Gelfand transformation of $l^p$
I would like to describe Gelfand transofrmation of commutative Banach algebra $l^p(mathbb{N}),p in [1,infty)$ with multiplication define by $(a_n)_n(b_n)_n=(a_n b_n)_n$, but I have no idea, how to do it. Any hints ? Thanks
lp-spaces banach-algebras gelfand-representation
add a comment |
I would like to describe Gelfand transofrmation of commutative Banach algebra $l^p(mathbb{N}),p in [1,infty)$ with multiplication define by $(a_n)_n(b_n)_n=(a_n b_n)_n$, but I have no idea, how to do it. Any hints ? Thanks
lp-spaces banach-algebras gelfand-representation
It doesn't seem like $l^p$ is closed under your multiplication operation.
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 18 '18 at 0:05
@DanielSchepler It is closed - we consider space $l^p$, not $L^p$.
– lojdmoj
Dec 30 '18 at 2:20
add a comment |
I would like to describe Gelfand transofrmation of commutative Banach algebra $l^p(mathbb{N}),p in [1,infty)$ with multiplication define by $(a_n)_n(b_n)_n=(a_n b_n)_n$, but I have no idea, how to do it. Any hints ? Thanks
lp-spaces banach-algebras gelfand-representation
I would like to describe Gelfand transofrmation of commutative Banach algebra $l^p(mathbb{N}),p in [1,infty)$ with multiplication define by $(a_n)_n(b_n)_n=(a_n b_n)_n$, but I have no idea, how to do it. Any hints ? Thanks
lp-spaces banach-algebras gelfand-representation
lp-spaces banach-algebras gelfand-representation
edited Dec 20 '18 at 0:36
lojdmoj
asked Dec 17 '18 at 15:56
lojdmojlojdmoj
877
877
It doesn't seem like $l^p$ is closed under your multiplication operation.
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 18 '18 at 0:05
@DanielSchepler It is closed - we consider space $l^p$, not $L^p$.
– lojdmoj
Dec 30 '18 at 2:20
add a comment |
It doesn't seem like $l^p$ is closed under your multiplication operation.
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 18 '18 at 0:05
@DanielSchepler It is closed - we consider space $l^p$, not $L^p$.
– lojdmoj
Dec 30 '18 at 2:20
It doesn't seem like $l^p$ is closed under your multiplication operation.
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 18 '18 at 0:05
It doesn't seem like $l^p$ is closed under your multiplication operation.
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 18 '18 at 0:05
@DanielSchepler It is closed - we consider space $l^p$, not $L^p$.
– lojdmoj
Dec 30 '18 at 2:20
@DanielSchepler It is closed - we consider space $l^p$, not $L^p$.
– lojdmoj
Dec 30 '18 at 2:20
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The Gelfand transform in this case is nothing but the inclusion map $ell_pto c_0$ because the point-evaluations are the only non-zero characters on $ell_p$.
we know, that $Delta (l^p)={e_n:nin mathbb{N}}$ so then GT of $e_n$ is projection to n-th coordinate of $xin l^p$ ...$widehat{x}(n)=x_n$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:09
the question is if there exist any other element of $Delta(l^p)$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:13
@lojdmoj, certainly not. Suppose that $f$ is a non-zero character. Then $f(e_n) = f(e_n)^2 in {0,1}$. If $f(e_n) = 1 = f(e_m)$ and $nneq m$, then $2 = f(e_n + e_m) = f(e_n + e_m)^2$ because $e_n+e_m$ is an idempotent; a contradiction. Thus $f$ is a point-evaluation.
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 20:29
Many thanks for your help :)
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:39
1
@lojdmoj, but $f$ is linear...
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:35
|
show 2 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044111%2fgelfand-transformation-of-lp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The Gelfand transform in this case is nothing but the inclusion map $ell_pto c_0$ because the point-evaluations are the only non-zero characters on $ell_p$.
we know, that $Delta (l^p)={e_n:nin mathbb{N}}$ so then GT of $e_n$ is projection to n-th coordinate of $xin l^p$ ...$widehat{x}(n)=x_n$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:09
the question is if there exist any other element of $Delta(l^p)$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:13
@lojdmoj, certainly not. Suppose that $f$ is a non-zero character. Then $f(e_n) = f(e_n)^2 in {0,1}$. If $f(e_n) = 1 = f(e_m)$ and $nneq m$, then $2 = f(e_n + e_m) = f(e_n + e_m)^2$ because $e_n+e_m$ is an idempotent; a contradiction. Thus $f$ is a point-evaluation.
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 20:29
Many thanks for your help :)
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:39
1
@lojdmoj, but $f$ is linear...
