sets theory-Realation proof question












0














Let $A,B,C$ and $R,S,T$ be sets.
And assume that



$$ R subseteq A times B, ~~ S subseteq B times C, ~~
T subseteq B times C.$$



Then, I want to show that
$$
begin{equation}
(S circ R) cap (T circ R) subseteq (Scap T) circ R, \
(S circ R) cup (T circ R) = (S cup T) circ R.
end{equation}
$$



I tried solving this for hours.
I have no idea to even handle this.
I would love any kind of help or assistence.
Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 4 at 10:35






  • 1




    What do you know about set theory already? What text is this problem from? What course are you taking? Providing information like this would be a suitable alternative to any ideas you have to solve the problem.
    – Shaun
    Jan 4 at 10:41
















0














Let $A,B,C$ and $R,S,T$ be sets.
And assume that



$$ R subseteq A times B, ~~ S subseteq B times C, ~~
T subseteq B times C.$$



Then, I want to show that
$$
begin{equation}
(S circ R) cap (T circ R) subseteq (Scap T) circ R, \
(S circ R) cup (T circ R) = (S cup T) circ R.
end{equation}
$$



I tried solving this for hours.
I have no idea to even handle this.
I would love any kind of help or assistence.
Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 4 at 10:35






  • 1




    What do you know about set theory already? What text is this problem from? What course are you taking? Providing information like this would be a suitable alternative to any ideas you have to solve the problem.
    – Shaun
    Jan 4 at 10:41














0












0








0







Let $A,B,C$ and $R,S,T$ be sets.
And assume that



$$ R subseteq A times B, ~~ S subseteq B times C, ~~
T subseteq B times C.$$



Then, I want to show that
$$
begin{equation}
(S circ R) cap (T circ R) subseteq (Scap T) circ R, \
(S circ R) cup (T circ R) = (S cup T) circ R.
end{equation}
$$



I tried solving this for hours.
I have no idea to even handle this.
I would love any kind of help or assistence.
Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Let $A,B,C$ and $R,S,T$ be sets.
And assume that



$$ R subseteq A times B, ~~ S subseteq B times C, ~~
T subseteq B times C.$$



Then, I want to show that
$$
begin{equation}
(S circ R) cap (T circ R) subseteq (Scap T) circ R, \
(S circ R) cup (T circ R) = (S cup T) circ R.
end{equation}
$$



I tried solving this for hours.
I have no idea to even handle this.
I would love any kind of help or assistence.
Thank you.







discrete-mathematics proof-explanation relations






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Jan 4 at 18:39









verret

2,9941818




2,9941818






New contributor




ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Jan 4 at 10:30









ga asga as

31




31




New contributor




ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






ga as is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 4 at 10:35






  • 1




    What do you know about set theory already? What text is this problem from? What course are you taking? Providing information like this would be a suitable alternative to any ideas you have to solve the problem.
    – Shaun
    Jan 4 at 10:41


















  • Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Jan 4 at 10:35






  • 1




    What do you know about set theory already? What text is this problem from? What course are you taking? Providing information like this would be a suitable alternative to any ideas you have to solve the problem.
    – Shaun
    Jan 4 at 10:41
















Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 4 at 10:35




Welcome to MSE. Your question is phrased as an isolated problem, without any further information or context. This does not match many users' quality standards, so it may attract downvotes, or be put on hold. To prevent that, please edit the question. This will help you recognise and resolve the issues. Concretely: please provide context, and include your work and thoughts on the problem. These changes can help in formulating more appropriate answers.
– José Carlos Santos
Jan 4 at 10:35




1




1




What do you know about set theory already? What text is this problem from? What course are you taking? Providing information like this would be a suitable alternative to any ideas you have to solve the problem.
– Shaun
Jan 4 at 10:41




What do you know about set theory already? What text is this problem from? What course are you taking? Providing information like this would be a suitable alternative to any ideas you have to solve the problem.
– Shaun
Jan 4 at 10:41










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















-1














If a(R o (S $cap$ T))c, then exists

b in B with aRb and b(S $cap$ T)c.

Thus aRb, bSc and bTc; a(RoS)c, a(RoT)c.

In conclusion, R o (S $cap$ T) subset RoS $cap$ RoT.



a(R o (S $cup$ T))c iff exists b in B with

aRb, b(S $cup$ T)c iff aRb and (bSc or bTc)

iff (aRb and bSc) or (aRb and bTc)

iff a(RoS)c or a(RoT)c.

In conclusion R o (S $cup$ T) = RoS $cup$ RoT.



Note that I'm using the conventions aRb for (a,b) in R and

for composition RoS ={ (a,c) : exists b with (aRb and bSc) }






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Many thanks! Helped me alot
    – ga as
    Jan 4 at 12:43










  • @William: You've been on the site long enough to have a general idea how to use MathJax, and not rely on the kindness of others to make your posts look good. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to. Please look into it.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






ga as is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061501%2fsets-theory-realation-proof-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









-1














If a(R o (S $cap$ T))c, then exists

b in B with aRb and b(S $cap$ T)c.

