Find $k$,$m$,$n$ such that $f$ is an epimorphism/monomorphism
I am trying to solve this task:
$f in L(X,Y)$, $dim X = n$, $dim Y = m$, $dim ker(f) = k.$
Find $k$,$m$,$n$ such that:
a) $f$ is an monomorphism
b) $f$ is an epimorphism
b) If $f$ is an epimorphism, we must be able to get any element from $Y$ by $f$. So $dim y = dim im(f)$
$$ m = n - k $$
have I right?
a) But there I am not sure about my idea - I think that it should be (intuitively) $dim X = dim im(f) $ so I get:
$$ n = n - k $$
$$ k = 0 $$
but firstly I am not sure if that is true, secondly it is only my intuitive try...
linear-algebra
add a comment |
I am trying to solve this task:
$f in L(X,Y)$, $dim X = n$, $dim Y = m$, $dim ker(f) = k.$
Find $k$,$m$,$n$ such that:
a) $f$ is an monomorphism
b) $f$ is an epimorphism
b) If $f$ is an epimorphism, we must be able to get any element from $Y$ by $f$. So $dim y = dim im(f)$
$$ m = n - k $$
have I right?
a) But there I am not sure about my idea - I think that it should be (intuitively) $dim X = dim im(f) $ so I get:
$$ n = n - k $$
$$ k = 0 $$
but firstly I am not sure if that is true, secondly it is only my intuitive try...
linear-algebra
$(b)$ is correct. What is a monomorphism? I don't see monomorphism anywhere online.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:45
@ShubhamJohri The terms are defined in a general sense in category theory, but the exact definition one works with depends on the context. For linear maps, $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective (one-to-one), and $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective (onto).
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 4 at 15:47
@Omnomnomnom Thanks for the definition.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:49
add a comment |
I am trying to solve this task:
$f in L(X,Y)$, $dim X = n$, $dim Y = m$, $dim ker(f) = k.$
Find $k$,$m$,$n$ such that:
a) $f$ is an monomorphism
b) $f$ is an epimorphism
b) If $f$ is an epimorphism, we must be able to get any element from $Y$ by $f$. So $dim y = dim im(f)$
$$ m = n - k $$
have I right?
a) But there I am not sure about my idea - I think that it should be (intuitively) $dim X = dim im(f) $ so I get:
$$ n = n - k $$
$$ k = 0 $$
but firstly I am not sure if that is true, secondly it is only my intuitive try...
linear-algebra
I am trying to solve this task:
$f in L(X,Y)$, $dim X = n$, $dim Y = m$, $dim ker(f) = k.$
Find $k$,$m$,$n$ such that:
a) $f$ is an monomorphism
b) $f$ is an epimorphism
b) If $f$ is an epimorphism, we must be able to get any element from $Y$ by $f$. So $dim y = dim im(f)$
$$ m = n - k $$
have I right?
a) But there I am not sure about my idea - I think that it should be (intuitively) $dim X = dim im(f) $ so I get:
$$ n = n - k $$
$$ k = 0 $$
but firstly I am not sure if that is true, secondly it is only my intuitive try...
linear-algebra
linear-algebra
asked Jan 4 at 15:35
VirtualUserVirtualUser
54712
54712
$(b)$ is correct. What is a monomorphism? I don't see monomorphism anywhere online.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:45
@ShubhamJohri The terms are defined in a general sense in category theory, but the exact definition one works with depends on the context. For linear maps, $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective (one-to-one), and $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective (onto).
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 4 at 15:47
@Omnomnomnom Thanks for the definition.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:49
add a comment |
$(b)$ is correct. What is a monomorphism? I don't see monomorphism anywhere online.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:45
@ShubhamJohri The terms are defined in a general sense in category theory, but the exact definition one works with depends on the context. For linear maps, $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective (one-to-one), and $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective (onto).
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 4 at 15:47
@Omnomnomnom Thanks for the definition.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:49
$(b)$ is correct. What is a monomorphism? I don't see monomorphism anywhere online.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:45
$(b)$ is correct. What is a monomorphism? I don't see monomorphism anywhere online.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:45
@ShubhamJohri The terms are defined in a general sense in category theory, but the exact definition one works with depends on the context. For linear maps, $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective (one-to-one), and $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective (onto).
