:23










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















1














You just need to use the fundamental theorem of calculus. Since the integrand $sin(t^2)$ is continuous everywhere we can write $$F(x) =int_{0}^{2x}sin t^2,dt-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ Use substitution $z=t/2$ in first integral on right to get $$F(x) =2int_{0}^{x}sin (4z^2),dz-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ and by FTC we can see that $F$ is continuous and differentiable everywhere with derivative $$F'(x) =2sin (4x^2)-sin x^2$$ for all $xinmathbb {R} $.





For reference I mention FTC explicitly :




Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1: Let the function $f:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ be Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $. Then the function $F:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ is continuous on $[a, b] $ and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin[a, b] $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with derivative $F'(c) =f(c) $.




Using the above theorem it can be proved that if a function $f:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ is Riemann integrable on every bounded and closed interval then the function $F:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ for some $ainmathbb {R} $ is continuous everywhere and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin mathbb {R} $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with $F'(c) =f(c) $.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    @manooooh: if you carefully note the FTC you will see that it deals with integrals where upper limit of integral is $x$ and lower limit is a constant. The substitution in first integral is done to change upper limit $2x$ to $x$. The second integral is already having $x$ as upper limit. If we apply substitution in second integral also then the upper limit changes from $x$ to $x/2$ and FTC can't be applied directly. Continued in next comment.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: Using FTC and chain rule for derivatives it can be proved that if $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{g(x)} f(t) , dt$$ then $F'(x) =f(g(x)) g'(x) $. This handles the case when the upper limit of integral is not $x$ but rather some complicated function $g(x) $. Regarding your second doubt, you can check using this formula that the answer remains same even if we apply substitution in second integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: you need to revisit substitution in definite integrals in your textbook and observe very carefully the given examples. During substitution in a definite integral the function as well as the limit of integral change according to the substitution used. Thus if we use $z=t/2, t=2z,dt=2,dz$ in second integral the limits $0$ and $x$ change to $0$ and $x/2$ to give $$int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt=2int_{0}^{x/2}sin (4z^2),dz$$
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @manooooh: the limits of integral indicate the range of values being taken by the variable of integration. Thus in $int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$ the variable $t$ varies from $0$ to $x$. If $z=t/2$ then $z$ should vary from $0$ to $x/2$ (as $z$ is half of $t$).
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: irrespective of how proficient you are in mathematics, your comments indicate that you have a sincere desire to learn. That's what matters here and nothing else. +1 for your question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago



















2














If you want to evaluate the limit:



$$displaystylelim_{xto 0}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt$$



you can observe that $forall x>0$ (the case $x<0$ is the same), $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ is continuous in $[x,2x]$ so for the mean value theorem, exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that



$$int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt=sin(xi_{x}^2)(2x-x)implies F(x)=sin(xi_{x}^2)x$$



Now $xi_{x}to 0$ for $xto 0^{+}$ so:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)x=[sin(0)cdot 0]=0$$



Note that this argument can be used to show that $F(x)$ is derivable for $x=0$, infact:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto 0}frac{sin(xi_{x}^2)x}{x}=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)=0$$



For $x_0=sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}$, the derivative of $F(x)$ can be found using the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus.



$F'(x)=2sin(4x^2)-sin(x^2)implies F'left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}right)=2sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})-sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})=-1$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the answer! How do you know that $F(x)=f(xi_{x})(2x-x)$? From Mean Value Theorem, we have that exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that $F(x)=frac{F(2x)-F(x)}{2x-x}$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:49












  • I applied the mean value theorem for the function $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ over the intervall $[x,2x]$. So exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $int_{x}^{2x}f(t)dt=f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – Ixion
    Jan 4 at 0:52












  • I do not know how do you get $f(xi_x)(2x-x)$. Since $f(x)$ is continuous at $[x,2x]$ and $f(x)$ is differentiable at $(x,2x)$ then exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $require{cancel}f'(xi_x)=dfrac{f(2x)-f(x)}{2x-x}=dfrac{sin(4x^2)-sin(2x)}xcancelimplies f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 5:31








  • 1




    The mean value theorem states that: if $f(t)$ is continuous in $[a,b]$ then it exists $xiin (a,b)$ such that: $$int_{a}^{b}f(t)dt=f(xi)(b-a)$$ In this case $f(t)=sin(t^2), a=x$ and $b=2x.$
    – Ixion
    2 days ago





















1














Since $frac {sin, x} xto1 $as $x to 0$ we can find $delta >0$ such that $frac 1 2 t^{2} leqsin(t^{2})leq 2t^{2}$ for $|t| <delta$. This gives $frac 7 6 x^{3} leq F(x) leq frac {14} 3x^{3}$ for $0<x<sqrt {delta}$ and it follows easily from the definition that the right hand derivative of $F$ at $0$ is $0$. Make the substitution $s=-t$ to see that the left hand derivative is also $0$. Hence $F'(0)=0$. For $x>0$ we have $F(x)=int_0^{2x}sin(t^{2}), dt -int_0^{x}sin(t^{2}), dt$ from which it follows (by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) that $F'(x)=2sin(4x^{2})-sin(x^{2})$. At the given point $x_0$ the derivative is $-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the answer! Why do you use "Since $frac {sin, x} xto1$ as $xto0$ (...)"?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:35








