Flattening directory hierarchy preserving directory names in new directory name












8














I basically want to go from this:



.
├── Alan Walker
│   ├── Different World
│   │ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   │ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│   │ └── cover.jpg
│   └── Same World
│   ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora
│   └── Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│   ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│   ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│   └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses
    └── Use Your Illusion I
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
   ├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
   └── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


to this:



.
├── Alan Walker - Different World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│ └── cover.jpg
├── Alan Walker - Same World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora - Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│ ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│ ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│ └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses - Use Your Illusion I
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
└── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


None of the existing solutions I could find included renaming the directory itself. It'd be great to be able to do this with zmv, but I can't figure out how to.










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    Not a full solution, so not an answer: easytag may let you do this, but only for audio files - I don't think it will move covers, etc.
    – rvs
    yesterday






  • 2




    Could there be more than one album for a specific artist within one artist directory? Is the structure always three levels deep?
    – nohillside
    yesterday






  • 1




    @nohillside Yes, There can be more than one album for an artist. And yes, the structure is always three levels deep.
    – aksh1618
    yesterday
















8














I basically want to go from this:



.
├── Alan Walker
│   ├── Different World
│   │ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   │ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│   │ └── cover.jpg
│   └── Same World
│   ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora
│   └── Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│   ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│   ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│   └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses
    └── Use Your Illusion I
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
   ├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
   └── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


to this:



.
├── Alan Walker - Different World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│ └── cover.jpg
├── Alan Walker - Same World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora - Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│ ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│ ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│ └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses - Use Your Illusion I
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
└── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


None of the existing solutions I could find included renaming the directory itself. It'd be great to be able to do this with zmv, but I can't figure out how to.










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    Not a full solution, so not an answer: easytag may let you do this, but only for audio files - I don't think it will move covers, etc.
    – rvs
    yesterday






  • 2




    Could there be more than one album for a specific artist within one artist directory? Is the structure always three levels deep?
    – nohillside
    yesterday






  • 1




    @nohillside Yes, There can be more than one album for an artist. And yes, the structure is always three levels deep.
    – aksh1618
    yesterday














8












8








8







I basically want to go from this:



.
├── Alan Walker
│   ├── Different World
│   │ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   │ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│   │ └── cover.jpg
│   └── Same World
│   ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora
│   └── Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│   ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│   ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│   └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses
    └── Use Your Illusion I
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
   ├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
   └── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


to this:



.
├── Alan Walker - Different World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│ └── cover.jpg
├── Alan Walker - Same World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora - Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│ ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│ ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│ └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses - Use Your Illusion I
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
└── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


None of the existing solutions I could find included renaming the directory itself. It'd be great to be able to do this with zmv, but I can't figure out how to.










share|improve this question















I basically want to go from this:



.
├── Alan Walker
│   ├── Different World
│   │ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   │ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│   │ └── cover.jpg
│   └── Same World
│   ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│   └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora
│   └── Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│   ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│   ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│   └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses
    └── Use Your Illusion I
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
   ├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
   ├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
   └── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


to this:



.
├── Alan Walker - Different World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ ├── 02 Lost Control.mp3
│ └── cover.jpg
├── Alan Walker - Same World
│ ├── 01 Intro.mp3
│ └── 02 Found Control.mp3
├── Aurora - Infections Of A Different Kind Step 1
│ ├── 01 Queendom.lrc
│ ├── 02 Forgotten Love.lrc
│ └── 03 Gentle Earthquakes.mp3
└── Guns N' Roses - Use Your Illusion I
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.lrc
├── 01 Right Next Door To Hell.mp3
├── 02 Dust N' Bones.lrc
└── 02 Dust N' Bones.mp3


None of the existing solutions I could find included renaming the directory itself. It'd be great to be able to do this with zmv, but I can't figure out how to.







bash shell-script zsh directory rename






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 11 hours ago









Kusalananda

122k16230374




122k16230374










asked yesterday









aksh1618

506




506








  • 2




    Not a full solution, so not an answer: easytag may let you do this, but only for audio files - I don't think it will move covers, etc.
    – rvs
    yesterday






  • 2




    Could there be more than one album for a specific artist within one artist directory? Is the structure always three levels deep?
    – nohillside
    yesterday






  • 1




    @nohillside Yes, There can be more than one album for an artist. And yes, the structure is always three levels deep.
    – aksh1618
    yesterday














  • 2




    Not a full solution, so not an answer: easytag may let you do this, but only for audio files - I don't think it will move covers, etc.
    – rvs
    yesterday






  • 2




    Could there be more than one album for a specific artist within one artist directory? Is the structure always three levels deep?
    – nohillside
    yesterday






  • 1




    @nohillside Yes, There can be more than one album for an artist. And yes, the structure is always three levels deep.
    – aksh1618
    yesterday








