Identity involving binomial coefficients: $sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j}{i-j}binom mj=sum_{j=0}^i...












1














Can you help me prove the following identity? I know it holds because I simulated it.



For positive integers $n,m,k$ and for $i=0,ldots,n$ and for $n leq m$ we have:



$$sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j} {i-j} binom {m}{j} = sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j+k} {i-j} binom {m+k}{j}$$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Both sides equal $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i}$. To prove this, use upper negation to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i-j}$, and to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j+k}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n+k-1}{i-j}$. Then, simplify both sides using Chu-Vandermonde convolution.
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 4 at 20:24


















1














Can you help me prove the following identity? I know it holds because I simulated it.



For positive integers $n,m,k$ and for $i=0,ldots,n$ and for $n leq m$ we have:



$$sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j} {i-j} binom {m}{j} = sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j+k} {i-j} binom {m+k}{j}$$










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Both sides equal $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i}$. To prove this, use upper negation to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i-j}$, and to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j+k}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n+k-1}{i-j}$. Then, simplify both sides using Chu-Vandermonde convolution.
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 4 at 20:24
















1












1








1







Can you help me prove the following identity? I know it holds because I simulated it.



For positive integers $n,m,k$ and for $i=0,ldots,n$ and for $n leq m$ we have:



$$sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j} {i-j} binom {m}{j} = sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j+k} {i-j} binom {m+k}{j}$$










share|cite|improve this question















Can you help me prove the following identity? I know it holds because I simulated it.



For positive integers $n,m,k$ and for $i=0,ldots,n$ and for $n leq m$ we have:



$$sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j} {i-j} binom {m}{j} = sum_{j=0}^i (-1)^{i+j}binom {n-j+k} {i-j} binom {m+k}{j}$$







discrete-mathematics summation binomial-coefficients






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 8 '16 at 7:48









Martin Sleziak

44.6k8115271




44.6k8115271










asked Mar 18 '14 at 20:28









biancabianca

62




62












  • Both sides equal $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i}$. To prove this, use upper negation to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i-j}$, and to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j+k}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n+k-1}{i-j}$. Then, simplify both sides using Chu-Vandermonde convolution.
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 4 at 20:24




















  • Both sides equal $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i}$. To prove this, use upper negation to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i-j}$, and to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j+k}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n+k-1}{i-j}$. Then, simplify both sides using Chu-Vandermonde convolution.
    – darij grinberg
    Jan 4 at 20:24


















Both sides equal $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i}$. To prove this, use upper negation to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i-j}$, and to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j+k}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n+k-1}{i-j}$. Then, simplify both sides using Chu-Vandermonde convolution.
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:24






Both sides equal $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i}$. To prove this, use upper negation to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n-1}{i-j}$, and to rewrite $left(-1right)^{i+j} dbinom{n-j+k}{i-j}$ as $dbinom{i+m-n+k-1}{i-j}$. Then, simplify both sides using Chu-Vandermonde convolution.
– darij grinberg
Jan 4 at 20:24












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















1














This can be done using a basic complex variables technique.
Suppose we seek to verify that
$$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
= sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$

We will treat the case $q=m$ and $nle m.$



Introduce the two integral representations
$${n-jchoose q-j}
= frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz$$

and
$${n-j+kchoose q-j}
= frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz$$



This gives the following integral for the sum on the LHS
$$frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz
\ = frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
\ = frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m ; dz
\ = frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz.$$



We get the following integral for the sum on the RHS
$$frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon}
sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz
\ = frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
\ = frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
left(
left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
-sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
{m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j}
right) dz.$$

There are two pieces here inside the parentheses, call them $A$ and $B$.



For $A$ we get
$$frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k} ; dz
\ = frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz$$



This is the same as the LHS. Now we just need to show that piece $B$
is zero. It is given by
$$- frac{1}{2pi i}
int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
{m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz.$$



But we have $jge m+1 = q+1$ so the apparent pole at zero vanishes and
this term is analytic in and on the circle $|z|=epsilon$ with no poles
inside it and piece $B$ is indeed zero.