  • 1




    @manooooh it makes it easy to see that $frac {F(x)} x to 0$ as $xto 0$. I can use just the definition of derivative instead of using MVT, etc.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 6:40










  • Ok. Could you give me the guidelines on how to use the derivative definition at a point, please? From $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x$$ I should use the fact that $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$ so now the limit becomes $lim_{xto0}left|frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt}xright|$?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:44








  • 1




    @manooooh Now calculate he integral of $t^{2}$ from $x$ to $2x$. You will get $7x^{3} /3$. You now see that the limit is $0$, right?
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:17








  • 1




    @manooooh You said you have been asked to use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. That is what I have done in my answer. DO not try to find the derivative at $x_0$ using the definition of derivative. That is messy!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:30











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061154%2ffor-a-function-defined-by-parts-study-continuity-and-differentiability-at-two-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














You just need to use the fundamental theorem of calculus. Since the integrand $sin(t^2)$ is continuous everywhere we can write $$F(x) =int_{0}^{2x}sin t^2,dt-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ Use substitution $z=t/2$ in first integral on right to get $$F(x) =2int_{0}^{x}sin (4z^2),dz-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ and by FTC we can see that $F$ is continuous and differentiable everywhere with derivative $$F'(x) =2sin (4x^2)-sin x^2$$ for all $xinmathbb {R} $.





For reference I mention FTC explicitly :




Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1: Let the function $f:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ be Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $. Then the function $F:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ is continuous on $[a, b] $ and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin[a, b] $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with derivative $F'(c) =f(c) $.




Using the above theorem it can be proved that if a function $f:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ is Riemann integrable on every bounded and closed interval then the function $F:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ for some $ainmathbb {R} $ is continuous everywhere and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin mathbb {R} $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with $F'(c) =f(c) $.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    @manooooh: if you carefully note the FTC you will see that it deals with integrals where upper limit of integral is $x$ and lower limit is a constant. The substitution in first integral is done to change upper limit $2x$ to $x$. The second integral is already having $x$ as upper limit. If we apply substitution in second integral also then the upper limit changes from $x$ to $x/2$ and FTC can't be applied directly. Continued in next comment.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: Using FTC and chain rule for derivatives it can be proved that if $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{g(x)} f(t) , dt$$ then $F'(x) =f(g(x)) g'(x) $. This handles the case when the upper limit of integral is not $x$ but rather some complicated function $g(x) $. Regarding your second doubt, you can check using this formula that the answer remains same even if we apply substitution in second integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: you need to revisit substitution in definite integrals in your textbook and observe very carefully the given examples. During substitution in a definite integral the function as well as the limit of integral change according to the substitution used. Thus if we use $z=t/2, t=2z,dt=2,dz$ in second integral the limits $0$ and $x$ change to $0$ and $x/2$ to give $$int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt=2int_{0}^{x/2}sin (4z^2),dz$$
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @manooooh: the limits of integral indicate the range of values being taken by the variable of integration. Thus in $int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$ the variable $t$ varies from $0$ to $x$. If $z=t/2$ then $z$ should vary from $0$ to $x/2$ (as $z$ is half of $t$).
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: irrespective of how proficient you are in mathematics, your comments indicate that you have a sincere desire to learn. That's what matters here and nothing else. +1 for your question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago
















1














You just need to use the fundamental theorem of calculus. Since the integrand $sin(t^2)$ is continuous everywhere we can write $$F(x) =int_{0}^{2x}sin t^2,dt-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ Use substitution $z=t/2$ in first integral on right to get $$F(x) =2int_{0}^{x}sin (4z^2),dz-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ and by FTC we can see that $F$ is continuous and differentiable everywhere with derivative $$F'(x) =2sin (4x^2)-sin x^2$$ for all $xinmathbb {R} $.





For reference I mention FTC explicitly :




Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1: Let the function $f:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ be Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $. Then the function $F:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ is continuous on $[a, b] $ and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin[a, b] $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with derivative $F'(c) =f(c) $.