Thus aRb, bSc and bTc; a(RoS)c, a(RoT)c.

In conclusion, R o (S $cap$ T) subset RoS $cap$ RoT.



a(R o (S $cup$ T))c iff exists b in B with

aRb, b(S $cup$ T)c iff aRb and (bSc or bTc)

iff (aRb and bSc) or (aRb and bTc)

iff a(RoS)c or a(RoT)c.

In conclusion R o (S $cup$ T) = RoS $cup$ RoT.



Note that I'm using the conventions aRb for (a,b) in R and

for composition RoS ={ (a,c) : exists b with (aRb and bSc) }






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Many thanks! Helped me alot
    – ga as
    Jan 4 at 12:43










  • @William: You've been on the site long enough to have a general idea how to use MathJax, and not rely on the kindness of others to make your posts look good. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to. Please look into it.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago
















-1














If a(R o (S $cap$ T))c, then exists

b in B with aRb and b(S $cap$ T)c.

Thus aRb, bSc and bTc; a(RoS)c, a(RoT)c.

In conclusion, R o (S $cap$ T) subset RoS $cap$ RoT.



a(R o (S $cup$ T))c iff exists b in B with

aRb, b(S $cup$ T)c iff aRb and (bSc or bTc)

iff (aRb and bSc) or (aRb and bTc)

iff a(RoS)c or a(RoT)c.

In conclusion R o (S $cup$ T) = RoS $cup$ RoT.



Note that I'm using the conventions aRb for (a,b) in R and

for composition RoS ={ (a,c) : exists b with (aRb and bSc) }






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • Many thanks! Helped me alot
    – ga as
    Jan 4 at 12:43










  • @William: You've been on the site long enough to have a general idea how to use MathJax, and not rely on the kindness of others to make your posts look good. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to. Please look into it.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago














-1












-1








-1






If a(R o (S $cap$ T))c, then exists

b in B with aRb and b(S $cap$ T)c.

Thus aRb, bSc and bTc; a(RoS)c, a(RoT)c.

In conclusion, R o (S $cap$ T) subset RoS $cap$ RoT.



a(R o (S $cup$ T))c iff exists b in B with

aRb, b(S $cup$ T)c iff aRb and (bSc or bTc)

iff (aRb and bSc) or (aRb and bTc)

iff a(RoS)c or a(RoT)c.

In conclusion R o (S $cup$ T) = RoS $cup$ RoT.



Note that I'm using the conventions aRb for (a,b) in R and

for composition RoS ={ (a,c) : exists b with (aRb and bSc) }






share|cite|improve this answer












If a(R o (S $cap$ T))c, then exists

b in B with aRb and b(S $cap$ T)c.

Thus aRb, bSc and bTc; a(RoS)c, a(RoT)c.

In conclusion, R o (S $cap$ T) subset RoS $cap$ RoT.



a(R o (S $cup$ T))c iff exists b in B with

aRb, b(S $cup$ T)c iff aRb and (bSc or bTc)

iff (aRb and bSc) or (aRb and bTc)

iff a(RoS)c or a(RoT)c.

In conclusion R o (S $cup$ T) = RoS $cup$ RoT.



Note that I'm using the conventions aRb for (a,b) in R and

for composition RoS ={ (a,c) : exists b with (aRb and bSc) }







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 4 at 12:07









William ElliotWilliam Elliot

7,3912720




7,3912720












  • Many thanks! Helped me alot
    – ga as
    Jan 4 at 12:43










  • @William: You've been on the site long enough to have a general idea how to use MathJax, and not rely on the kindness of others to make your posts look good. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to. Please look into it.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago


















  • Many thanks! Helped me alot
    – ga as
    Jan 4 at 12:43










  • @William: You've been on the site long enough to have a general idea how to use MathJax, and not rely on the kindness of others to make your posts look good. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to. Please look into it.
    – Cameron Buie
    2 days ago
















Many thanks! Helped me alot
– ga as
Jan 4 at 12:43




Many thanks! Helped me alot
– ga as
Jan 4 at 12:43












@William: You've been on the site long enough to have a general idea how to use MathJax, and not rely on the kindness of others to make your posts look good. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to. Please look into it.
– Cameron Buie
2 days ago




@William: You've been on the site long enough to have a general idea how to use MathJax, and not rely on the kindness of others to make your posts look good. For some basic information about writing mathematics at this site see, e.g., basic help on mathjax notation, mathjax tutorial and quick reference, main meta site math tutorial and equation editing how-to. Please look into it.
– Cameron Buie
2 days ago










ga as is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















ga as is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













ga as is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












ga as is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3061501%2fsets-theory-realation-proof-question%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

1300-talet

1300-talet

Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8