Power operations from a Tate construction












9














In an action-packed three pages of Lurie's DAG-XIII: Rational and p-adic Homotopy Theory, section 2.2: Power Operations on $mathbb{E}_{infty}$-algebras, one finds a construction of the power operation $P^0$ following a few observations on the $p$-power Tate construction in the category of $k$-module spectra: $hat{T}_p: X mapsto ( X^{otimes p})^{tC_p}$ and its best colimit-preserving approximation, $T_p.$ For any $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra $X,$ one obtains a map $T_p(X)[-1] to X.$ $T_p(X)$ is given by tensoring with a $k$-bimodule which is equivalent on one side to $k^{tC_p}$ and this allows us to obtain operations (not $k$-linear) from elements of Tate cohomology, $ pi_* k^{tC_p} simeq hat{H}^{-*}(C_p, k).$



The precise statement is in construction 2.2.6, which applies the observation that for $k$ a discrete ring of characteristic $p$, $1 in k$ determines a canonical element of $hat{H}^{-1}(C_p, k),$ precisely because that group is given as the kernel of the norm. This defines a map $k to k^{tC_p}[-1]$ which upon composition with the map in the previous paragraph gives a map $X to X.$ This map is supposed to be the derived witness to $P^0.$



Here is remark 2.2.9




Construction 2.2.6 can be generalized: given any class $x in hat{H}^{n-1}(mathbb{Z} / pmathbb{Z}; k)$, we obtain an associated
map $P(x) : A to A[n]$, which induces
group homomorphisms $pi_m(A) to pi_{m-n}(A)$. These operations depend functorially
on $A$ and generate an algebra (the extended Steenrod algebra) of “power
operations” which act on the homotopy groups of every $mathbb{E}_infty$-algebra over $k.$




My questions: is there any reference where this construction of the extended powers is fully elaborated? How much of the elementary structure of the Steenrod algebra (e.g. Adem relations, structure of the dual Steenrod algebra, etc.) can be translated to this point of view?



Just to fill in a few details, Lurie constructs these power operations by first rotating the fiber sequence defining the Tate construction to yield



$hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to (X^{otimes p})^{hC_p}$



If $X$ is an $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra, one then computes the composition



$T_p(X)[-1] to hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to X^{otimes p}_{hSigma_p} to X$



where the maps are given by approximation, the first map in the rotated fiber sequence, a tautological map between colimits, and the $mathbb{E}_infty$ multiplication respectively.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    9














    In an action-packed three pages of Lurie's DAG-XIII: Rational and p-adic Homotopy Theory, section 2.2: Power Operations on $mathbb{E}_{infty}$-algebras, one finds a construction of the power operation $P^0$ following a few observations on the $p$-power Tate construction in the category of $k$-module spectra: $hat{T}_p: X mapsto ( X^{otimes p})^{tC_p}$ and its best colimit-preserving approximation, $T_p.$ For any $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra $X,$ one obtains a map $T_p(X)[-1] to X.$ $T_p(X)$ is given by tensoring with a $k$-bimodule which is equivalent on one side to $k^{tC_p}$ and this allows us to obtain operations (not $k$-linear) from elements of Tate cohomology, $ pi_* k^{tC_p} simeq hat{H}^{-*}(C_p, k).$



    The precise statement is in construction 2.2.6, which applies the observation that for $k$ a discrete ring of characteristic $p$, $1 in k$ determines a canonical element of $hat{H}^{-1}(C_p, k),$ precisely because that group is given as the kernel of the norm. This defines a map $k to k^{tC_p}[-1]$ which upon composition with the map in the previous paragraph gives a map $X to X.$ This map is supposed to be the derived witness to $P^0.$



    Here is remark 2.2.9




    Construction 2.2.6 can be generalized: given any class $x in hat{H}^{n-1}(mathbb{Z} / pmathbb{Z}; k)$, we obtain an associated
    map $P(x) : A to A[n]$, which induces
    group homomorphisms $pi_m(A) to pi_{m-n}(A)$. These operations depend functorially
    on $A$ and generate an algebra (the extended Steenrod algebra) of “power
    operations” which act on the homotopy groups of every $mathbb{E}_infty$-algebra over $k.$




    My questions: is there any reference where this construction of the extended powers is fully elaborated? How much of the elementary structure of the Steenrod algebra (e.g. Adem relations, structure of the dual Steenrod algebra, etc.) can be translated to this point of view?