Using the above theorem it can be proved that if a function $f:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ is Riemann integrable on every bounded and closed interval then the function $F:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ for some $ainmathbb {R} $ is continuous everywhere and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin mathbb {R} $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with $F'(c) =f(c) $.






share|cite|improve this answer



















  • 1




    @manooooh: if you carefully note the FTC you will see that it deals with integrals where upper limit of integral is $x$ and lower limit is a constant. The substitution in first integral is done to change upper limit $2x$ to $x$. The second integral is already having $x$ as upper limit. If we apply substitution in second integral also then the upper limit changes from $x$ to $x/2$ and FTC can't be applied directly. Continued in next comment.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: Using FTC and chain rule for derivatives it can be proved that if $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{g(x)} f(t) , dt$$ then $F'(x) =f(g(x)) g'(x) $. This handles the case when the upper limit of integral is not $x$ but rather some complicated function $g(x) $. Regarding your second doubt, you can check using this formula that the answer remains same even if we apply substitution in second integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: you need to revisit substitution in definite integrals in your textbook and observe very carefully the given examples. During substitution in a definite integral the function as well as the limit of integral change according to the substitution used. Thus if we use $z=t/2, t=2z,dt=2,dz$ in second integral the limits $0$ and $x$ change to $0$ and $x/2$ to give $$int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt=2int_{0}^{x/2}sin (4z^2),dz$$
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @manooooh: the limits of integral indicate the range of values being taken by the variable of integration. Thus in $int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$ the variable $t$ varies from $0$ to $x$. If $z=t/2$ then $z$ should vary from $0$ to $x/2$ (as $z$ is half of $t$).
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: irrespective of how proficient you are in mathematics, your comments indicate that you have a sincere desire to learn. That's what matters here and nothing else. +1 for your question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago














1












1








1






You just need to use the fundamental theorem of calculus. Since the integrand $sin(t^2)$ is continuous everywhere we can write $$F(x) =int_{0}^{2x}sin t^2,dt-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ Use substitution $z=t/2$ in first integral on right to get $$F(x) =2int_{0}^{x}sin (4z^2),dz-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ and by FTC we can see that $F$ is continuous and differentiable everywhere with derivative $$F'(x) =2sin (4x^2)-sin x^2$$ for all $xinmathbb {R} $.





For reference I mention FTC explicitly :




Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1: Let the function $f:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ be Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $. Then the function $F:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ is continuous on $[a, b] $ and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin[a, b] $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with derivative $F'(c) =f(c) $.




Using the above theorem it can be proved that if a function $f:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ is Riemann integrable on every bounded and closed interval then the function $F:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ for some $ainmathbb {R} $ is continuous everywhere and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin mathbb {R} $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with $F'(c) =f(c) $.






share|cite|improve this answer














You just need to use the fundamental theorem of calculus. Since the integrand $sin(t^2)$ is continuous everywhere we can write $$F(x) =int_{0}^{2x}sin t^2,dt-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ Use substitution $z=t/2$ in first integral on right to get $$F(x) =2int_{0}^{x}sin (4z^2),dz-int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$$ and by FTC we can see that $F$ is continuous and differentiable everywhere with derivative $$F'(x) =2sin (4x^2)-sin x^2$$ for all $xinmathbb {R} $.





For reference I mention FTC explicitly :




Fundamental Theorem of Calculus Part 1: Let the function $f:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ be Riemann integrable on $[a, b] $. Then the function $F:[a, b] tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ is continuous on $[a, b] $ and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin[a, b] $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with derivative $F'(c) =f(c) $.




Using the above theorem it can be proved that if a function $f:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ is Riemann integrable on every bounded and closed interval then the function $F:mathbb {R} tomathbb {R} $ defined by $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{x} f(t) , dt$$ for some $ainmathbb {R} $ is continuous everywhere and if $f$ is continuous at some point $cin mathbb {R} $ then $F$ is differentiable at $c$ with $F'(c) =f(c) $.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 4 at 8:14

























answered Jan 4 at 7:28









Paramanand Singh

49k555161




49k555161








  • 1




    @manooooh: if you carefully note the FTC you will see that it deals with integrals where upper limit of integral is $x$ and lower limit is a constant. The substitution in first integral is done to change upper limit $2x$ to $x$. The second integral is already having $x$ as upper limit. If we apply substitution in second integral also then the upper limit changes from $x$ to $x/2$ and FTC can't be applied directly. Continued in next comment.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: Using FTC and chain rule for derivatives it can be proved that if $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{g(x)} f(t) , dt$$ then $F'(x) =f(g(x)) g'(x) $. This handles the case when the upper limit of integral is not $x$ but rather some complicated function $g(x) $. Regarding your second doubt, you can check using this formula that the answer remains same even if we apply substitution in second integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: you need to revisit substitution in definite integrals in your textbook and observe very carefully the given examples. During substitution in a definite integral the function as well as the limit of integral change according to the substitution used. Thus if we use $z=t/2, t=2z,dt=2,dz$ in second integral the limits $0$ and $x$ change to $0$ and $x/2$ to give $$int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt=2int_{0}^{x/2}sin (4z^2),dz$$
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @manooooh: the limits of integral indicate the range of values being taken by the variable of integration. Thus in $int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$ the variable $t$ varies from $0$ to $x$. If $z=t/2$ then $z$ should vary from $0$ to $x/2$ (as $z$ is half of $t$).
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: irrespective of how proficient you are in mathematics, your comments indicate that you have a sincere desire to learn. That's what matters here and nothing else. +1 for your question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago














  • 1




    @manooooh: if you carefully note the FTC you will see that it deals with integrals where upper limit of integral is $x$ and lower limit is a constant. The substitution in first integral is done to change upper limit $2x$ to $x$. The second integral is already having $x$ as upper limit. If we apply substitution in second integral also then the upper limit changes from $x$ to $x/2$ and FTC can't be applied directly. Continued in next comment.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: Using FTC and chain rule for derivatives it can be proved that if $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{g(x)} f(t) , dt$$ then $F'(x) =f(g(x)) g'(x) $. This handles the case when the upper limit of integral is not $x$ but rather some complicated function $g(x) $. Regarding your second doubt, you can check using this formula that the answer remains same even if we apply substitution in second integral.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: you need to revisit substitution in definite integrals in your textbook and observe very carefully the given examples. During substitution in a definite integral the function as well as the limit of integral change according to the substitution used. Thus if we use $z=t/2, t=2z,dt=2,dz$ in second integral the limits $0$ and $x$ change to $0$ and $x/2$ to give $$int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt=2int_{0}^{x/2}sin (4z^2),dz$$
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago








  • 1




    @manooooh: the limits of integral indicate the range of values being taken by the variable of integration. Thus in $int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$ the variable $t$ varies from $0$ to $x$. If $z=t/2$ then $z$ should vary from $0$ to $x/2$ (as $z$ is half of $t$).
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago






  • 1




    @manooooh: irrespective of how proficient you are in mathematics, your comments indicate that you have a sincere desire to learn. That's what matters here and nothing else. +1 for your question.
    – Paramanand Singh
    2 days ago








1




1




@manooooh: if you carefully note the FTC you will see that it deals with integrals where upper limit of integral is $x$ and lower limit is a constant. The substitution in first integral is done to change upper limit $2x$ to $x$. The second integral is already having $x$ as upper limit. If we apply substitution in second integral also then the upper limit changes from $x$ to $x/2$ and FTC can't be applied directly. Continued in next comment.
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago




@manooooh: if you carefully note the FTC you will see that it deals with integrals where upper limit of integral is $x$ and lower limit is a constant. The substitution in first integral is done to change upper limit $2x$ to $x$. The second integral is already having $x$ as upper limit. If we apply substitution in second integral also then the upper limit changes from $x$ to $x/2$ and FTC can't be applied directly. Continued in next comment.
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago




1




1




@manooooh: Using FTC and chain rule for derivatives it can be proved that if $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{g(x)} f(t) , dt$$ then $F'(x) =f(g(x)) g'(x) $. This handles the case when the upper limit of integral is not $x$ but rather some complicated function $g(x) $. Regarding your second doubt, you can check using this formula that the answer remains same even if we apply substitution in second integral.
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago




@manooooh: Using FTC and chain rule for derivatives it can be proved that if $$F(x) =int_{a} ^{g(x)} f(t) , dt$$ then $F'(x) =f(g(x)) g'(x) $. This handles the case when the upper limit of integral is not $x$ but rather some complicated function $g(x) $. Regarding your second doubt, you can check using this formula that the answer remains same even if we apply substitution in second integral.
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago




1




1




@manooooh: you need to revisit substitution in definite integrals in your textbook and observe very carefully the given examples. During substitution in a definite integral the function as well as the limit of integral change according to the substitution used. Thus if we use $z=t/2, t=2z,dt=2,dz$ in second integral the limits $0$ and $x$ change to $0$ and $x/2$ to give $$int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt=2int_{0}^{x/2}sin (4z^2),dz$$
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago






@manooooh: you need to revisit substitution in definite integrals in your textbook and observe very carefully the given examples. During substitution in a definite integral the function as well as the limit of integral change according to the substitution used. Thus if we use $z=t/2, t=2z,dt=2,dz$ in second integral the limits $0$ and $x$ change to $0$ and $x/2$ to give $$int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt=2int_{0}^{x/2}sin (4z^2),dz$$
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago






1




1




@manooooh: the limits of integral indicate the range of values being taken by the variable of integration. Thus in $int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$ the variable $t$ varies from $0$ to $x$. If $z=t/2$ then $z$ should vary from $0$ to $x/2$ (as $z$ is half of $t$).
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago




@manooooh: the limits of integral indicate the range of values being taken by the variable of integration. Thus in $int_{0}^{x}sin t^2,dt$ the variable $t$ varies from $0$ to $x$. If $z=t/2$ then $z$ should vary from $0$ to $x/2$ (as $z$ is half of $t$).
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago




1




1




@manooooh: irrespective of how proficient you are in mathematics, your comments indicate that you have a sincere desire to learn. That's what matters here and nothing else. +1 for your question.
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago




@manooooh: irrespective of how proficient you are in mathematics, your comments indicate that you have a sincere desire to learn. That's what matters here and nothing else. +1 for your question.
– Paramanand Singh
2 days ago











2














If you want to evaluate the limit:



$$displaystylelim_{xto 0}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt$$



you can observe that $forall x>0$ (the case $x<0$ is the same), $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ is continuous in $[x,2x]$ so for the mean value theorem, exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that



$$int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt=sin(xi_{x}^2)(2x-x)implies F(x)=sin(xi_{x}^2)x$$



Now $xi_{x}to 0$ for $xto 0^{+}$ so:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)x=[sin(0)cdot 0]=0$$



Note that this argument can be used to show that $F(x)$ is derivable for $x=0$, infact:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto 0}frac{sin(xi_{x}^2)x}{x}=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)=0$$



For $x_0=sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}$, the derivative of $F(x)$ can be found using the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus.



$F'(x)=2sin(4x^2)-sin(x^2)implies F'left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}right)=2sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})-sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})=-1$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the answer! How do you know that $F(x)=f(xi_{x})(2x-x)$? From Mean Value Theorem, we have that exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that $F(x)=frac{F(2x)-F(x)}{2x-x}$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:49












  • I applied the mean value theorem for the function $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ over the intervall $[x,2x]$. So exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $int_{x}^{2x}f(t)dt=f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – Ixion
    Jan 4 at 0:52












  • I do not know how do you get $f(xi_x)(2x-x)$. Since $f(x)$ is continuous at $[x,2x]$ and $f(x)$ is differentiable at $(x,2x)$ then exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $require{cancel}f'(xi_x)=dfrac{f(2x)-f(x)}{2x-x}=dfrac{sin(4x^2)-sin(2x)}xcancelimplies f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 5:31








  • 1




    The mean value theorem states that: if $f(t)$ is continuous in $[a,b]$ then it exists $xiin (a,b)$ such that: $$int_{a}^{b}f(t)dt=f(xi)(b-a)$$ In this case $f(t)=sin(t^2), a=x$ and $b=2x.$
    – Ixion
    2 days ago


















2














If you want to evaluate the limit:



$$displaystylelim_{xto 0}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt$$



you can observe that $forall x>0$ (the case $x<0$ is the same), $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ is continuous in $[x,2x]$ so for the mean value theorem, exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that



$$int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt=sin(xi_{x}^2)(2x-x)implies F(x)=sin(xi_{x}^2)x$$



Now $xi_{x}to 0$ for $xto 0^{+}$ so:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)x=[sin(0)cdot 0]=0$$



Note that this argument can be used to show that $F(x)$ is derivable for $x=0$, infact:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto 0}frac{sin(xi_{x}^2)x}{x}=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)=0$$



For $x_0=sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}$, the derivative of $F(x)$ can be found using the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus.



$F'(x)=2sin(4x^2)-sin(x^2)implies F'left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}right)=2sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})-sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})=-1$






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the answer! How do you know that $F(x)=f(xi_{x})(2x-x)$? From Mean Value Theorem, we have that exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that $F(x)=frac{F(2x)-F(x)}{2x-x}$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:49












  • I applied the mean value theorem for the function $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ over the intervall $[x,2x]$. So exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $int_{x}^{2x}f(t)dt=f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – Ixion
    Jan 4 at 0:52












  • I do not know how do you get $f(xi_x)(2x-x)$. Since $f(x)$ is continuous at $[x,2x]$ and $f(x)$ is differentiable at $(x,2x)$ then exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $require{cancel}f'(xi_x)=dfrac{f(2x)-f(x)}{2x-x}=dfrac{sin(4x^2)-sin(2x)}xcancelimplies f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 5:31








  • 1




    The mean value theorem states that: if $f(t)$ is continuous in $[a,b]$ then it exists $xiin (a,b)$ such that: $$int_{a}^{b}f(t)dt=f(xi)(b-a)$$ In this case $f(t)=sin(t^2), a=x$ and $b=2x.$
    – Ixion
    2 days ago
















2












2








2






If you want to evaluate the limit:



$$displaystylelim_{xto 0}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt$$



you can observe that $forall x>0$ (the case $x<0$ is the same), $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ is continuous in $[x,2x]$ so for the mean value theorem, exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that



$$int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt=sin(xi_{x}^2)(2x-x)implies F(x)=sin(xi_{x}^2)x$$



Now $xi_{x}to 0$ for $xto 0^{+}$ so:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)x=[sin(0)cdot 0]=0$$



Note that this argument can be used to show that $F(x)$ is derivable for $x=0$, infact:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto 0}frac{sin(xi_{x}^2)x}{x}=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)=0$$



For $x_0=sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}$, the derivative of $F(x)$ can be found using the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus.



