Isomorphism between torsion subgroups of $H_q (M)$ and $H_{n-q-1} (M)$ where $M$ is a compact oriented...
It it the exercise in Massey's book
Massey, William S., Singular homology theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 70. New York Heidelberg Berlin: Springer- Verlag. XII, 265 p. DM 49.50; $ 29.20 (1980). ZBL0442.55001.
chapter IX, section 5, exercise 5.1, he states that if $M$ is a compact oriented $n$-manifold, then the torsion subgroup of $H_q (M)$ is isomorphic to the torsion subgroup of $H_{n-q-1} (M)$.
I use the fact that a compact oriented $n$-manifold $M$ must have finitely generated homology groups, $mathrm{Hom} (G,mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z} )$ is the torsion part of $G$ if $G$ is finitely generated and $mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} $ is injective to obtain the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H^q (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$, and use the Poincare duality to give the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H_{n-q} (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$. However, by the Universal Coefficient Theorem for Tor, I must state that $H_q (M)otimesmathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} =0$. Will that be true?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
add a comment |
It it the exercise in Massey's book
Massey, William S., Singular homology theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 70. New York Heidelberg Berlin: Springer- Verlag. XII, 265 p. DM 49.50; $ 29.20 (1980). ZBL0442.55001.
chapter IX, section 5, exercise 5.1, he states that if $M$ is a compact oriented $n$-manifold, then the torsion subgroup of $H_q (M)$ is isomorphic to the torsion subgroup of $H_{n-q-1} (M)$.
I use the fact that a compact oriented $n$-manifold $M$ must have finitely generated homology groups, $mathrm{Hom} (G,mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z} )$ is the torsion part of $G$ if $G$ is finitely generated and $mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} $ is injective to obtain the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H^q (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$, and use the Poincare duality to give the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H_{n-q} (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$. However, by the Universal Coefficient Theorem for Tor, I must state that $H_q (M)otimesmathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} =0$. Will that be true?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
You cannot apply Poincare duality like this because $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is not a ring. You need to dualize first, then apply UCT.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
But Poincare duality can be used here because of theorem 4.1 in this book. I don't find any error on his proof except a lemma for commutativity, it is quite lengthy and I finally choose to believe it.
– CTW
yesterday
Sorry, you're quite right! (For context, I was thinking of using the product structure on $R$ to take the cap product with the $R$-fundamental class, but you may as well just take cap productwith $Bbb Z$-fundamental class.) Instead the error is in your isomorphism $T(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. I will write an answer.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
It it the exercise in Massey's book
Massey, William S., Singular homology theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 70. New York Heidelberg Berlin: Springer- Verlag. XII, 265 p. DM 49.50; $ 29.20 (1980). ZBL0442.55001.
chapter IX, section 5, exercise 5.1, he states that if $M$ is a compact oriented $n$-manifold, then the torsion subgroup of $H_q (M)$ is isomorphic to the torsion subgroup of $H_{n-q-1} (M)$.
I use the fact that a compact oriented $n$-manifold $M$ must have finitely generated homology groups, $mathrm{Hom} (G,mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z} )$ is the torsion part of $G$ if $G$ is finitely generated and $mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} $ is injective to obtain the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H^q (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$, and use the Poincare duality to give the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H_{n-q} (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$. However, by the Universal Coefficient Theorem for Tor, I must state that $H_q (M)otimesmathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} =0$. Will that be true?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
It it the exercise in Massey's book
Massey, William S., Singular homology theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 70. New York Heidelberg Berlin: Springer- Verlag. XII, 265 p. DM 49.50; $ 29.20 (1980). ZBL0442.55001.
chapter IX, section 5, exercise 5.1, he states that if $M$ is a compact oriented $n$-manifold, then the torsion subgroup of $H_q (M)$ is isomorphic to the torsion subgroup of $H_{n-q-1} (M)$.
I use the fact that a compact oriented $n$-manifold $M$ must have finitely generated homology groups, $mathrm{Hom} (G,mathbb{Q}/mathbb{Z} )$ is the torsion part of $G$ if $G$ is finitely generated and $mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} $ is injective to obtain the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H^q (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$, and use the Poincare duality to give the isomorphism $T(H_q (M))cong H_{n-q} (M;mathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} )$. However, by the Universal Coefficient Theorem for Tor, I must state that $H_q (M)otimesmathbb{Q} /mathbb{Z} =0$. Will that be true?