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 4 at 15:47
@ShubhamJohri The terms are defined in a general sense in category theory, but the exact definition one works with depends on the context. For linear maps, $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective (one-to-one), and $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective (onto).
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 4 at 15:47
@Omnomnomnom Thanks for the definition.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:49
@Omnomnomnom Thanks for the definition.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:49
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Your answers are correct.
The rank nullity theorem states that for linear maps $f: X to Y$, $dim ker(f) + dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim(X)$. So for this context, we have $k+ dim operatorname{im}(f) = n$.
For a: whatever your definition of a monomorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $ker(f) = {0}$, which is to say that $k=0$. The rank-nullity theorem confirms your intuition.
For b: whatever your definition of an epimorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if $operatorname{im}(f) = Y$. So, $dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim Y$, and by the rank-nullity theorem $dim operatorname{im}(f) = n-k$.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061763%2ffind-k-m-n-such-that-f-is-an-epimorphism-monomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Your answers are correct.
The rank nullity theorem states that for linear maps $f: X to Y$, $dim ker(f) + dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim(X)$. So for this context, we have $k+ dim operatorname{im}(f) = n$.
For a: whatever your definition of a monomorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $ker(f) = {0}$, which is to say that $k=0$. The rank-nullity theorem confirms your intuition.
For b: whatever your definition of an epimorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if $operatorname{im}(f) = Y$. So, $dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim Y$, and by the rank-nullity theorem $dim operatorname{im}(f) = n-k$.
add a comment |
Your answers are correct.
The rank nullity theorem states that for linear maps $f: X to Y$, $dim ker(f) + dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim(X)$. So for this context, we have $k+ dim operatorname{im}(f) = n$.
For a: whatever your definition of a monomorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $ker(f) = {0}$, which is to say that $k=0$. The rank-nullity theorem confirms your intuition.
For b: whatever your definition of an epimorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if $operatorname{im}(f) = Y$. So, $dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim Y$, and by the rank-nullity theorem $dim operatorname{im}(f) = n-k$.
add a comment |
Your answers are correct.
The rank nullity theorem states that for linear maps $f: X to Y$, $dim ker(f) + dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim(X)$. So for this context, we have $k+ dim operatorname{im}(f) = n$.
For a: whatever your definition of a monomorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $ker(f) = {0}$, which is to say that $k=0$. The rank-nullity theorem confirms your intuition.
For b: whatever your definition of an epimorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if $operatorname{im}(f) = Y$. So, $dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim Y$, and by the rank-nullity theorem $dim operatorname{im}(f) = n-k$.
Your answers are correct.
The rank nullity theorem states that for linear maps $f: X to Y$, $dim ker(f) + dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim(X)$. So for this context, we have $k+ dim operatorname{im}(f) = n$.
For a: whatever your definition of a monomorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if $ker(f) = {0}$, which is to say that $k=0$. The rank-nullity theorem confirms your intuition.
For b: whatever your definition of an epimorphism, we should be able to conclude that $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if $operatorname{im}(f) = Y$. So, $dim operatorname{im}(f) = dim Y$, and by the rank-nullity theorem $dim operatorname{im}(f) = n-k$.
answered Jan 4 at 15:44
OmnomnomnomOmnomnomnom
127k788176
127k788176
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061763%2ffind-k-m-n-such-that-f-is-an-epimorphism-monomorphism%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$(b)$ is correct. What is a monomorphism? I don't see monomorphism anywhere online.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:45
@ShubhamJohri The terms are defined in a general sense in category theory, but the exact definition one works with depends on the context. For linear maps, $f$ is a monomorphism if and only if it is injective (one-to-one), and $f$ is an epimorphism if and only if it is surjective (onto).
– Omnomnomnom
Jan 4 at 15:47
@Omnomnomnom Thanks for the definition.
– Shubham Johri
Jan 4 at 15:49