$F'(x)=2sin(4x^2)-sin(x^2)implies F'left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}right)=2sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})-sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})=-1$






share|cite|improve this answer














If you want to evaluate the limit:



$$displaystylelim_{xto 0}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt$$



you can observe that $forall x>0$ (the case $x<0$ is the same), $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ is continuous in $[x,2x]$ so for the mean value theorem, exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that



$$int_{x}^{2x}sin(t^2)dt=sin(xi_{x}^2)(2x-x)implies F(x)=sin(xi_{x}^2)x$$



Now $xi_{x}to 0$ for $xto 0^{+}$ so:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}F(x)=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)x=[sin(0)cdot 0]=0$$



Note that this argument can be used to show that $F(x)$ is derivable for $x=0$, infact:



$$lim_{xto 0^{+}}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto 0}frac{sin(xi_{x}^2)x}{x}=lim_{xto 0}sin(xi_{x}^2)=0$$



For $x_0=sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}$, the derivative of $F(x)$ can be found using the Fundamental Theorem of Integral Calculus.



$F'(x)=2sin(4x^2)-sin(x^2)implies F'left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}right)=2sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})-sin(4cdotfrac{pi}{2})=-1$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 4 at 0:57

























answered Jan 4 at 0:41









Ixion

778419




778419












  • Thanks for the answer! How do you know that $F(x)=f(xi_{x})(2x-x)$? From Mean Value Theorem, we have that exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that $F(x)=frac{F(2x)-F(x)}{2x-x}$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:49












  • I applied the mean value theorem for the function $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ over the intervall $[x,2x]$. So exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $int_{x}^{2x}f(t)dt=f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – Ixion
    Jan 4 at 0:52












  • I do not know how do you get $f(xi_x)(2x-x)$. Since $f(x)$ is continuous at $[x,2x]$ and $f(x)$ is differentiable at $(x,2x)$ then exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $require{cancel}f'(xi_x)=dfrac{f(2x)-f(x)}{2x-x}=dfrac{sin(4x^2)-sin(2x)}xcancelimplies f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 5:31








  • 1




    The mean value theorem states that: if $f(t)$ is continuous in $[a,b]$ then it exists $xiin (a,b)$ such that: $$int_{a}^{b}f(t)dt=f(xi)(b-a)$$ In this case $f(t)=sin(t^2), a=x$ and $b=2x.$
    – Ixion
    2 days ago




















  • Thanks for the answer! How do you know that $F(x)=f(xi_{x})(2x-x)$? From Mean Value Theorem, we have that exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that $F(x)=frac{F(2x)-F(x)}{2x-x}$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 0:49












  • I applied the mean value theorem for the function $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ over the intervall $[x,2x]$. So exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $int_{x}^{2x}f(t)dt=f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – Ixion
    Jan 4 at 0:52












  • I do not know how do you get $f(xi_x)(2x-x)$. Since $f(x)$ is continuous at $[x,2x]$ and $f(x)$ is differentiable at $(x,2x)$ then exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $require{cancel}f'(xi_x)=dfrac{f(2x)-f(x)}{2x-x}=dfrac{sin(4x^2)-sin(2x)}xcancelimplies f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 5:31








  • 1




    The mean value theorem states that: if $f(t)$ is continuous in $[a,b]$ then it exists $xiin (a,b)$ such that: $$int_{a}^{b}f(t)dt=f(xi)(b-a)$$ In this case $f(t)=sin(t^2), a=x$ and $b=2x.$
    – Ixion
    2 days ago


















Thanks for the answer! How do you know that $F(x)=f(xi_{x})(2x-x)$? From Mean Value Theorem, we have that exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that $F(x)=frac{F(2x)-F(x)}{2x-x}$.
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 0:49






Thanks for the answer! How do you know that $F(x)=f(xi_{x})(2x-x)$? From Mean Value Theorem, we have that exists $xi_{x}in (x,2x)$ such that $F(x)=frac{F(2x)-F(x)}{2x-x}$.
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 0:49














I applied the mean value theorem for the function $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ over the intervall $[x,2x]$. So exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $int_{x}^{2x}f(t)dt=f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
– Ixion
Jan 4 at 0:52






I applied the mean value theorem for the function $f(t)=sin(t^2)$ over the intervall $[x,2x]$. So exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $int_{x}^{2x}f(t)dt=f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
– Ixion
Jan 4 at 0:52














I do not know how do you get $f(xi_x)(2x-x)$. Since $f(x)$ is continuous at $[x,2x]$ and $f(x)$ is differentiable at $(x,2x)$ then exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $require{cancel}f'(xi_x)=dfrac{f(2x)-f(x)}{2x-x}=dfrac{sin(4x^2)-sin(2x)}xcancelimplies f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 5:31






I do not know how do you get $f(xi_x)(2x-x)$. Since $f(x)$ is continuous at $[x,2x]$ and $f(x)$ is differentiable at $(x,2x)$ then exists $xi_xin(x,2x)$ such that $require{cancel}f'(xi_x)=dfrac{f(2x)-f(x)}{2x-x}=dfrac{sin(4x^2)-sin(2x)}xcancelimplies f(xi_x)(2x-x)$.
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 5:31






