Is there a struct that isomorphic to rational numbers? [closed]
This is my frist question. Can you explain how can I write R, Q as real and rational numbers, please?
We know that there are only one real numbers struct. I mean if there is two struct, (R,+,×,<,0,1) and (R',+',×',<',0',1'); both of them are same. They are isomorphic. SUP axiom provides this.
My question is; is there an isomorphism between two rational number system (Q,+,×,<,0,1)?
real-analysis analysis real-numbers rational-numbers ring-isomorphism
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Peter, amWhy, lulu, RRL, Andrés E. Caicedo Jan 4 at 17:58
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
|
show 4 more comments
This is my frist question. Can you explain how can I write R, Q as real and rational numbers, please?
We know that there are only one real numbers struct. I mean if there is two struct, (R,+,×,<,0,1) and (R',+',×',<',0',1'); both of them are same. They are isomorphic. SUP axiom provides this.
My question is; is there an isomorphism between two rational number system (Q,+,×,<,0,1)?
real-analysis analysis real-numbers rational-numbers ring-isomorphism
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Peter, amWhy, lulu, RRL, Andrés E. Caicedo Jan 4 at 17:58
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
I suspect math.stackexchange.com/questions/262329/… may answer your question. Your title and text does a rather poor job of conveying what your question really is, however...
– Ian
Jan 4 at 16:17
I don't think there is anything wrong with your question. I suspect the close votes and the downvotes are because of the sloppiness of your question. Even though you may not be a native speaker of English you should at least check your spelling. For example, I have a hard time believing someone who is capable of asking a question like this cannot spell "isomorphic".
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:07
This was my first post. And I am not a native speaker. I am learning English and I am quite new. May I have a few spelling wrongs. Really I don't know this language. I am very sorry.
– user631683
Jan 4 at 17:15
@user631683 Do not care about the post about the spelling. More important is the mathemtical content. What exactly do you mean with a "rational number system" ?
– Peter
Jan 4 at 17:20
I understand. I did not downvote your question. Ian's link should answer your question.
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:21
|
show 4 more comments
This is my frist question. Can you explain how can I write R, Q as real and rational numbers, please?
We know that there are only one real numbers struct. I mean if there is two struct, (R,+,×,<,0,1) and (R',+',×',<',0',1'); both of them are same. They are isomorphic. SUP axiom provides this.
My question is; is there an isomorphism between two rational number system (Q,+,×,<,0,1)?
real-analysis analysis real-numbers rational-numbers ring-isomorphism
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This is my frist question. Can you explain how can I write R, Q as real and rational numbers, please?
We know that there are only one real numbers struct. I mean if there is two struct, (R,+,×,<,0,1) and (R',+',×',<',0',1'); both of them are same. They are isomorphic. SUP axiom provides this.
My question is; is there an isomorphism between two rational number system (Q,+,×,<,0,1)?
real-analysis analysis real-numbers rational-numbers ring-isomorphism
real-analysis analysis real-numbers rational-numbers ring-isomorphism
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jan 4 at 17:13
user631683
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
asked Jan 4 at 16:12
user631683user631683
61
61
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user631683 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Peter, amWhy, lulu, RRL, Andrés E. Caicedo Jan 4 at 17:58
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Peter, amWhy, lulu, RRL, Andrés E. Caicedo Jan 4 at 17:58
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
3
I suspect math.stackexchange.com/questions/262329/… may answer your question. Your title and text does a rather poor job of conveying what your question really is, however...
– Ian
Jan 4 at 16:17
I don't think there is anything wrong with your question. I suspect the close votes and the downvotes are because of the sloppiness of your question. Even though you may not be a native speaker of English you should at least check your spelling. For example, I have a hard time believing someone who is capable of asking a question like this cannot spell "isomorphic".
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:07
This was my first post. And I am not a native speaker. I am learning English and I am quite new. May I have a few spelling wrongs. Really I don't know this language. I am very sorry.