2




2




Not a full solution, so not an answer: easytag may let you do this, but only for audio files - I don't think it will move covers, etc.
– rvs
yesterday




Not a full solution, so not an answer: easytag may let you do this, but only for audio files - I don't think it will move covers, etc.
– rvs
yesterday




2




2




Could there be more than one album for a specific artist within one artist directory? Is the structure always three levels deep?
– nohillside
yesterday




Could there be more than one album for a specific artist within one artist directory? Is the structure always three levels deep?
– nohillside
yesterday




1




1




@nohillside Yes, There can be more than one album for an artist. And yes, the structure is always three levels deep.
– aksh1618
yesterday




@nohillside Yes, There can be more than one album for an artist. And yes, the structure is always three levels deep.
– aksh1618
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















13














Something like this maybe?





#!/bin/sh

for topdir in */; do
topdir_name=$( basename "$topdir" )

for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
subdir_name=$( basename "$subdir" )

newdir="$topdir_name - $subdir_name"
if mkdir "$newdir"; then
mv "$subdir"/* "$newdir"
rmdir "$subdir"
fi
done

rmdir "$topdir"
done


This goes through all the top-level directories in the current directory (the band names). For each such directory, it goes through its subdirectories (the album names). For each pair of band name and album name, a new directory is created and the files from the subdirectory are moved to it. The album subdirectories are removed when they have been processed, as are the original band top-level directories.



The rmdir calls will fail if any directory contains hidden filenames or if any of the new directories failed to be created.



This is totally untested code. Run it on a backed-up copy of your files.






share|improve this answer























  • I mean, yes, something like would work, but I'm kinda looking for a one or two line solution, to run easily from terminal. Some find/sed/zmv magic :)
    – aksh1618
    yesterday






  • 10




    Put ot into a script, and -boom- it becomes a one-liner.
    – Hans-Martin Mosner
    yesterday



















8














Zsh



Untested:



zmv -Q '(*)/(*)(/)' '$1 - $2'
rmdir -- *(/^F)


The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before. It's possible to work around this with a custom mv wrapper that records what directories it moves things from.



Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory.



Linux rename utility



Untested.



rename / ' - ' */*/
rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



Perl rename script



Untested.



prename 's~/~ - ~' */*/
rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



Here's a more complex approach that only removes directories that it renamed something from. Again, untested.



prename 's~([^/]+)/~$1 - ~ and ++$d{$1}; END {map {rmdir} keys %d}' */*/





share|improve this answer





























    4














    Strategically, rather than moving files, have you considered leaving the current structure in place and creating links for the new structure you want?



    Tactically, a pattern that'll do the job goes like this:



    find . -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -type d -print0 | xargs -0n1 bash -c 
    'b=$(basename "$(dirname "$1")"); a=$(basename "$1"); echo ln -s "$1" "$b-$a"' {}




    • find locates all directories exactly two levels deep from the current working directory, which should be the directory containing the bands: thus two levels deep are the album names underneath the band names.1


    • xargs consumes each path containing an album and calls out to the inline bash script.


    • bash -c '...' takes the album path as its first argument, breaking that path into two parts: the band ($b) and the album ($a). Finally, the script reassembles the names into the desired format and links the new directory name to the original directory.


    Note that, in this example, the links would be created in the same directory from which you start, which also happens to be where the band names are.



    You could - and should - tweak the ln strategy above to match your intent. mv with the right paths if you physically want to rearrange, or ln if you're wanting to create a convenience "view" over the media. The important parts inside the bash script are:





    • $b the band name. Always quote it: "$b".


    • $a the album name. Always quote it: "$a".


    • $1 the physical path to the album directory. Always quote it: "$1".




    1 I believe m{ax,in}depth are supported by GNU and some BSD find, but not POSIX: in which case, rely on */* or similar shell gymnastics.






    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      I like this answer... you could also make hardlinks, then delete the old folder structure when you're satisfied
      – Thomas Zwaagstra
      yesterday










    • @ThomasZwaagstra That's no different than moving the files
      – Darkhogg
      16 hours ago






    • 1




      @Darkhogg Exactly! OP was looking for a 1-liner to move the files. Using hardlinks with this solution would nearly accomplish that, except you would have an intermediate "preview" stage before deleting the original files
      – Thomas Zwaagstra
      4 hours ago











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492030%2fflattening-directory-hierarchy-preserving-directory-names-in-new-directory-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13














    Something like this maybe?





    #!/bin/sh

    for topdir in */; do
    topdir_name=$( basename "$topdir" )

    for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
    subdir_name=$( basename "$subdir" )

    newdir="$topdir_name - $subdir_name"
    if mkdir "$newdir"; then
    mv "$subdir"/* "$newdir"
    rmdir "$subdir"
    fi
    done

    rmdir "$topdir"
    done


    This goes through all the top-level directories in the current directory (the band names). For each such directory, it goes through its subdirectories (the album names). For each pair of band name and album name, a new directory is created and the files from the subdirectory are moved to it. The album subdirectories are removed when they have been processed, as are the original band top-level directories.