1




1




The mean value theorem states that: if $f(t)$ is continuous in $[a,b]$ then it exists $xiin (a,b)$ such that: $$int_{a}^{b}f(t)dt=f(xi)(b-a)$$ In this case $f(t)=sin(t^2), a=x$ and $b=2x.$
– Ixion
2 days ago






The mean value theorem states that: if $f(t)$ is continuous in $[a,b]$ then it exists $xiin (a,b)$ such that: $$int_{a}^{b}f(t)dt=f(xi)(b-a)$$ In this case $f(t)=sin(t^2), a=x$ and $b=2x.$
– Ixion
2 days ago













1














Since $frac {sin, x} xto1 $as $x to 0$ we can find $delta >0$ such that $frac 1 2 t^{2} leqsin(t^{2})leq 2t^{2}$ for $|t| <delta$. This gives $frac 7 6 x^{3} leq F(x) leq frac {14} 3x^{3}$ for $0<x<sqrt {delta}$ and it follows easily from the definition that the right hand derivative of $F$ at $0$ is $0$. Make the substitution $s=-t$ to see that the left hand derivative is also $0$. Hence $F'(0)=0$. For $x>0$ we have $F(x)=int_0^{2x}sin(t^{2}), dt -int_0^{x}sin(t^{2}), dt$ from which it follows (by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) that $F'(x)=2sin(4x^{2})-sin(x^{2})$. At the given point $x_0$ the derivative is $-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the answer! Why do you use "Since $frac {sin, x} xto1$ as $xto0$ (...)"?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:35








  • 1




    @manooooh it makes it easy to see that $frac {F(x)} x to 0$ as $xto 0$. I can use just the definition of derivative instead of using MVT, etc.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 6:40










  • Ok. Could you give me the guidelines on how to use the derivative definition at a point, please? From $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x$$ I should use the fact that $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$ so now the limit becomes $lim_{xto0}left|frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt}xright|$?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:44








  • 1




    @manooooh Now calculate he integral of $t^{2}$ from $x$ to $2x$. You will get $7x^{3} /3$. You now see that the limit is $0$, right?
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:17








  • 1




    @manooooh You said you have been asked to use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. That is what I have done in my answer. DO not try to find the derivative at $x_0$ using the definition of derivative. That is messy!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:30
















1














Since $frac {sin, x} xto1 $as $x to 0$ we can find $delta >0$ such that $frac 1 2 t^{2} leqsin(t^{2})leq 2t^{2}$ for $|t| <delta$. This gives $frac 7 6 x^{3} leq F(x) leq frac {14} 3x^{3}$ for $0<x<sqrt {delta}$ and it follows easily from the definition that the right hand derivative of $F$ at $0$ is $0$. Make the substitution $s=-t$ to see that the left hand derivative is also $0$. Hence $F'(0)=0$. For $x>0$ we have $F(x)=int_0^{2x}sin(t^{2}), dt -int_0^{x}sin(t^{2}), dt$ from which it follows (by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) that $F'(x)=2sin(4x^{2})-sin(x^{2})$. At the given point $x_0$ the derivative is $-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the answer! Why do you use "Since $frac {sin, x} xto1$ as $xto0$ (...)"?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:35








  • 1




    @manooooh it makes it easy to see that $frac {F(x)} x to 0$ as $xto 0$. I can use just the definition of derivative instead of using MVT, etc.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 6:40










  • Ok. Could you give me the guidelines on how to use the derivative definition at a point, please? From $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x$$ I should use the fact that $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$ so now the limit becomes $lim_{xto0}left|frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt}xright|$?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:44








  • 1




    @manooooh Now calculate he integral of $t^{2}$ from $x$ to $2x$. You will get $7x^{3} /3$. You now see that the limit is $0$, right?
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:17








  • 1




    @manooooh You said you have been asked to use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. That is what I have done in my answer. DO not try to find the derivative at $x_0$ using the definition of derivative. That is messy!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:30














1












1








1






Since $frac {sin, x} xto1 $as $x to 0$ we can find $delta >0$ such that $frac 1 2 t^{2} leqsin(t^{2})leq 2t^{2}$ for $|t| <delta$. This gives $frac 7 6 x^{3} leq F(x) leq frac {14} 3x^{3}$ for $0<x<sqrt {delta}$ and it follows easily from the definition that the right hand derivative of $F$ at $0$ is $0$. Make the substitution $s=-t$ to see that the left hand derivative is also $0$. Hence $F'(0)=0$. For $x>0$ we have $F(x)=int_0^{2x}sin(t^{2}), dt -int_0^{x}sin(t^{2}), dt$ from which it follows (by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) that $F'(x)=2sin(4x^{2})-sin(x^{2})$. At the given point $x_0$ the derivative is $-1$.