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
algebraic-topology homology-cohomology homological-algebra
asked yesterday
CTW
838
838
You cannot apply Poincare duality like this because $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is not a ring. You need to dualize first, then apply UCT.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
But Poincare duality can be used here because of theorem 4.1 in this book. I don't find any error on his proof except a lemma for commutativity, it is quite lengthy and I finally choose to believe it.
– CTW
yesterday
Sorry, you're quite right! (For context, I was thinking of using the product structure on $R$ to take the cap product with the $R$-fundamental class, but you may as well just take cap productwith $Bbb Z$-fundamental class.) Instead the error is in your isomorphism $T(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. I will write an answer.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
You cannot apply Poincare duality like this because $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is not a ring. You need to dualize first, then apply UCT.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
But Poincare duality can be used here because of theorem 4.1 in this book. I don't find any error on his proof except a lemma for commutativity, it is quite lengthy and I finally choose to believe it.
– CTW
yesterday
Sorry, you're quite right! (For context, I was thinking of using the product structure on $R$ to take the cap product with the $R$-fundamental class, but you may as well just take cap productwith $Bbb Z$-fundamental class.) Instead the error is in your isomorphism $T(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. I will write an answer.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
You cannot apply Poincare duality like this because $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is not a ring. You need to dualize first, then apply UCT.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
You cannot apply Poincare duality like this because $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is not a ring. You need to dualize first, then apply UCT.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
But Poincare duality can be used here because of theorem 4.1 in this book. I don't find any error on his proof except a lemma for commutativity, it is quite lengthy and I finally choose to believe it.
– CTW
yesterday
But Poincare duality can be used here because of theorem 4.1 in this book. I don't find any error on his proof except a lemma for commutativity, it is quite lengthy and I finally choose to believe it.
– CTW
yesterday
Sorry, you're quite right! (For context, I was thinking of using the product structure on $R$ to take the cap product with the $R$-fundamental class, but you may as well just take cap productwith $Bbb Z$-fundamental class.) Instead the error is in your isomorphism $T(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. I will write an answer.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
Sorry, you're quite right! (For context, I was thinking of using the product structure on $R$ to take the cap product with the $R$-fundamental class, but you may as well just take cap productwith $Bbb Z$-fundamental class.) Instead the error is in your isomorphism $T(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. I will write an answer.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
It is not true that $text{Tors}(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. You are right that $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is injective, so the Ext-term vanishes, but if $H_q(M;Bbb Z) = Bbb Z^{b_q} oplus T$, then $$H^{q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Hom}(H_q(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q},$$ noncanonically.
So your approach shows that $T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q} cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. What you want to do now is understand the last term. Again we have the universal coefficient sequence,
$$0 to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to text{Tor}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to 0.$$
The first term is the divisible subgroup of $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and is isomorphic to $(Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_{n-q}} = (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q}$. The last term is $text{Tors}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z))$.
Because we have an isomorphism of groups $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and isomorphisms preserve the maximal divisible subgroup, we see that they preserve the quotient by this subgroup; in both cases it is isomorphic to the finite abelian group $T$.
Note that $H_q(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is indeed zero if and only if the claim that $H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Tors}(H_q(M;Bbb Z))$ is true.
Thanks! I have realized of my mistake.
– CTW
yesterday
@CTW Sure, and thanks for helping me realize my understanding of which coefficients one may take for Poincare duality was incorrect.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060576%2fisomorphism-between-torsion-subgroups-of-h-q-m-and-h-n-q-1-m-where-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It is not true that $text{Tors}(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. You are right that $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is injective, so the Ext-term vanishes, but if $H_q(M;Bbb Z) = Bbb Z^{b_q} oplus T$, then $$H^{q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Hom}(H_q(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q},$$ noncanonically.
So your approach shows that $T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q} cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. What you want to do now is understand the last term. Again we have the universal coefficient sequence,
$$0 to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to text{Tor}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to 0.$$
The first term is the divisible subgroup of $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and is isomorphic to $(Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_{n-q}} = (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q}$. The last term is $text{Tors}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z))$.
Because we have an isomorphism of groups $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and isomorphisms preserve the maximal divisible subgroup, we see that they preserve the quotient by this subgroup; in both cases it is isomorphic to the finite abelian group $T$.
Note that $H_q(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is indeed zero if and only if the claim that $H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Tors}(H_q(M;Bbb Z))$ is true.
Thanks! I have realized of my mistake.
– CTW
yesterday
@CTW Sure, and thanks for helping me realize my understanding of which coefficients one may take for Poincare duality was incorrect.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
It is not true that $text{Tors}(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. You are right that $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is injective, so the Ext-term vanishes, but if $H_q(M;Bbb Z) = Bbb Z^{b_q} oplus T$, then $$H^{q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Hom}(H_q(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q},$$ noncanonically.
