Is it possible for research paper to have a similarity of 2 out of 100 using iThenticate?












2














I'm involved in TPC (technical program committee) task for some international conference. In one paper I'm reviewing, I noticed that the similarity index is just 2% using iThenticate which seems impractical (for me).
Though the type/context of the paper is an essay paper, discussing current status and challenges of some phenomenon/technology/topic, there like no graphs and discussion of numerical/simulation results. I'm suspecting whether the authors are trying to cheat somehow?
Any tips how to proceed since this is my first TPC task?










share|improve this question






















  • Is this also your first task? academia.stackexchange.com/q/122731/72855
    – Solar Mike
    2 days ago










  • Yes, this it is.
    – AlFagera
    2 days ago
















2














I'm involved in TPC (technical program committee) task for some international conference. In one paper I'm reviewing, I noticed that the similarity index is just 2% using iThenticate which seems impractical (for me).
Though the type/context of the paper is an essay paper, discussing current status and challenges of some phenomenon/technology/topic, there like no graphs and discussion of numerical/simulation results. I'm suspecting whether the authors are trying to cheat somehow?
Any tips how to proceed since this is my first TPC task?










share|improve this question






















  • Is this also your first task? academia.stackexchange.com/q/122731/72855
    – Solar Mike
    2 days ago










  • Yes, this it is.
    – AlFagera
    2 days ago














2












2








2


2





I'm involved in TPC (technical program committee) task for some international conference. In one paper I'm reviewing, I noticed that the similarity index is just 2% using iThenticate which seems impractical (for me).
Though the type/context of the paper is an essay paper, discussing current status and challenges of some phenomenon/technology/topic, there like no graphs and discussion of numerical/simulation results. I'm suspecting whether the authors are trying to cheat somehow?
Any tips how to proceed since this is my first TPC task?










share|improve this question













I'm involved in TPC (technical program committee) task for some international conference. In one paper I'm reviewing, I noticed that the similarity index is just 2% using iThenticate which seems impractical (for me).
Though the type/context of the paper is an essay paper, discussing current status and challenges of some phenomenon/technology/topic, there like no graphs and discussion of numerical/simulation results. I'm suspecting whether the authors are trying to cheat somehow?
Any tips how to proceed since this is my first TPC task?







publications peer-review paper-submission plagiarism






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 2 days ago









AlFageraAlFagera

3921716




3921716












  • Is this also your first task? academia.stackexchange.com/q/122731/72855
    – Solar Mike
    2 days ago










  • Yes, this it is.
    – AlFagera
    2 days ago


















  • Is this also your first task? academia.stackexchange.com/q/122731/72855
    – Solar Mike
    2 days ago










  • Yes, this it is.
    – AlFagera
    2 days ago
















Is this also your first task? academia.stackexchange.com/q/122731/72855
– Solar Mike
2 days ago




Is this also your first task? academia.stackexchange.com/q/122731/72855
– Solar Mike
2 days ago












Yes, this it is.
– AlFagera
2 days ago




Yes, this it is.
– AlFagera
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4














I don't think I've ever seen an iThenticate paper with 2% similarity. Less than 10% is rare enough.



However: so what? Low similarity isn't a problem, only high similarity is. The latter implies plagiarism, but the former ... I can't think of any way the authors can cheat by having low similarity. If it's a fake paper generated by SciGen then perhaps it would have abnormally low similarity, but you've already ruled that out since you understood the paper. It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags.



I'd assess the paper on its content and not worry about the similarity.






share|improve this answer





















  • "It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags." I think a slight concern here might be that this result hints that the authors felt the need to do that, which might hint about something fishy.
    – JiK
    yesterday



















1














A high portion of the similarities usually come from the reference list, because most of the references in a new paper will already have appeared in the reference lists of earlier papers.



For the paper you are looking at, it may be that either the reference list is extremely short, or they only cite papers that have not been cited anywhere else yet. Both would be rather suspicious for the type of essay paper you are describing.



When reviewing this paper, have an extra close look at the selection of references. Do the authors really cover the state of the art? Do they give enough and appropriate references for the things they are discussing?






share|improve this answer





















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "415"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122736%2fis-it-possible-for-research-paper-to-have-a-similarity-of-2-out-of-100-using-ith%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    4














    I don't think I've ever seen an iThenticate paper with 2% similarity. Less than 10% is rare enough.



    However: so what? Low similarity isn't a problem, only high similarity is. The latter implies plagiarism, but the former ... I can't think of any way the authors can cheat by having low similarity. If it's a fake paper generated by SciGen then perhaps it would have abnormally low similarity, but you've already ruled that out since you understood the paper. It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags.



