Issue with root of unity
I everyone !
I have to show that with $r=frac{p}{q}$ a rationnal number, an $k$ a natural number :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)$ is a $2q$-th root of unity.
What I did :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=(e^{itimespi})^{2^k times r}$
$=((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r$
I used the fact that $e^{itimespi}=-1$ and $2^k$ is even :
$((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r=((-1)^{2^k})^r$
$=1^r=1$
I know there is a mistake somewhere because for $r=frac{1}{2}$ and $k=1$,
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=-1$
Can you help me to fix my issue please ?
complex-analysis complex-numbers exponential-function
New contributor
add a comment |
I everyone !
I have to show that with $r=frac{p}{q}$ a rationnal number, an $k$ a natural number :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)$ is a $2q$-th root of unity.
What I did :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=(e^{itimespi})^{2^k times r}$
$=((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r$
I used the fact that $e^{itimespi}=-1$ and $2^k$ is even :
$((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r=((-1)^{2^k})^r$
$=1^r=1$
I know there is a mistake somewhere because for $r=frac{1}{2}$ and $k=1$,
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=-1$
Can you help me to fix my issue please ?
complex-analysis complex-numbers exponential-function
New contributor
$exp(2i pi n/m)$ is a primitive $m$-th root of unity iff $gcd(m,n)=1$. In general it is a $km$-th root of unity and a primitive $frac{m}{gcd(m,n)}$-th root of unity.
– reuns
Jan 4 at 0:05
1
What mistake? -1 is a square root of unity.
– fleablood
Jan 4 at 0:14
@reuns can you show me the proof of this ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
add a comment |
I everyone !
I have to show that with $r=frac{p}{q}$ a rationnal number, an $k$ a natural number :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)$ is a $2q$-th root of unity.
What I did :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=(e^{itimespi})^{2^k times r}$
$=((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r$
I used the fact that $e^{itimespi}=-1$ and $2^k$ is even :
$((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r=((-1)^{2^k})^r$
$=1^r=1$
I know there is a mistake somewhere because for $r=frac{1}{2}$ and $k=1$,
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=-1$
Can you help me to fix my issue please ?
complex-analysis complex-numbers exponential-function
New contributor
I everyone !
I have to show that with $r=frac{p}{q}$ a rationnal number, an $k$ a natural number :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)$ is a $2q$-th root of unity.
What I did :
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=(e^{itimespi})^{2^k times r}$
$=((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r$
I used the fact that $e^{itimespi}=-1$ and $2^k$ is even :
$((e^{itimespi})^{2^k})^r=((-1)^{2^k})^r$
$=1^r=1$
I know there is a mistake somewhere because for $r=frac{1}{2}$ and $k=1$,
$exp(itimespitimes 2^k times r)=-1$
Can you help me to fix my issue please ?
complex-analysis complex-numbers exponential-function
complex-analysis complex-numbers exponential-function
New contributor
New contributor
edited Jan 4 at 0:16
José Carlos Santos
152k22123225
152k22123225
New contributor
asked Jan 3 at 23:58
Yazid
31
31
New contributor
New contributor
$exp(2i pi n/m)$ is a primitive $m$-th root of unity iff $gcd(m,n)=1$. In general it is a $km$-th root of unity and a primitive $frac{m}{gcd(m,n)}$-th root of unity.
– reuns
Jan 4 at 0:05
1
What mistake? -1 is a square root of unity.
– fleablood
Jan 4 at 0:14
@reuns can you show me the proof of this ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
add a comment |
$exp(2i pi n/m)$ is a primitive $m$-th root of unity iff $gcd(m,n)=1$. In general it is a $km$-th root of unity and a primitive $frac{m}{gcd(m,n)}$-th root of unity.
– reuns
Jan 4 at 0:05
1
What mistake? -1 is a square root of unity.
– fleablood
Jan 4 at 0:14
@reuns can you show me the proof of this ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
$exp(2i pi n/m)$ is a primitive $m$-th root of unity iff $gcd(m,n)=1$. In general it is a $km$-th root of unity and a primitive $frac{m}{gcd(m,n)}$-th root of unity.
– reuns
Jan 4 at 0:05
$exp(2i pi n/m)$ is a primitive $m$-th root of unity iff $gcd(m,n)=1$. In general it is a $km$-th root of unity and a primitive $frac{m}{gcd(m,n)}$-th root of unity.
