How to show $|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$?
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
add a comment |
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
– zimbra314
yesterday
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
– Saeed
yesterday
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
– zimbra314
yesterday
add a comment |
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
Let $x,y in mathbb{R}^n$.
How can I show the following
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
The above has been used by the authors of the following paper on page 8, in first line
Online Principal Component Analysis.
Also, I think using the above for $M , N in mathbb{R}^{d times k}$ the following is true.
$$|M-N|_F^2 leq |M|_F^2+2|text{tr}(M^TN)|$$
where $|cdot|_F$ is Frobenius norm.
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
linear-algebra inequality trace cauchy-schwarz-inequality
edited yesterday
asked yesterday
Saeed
698310
698310
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
– zimbra314
yesterday
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
– Saeed
yesterday
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
– zimbra314
yesterday
add a comment |
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
– zimbra314
yesterday
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
– Saeed
yesterday
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
– zimbra314
yesterday
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
– zimbra314
yesterday
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
– zimbra314
yesterday
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
– Saeed
yesterday
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
– Saeed
yesterday
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
– zimbra314
yesterday
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
– zimbra314
yesterday
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
– Saeed
yesterday
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
– Saeed
yesterday
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060598%2fhow-to-show-x-y-22-leq-x-222xty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
– Saeed
yesterday
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
– Saeed
yesterday
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
add a comment |
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
– Saeed
yesterday
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
– Saeed
yesterday
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
add a comment |
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
You'll have hard time to prove:
$$|x-y|_2^2 leq |x|_2^2+2|x^Ty|$$
Take $x = 0$ and $y neq 0$, you get:
$$|y|_2^2 le 0$$
which is unlikely.
answered yesterday
mathcounterexamples.net
25k21853
25k21853
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
– Saeed
yesterday
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
– Saeed
yesterday
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
add a comment |
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
– Saeed
yesterday
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
– Saeed
yesterday
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
– Saeed
yesterday
But in the following paper which is a well-known paper on page 8, in first line, the author claims this cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/el327/papers/opca.pdf. Maybe, for $x=0$ $y$ has to be zero.
– Saeed
yesterday
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
There is probably a typo in the paper. Take $n = 2$, $x=(0.1,0.0)$ and $y=(0,1)$. The inequality clearly doesn't hold.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
– Saeed
yesterday
But it uses at equation (8), could you take a look, I have spent a day on that to figure it out.
– Saeed
yesterday
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
Sorry. I won't spend time on it. The inequality is clearly wrong. Just have a look at the counterexample I provided in the comment above. And make the computation ==> $0.1^2 + 1^2 nleq 0.1^2$.
– mathcounterexamples.net
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060598%2fhow-to-show-x-y-22-leq-x-222xty%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
that doesn't seem to be true. take x, y such that $x^{T}y=0$
– zimbra314
yesterday
@ zimbra314: Could you take a look at the paper that I have cited. It is a well-known paper.
– Saeed
yesterday
Evenif the inequality was true (which it is not), equation 8 on page 7 will change its inequality sign so equation 8 is wrong.
– zimbra314
yesterday