Similar Matrices Confer Equivalent Linear Transformations












1














Apologies - I know there are some similar questions on this site, but I couldn't quite apply what they are saying here.



Let's say I have the following matrices:
$$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&6\-2&6end{bmatrix}; B=begin{bmatrix}1&2\-1&4end{bmatrix}$$
I conclude that they are similar (without finding $P$ such that $PAP^{-1} = B$) because both have eigenvalues 2,3 and thus will be similar to $D=begin{bmatrix}2&0\0&3end{bmatrix}$.



If we let $x=begin{bmatrix}2\3 end{bmatrix}$, we have:
$$Ax=begin{bmatrix}16\14end{bmatrix}; Bx=begin{bmatrix}8\10end{bmatrix}$$



I was told, however, that if two matrices are similar then they induce the same linear transformation. How can they do this if they map the same vector to a different vector? What is meant by 'same' here?



Thanks for help and sorry if an elementary question.










share|cite|improve this question



























    1














    Apologies - I know there are some similar questions on this site, but I couldn't quite apply what they are saying here.



    Let's say I have the following matrices:
    $$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&6\-2&6end{bmatrix}; B=begin{bmatrix}1&2\-1&4end{bmatrix}$$
    I conclude that they are similar (without finding $P$ such that $PAP^{-1} = B$) because both have eigenvalues 2,3 and thus will be similar to $D=begin{bmatrix}2&0\0&3end{bmatrix}$.



    If we let $x=begin{bmatrix}2\3 end{bmatrix}$, we have:
    $$Ax=begin{bmatrix}16\14end{bmatrix}; Bx=begin{bmatrix}8\10end{bmatrix}$$



    I was told, however, that if two matrices are similar then they induce the same linear transformation. How can they do this if they map the same vector to a different vector? What is meant by 'same' here?



    Thanks for help and sorry if an elementary question.










    share|cite|improve this question

























      1












      1








      1







      Apologies - I know there are some similar questions on this site, but I couldn't quite apply what they are saying here.



      Let's say I have the following matrices:
      $$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&6\-2&6end{bmatrix}; B=begin{bmatrix}1&2\-1&4end{bmatrix}$$
      I conclude that they are similar (without finding $P$ such that $PAP^{-1} = B$) because both have eigenvalues 2,3 and thus will be similar to $D=begin{bmatrix}2&0\0&3end{bmatrix}$.



      If we let $x=begin{bmatrix}2\3 end{bmatrix}$, we have:
      $$Ax=begin{bmatrix}16\14end{bmatrix}; Bx=begin{bmatrix}8\10end{bmatrix}$$



      I was told, however, that if two matrices are similar then they induce the same linear transformation. How can they do this if they map the same vector to a different vector? What is meant by 'same' here?



      Thanks for help and sorry if an elementary question.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Apologies - I know there are some similar questions on this site, but I couldn't quite apply what they are saying here.



      Let's say I have the following matrices:
      $$A=begin{bmatrix}-1&6\-2&6end{bmatrix}; B=begin{bmatrix}1&2\-1&4end{bmatrix}$$
      I conclude that they are similar (without finding $P$ such that $PAP^{-1} = B$) because both have eigenvalues 2,3 and thus will be similar to $D=begin{bmatrix}2&0\0&3end{bmatrix}$.



      If we let $x=begin{bmatrix}2\3 end{bmatrix}$, we have:
      $$Ax=begin{bmatrix}16\14end{bmatrix}; Bx=begin{bmatrix}8\10end{bmatrix}$$



      I was told, however, that if two matrices are similar then they induce the same linear transformation. How can they do this if they map the same vector to a different vector? What is meant by 'same' here?