– user631683
Jan 4 at 17:15
@user631683 Do not care about the post about the spelling. More important is the mathemtical content. What exactly do you mean with a "rational number system" ?
– Peter
Jan 4 at 17:20
I understand. I did not downvote your question. Ian's link should answer your question.
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:21
|
show 4 more comments
3
I suspect math.stackexchange.com/questions/262329/… may answer your question. Your title and text does a rather poor job of conveying what your question really is, however...
– Ian
Jan 4 at 16:17
I don't think there is anything wrong with your question. I suspect the close votes and the downvotes are because of the sloppiness of your question. Even though you may not be a native speaker of English you should at least check your spelling. For example, I have a hard time believing someone who is capable of asking a question like this cannot spell "isomorphic".
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:07
This was my first post. And I am not a native speaker. I am learning English and I am quite new. May I have a few spelling wrongs. Really I don't know this language. I am very sorry.
– user631683
Jan 4 at 17:15
@user631683 Do not care about the post about the spelling. More important is the mathemtical content. What exactly do you mean with a "rational number system" ?
– Peter
Jan 4 at 17:20
I understand. I did not downvote your question. Ian's link should answer your question.
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:21
3
3
I suspect math.stackexchange.com/questions/262329/… may answer your question. Your title and text does a rather poor job of conveying what your question really is, however...
– Ian
Jan 4 at 16:17
I suspect math.stackexchange.com/questions/262329/… may answer your question. Your title and text does a rather poor job of conveying what your question really is, however...
– Ian
Jan 4 at 16:17
I don't think there is anything wrong with your question. I suspect the close votes and the downvotes are because of the sloppiness of your question. Even though you may not be a native speaker of English you should at least check your spelling. For example, I have a hard time believing someone who is capable of asking a question like this cannot spell "isomorphic".
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:07
I don't think there is anything wrong with your question. I suspect the close votes and the downvotes are because of the sloppiness of your question. Even though you may not be a native speaker of English you should at least check your spelling. For example, I have a hard time believing someone who is capable of asking a question like this cannot spell "isomorphic".
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:07
This was my first post. And I am not a native speaker. I am learning English and I am quite new. May I have a few spelling wrongs. Really I don't know this language. I am very sorry.
– user631683
Jan 4 at 17:15
This was my first post. And I am not a native speaker. I am learning English and I am quite new. May I have a few spelling wrongs. Really I don't know this language. I am very sorry.
– user631683
Jan 4 at 17:15
@user631683 Do not care about the post about the spelling. More important is the mathemtical content. What exactly do you mean with a "rational number system" ?
– Peter
Jan 4 at 17:20
@user631683 Do not care about the post about the spelling. More important is the mathemtical content. What exactly do you mean with a "rational number system" ?
– Peter
Jan 4 at 17:20
I understand. I did not downvote your question. Ian's link should answer your question.
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:21
I understand. I did not downvote your question. Ian's link should answer your question.
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:21
|
show 4 more comments
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
3
I suspect math.stackexchange.com/questions/262329/… may answer your question. Your title and text does a rather poor job of conveying what your question really is, however...
– Ian
Jan 4 at 16:17
I don't think there is anything wrong with your question. I suspect the close votes and the downvotes are because of the sloppiness of your question. Even though you may not be a native speaker of English you should at least check your spelling. For example, I have a hard time believing someone who is capable of asking a question like this cannot spell "isomorphic".
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:07
This was my first post. And I am not a native speaker. I am learning English and I am quite new. May I have a few spelling wrongs. Really I don't know this language. I am very sorry.
– user631683
Jan 4 at 17:15
@user631683 Do not care about the post about the spelling. More important is the mathemtical content. What exactly do you mean with a "rational number system" ?
– Peter
Jan 4 at 17:20
I understand. I did not downvote your question. Ian's link should answer your question.
– John Douma
Jan 4 at 17:21