    I'd assess the paper on its content and not worry about the similarity.






    share|improve this answer





















    • "It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags." I think a slight concern here might be that this result hints that the authors felt the need to do that, which might hint about something fishy.
      – JiK
      yesterday
















    4














    I don't think I've ever seen an iThenticate paper with 2% similarity. Less than 10% is rare enough.



    However: so what? Low similarity isn't a problem, only high similarity is. The latter implies plagiarism, but the former ... I can't think of any way the authors can cheat by having low similarity. If it's a fake paper generated by SciGen then perhaps it would have abnormally low similarity, but you've already ruled that out since you understood the paper. It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags.



    I'd assess the paper on its content and not worry about the similarity.






    share|improve this answer





















    • "It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags." I think a slight concern here might be that this result hints that the authors felt the need to do that, which might hint about something fishy.
      – JiK
      yesterday














    4












    4








    4






    I don't think I've ever seen an iThenticate paper with 2% similarity. Less than 10% is rare enough.



    However: so what? Low similarity isn't a problem, only high similarity is. The latter implies plagiarism, but the former ... I can't think of any way the authors can cheat by having low similarity. If it's a fake paper generated by SciGen then perhaps it would have abnormally low similarity, but you've already ruled that out since you understood the paper. It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags.



    I'd assess the paper on its content and not worry about the similarity.






    share|improve this answer












    I don't think I've ever seen an iThenticate paper with 2% similarity. Less than 10% is rare enough.



    However: so what? Low similarity isn't a problem, only high similarity is. The latter implies plagiarism, but the former ... I can't think of any way the authors can cheat by having low similarity. If it's a fake paper generated by SciGen then perhaps it would have abnormally low similarity, but you've already ruled that out since you understood the paper. It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags.



    I'd assess the paper on its content and not worry about the similarity.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 2 days ago









    AllureAllure

    27.5k1482134




    27.5k1482134












    • "It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags." I think a slight concern here might be that this result hints that the authors felt the need to do that, which might hint about something fishy.
      – JiK
      yesterday


















    • "It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags." I think a slight concern here might be that this result hints that the authors felt the need to do that, which might hint about something fishy.
      – JiK
      yesterday
















    "It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags." I think a slight concern here might be that this result hints that the authors felt the need to do that, which might hint about something fishy.
    – JiK
    yesterday




    "It's also presumably possible to force a paper to have low similarity as well, simply by continuously rewriting the parts that iThenticate flags." I think a slight concern here might be that this result hints that the authors felt the need to do that, which might hint about something fishy.
    – JiK
    yesterday











    1














    A high portion of the similarities usually come from the reference list, because most of the references in a new paper will already have appeared in the reference lists of earlier papers.



    For the paper you are looking at, it may be that either the reference list is extremely short, or they only cite papers that have not been cited anywhere else yet. Both would be rather suspicious for the type of essay paper you are describing.



    When reviewing this paper, have an extra close look at the selection of references. Do the authors really cover the state of the art? Do they give enough and appropriate references for the things they are discussing?






    share|improve this answer


























      1














      A high portion of the similarities usually come from the reference list, because most of the references in a new paper will already have appeared in the reference lists of earlier papers.



      For the paper you are looking at, it may be that either the reference list is extremely short, or they only cite papers that have not been cited anywhere else yet. Both would be rather suspicious for the type of essay paper you are describing.



      When reviewing this paper, have an extra close look at the selection of references. Do the authors really cover the state of the art? Do they give enough and appropriate references for the things they are discussing?






      share|improve this answer
























        1












        1








        1






        A high portion of the similarities usually come from the reference list, because most of the references in a new paper will already have appeared in the reference lists of earlier papers.



        For the paper you are looking at, it may be that either the reference list is extremely short, or they only cite papers that have not been cited anywhere else yet. Both would be rather suspicious for the type of essay paper you are describing.



        When reviewing this paper, have an extra close look at the selection of references. Do the authors really cover the state of the art? Do they give enough and appropriate references for the things they are discussing?






        share|improve this answer












        A high portion of the similarities usually come from the reference list, because most of the references in a new paper will already have appeared in the reference lists of earlier papers.



        For the paper you are looking at, it may be that either the reference list is extremely short, or they only cite papers that have not been cited anywhere else yet. Both would be rather suspicious for the type of essay paper you are describing.



        When reviewing this paper, have an extra close look at the selection of references. Do the authors really cover the state of the art? Do they give enough and appropriate references for the things they are discussing?







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        silvadosilvado

        15.7k15379




        15.7k15379






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122736%2fis-it-possible-for-research-paper-to-have-a-similarity-of-2-out-of-100-using-ith%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            1300-talet

            1300-talet

            Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8