We can stop here without further evaluation because the integrals for
LHS and RHS are seen to be the same. Moreover, they are trivial to evaluate,
we get $$(-1)^m times {2m-n-1choose m-n-1}.$$



The reader is invited to supply a proof for the case $q<m.$



A trace as to when this method appeared on MSE and by whom starts at this
MSE link.






share|cite|improve this answer































    0














    Suppose we seek to verify that
    $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
    = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$



    We will treat the case $qle m$, $nle m$ and $kge 0.$
    We have by formal power series on the LHS



    $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j}
    = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}.$$



    Now we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no contribution to
    the coefficient extractor in front:



    $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}
    = [z^q] (1+z)^n sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
    \ = [z^q] (1+z)^n left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m
    = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



    Since we have $nle m$ we write this as



    $$[z^q] frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} = (-1)^q {m-n-1+qchoose m-n-1}.$$



    Continuing with the RHS we get



    $$sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j+k}
    = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}.$$



    Once more we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no
    contribution to the coefficient extractor in front:



    $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}
    = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
    \ = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
    = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



    This is the same as the LHS and we have the nice result that the RHS
    does not depend on $k.$ Having seen this we observe that it suffices
    to evaluate the RHS, with the LHS being the special case $k=0.$






    share|cite|improve this answer





















      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f717228%2fidentity-involving-binomial-coefficients-sum-j-0i-1ij-binom-n-ji%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1














      This can be done using a basic complex variables technique.
      Suppose we seek to verify that
      $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
      = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$

      We will treat the case $q=m$ and $nle m.$



      Introduce the two integral representations
      $${n-jchoose q-j}
      = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz$$

      and
      $${n-j+kchoose q-j}
      = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz$$



      This gives the following integral for the sum on the LHS
      $$frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon}
      sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
      frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz
      \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon}
      frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
      sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
      frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
      \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon}
      frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
      left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m ; dz
      \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon}
      frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
      frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz.$$



      We get the following integral for the sum on the RHS
      $$frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon}
      sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
      frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz
      \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
      sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
      frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
      \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
      left(
      left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
      -sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
      {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
      frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j}
      right) dz.$$

      There are two pieces here inside the parentheses, call them $A$ and $B$.



      For $A$ we get
      $$frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
      left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k} ; dz
      \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
      frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz$$



      This is the same as the LHS. Now we just need to show that piece $B$
      is zero. It is given by
      $$- frac{1}{2pi i}
      int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
      sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
      {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
      frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz.$$



      But we have $jge m+1 = q+1$ so the apparent pole at zero vanishes and
      this term is analytic in and on the circle $|z|=epsilon$ with no poles
      inside it and piece $B$ is indeed zero.



      We can stop here without further evaluation because the integrals for
      LHS and RHS are seen to be the same. Moreover, they are trivial to evaluate,
      we get $$(-1)^m times {2m-n-1choose m-n-1}.$$



      The reader is invited to supply a proof for the case $q<m.$



      A trace as to when this method appeared on MSE and by whom starts at this
      MSE link.






      share|cite|improve this answer




























        1














        This can be done using a basic complex variables technique.
        Suppose we seek to verify that
        $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
        = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$

        We will treat the case $q=m$ and $nle m.$



        Introduce the two integral representations
        $${n-jchoose q-j}
        = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz$$

        and
        $${n-j+kchoose q-j}
        = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz$$



        This gives the following integral for the sum on the LHS
        $$frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon}
        sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
        frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz
        \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon}
        frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
        sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
        frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
        \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon}
        frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
        left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m ; dz
        \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon}
        frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
        frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz.$$



        We get the following integral for the sum on the RHS
        $$frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon}
        sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
        frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz
        \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
        sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
        frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
        \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
        left(
        left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
        -sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
        {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
        frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j}
        right) dz.$$

        There are two pieces here inside the parentheses, call them $A$ and $B$.



        For $A$ we get
        $$frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
        left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k} ; dz
        \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
        frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz$$



        This is the same as the LHS. Now we just need to show that piece $B$
        is zero. It is given by
        $$- frac{1}{2pi i}
        int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
        sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
        {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
        frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz.$$



        But we have $jge m+1 = q+1$ so the apparent pole at zero vanishes and
        this term is analytic in and on the circle $|z|=epsilon$ with no poles
        inside it and piece $B$ is indeed zero.



