Find the smallest number with total number of set bits greater than X












0












$begingroup$


Find the smallest number $n$ such that the sum of set bits(1's in binary representation) for all number from $1$ to $n$ is greater than a given integer $X$ where $1 lt X lt 10^{18}$



Example for $X = 5$, the answer is $4$,since sum of $1$ to $4$ is $5$



$0001 = 1$



$0010 = 1$



$0011 = 2$



$0100 = 1$



From this answer



$F(n) = F(m) + F(n - m - 1) + (n - m)$
where $m = 2^k - 1$ and $m < n$



I can only think of looping though all possible integers in the range and find which is the smallest one that satisfies this condition.



How do I solve this without looping though the entire range of possible answers.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$

















    0












    $begingroup$


    Find the smallest number $n$ such that the sum of set bits(1's in binary representation) for all number from $1$ to $n$ is greater than a given integer $X$ where $1 lt X lt 10^{18}$



    Example for $X = 5$, the answer is $4$,since sum of $1$ to $4$ is $5$



    $0001 = 1$



    $0010 = 1$



    $0011 = 2$



    $0100 = 1$



    From this answer



    $F(n) = F(m) + F(n - m - 1) + (n - m)$
    where $m = 2^k - 1$ and $m < n$



    I can only think of looping though all possible integers in the range and find which is the smallest one that satisfies this condition.



    How do I solve this without looping though the entire range of possible answers.










    share|cite|improve this question











    $endgroup$















      0












      0








      0





      $begingroup$


      Find the smallest number $n$ such that the sum of set bits(1's in binary representation) for all number from $1$ to $n$ is greater than a given integer $X$ where $1 lt X lt 10^{18}$



      Example for $X = 5$, the answer is $4$,since sum of $1$ to $4$ is $5$



      $0001 = 1$



      $0010 = 1$



      $0011 = 2$



      $0100 = 1$



      From this answer



      $F(n) = F(m) + F(n - m - 1) + (n - m)$
      where $m = 2^k - 1$ and $m < n$



      I can only think of looping though all possible integers in the range and find which is the smallest one that satisfies this condition.



      How do I solve this without looping though the entire range of possible answers.










      share|cite|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      Find the smallest number $n$ such that the sum of set bits(1's in binary representation) for all number from $1$ to $n$ is greater than a given integer $X$ where $1 lt X lt 10^{18}$



      Example for $X = 5$, the answer is $4$,since sum of $1$ to $4$ is $5$



      $0001 = 1$



      $0010 = 1$



      $0011 = 2$



      $0100 = 1$



      From this answer



      $F(n) = F(m) + F(n - m - 1) + (n - m)$
      where $m = 2^k - 1$ and $m < n$



      I can only think of looping though all possible integers in the range and find which is the smallest one that satisfies this condition.



      How do I solve this without looping though the entire range of possible answers.







      linear-algebra exponential-function






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 6 at 18:48









      amWhy

      1




      1










      asked Jan 6 at 17:44









      thebenmanthebenman

      1254




      1254






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0












          $begingroup$

          Let $P_X(n)$ be true if the sum of set bits of the numbers from 1 to $n$ is greater or equal to $X$. Then $P_X(n)$ true implies $P_X(n')$ true for any $n' > n$.
          Therefore you can apply binary search: suppose you are searching the interval $[a,b]$. Let $m=lfloor(a+b)/2rfloor$. If $P_X(m)$ is true, then you can reduce your interval to $[a,m]$; if it is false, you can reduce your interval to $[m+1,b]$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$













            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064167%2ffind-the-smallest-number-with-total-number-of-set-bits-greater-than-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0












            $begingroup$

            Let $P_X(n)$ be true if the sum of set bits of the numbers from 1 to $n$ is greater or equal to $X$. Then $P_X(n)$ true implies $P_X(n')$ true for any $n' > n$.
            Therefore you can apply binary search: suppose you are searching the interval $[a,b]$. Let $m=lfloor(a+b)/2rfloor$. If $P_X(m)$ is true, then you can reduce your interval to $[a,m]$; if it is false, you can reduce your interval to $[m+1,b]$.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$


















              0












              $begingroup$

              Let $P_X(n)$ be true if the sum of set bits of the numbers from 1 to $n$ is greater or equal to $X$. Then $P_X(n)$ true implies $P_X(n')$ true for any $n' > n$.
              Therefore you can apply binary search: suppose you are searching the interval $[a,b]$. Let $m=lfloor(a+b)/2rfloor$. If $P_X(m)$ is true, then you can reduce your interval to $[a,m]$; if it is false, you can reduce your interval to $[m+1,b]$.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$
















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                Let $P_X(n)$ be true if the sum of set bits of the numbers from 1 to $n$ is greater or equal to $X$. Then $P_X(n)$ true implies $P_X(n')$ true for any $n' > n$.
                Therefore you can apply binary search: suppose you are searching the interval $[a,b]$. Let $m=lfloor(a+b)/2rfloor$. If $P_X(m)$ is true, then you can reduce your interval to $[a,m]$; if it is false, you can reduce your interval to $[m+1,b]$.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$



                Let $P_X(n)$ be true if the sum of set bits of the numbers from 1 to $n$ is greater or equal to $X$. Then $P_X(n)$ true implies $P_X(n')$ true for any $n' > n$.
                Therefore you can apply binary search: suppose you are searching the interval $[a,b]$. Let $m=lfloor(a+b)/2rfloor$. If $P_X(m)$ is true, then you can reduce your interval to $[a,m]$; if it is false, you can reduce your interval to $[m+1,b]$.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 6 at 18:44









                VincenzoVincenzo

                1916




                1916






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3064167%2ffind-the-smallest-number-with-total-number-of-set-bits-greater-than-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    1300-talet

                    1300-talet

                    Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8