– reuns
Jan 4 at 0:05
1
1
What mistake? -1 is a square root of unity.
– fleablood
Jan 4 at 0:14
What mistake? -1 is a square root of unity.
– fleablood
Jan 4 at 0:14
@reuns can you show me the proof of this ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
@reuns can you show me the proof of this ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your mistake lies in assuming that $e^{ab}=(e^a)^b$. This is worst than wrong: it doesn't make sense in general (but it holds if $binmathbb Z$).
You can prove what you wish to prove this way:begin{align}expleft(ipi2^k rright)^{2q}&=expleft(ipi 2^kfrac pqtimes2qright)\&=expleft(ipi 2^{k+1}pright)\&=1.end{align}
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense in general please ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
Of course. The number $e^a$ can be any number $winmathbb{C}setminus{0}$. But then, what is $w^b$? How do you define it?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
I provided an answer to that, did I not?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Yazid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061167%2fissue-with-root-of-unity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your mistake lies in assuming that $e^{ab}=(e^a)^b$. This is worst than wrong: it doesn't make sense in general (but it holds if $binmathbb Z$).
You can prove what you wish to prove this way:begin{align}expleft(ipi2^k rright)^{2q}&=expleft(ipi 2^kfrac pqtimes2qright)\&=expleft(ipi 2^{k+1}pright)\&=1.end{align}
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense in general please ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
Of course. The number $e^a$ can be any number $winmathbb{C}setminus{0}$. But then, what is $w^b$? How do you define it?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
I provided an answer to that, did I not?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your mistake lies in assuming that $e^{ab}=(e^a)^b$. This is worst than wrong: it doesn't make sense in general (but it holds if $binmathbb Z$).
You can prove what you wish to prove this way:begin{align}expleft(ipi2^k rright)^{2q}&=expleft(ipi 2^kfrac pqtimes2qright)\&=expleft(ipi 2^{k+1}pright)\&=1.end{align}
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense in general please ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
Of course. The number $e^a$ can be any number $winmathbb{C}setminus{0}$. But then, what is $w^b$? How do you define it?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
I provided an answer to that, did I not?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your mistake lies in assuming that $e^{ab}=(e^a)^b$. This is worst than wrong: it doesn't make sense in general (but it holds if $binmathbb Z$).
You can prove what you wish to prove this way:begin{align}expleft(ipi2^k rright)^{2q}&=expleft(ipi 2^kfrac pqtimes2qright)\&=expleft(ipi 2^{k+1}pright)\&=1.end{align}
Your mistake lies in assuming that $e^{ab}=(e^a)^b$. This is worst than wrong: it doesn't make sense in general (but it holds if $binmathbb Z$).
You can prove what you wish to prove this way:begin{align}expleft(ipi2^k rright)^{2q}&=expleft(ipi 2^kfrac pqtimes2qright)\&=expleft(ipi 2^{k+1}pright)\&=1.end{align}
answered Jan 4 at 0:13
José Carlos Santos
152k22123225
152k22123225
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense in general please ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
Of course. The number $e^a$ can be any number $winmathbb{C}setminus{0}$. But then, what is $w^b$? How do you define it?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
I provided an answer to that, did I not?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
add a comment |
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense in general please ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
Of course. The number $e^a$ can be any number $winmathbb{C}setminus{0}$. But then, what is $w^b$? How do you define it?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
I provided an answer to that, did I not?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense in general please ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
Can you explain why it doesn't make sense in general please ?
– Yazid
2 days ago
Of course. The number $e^a$ can be any number $winmathbb{C}setminus{0}$. But then, what is $w^b$? How do you define it?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
Of course. The number $e^a$ can be any number $winmathbb{C}setminus{0}$. But then, what is $w^b$? How do you define it?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
I provided an answer to that, did I not?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
I provided an answer to that, did I not?
– José Carlos Santos
2 days ago
add a comment |
Yazid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yazid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yazid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Yazid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061167%2fissue-with-root-of-unity%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$exp(2i pi n/m)$ is a primitive $m$-th root of unity iff $gcd(m,n)=1$. In general it is a $km$-th root of unity and a primitive $frac{m}{gcd(m,n)}$-th root of unity.
– reuns
Jan 4 at 0:05
1
What mistake? -1 is a square root of unity.
– fleablood
Jan 4 at 0:14
@reuns can you show me the proof of this ?
– Yazid
2 days ago