      Thanks for help and sorry if an elementary question.







      linear-algebra matrices linear-transformations






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Jan 4 at 5:15









      AndrewAndrew

      334211




      334211






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          When you write



          $$x = begin{bmatrix} 2\3end{bmatrix}$$



          what you are really referencing is the linear combination $2v_1 + 3v_2$ where $v_1, v_2$ is a basis for $mathbb{R}^2$. Usually, we assume that



          $$v_1 = begin{bmatrix} 1\0end{bmatrix}qquad v_2 = begin{bmatrix} 0\1end{bmatrix}, $$



          but we don’t need to. Given a vector $x$ and a basis $alpha = {alpha_1, alpha_2}$, if $x = aalpha_1 + balpha_2$, I’ll be explicit and write that



          $$[x]_{alpha} = begin{bmatrix} a\bend{bmatrix}. $$



          Your statement, that similar matrices induce the same linear transformation, is true assuming you choose the correct basis. That is, there are bases $alpha$ and $beta$ such that given any $xinmathbb{R}^2$



          $$A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your answer. Sorry if I it sounds stupid, but I still don’t understand how your explanation above means that the two similar matrices induce the SAME liner transformation. You can always write any vector as the linear combination of basis vectors, but not all invertible matrices are similar to each other.
            – Andrew
            Jan 4 at 9:20










          • You can always write any vector as a linear combination of basis vectors, but you can’t always find two bases so that $A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}$. For two non-similar matrices, this won’t be possible.
            – Santana Afton
            Jan 4 at 14:41











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061335%2fsimilar-matrices-confer-equivalent-linear-transformations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          0














          When you write



          $$x = begin{bmatrix} 2\3end{bmatrix}$$



          what you are really referencing is the linear combination $2v_1 + 3v_2$ where $v_1, v_2$ is a basis for $mathbb{R}^2$. Usually, we assume that



          $$v_1 = begin{bmatrix} 1\0end{bmatrix}qquad v_2 = begin{bmatrix} 0\1end{bmatrix}, $$



          but we don’t need to. Given a vector $x$ and a basis $alpha = {alpha_1, alpha_2}$, if $x = aalpha_1 + balpha_2$, I’ll be explicit and write that



          $$[x]_{alpha} = begin{bmatrix} a\bend{bmatrix}. $$



          Your statement, that similar matrices induce the same linear transformation, is true assuming you choose the correct basis. That is, there are bases $alpha$ and $beta$ such that given any $xinmathbb{R}^2$



          $$A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your answer. Sorry if I it sounds stupid, but I still don’t understand how your explanation above means that the two similar matrices induce the SAME liner transformation. You can always write any vector as the linear combination of basis vectors, but not all invertible matrices are similar to each other.
            – Andrew
            Jan 4 at 9:20










          • You can always write any vector as a linear combination of basis vectors, but you can’t always find two bases so that $A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}$. For two non-similar matrices, this won’t be possible.
            – Santana Afton
            Jan 4 at 14:41
















          0














          When you write



          $$x = begin{bmatrix} 2\3end{bmatrix}$$



          what you are really referencing is the linear combination $2v_1 + 3v_2$ where $v_1, v_2$ is a basis for $mathbb{R}^2$. Usually, we assume that



          $$v_1 = begin{bmatrix} 1\0end{bmatrix}qquad v_2 = begin{bmatrix} 0\1end{bmatrix}, $$



          but we don’t need to. Given a vector $x$ and a basis $alpha = {alpha_1, alpha_2}$, if $x = aalpha_1 + balpha_2$, I’ll be explicit and write that



          $$[x]_{alpha} = begin{bmatrix} a\bend{bmatrix}. $$



          Your statement, that similar matrices induce the same linear transformation, is true assuming you choose the correct basis. That is, there are bases $alpha$ and $beta$ such that given any $xinmathbb{R}^2$



          $$A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your answer. Sorry if I it sounds stupid, but I still don’t understand how your explanation above means that the two similar matrices induce the SAME liner transformation. You can always write any vector as the linear combination of basis vectors, but not all invertible matrices are similar to each other.
            – Andrew
            Jan 4 at 9:20










          • You can always write any vector as a linear combination of basis vectors, but you can’t always find two bases so that $A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}$. For two non-similar matrices, this won’t be possible.
            – Santana Afton
            Jan 4 at 14:41