    Just to fill in a few details, Lurie constructs these power operations by first rotating the fiber sequence defining the Tate construction to yield



    $hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to (X^{otimes p})^{hC_p}$



    If $X$ is an $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra, one then computes the composition



    $T_p(X)[-1] to hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to X^{otimes p}_{hSigma_p} to X$



    where the maps are given by approximation, the first map in the rotated fiber sequence, a tautological map between colimits, and the $mathbb{E}_infty$ multiplication respectively.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      9












      9








      9


      1





      In an action-packed three pages of Lurie's DAG-XIII: Rational and p-adic Homotopy Theory, section 2.2: Power Operations on $mathbb{E}_{infty}$-algebras, one finds a construction of the power operation $P^0$ following a few observations on the $p$-power Tate construction in the category of $k$-module spectra: $hat{T}_p: X mapsto ( X^{otimes p})^{tC_p}$ and its best colimit-preserving approximation, $T_p.$ For any $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra $X,$ one obtains a map $T_p(X)[-1] to X.$ $T_p(X)$ is given by tensoring with a $k$-bimodule which is equivalent on one side to $k^{tC_p}$ and this allows us to obtain operations (not $k$-linear) from elements of Tate cohomology, $ pi_* k^{tC_p} simeq hat{H}^{-*}(C_p, k).$



      The precise statement is in construction 2.2.6, which applies the observation that for $k$ a discrete ring of characteristic $p$, $1 in k$ determines a canonical element of $hat{H}^{-1}(C_p, k),$ precisely because that group is given as the kernel of the norm. This defines a map $k to k^{tC_p}[-1]$ which upon composition with the map in the previous paragraph gives a map $X to X.$ This map is supposed to be the derived witness to $P^0.$



      Here is remark 2.2.9




      Construction 2.2.6 can be generalized: given any class $x in hat{H}^{n-1}(mathbb{Z} / pmathbb{Z}; k)$, we obtain an associated
      map $P(x) : A to A[n]$, which induces
      group homomorphisms $pi_m(A) to pi_{m-n}(A)$. These operations depend functorially
      on $A$ and generate an algebra (the extended Steenrod algebra) of “power
      operations” which act on the homotopy groups of every $mathbb{E}_infty$-algebra over $k.$




      My questions: is there any reference where this construction of the extended powers is fully elaborated? How much of the elementary structure of the Steenrod algebra (e.g. Adem relations, structure of the dual Steenrod algebra, etc.) can be translated to this point of view?



      Just to fill in a few details, Lurie constructs these power operations by first rotating the fiber sequence defining the Tate construction to yield



      $hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to (X^{otimes p})^{hC_p}$



      If $X$ is an $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra, one then computes the composition



      $T_p(X)[-1] to hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to X^{otimes p}_{hSigma_p} to X$



      where the maps are given by approximation, the first map in the rotated fiber sequence, a tautological map between colimits, and the $mathbb{E}_infty$ multiplication respectively.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      In an action-packed three pages of Lurie's DAG-XIII: Rational and p-adic Homotopy Theory, section 2.2: Power Operations on $mathbb{E}_{infty}$-algebras, one finds a construction of the power operation $P^0$ following a few observations on the $p$-power Tate construction in the category of $k$-module spectra: $hat{T}_p: X mapsto ( X^{otimes p})^{tC_p}$ and its best colimit-preserving approximation, $T_p.$ For any $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra $X,$ one obtains a map $T_p(X)[-1] to X.$ $T_p(X)$ is given by tensoring with a $k$-bimodule which is equivalent on one side to $k^{tC_p}$ and this allows us to obtain operations (not $k$-linear) from elements of Tate cohomology, $ pi_* k^{tC_p} simeq hat{H}^{-*}(C_p, k).$



      The precise statement is in construction 2.2.6, which applies the observation that for $k$ a discrete ring of characteristic $p$, $1 in k$ determines a canonical element of $hat{H}^{-1}(C_p, k),$ precisely because that group is given as the kernel of the norm. This defines a map $k to k^{tC_p}[-1]$ which upon composition with the map in the previous paragraph gives a map $X to X.$ This map is supposed to be the derived witness to $P^0.$



      Here is remark 2.2.9




      Construction 2.2.6 can be generalized: given any class $x in hat{H}^{n-1}(mathbb{Z} / pmathbb{Z}; k)$, we obtain an associated
      map $P(x) : A to A[n]$, which induces
      group homomorphisms $pi_m(A) to pi_{m-n}(A)$. These operations depend functorially
      on $A$ and generate an algebra (the extended Steenrod algebra) of “power
      operations” which act on the homotopy groups of every $mathbb{E}_infty$-algebra over $k.$




      My questions: is there any reference where this construction of the extended powers is fully elaborated? How much of the elementary structure of the Steenrod algebra (e.g. Adem relations, structure of the dual Steenrod algebra, etc.) can be translated to this point of view?