        We can stop here without further evaluation because the integrals for
        LHS and RHS are seen to be the same. Moreover, they are trivial to evaluate,
        we get $$(-1)^m times {2m-n-1choose m-n-1}.$$



        The reader is invited to supply a proof for the case $q<m.$



        A trace as to when this method appeared on MSE and by whom starts at this
        MSE link.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          1












          1








          1






          This can be done using a basic complex variables technique.
          Suppose we seek to verify that
          $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
          = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$

          We will treat the case $q=m$ and $nle m.$



          Introduce the two integral representations
          $${n-jchoose q-j}
          = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz$$

          and
          $${n-j+kchoose q-j}
          = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz$$



          This gives the following integral for the sum on the LHS
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
          sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
          left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
          frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz.$$



          We get the following integral for the sum on the RHS
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          left(
          left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
          -sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
          {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j}
          right) dz.$$

          There are two pieces here inside the parentheses, call them $A$ and $B$.



          For $A$ we get
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
          frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz$$



          This is the same as the LHS. Now we just need to show that piece $B$
          is zero. It is given by
          $$- frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
          {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz.$$



          But we have $jge m+1 = q+1$ so the apparent pole at zero vanishes and
          this term is analytic in and on the circle $|z|=epsilon$ with no poles
          inside it and piece $B$ is indeed zero.



          We can stop here without further evaluation because the integrals for
          LHS and RHS are seen to be the same. Moreover, they are trivial to evaluate,
          we get $$(-1)^m times {2m-n-1choose m-n-1}.$$



          The reader is invited to supply a proof for the case $q<m.$



          A trace as to when this method appeared on MSE and by whom starts at this
          MSE link.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          This can be done using a basic complex variables technique.
          Suppose we seek to verify that
          $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
          = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$

          We will treat the case $q=m$ and $nle m.$



          Introduce the two integral representations
          $${n-jchoose q-j}
          = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz$$

          and
          $${n-j+kchoose q-j}
          = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz$$



          This gives the following integral for the sum on the LHS
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
          sum_{j=0}^m {mchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          frac{(1+z)^n}{z^{q+1}}
          left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
          frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz.$$



          We get the following integral for the sum on the RHS
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon}
          sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{1}{z^{q-j+1}} (1+z)^{n-j+k} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          sum_{j=0}^m {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          left(
          left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
          -sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
          {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j}
          right) dz.$$

          There are two pieces here inside the parentheses, call them $A$ and $B$.



          For $A$ we get
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k} ; dz
          \ = frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{1}{z^{q+1}}
          frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} ; dz$$



          This is the same as the LHS. Now we just need to show that piece $B$
          is zero. It is given by
          $$- frac{1}{2pi i}
          int_{|z|=epsilon} frac{(1+z)^{n+k}}{z^{q+1}}
          sum_{j=m+1}^{m+k}
          {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j
          frac{z^j}{(1+z)^j} ; dz.$$



          But we have $jge m+1 = q+1$ so the apparent pole at zero vanishes and
          this term is analytic in and on the circle $|z|=epsilon$ with no poles
          inside it and piece $B$ is indeed zero.



          We can stop here without further evaluation because the integrals for
          LHS and RHS are seen to be the same. Moreover, they are trivial to evaluate,
          we get $$(-1)^m times {2m-n-1choose m-n-1}.$$



          The reader is invited to supply a proof for the case $q<m.$



          A trace as to when this method appeared on MSE and by whom starts at this
          MSE link.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Jan 4 at 18:01

























          answered Aug 26 '14 at 22:21









          Marko RiedelMarko Riedel

          39.4k339107




          39.4k339107























              0














              Suppose we seek to verify that
              $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
              = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$



              We will treat the case $qle m$, $nle m$ and $kge 0.$
              We have by formal power series on the LHS



              $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j}
              = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}.$$



              Now we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no contribution to
              the coefficient extractor in front:



