Does a Paley-Wiener type function have existing boundary values on to the real line?
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ (where $mathbb C^+$ denotes the upper half plane) be a holomorphic function with the property that $$sup_{y>0} int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x+iy) rvert^2 , dx = C < infty. qquad (1)$$ The Paley-Wiener theorem gives a classification of this type of function, i.e. there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty) $ such that $$f(z) = int_0^infty F(t) e^{itz}, dt$$
for $zin mathbb C^+$ and $int_0^infty lvert F(t) rvert , dt = C$ (see Big Rudin for a proof). I now found a similar type of theorem:
Let $f: mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ be a holomorphic function with the condition that for all $epsilon > 0$ there is $C_epsilon > 0 $ such that $$lvert f(z) rvert leq C_epsilon exp(epsilon lvert z rvert)$$ for all $zin mathbb C^+$ and assume that for almost every $xin mathbb R$ $f$ has boundary values $$f_0(x) = lim_{substack{yto 0\ y > 0}}f(x+iy)$$ with the property that $$int_{mathbb R} lvert f_0(x) rvert^2<
infty.$$
Then there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty)$ such that$$f(z) = int_0^infty e^{itz}F(t) , dt$$
for all $zin mathbb C^+$.
My question: Are these two theorems or conditions imposed on the function $f$ equivalent?
Explanation: The theorems seem to be closely linked because they both give the same function as an output. So to me the question arose whether one of the condition implies the other or if they are even equivalent.
complex-analysis functional-analysis analysis fourier-analysis
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ (where $mathbb C^+$ denotes the upper half plane) be a holomorphic function with the property that $$sup_{y>0} int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x+iy) rvert^2 , dx = C < infty. qquad (1)$$ The Paley-Wiener theorem gives a classification of this type of function, i.e. there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty) $ such that $$f(z) = int_0^infty F(t) e^{itz}, dt$$
for $zin mathbb C^+$ and $int_0^infty lvert F(t) rvert , dt = C$ (see Big Rudin for a proof). I now found a similar type of theorem:
Let $f: mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ be a holomorphic function with the condition that for all $epsilon > 0$ there is $C_epsilon > 0 $ such that $$lvert f(z) rvert leq C_epsilon exp(epsilon lvert z rvert)$$ for all $zin mathbb C^+$ and assume that for almost every $xin mathbb R$ $f$ has boundary values $$f_0(x) = lim_{substack{yto 0\ y > 0}}f(x+iy)$$ with the property that $$int_{mathbb R} lvert f_0(x) rvert^2<
infty.$$
Then there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty)$ such that$$f(z) = int_0^infty e^{itz}F(t) , dt$$
for all $zin mathbb C^+$.
My question: Are these two theorems or conditions imposed on the function $f$ equivalent?
Explanation: The theorems seem to be closely linked because they both give the same function as an output. So to me the question arose whether one of the condition implies the other or if they are even equivalent.
complex-analysis functional-analysis analysis fourier-analysis
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let $f : mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ (where $mathbb C^+$ denotes the upper half plane) be a holomorphic function with the property that $$sup_{y>0} int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x+iy) rvert^2 , dx = C < infty. qquad (1)$$ The Paley-Wiener theorem gives a classification of this type of function, i.e. there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty) $ such that $$f(z) = int_0^infty F(t) e^{itz}, dt$$
for $zin mathbb C^+$ and $int_0^infty lvert F(t) rvert , dt = C$ (see Big Rudin for a proof). I now found a similar type of theorem:
Let $f: mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ be a holomorphic function with the condition that for all $epsilon > 0$ there is $C_epsilon > 0 $ such that $$lvert f(z) rvert leq C_epsilon exp(epsilon lvert z rvert)$$ for all $zin mathbb C^+$ and assume that for almost every $xin mathbb R$ $f$ has boundary values $$f_0(x) = lim_{substack{yto 0\ y > 0}}f(x+iy)$$ with the property that $$int_{mathbb R} lvert f_0(x) rvert^2<
infty.$$
Then there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty)$ such that$$f(z) = int_0^infty e^{itz}F(t) , dt$$
for all $zin mathbb C^+$.
My question: Are these two theorems or conditions imposed on the function $f$ equivalent?
Explanation: The theorems seem to be closely linked because they both give the same function as an output. So to me the question arose whether one of the condition implies the other or if they are even equivalent.
complex-analysis functional-analysis analysis fourier-analysis
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
$endgroup$
Let $f : mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ (where $mathbb C^+$ denotes the upper half plane) be a holomorphic function with the property that $$sup_{y>0} int_{-infty}^infty lvert f(x+iy) rvert^2 , dx = C < infty. qquad (1)$$ The Paley-Wiener theorem gives a classification of this type of function, i.e. there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty) $ such that $$f(z) = int_0^infty F(t) e^{itz}, dt$$
for $zin mathbb C^+$ and $int_0^infty lvert F(t) rvert , dt = C$ (see Big Rudin for a proof). I now found a similar type of theorem:
Let $f: mathbb C^+ to mathbb C$ be a holomorphic function with the condition that for all $epsilon > 0$ there is $C_epsilon > 0 $ such that $$lvert f(z) rvert leq C_epsilon exp(epsilon lvert z rvert)$$ for all $zin mathbb C^+$ and assume that for almost every $xin mathbb R$ $f$ has boundary values $$f_0(x) = lim_{substack{yto 0\ y > 0}}f(x+iy)$$ with the property that $$int_{mathbb R} lvert f_0(x) rvert^2<
infty.$$
Then there exists $Fin L^2(0,infty)$ such that$$f(z) = int_0^infty e^{itz}F(t) , dt$$
for all $zin mathbb C^+$.
My question: Are these two theorems or conditions imposed on the function $f$ equivalent?
Explanation: The theorems seem to be closely linked because they both give the same function as an output. So to me the question arose whether one of the condition implies the other or if they are even equivalent.
complex-analysis functional-analysis analysis fourier-analysis
complex-analysis functional-analysis analysis fourier-analysis
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
edited Jan 6 at 8:33
bavor42
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
asked Jan 5 at 13:59
bavor42bavor42
30419
30419
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062744%2fdoes-a-paley-wiener-type-function-have-existing-boundary-values-on-to-the-real-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3062744%2fdoes-a-paley-wiener-type-function-have-existing-boundary-values-on-to-the-real-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