      Just to fill in a few details, Lurie constructs these power operations by first rotating the fiber sequence defining the Tate construction to yield



      $hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to (X^{otimes p})^{hC_p}$



      If $X$ is an $mathbb{E}_infty$ $k$-algebra, one then computes the composition



      $T_p(X)[-1] to hat{T}_p(X)[-1] to (X^{otimes p})_{hC_p} to X^{otimes p}_{hSigma_p} to X$



      where the maps are given by approximation, the first map in the rotated fiber sequence, a tautological map between colimits, and the $mathbb{E}_infty$ multiplication respectively.







      at.algebraic-topology homotopy-theory derived-algebraic-geometry steenrod-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      pupshawpupshaw

      1205




      1205




      New contributor




      pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      pupshaw is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          11














          What you are looking for is probably Lecture 24 of Lurie's lecture notes on the Sullivan Conjecture. However, these kinds of results (namely, the relation between $Sigma_2$ and operations, or the relation between $Sigma_4$ and relations) have a much more extensive historical background, which Dylan Wilson discusses near the beginning of Section 3 of his paper Power operations for $Hunderline{Bbb{F}}_2$ and a cellular construction of $BP{Bbb R}$.



          There is probably more to say but you should feel free to contact me by email if you want further elaboration.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "504"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            pupshaw is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f320321%2fpower-operations-from-a-tate-construction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            11














            What you are looking for is probably Lecture 24 of Lurie's lecture notes on the Sullivan Conjecture. However, these kinds of results (namely, the relation between $Sigma_2$ and operations, or the relation between $Sigma_4$ and relations) have a much more extensive historical background, which Dylan Wilson discusses near the beginning of Section 3 of his paper Power operations for $Hunderline{Bbb{F}}_2$ and a cellular construction of $BP{Bbb R}$.



            There is probably more to say but you should feel free to contact me by email if you want further elaboration.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              11














              What you are looking for is probably Lecture 24 of Lurie's lecture notes on the Sullivan Conjecture. However, these kinds of results (namely, the relation between $Sigma_2$ and operations, or the relation between $Sigma_4$ and relations) have a much more extensive historical background, which Dylan Wilson discusses near the beginning of Section 3 of his paper Power operations for $Hunderline{Bbb{F}}_2$ and a cellular construction of $BP{Bbb R}$.



              There is probably more to say but you should feel free to contact me by email if you want further elaboration.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                11












                11








                11






                What you are looking for is probably Lecture 24 of Lurie's lecture notes on the Sullivan Conjecture. However, these kinds of results (namely, the relation between $Sigma_2$ and operations, or the relation between $Sigma_4$ and relations) have a much more extensive historical background, which Dylan Wilson discusses near the beginning of Section 3 of his paper Power operations for $Hunderline{Bbb{F}}_2$ and a cellular construction of $BP{Bbb R}$.



                There is probably more to say but you should feel free to contact me by email if you want further elaboration.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                What you are looking for is probably Lecture 24 of Lurie's lecture notes on the Sullivan Conjecture. However, these kinds of results (namely, the relation between $Sigma_2$ and operations, or the relation between $Sigma_4$ and relations) have a much more extensive historical background, which Dylan Wilson discusses near the beginning of Section 3 of his paper Power operations for $Hunderline{Bbb{F}}_2$ and a cellular construction of $BP{Bbb R}$.



                There is probably more to say but you should feel free to contact me by email if you want further elaboration.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                Tyler LawsonTyler Lawson

                39.1k8136199




                39.1k8136199






















                    pupshaw is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    pupshaw is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    pupshaw is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    pupshaw is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to MathOverflow!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f320321%2fpower-operations-from-a-tate-construction%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    1300-talet

                    1300-talet

                    Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8