          0












          0








          0






          When you write



          $$x = begin{bmatrix} 2\3end{bmatrix}$$



          what you are really referencing is the linear combination $2v_1 + 3v_2$ where $v_1, v_2$ is a basis for $mathbb{R}^2$. Usually, we assume that



          $$v_1 = begin{bmatrix} 1\0end{bmatrix}qquad v_2 = begin{bmatrix} 0\1end{bmatrix}, $$



          but we don’t need to. Given a vector $x$ and a basis $alpha = {alpha_1, alpha_2}$, if $x = aalpha_1 + balpha_2$, I’ll be explicit and write that



          $$[x]_{alpha} = begin{bmatrix} a\bend{bmatrix}. $$



          Your statement, that similar matrices induce the same linear transformation, is true assuming you choose the correct basis. That is, there are bases $alpha$ and $beta$ such that given any $xinmathbb{R}^2$



          $$A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer














          When you write



          $$x = begin{bmatrix} 2\3end{bmatrix}$$



          what you are really referencing is the linear combination $2v_1 + 3v_2$ where $v_1, v_2$ is a basis for $mathbb{R}^2$. Usually, we assume that



          $$v_1 = begin{bmatrix} 1\0end{bmatrix}qquad v_2 = begin{bmatrix} 0\1end{bmatrix}, $$



          but we don’t need to. Given a vector $x$ and a basis $alpha = {alpha_1, alpha_2}$, if $x = aalpha_1 + balpha_2$, I’ll be explicit and write that



          $$[x]_{alpha} = begin{bmatrix} a\bend{bmatrix}. $$



          Your statement, that similar matrices induce the same linear transformation, is true assuming you choose the correct basis. That is, there are bases $alpha$ and $beta$ such that given any $xinmathbb{R}^2$



          $$A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}.$$







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 4 at 8:24

























          answered Jan 4 at 5:47









          Santana AftonSantana Afton

          2,5752629




          2,5752629












          • Thanks for your answer. Sorry if I it sounds stupid, but I still don’t understand how your explanation above means that the two similar matrices induce the SAME liner transformation. You can always write any vector as the linear combination of basis vectors, but not all invertible matrices are similar to each other.
            – Andrew
            Jan 4 at 9:20










          • You can always write any vector as a linear combination of basis vectors, but you can’t always find two bases so that $A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}$. For two non-similar matrices, this won’t be possible.
            – Santana Afton
            Jan 4 at 14:41


















          • Thanks for your answer. Sorry if I it sounds stupid, but I still don’t understand how your explanation above means that the two similar matrices induce the SAME liner transformation. You can always write any vector as the linear combination of basis vectors, but not all invertible matrices are similar to each other.
            – Andrew
            Jan 4 at 9:20










          • You can always write any vector as a linear combination of basis vectors, but you can’t always find two bases so that $A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}$. For two non-similar matrices, this won’t be possible.
            – Santana Afton
            Jan 4 at 14:41
















          Thanks for your answer. Sorry if I it sounds stupid, but I still don’t understand how your explanation above means that the two similar matrices induce the SAME liner transformation. You can always write any vector as the linear combination of basis vectors, but not all invertible matrices are similar to each other.
          – Andrew
          Jan 4 at 9:20




          Thanks for your answer. Sorry if I it sounds stupid, but I still don’t understand how your explanation above means that the two similar matrices induce the SAME liner transformation. You can always write any vector as the linear combination of basis vectors, but not all invertible matrices are similar to each other.
          – Andrew
          Jan 4 at 9:20












          You can always write any vector as a linear combination of basis vectors, but you can’t always find two bases so that $A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}$. For two non-similar matrices, this won’t be possible.
          – Santana Afton
          Jan 4 at 14:41




          You can always write any vector as a linear combination of basis vectors, but you can’t always find two bases so that $A[x]_{alpha} = B[x]_{beta}$. For two non-similar matrices, this won’t be possible.
          – Santana Afton
          Jan 4 at 14:41


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061335%2fsimilar-matrices-confer-equivalent-linear-transformations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          An IMO inspired problem

          Management

          Investment