trapezoid approximation of sinus function












-1














I want to find a reasonable good periodic trapezoid function approximation for the sinus (or cosinus) function.



My use case is it to divide the year in 4 epochs:




  1. visible light length stays roughly the same (around winter solistice),

  2. visible light lenghtens by roughly x minutes a day (around spring equinox),

  3. visible light length stays roughly the same (around summer solistice),

  4. visible light length shortens by roughly x minutes a day (around fall equinox).


I'd be interrested in 3 values:




  • length of visible light during quasi-contant epochs

  • steepness of change in the transit epoch

  • days of transition between the epochs


If I did not make a mistake, this requires estimation or calculation of two parameters of the trapezoid function: amplitude and one of either lenght in high or low phase or steepness of the transition. Additionally of course some weighting function to establish a minimum distance would be required. If sensible/possible I'd go for sum of absolute difference.



I tried to establish a picewise formula for the difference between sinus and a periodic trapezoid function, to then minimize this, but it was over my head. Unfortunately I am not fluent enough in a mathematical program language to state that problem. Before I do a brute force numerical approximation I'd rather have a closed symbolic expression that yields a nice and exact solution.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I assume you mean "sine" and "cosine", I've never heard them called "sinus" and "cosinus" before. The question that needs to be asked is what criterion you want to use to determine a "good" approximation. The two obvious choices are to either minimize the maximum difference between function values, or else to minimize the area between the two curves. But which would you prefer? Or is there some other criterion that would be better in this case? There is no need to "brute force" it. Either way, the problem is not hard to solve analytically.
    – Paul Sinclair
    yesterday












  • @PaulSinclair. These are the French names of these functions.
    – Claude Leibovici
    yesterday


















-1














I want to find a reasonable good periodic trapezoid function approximation for the sinus (or cosinus) function.



My use case is it to divide the year in 4 epochs:




  1. visible light length stays roughly the same (around winter solistice),

  2. visible light lenghtens by roughly x minutes a day (around spring equinox),

  3. visible light length stays roughly the same (around summer solistice),

  4. visible light length shortens by roughly x minutes a day (around fall equinox).


I'd be interrested in 3 values:




  • length of visible light during quasi-contant epochs

  • steepness of change in the transit epoch

  • days of transition between the epochs


If I did not make a mistake, this requires estimation or calculation of two parameters of the trapezoid function: amplitude and one of either lenght in high or low phase or steepness of the transition. Additionally of course some weighting function to establish a minimum distance would be required. If sensible/possible I'd go for sum of absolute difference.



I tried to establish a picewise formula for the difference between sinus and a periodic trapezoid function, to then minimize this, but it was over my head. Unfortunately I am not fluent enough in a mathematical program language to state that problem. Before I do a brute force numerical approximation I'd rather have a closed symbolic expression that yields a nice and exact solution.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I assume you mean "sine" and "cosine", I've never heard them called "sinus" and "cosinus" before. The question that needs to be asked is what criterion you want to use to determine a "good" approximation. The two obvious choices are to either minimize the maximum difference between function values, or else to minimize the area between the two curves. But which would you prefer? Or is there some other criterion that would be better in this case? There is no need to "brute force" it. Either way, the problem is not hard to solve analytically.
    – Paul Sinclair
    yesterday












  • @PaulSinclair. These are the French names of these functions.
    – Claude Leibovici
    yesterday
















-1












-1








-1







I want to find a reasonable good periodic trapezoid function approximation for the sinus (or cosinus) function.



My use case is it to divide the year in 4 epochs:




  1. visible light length stays roughly the same (around winter solistice),

  2. visible light lenghtens by roughly x minutes a day (around spring equinox),

  3. visible light length stays roughly the same (around summer solistice),

  4. visible light length shortens by roughly x minutes a day (around fall equinox).


I'd be interrested in 3 values:




  • length of visible light during quasi-contant epochs

  • steepness of change in the transit epoch

  • days of transition between the epochs


If I did not make a mistake, this requires estimation or calculation of two parameters of the trapezoid function: amplitude and one of either lenght in high or low phase or steepness of the transition. Additionally of course some weighting function to establish a minimum distance would be required. If sensible/possible I'd go for sum of absolute difference.