share|cite|improve this answer














Since $frac {sin, x} xto1 $as $x to 0$ we can find $delta >0$ such that $frac 1 2 t^{2} leqsin(t^{2})leq 2t^{2}$ for $|t| <delta$. This gives $frac 7 6 x^{3} leq F(x) leq frac {14} 3x^{3}$ for $0<x<sqrt {delta}$ and it follows easily from the definition that the right hand derivative of $F$ at $0$ is $0$. Make the substitution $s=-t$ to see that the left hand derivative is also $0$. Hence $F'(0)=0$. For $x>0$ we have $F(x)=int_0^{2x}sin(t^{2}), dt -int_0^{x}sin(t^{2}), dt$ from which it follows (by Fundamental Theorem of Calculus) that $F'(x)=2sin(4x^{2})-sin(x^{2})$. At the given point $x_0$ the derivative is $-1$.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited Jan 4 at 7:31

























answered Jan 4 at 6:14









Kavi Rama Murthy

51.4k31855




51.4k31855












  • Thanks for the answer! Why do you use "Since $frac {sin, x} xto1$ as $xto0$ (...)"?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:35








  • 1




    @manooooh it makes it easy to see that $frac {F(x)} x to 0$ as $xto 0$. I can use just the definition of derivative instead of using MVT, etc.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 6:40










  • Ok. Could you give me the guidelines on how to use the derivative definition at a point, please? From $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x$$ I should use the fact that $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$ so now the limit becomes $lim_{xto0}left|frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt}xright|$?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:44








  • 1




    @manooooh Now calculate he integral of $t^{2}$ from $x$ to $2x$. You will get $7x^{3} /3$. You now see that the limit is $0$, right?
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:17








  • 1




    @manooooh You said you have been asked to use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. That is what I have done in my answer. DO not try to find the derivative at $x_0$ using the definition of derivative. That is messy!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:30


















  • Thanks for the answer! Why do you use "Since $frac {sin, x} xto1$ as $xto0$ (...)"?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:35








  • 1




    @manooooh it makes it easy to see that $frac {F(x)} x to 0$ as $xto 0$. I can use just the definition of derivative instead of using MVT, etc.
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 6:40










  • Ok. Could you give me the guidelines on how to use the derivative definition at a point, please? From $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x$$ I should use the fact that $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$ so now the limit becomes $lim_{xto0}left|frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt}xright|$?
    – manooooh
    Jan 4 at 6:44








  • 1




    @manooooh Now calculate he integral of $t^{2}$ from $x$ to $2x$. You will get $7x^{3} /3$. You now see that the limit is $0$, right?
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:17








  • 1




    @manooooh You said you have been asked to use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. That is what I have done in my answer. DO not try to find the derivative at $x_0$ using the definition of derivative. That is messy!
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Jan 4 at 7:30
















Thanks for the answer! Why do you use "Since $frac {sin, x} xto1$ as $xto0$ (...)"?
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 6:35






Thanks for the answer! Why do you use "Since $frac {sin, x} xto1$ as $xto0$ (...)"?
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 6:35






1




1




@manooooh it makes it easy to see that $frac {F(x)} x to 0$ as $xto 0$. I can use just the definition of derivative instead of using MVT, etc.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 6:40




@manooooh it makes it easy to see that $frac {F(x)} x to 0$ as $xto 0$. I can use just the definition of derivative instead of using MVT, etc.
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 6:40












Ok. Could you give me the guidelines on how to use the derivative definition at a point, please? From $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x$$ I should use the fact that $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$ so now the limit becomes $lim_{xto0}left|frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt}xright|$?
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 6:44






Ok. Could you give me the guidelines on how to use the derivative definition at a point, please? From $$F'(0)=lim_{xto0}frac{F(x)-F(0)}{x-0}=lim_{xto0}frac{int_x^{2x}sin t^2,mathrm dt}x$$ I should use the fact that $left|sin t^2right|leq t^2$ so now the limit becomes $lim_{xto0}left|frac{int_x^{2x}t^2,mathrm dt}xright|$?
– manooooh
Jan 4 at 6:44






1




1




@manooooh Now calculate he integral of $t^{2}$ from $x$ to $2x$. You will get $7x^{3} /3$. You now see that the limit is $0$, right?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 7:17






@manooooh Now calculate he integral of $t^{2}$ from $x$ to $2x$. You will get $7x^{3} /3$. You now see that the limit is $0$, right?
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 7:17






1




1




@manooooh You said you have been asked to use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. That is what I have done in my answer. DO not try to find the derivative at $x_0$ using the definition of derivative. That is messy!
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 7:30




@manooooh You said you have been asked to use the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. That is what I have done in my answer. DO not try to find the derivative at $x_0$ using the definition of derivative. That is messy!
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Jan 4 at 7:30


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061154%2ffor-a-function-defined-by-parts-study-continuity-and-differentiability-at-two-p%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

An IMO inspired problem

Management

Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?