              $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}
              = [z^q] (1+z)^n sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
              \ = [z^q] (1+z)^n left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m
              = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



              Since we have $nle m$ we write this as



              $$[z^q] frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} = (-1)^q {m-n-1+qchoose m-n-1}.$$



              Continuing with the RHS we get



              $$sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j+k}
              = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}.$$



              Once more we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no
              contribution to the coefficient extractor in front:



              $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}
              = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
              \ = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
              = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



              This is the same as the LHS and we have the nice result that the RHS
              does not depend on $k.$ Having seen this we observe that it suffices
              to evaluate the RHS, with the LHS being the special case $k=0.$






              share|cite|improve this answer


























                0














                Suppose we seek to verify that
                $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
                = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$



                We will treat the case $qle m$, $nle m$ and $kge 0.$
                We have by formal power series on the LHS



                $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j}
                = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}.$$



                Now we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no contribution to
                the coefficient extractor in front:



                $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}
                = [z^q] (1+z)^n sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
                \ = [z^q] (1+z)^n left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m
                = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



                Since we have $nle m$ we write this as



                $$[z^q] frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} = (-1)^q {m-n-1+qchoose m-n-1}.$$



                Continuing with the RHS we get



                $$sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j+k}
                = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}.$$



                Once more we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no
                contribution to the coefficient extractor in front:



                $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}
                = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
                \ = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
                = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



                This is the same as the LHS and we have the nice result that the RHS
                does not depend on $k.$ Having seen this we observe that it suffices
                to evaluate the RHS, with the LHS being the special case $k=0.$






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  0












                  0








                  0






                  Suppose we seek to verify that
                  $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
                  = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$



                  We will treat the case $qle m$, $nle m$ and $kge 0.$
                  We have by formal power series on the LHS



                  $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j}
                  = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}.$$



                  Now we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no contribution to
                  the coefficient extractor in front:



                  $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^n sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
                  \ = [z^q] (1+z)^n left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



                  Since we have $nle m$ we write this as



                  $$[z^q] frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} = (-1)^q {m-n-1+qchoose m-n-1}.$$



                  Continuing with the RHS we get



                  $$sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j+k}
                  = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}.$$



                  Once more we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no
                  contribution to the coefficient extractor in front:



                  $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
                  \ = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



                  This is the same as the LHS and we have the nice result that the RHS
                  does not depend on $k.$ Having seen this we observe that it suffices
                  to evaluate the RHS, with the LHS being the special case $k=0.$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Suppose we seek to verify that
                  $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j {n-jchoose q-j}
                  = sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j {n-j+kchoose q-j} .$$



                  We will treat the case $qle m$, $nle m$ and $kge 0.$
                  We have by formal power series on the LHS



                  $$sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j}
                  = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}.$$



                  Now we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no contribution to
                  the coefficient extractor in front:



                  $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j}
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^n sum_{jge 0} {mchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
                  \ = [z^q] (1+z)^n left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^m
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



                  Since we have $nle m$ we write this as



                  $$[z^q] frac{1}{(1+z)^{m-n}} = (-1)^q {m-n-1+qchoose m-n-1}.$$



                  Continuing with the RHS we get



                  $$sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j [z^{q-j}] (1+z)^{n-j+k}
                  = [z^q] sum_{j=0}^q {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}.$$



                  Once more we may extend $j$ beyond $q$ because there is no
                  contribution to the coefficient extractor in front:



                  $$[z^q] sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{n-j+k}
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} sum_{jge 0} {m+kchoose j} (-1)^j z^j (1+z)^{-j}
                  \ = [z^q] (1+z)^{n+k} left(1-frac{z}{1+z}right)^{m+k}
                  = [z^q] (1+z)^{n-m}.$$



                  This is the same as the LHS and we have the nice result that the RHS
                  does not depend on $k.$ Having seen this we observe that it suffices
                  to evaluate the RHS, with the LHS being the special case $k=0.$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 4 at 18:32









                  Marko RiedelMarko Riedel

                  39.4k339107




                  39.4k339107






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f717228%2fidentity-involving-binomial-coefficients-sum-j-0i-1ij-binom-n-ji%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      1300-talet

                      1300-talet

                      Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8