I tried to establish a picewise formula for the difference between sinus and a periodic trapezoid function, to then minimize this, but it was over my head. Unfortunately I am not fluent enough in a mathematical program language to state that problem. Before I do a brute force numerical approximation I'd rather have a closed symbolic expression that yields a nice and exact solution.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I want to find a reasonable good periodic trapezoid function approximation for the sinus (or cosinus) function.



My use case is it to divide the year in 4 epochs:




  1. visible light length stays roughly the same (around winter solistice),

  2. visible light lenghtens by roughly x minutes a day (around spring equinox),

  3. visible light length stays roughly the same (around summer solistice),

  4. visible light length shortens by roughly x minutes a day (around fall equinox).


I'd be interrested in 3 values:




  • length of visible light during quasi-contant epochs

  • steepness of change in the transit epoch

  • days of transition between the epochs


If I did not make a mistake, this requires estimation or calculation of two parameters of the trapezoid function: amplitude and one of either lenght in high or low phase or steepness of the transition. Additionally of course some weighting function to establish a minimum distance would be required. If sensible/possible I'd go for sum of absolute difference.



I tried to establish a picewise formula for the difference between sinus and a periodic trapezoid function, to then minimize this, but it was over my head. Unfortunately I am not fluent enough in a mathematical program language to state that problem. Before I do a brute force numerical approximation I'd rather have a closed symbolic expression that yields a nice and exact solution.







optimization approximation periodic-functions






share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question






New contributor




trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









trapicki

99




99




New contributor




trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






trapicki is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I assume you mean "sine" and "cosine", I've never heard them called "sinus" and "cosinus" before. The question that needs to be asked is what criterion you want to use to determine a "good" approximation. The two obvious choices are to either minimize the maximum difference between function values, or else to minimize the area between the two curves. But which would you prefer? Or is there some other criterion that would be better in this case? There is no need to "brute force" it. Either way, the problem is not hard to solve analytically.
    – Paul Sinclair
    yesterday












  • @PaulSinclair. These are the French names of these functions.
    – Claude Leibovici
    yesterday




















  • I assume you mean "sine" and "cosine", I've never heard them called "sinus" and "cosinus" before. The question that needs to be asked is what criterion you want to use to determine a "good" approximation. The two obvious choices are to either minimize the maximum difference between function values, or else to minimize the area between the two curves. But which would you prefer? Or is there some other criterion that would be better in this case? There is no need to "brute force" it. Either way, the problem is not hard to solve analytically.
    – Paul Sinclair
    yesterday












  • @PaulSinclair. These are the French names of these functions.
    – Claude Leibovici
    yesterday


















I assume you mean "sine" and "cosine", I've never heard them called "sinus" and "cosinus" before. The question that needs to be asked is what criterion you want to use to determine a "good" approximation. The two obvious choices are to either minimize the maximum difference between function values, or else to minimize the area between the two curves. But which would you prefer? Or is there some other criterion that would be better in this case? There is no need to "brute force" it. Either way, the problem is not hard to solve analytically.
– Paul Sinclair
yesterday






I assume you mean "sine" and "cosine", I've never heard them called "sinus" and "cosinus" before. The question that needs to be asked is what criterion you want to use to determine a "good" approximation. The two obvious choices are to either minimize the maximum difference between function values, or else to minimize the area between the two curves. But which would you prefer? Or is there some other criterion that would be better in this case? There is no need to "brute force" it. Either way, the problem is not hard to solve analytically.
– Paul Sinclair
yesterday














@PaulSinclair. These are the French names of these functions.
– Claude Leibovici
yesterday






@PaulSinclair. These are the French names of these functions.
– Claude Leibovici
yesterday












0






active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






trapicki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060713%2ftrapezoid-approximation-of-sinus-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























0






active

oldest

votes








0






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








trapicki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















trapicki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













trapicki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












trapicki is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3060713%2ftrapezoid-approximation-of-sinus-function%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

An IMO inspired problem

Management

Investment