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:35
|
show 2 more comments
The Gelfand transform in this case is nothing but the inclusion map $ell_pto c_0$ because the point-evaluations are the only non-zero characters on $ell_p$.
we know, that $Delta (l^p)={e_n:nin mathbb{N}}$ so then GT of $e_n$ is projection to n-th coordinate of $xin l^p$ ...$widehat{x}(n)=x_n$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:09
the question is if there exist any other element of $Delta(l^p)$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:13
@lojdmoj, certainly not. Suppose that $f$ is a non-zero character. Then $f(e_n) = f(e_n)^2 in {0,1}$. If $f(e_n) = 1 = f(e_m)$ and $nneq m$, then $2 = f(e_n + e_m) = f(e_n + e_m)^2$ because $e_n+e_m$ is an idempotent; a contradiction. Thus $f$ is a point-evaluation.
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 20:29
Many thanks for your help :)
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:39
1
@lojdmoj, but $f$ is linear...
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:35
|
show 2 more comments
The Gelfand transform in this case is nothing but the inclusion map $ell_pto c_0$ because the point-evaluations are the only non-zero characters on $ell_p$.
The Gelfand transform in this case is nothing but the inclusion map $ell_pto c_0$ because the point-evaluations are the only non-zero characters on $ell_p$.
answered Jan 4 at 19:37
Tomek KaniaTomek Kania
12.1k11943
12.1k11943
we know, that $Delta (l^p)={e_n:nin mathbb{N}}$ so then GT of $e_n$ is projection to n-th coordinate of $xin l^p$ ...$widehat{x}(n)=x_n$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:09
the question is if there exist any other element of $Delta(l^p)$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:13
@lojdmoj, certainly not. Suppose that $f$ is a non-zero character. Then $f(e_n) = f(e_n)^2 in {0,1}$. If $f(e_n) = 1 = f(e_m)$ and $nneq m$, then $2 = f(e_n + e_m) = f(e_n + e_m)^2$ because $e_n+e_m$ is an idempotent; a contradiction. Thus $f$ is a point-evaluation.
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 20:29
Many thanks for your help :)
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:39
1
@lojdmoj, but $f$ is linear...
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:35
|
show 2 more comments
we know, that $Delta (l^p)={e_n:nin mathbb{N}}$ so then GT of $e_n$ is projection to n-th coordinate of $xin l^p$ ...$widehat{x}(n)=x_n$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:09
the question is if there exist any other element of $Delta(l^p)$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:13
@lojdmoj, certainly not. Suppose that $f$ is a non-zero character. Then $f(e_n) = f(e_n)^2 in {0,1}$. If $f(e_n) = 1 = f(e_m)$ and $nneq m$, then $2 = f(e_n + e_m) = f(e_n + e_m)^2$ because $e_n+e_m$ is an idempotent; a contradiction. Thus $f$ is a point-evaluation.
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 20:29
Many thanks for your help :)
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:39
1
@lojdmoj, but $f$ is linear...
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:35
we know, that $Delta (l^p)={e_n:nin mathbb{N}}$ so then GT of $e_n$ is projection to n-th coordinate of $xin l^p$ ...$widehat{x}(n)=x_n$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:09
we know, that $Delta (l^p)={e_n:nin mathbb{N}}$ so then GT of $e_n$ is projection to n-th coordinate of $xin l^p$ ...$widehat{x}(n)=x_n$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:09
the question is if there exist any other element of $Delta(l^p)$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:13
the question is if there exist any other element of $Delta(l^p)$
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:13
@lojdmoj, certainly not. Suppose that $f$ is a non-zero character. Then $f(e_n) = f(e_n)^2 in {0,1}$. If $f(e_n) = 1 = f(e_m)$ and $nneq m$, then $2 = f(e_n + e_m) = f(e_n + e_m)^2$ because $e_n+e_m$ is an idempotent; a contradiction. Thus $f$ is a point-evaluation.
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 20:29
@lojdmoj, certainly not. Suppose that $f$ is a non-zero character. Then $f(e_n) = f(e_n)^2 in {0,1}$. If $f(e_n) = 1 = f(e_m)$ and $nneq m$, then $2 = f(e_n + e_m) = f(e_n + e_m)^2$ because $e_n+e_m$ is an idempotent; a contradiction. Thus $f$ is a point-evaluation.
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 20:29
Many thanks for your help :)
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:39
Many thanks for your help :)
– lojdmoj
Jan 4 at 20:39
1
1
@lojdmoj, but $f$ is linear...
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:35
@lojdmoj, but $f$ is linear...
– Tomek Kania
Jan 4 at 22:35
|
show 2 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3044111%2fgelfand-transformation-of-lp%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
It doesn't seem like $l^p$ is closed under your multiplication operation.
– Daniel Schepler
Dec 18 '18 at 0:05
@DanielSchepler It is closed - we consider space $l^p$, not $L^p$.
– lojdmoj
Dec 30 '18 at 2:20