So your approach shows that $T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q} cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. What you want to do now is understand the last term. Again we have the universal coefficient sequence,
$$0 to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to text{Tor}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to 0.$$
The first term is the divisible subgroup of $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and is isomorphic to $(Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_{n-q}} = (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q}$. The last term is $text{Tors}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z))$.
Because we have an isomorphism of groups $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and isomorphisms preserve the maximal divisible subgroup, we see that they preserve the quotient by this subgroup; in both cases it is isomorphic to the finite abelian group $T$.
Note that $H_q(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is indeed zero if and only if the claim that $H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Tors}(H_q(M;Bbb Z))$ is true.
Thanks! I have realized of my mistake.
– CTW
yesterday
@CTW Sure, and thanks for helping me realize my understanding of which coefficients one may take for Poincare duality was incorrect.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
It is not true that $text{Tors}(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. You are right that $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is injective, so the Ext-term vanishes, but if $H_q(M;Bbb Z) = Bbb Z^{b_q} oplus T$, then $$H^{q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Hom}(H_q(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q},$$ noncanonically.
So your approach shows that $T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q} cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. What you want to do now is understand the last term. Again we have the universal coefficient sequence,
$$0 to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to text{Tor}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to 0.$$
The first term is the divisible subgroup of $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and is isomorphic to $(Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_{n-q}} = (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q}$. The last term is $text{Tors}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z))$.
Because we have an isomorphism of groups $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and isomorphisms preserve the maximal divisible subgroup, we see that they preserve the quotient by this subgroup; in both cases it is isomorphic to the finite abelian group $T$.
Note that $H_q(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is indeed zero if and only if the claim that $H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Tors}(H_q(M;Bbb Z))$ is true.
It is not true that $text{Tors}(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. You are right that $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is injective, so the Ext-term vanishes, but if $H_q(M;Bbb Z) = Bbb Z^{b_q} oplus T$, then $$H^{q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Hom}(H_q(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q},$$ noncanonically.
So your approach shows that $T oplus (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q} cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. What you want to do now is understand the last term. Again we have the universal coefficient sequence,
$$0 to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z to H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to text{Tor}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z), Bbb Q/Bbb Z) to 0.$$
The first term is the divisible subgroup of $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and is isomorphic to $(Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_{n-q}} = (Bbb Q/Bbb Z)^{b_q}$. The last term is $text{Tors}(H_{n-q-1}(M;Bbb Z))$.
Because we have an isomorphism of groups $H_{n-q}(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$, and isomorphisms preserve the maximal divisible subgroup, we see that they preserve the quotient by this subgroup; in both cases it is isomorphic to the finite abelian group $T$.
Note that $H_q(M;Bbb Z) otimes Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is indeed zero if and only if the claim that $H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z) cong text{Tors}(H_q(M;Bbb Z))$ is true.
answered yesterday
Mike Miller
36.4k470137
36.4k470137
Thanks! I have realized of my mistake.
– CTW
yesterday
@CTW Sure, and thanks for helping me realize my understanding of which coefficients one may take for Poincare duality was incorrect.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks! I have realized of my mistake.
– CTW
yesterday
@CTW Sure, and thanks for helping me realize my understanding of which coefficients one may take for Poincare duality was incorrect.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
Thanks! I have realized of my mistake.
– CTW
yesterday
Thanks! I have realized of my mistake.
– CTW
yesterday
@CTW Sure, and thanks for helping me realize my understanding of which coefficients one may take for Poincare duality was incorrect.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
@CTW Sure, and thanks for helping me realize my understanding of which coefficients one may take for Poincare duality was incorrect.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060576%2fisomorphism-between-torsion-subgroups-of-h-q-m-and-h-n-q-1-m-where-m%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You cannot apply Poincare duality like this because $Bbb Q/Bbb Z$ is not a ring. You need to dualize first, then apply UCT.
– Mike Miller
yesterday
But Poincare duality can be used here because of theorem 4.1 in this book. I don't find any error on his proof except a lemma for commutativity, it is quite lengthy and I finally choose to believe it.
– CTW
yesterday
Sorry, you're quite right! (For context, I was thinking of using the product structure on $R$ to take the cap product with the $R$-fundamental class, but you may as well just take cap productwith $Bbb Z$-fundamental class.) Instead the error is in your isomorphism $T(H_q(M)) cong H^q(M;Bbb Q/Bbb Z)$. I will write an answer.
– Mike Miller
yesterday