Let A be a denumerable subset of an uncountable set X. Prove that X/A is uncountable












2












$begingroup$


I'd like to know if my proof is correct:



Assume $A$ is denumerable and and $Asubseteq X$
Assume X is uncountable
(X uncountable means X is not finite and X is not denumerable)



$X=(Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)=(Xbackslash A)cup A$

(as $A subseteq X$)



Therefore $X$ is uncountable $implies (Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)$ uncountable.



Now using the Theorem: If A and B are denumerable sets then $Acup B$ is denumerable.
The contrapositive of this statement is: If $Acup B$ is not denumerable then A is not denumerable or B is not denumerable.



Now applying the contrapositive to what we have so far



$(Xbackslash A) cup A)$ uncountable(not denumerable) $implies(Xbackslash A)$ uncountable or $A$ is uncountable.



(by the contrapositive of the theorem)



By assumption A is denumerable and therefore countable hence XA is uncountable as required.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your proof seems fine, but it's "better" to start with assuming $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable and arrive at a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 11:22












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it might be better to say something like: Suppose $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable, then $(Xsetminus A)cup A=X$ is denumerable, contradiction."
    $endgroup$
    – palmpo
    Jan 8 at 15:36
















2












$begingroup$


I'd like to know if my proof is correct:



Assume $A$ is denumerable and and $Asubseteq X$
Assume X is uncountable
(X uncountable means X is not finite and X is not denumerable)



$X=(Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)=(Xbackslash A)cup A$

(as $A subseteq X$)



Therefore $X$ is uncountable $implies (Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)$ uncountable.



Now using the Theorem: If A and B are denumerable sets then $Acup B$ is denumerable.
The contrapositive of this statement is: If $Acup B$ is not denumerable then A is not denumerable or B is not denumerable.



Now applying the contrapositive to what we have so far



$(Xbackslash A) cup A)$ uncountable(not denumerable) $implies(Xbackslash A)$ uncountable or $A$ is uncountable.



(by the contrapositive of the theorem)



By assumption A is denumerable and therefore countable hence XA is uncountable as required.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Your proof seems fine, but it's "better" to start with assuming $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable and arrive at a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 11:22












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it might be better to say something like: Suppose $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable, then $(Xsetminus A)cup A=X$ is denumerable, contradiction."
    $endgroup$
    – palmpo
    Jan 8 at 15:36














2












2








2





$begingroup$


I'd like to know if my proof is correct:



Assume $A$ is denumerable and and $Asubseteq X$
Assume X is uncountable
(X uncountable means X is not finite and X is not denumerable)



$X=(Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)=(Xbackslash A)cup A$

(as $A subseteq X$)



Therefore $X$ is uncountable $implies (Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)$ uncountable.



Now using the Theorem: If A and B are denumerable sets then $Acup B$ is denumerable.
The contrapositive of this statement is: If $Acup B$ is not denumerable then A is not denumerable or B is not denumerable.



Now applying the contrapositive to what we have so far



$(Xbackslash A) cup A)$ uncountable(not denumerable) $implies(Xbackslash A)$ uncountable or $A$ is uncountable.



(by the contrapositive of the theorem)



By assumption A is denumerable and therefore countable hence XA is uncountable as required.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




I'd like to know if my proof is correct:



Assume $A$ is denumerable and and $Asubseteq X$
Assume X is uncountable
(X uncountable means X is not finite and X is not denumerable)



$X=(Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)=(Xbackslash A)cup A$

(as $A subseteq X$)



Therefore $X$ is uncountable $implies (Xbackslash A) cup (X cap A)$ uncountable.



Now using the Theorem: If A and B are denumerable sets then $Acup B$ is denumerable.
The contrapositive of this statement is: If $Acup B$ is not denumerable then A is not denumerable or B is not denumerable.



Now applying the contrapositive to what we have so far



$(Xbackslash A) cup A)$ uncountable(not denumerable) $implies(Xbackslash A)$ uncountable or $A$ is uncountable.



(by the contrapositive of the theorem)



By assumption A is denumerable and therefore countable hence XA is uncountable as required.







proof-verification elementary-set-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 8 at 11:16









stochasticmrfoxstochasticmrfox

837




837












  • $begingroup$
    Your proof seems fine, but it's "better" to start with assuming $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable and arrive at a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 11:22












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it might be better to say something like: Suppose $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable, then $(Xsetminus A)cup A=X$ is denumerable, contradiction."
    $endgroup$
    – palmpo
    Jan 8 at 15:36


















  • $begingroup$
    Your proof seems fine, but it's "better" to start with assuming $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable and arrive at a contradiction.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 11:22












  • $begingroup$
    Yes, it might be better to say something like: Suppose $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable, then $(Xsetminus A)cup A=X$ is denumerable, contradiction."
    $endgroup$
    – palmpo
    Jan 8 at 15:36
















$begingroup$
Your proof seems fine, but it's "better" to start with assuming $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable and arrive at a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 11:22






$begingroup$
Your proof seems fine, but it's "better" to start with assuming $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable and arrive at a contradiction.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 11:22














$begingroup$
Yes, it might be better to say something like: Suppose $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable, then $(Xsetminus A)cup A=X$ is denumerable, contradiction."
$endgroup$
– palmpo
Jan 8 at 15:36




$begingroup$
Yes, it might be better to say something like: Suppose $Xsetminus A$ is denumerable, then $(Xsetminus A)cup A=X$ is denumerable, contradiction."
$endgroup$
– palmpo
Jan 8 at 15:36










0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066037%2flet-a-be-a-denumerable-subset-of-an-uncountable-set-x-prove-that-x-a-is-uncount%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3066037%2flet-a-be-a-denumerable-subset-of-an-uncountable-set-x-prove-that-x-a-is-uncount%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

1300-talet

1300-talet

Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8