    The rmdir calls will fail if any directory contains hidden filenames or if any of the new directories failed to be created.



    This is totally untested code. Run it on a backed-up copy of your files.






    share|improve this answer























    • I mean, yes, something like would work, but I'm kinda looking for a one or two line solution, to run easily from terminal. Some find/sed/zmv magic :)
      – aksh1618
      yesterday






    • 10




      Put ot into a script, and -boom- it becomes a one-liner.
      – Hans-Martin Mosner
      yesterday
















    13














    Something like this maybe?





    #!/bin/sh

    for topdir in */; do
    topdir_name=$( basename "$topdir" )

    for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
    subdir_name=$( basename "$subdir" )

    newdir="$topdir_name - $subdir_name"
    if mkdir "$newdir"; then
    mv "$subdir"/* "$newdir"
    rmdir "$subdir"
    fi
    done

    rmdir "$topdir"
    done


    This goes through all the top-level directories in the current directory (the band names). For each such directory, it goes through its subdirectories (the album names). For each pair of band name and album name, a new directory is created and the files from the subdirectory are moved to it. The album subdirectories are removed when they have been processed, as are the original band top-level directories.



    The rmdir calls will fail if any directory contains hidden filenames or if any of the new directories failed to be created.



    This is totally untested code. Run it on a backed-up copy of your files.






    share|improve this answer























    • I mean, yes, something like would work, but I'm kinda looking for a one or two line solution, to run easily from terminal. Some find/sed/zmv magic :)
      – aksh1618
      yesterday






    • 10




      Put ot into a script, and -boom- it becomes a one-liner.
      – Hans-Martin Mosner
      yesterday














    13












    13








    13






    Something like this maybe?





    #!/bin/sh

    for topdir in */; do
    topdir_name=$( basename "$topdir" )

    for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
    subdir_name=$( basename "$subdir" )

    newdir="$topdir_name - $subdir_name"
    if mkdir "$newdir"; then
    mv "$subdir"/* "$newdir"
    rmdir "$subdir"
    fi
    done

    rmdir "$topdir"
    done


    This goes through all the top-level directories in the current directory (the band names). For each such directory, it goes through its subdirectories (the album names). For each pair of band name and album name, a new directory is created and the files from the subdirectory are moved to it. The album subdirectories are removed when they have been processed, as are the original band top-level directories.



    The rmdir calls will fail if any directory contains hidden filenames or if any of the new directories failed to be created.



    This is totally untested code. Run it on a backed-up copy of your files.






    share|improve this answer














    Something like this maybe?





    #!/bin/sh

    for topdir in */; do
    topdir_name=$( basename "$topdir" )

    for subdir in "$topdir"/*/; do
    subdir_name=$( basename "$subdir" )

    newdir="$topdir_name - $subdir_name"
    if mkdir "$newdir"; then
    mv "$subdir"/* "$newdir"
    rmdir "$subdir"
    fi
    done

    rmdir "$topdir"
    done


    This goes through all the top-level directories in the current directory (the band names). For each such directory, it goes through its subdirectories (the album names). For each pair of band name and album name, a new directory is created and the files from the subdirectory are moved to it. The album subdirectories are removed when they have been processed, as are the original band top-level directories.



    The rmdir calls will fail if any directory contains hidden filenames or if any of the new directories failed to be created.



    This is totally untested code. Run it on a backed-up copy of your files.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    Kusalananda

    122k16230374




    122k16230374












    • I mean, yes, something like would work, but I'm kinda looking for a one or two line solution, to run easily from terminal. Some find/sed/zmv magic :)
      – aksh1618
      yesterday






    • 10




      Put ot into a script, and -boom- it becomes a one-liner.
      – Hans-Martin Mosner
      yesterday


















    • I mean, yes, something like would work, but I'm kinda looking for a one or two line solution, to run easily from terminal. Some find/sed/zmv magic :)
      – aksh1618
      yesterday






    • 10




      Put ot into a script, and -boom- it becomes a one-liner.
      – Hans-Martin Mosner
      yesterday
















    I mean, yes, something like would work, but I'm kinda looking for a one or two line solution, to run easily from terminal. Some find/sed/zmv magic :)
    – aksh1618
    yesterday




    I mean, yes, something like would work, but I'm kinda looking for a one or two line solution, to run easily from terminal. Some find/sed/zmv magic :)
    – aksh1618
    yesterday




    10




    10




    Put ot into a script, and -boom- it becomes a one-liner.
    – Hans-Martin Mosner
    yesterday




    Put ot into a script, and -boom- it becomes a one-liner.
    – Hans-Martin Mosner
    yesterday













    8














    Zsh



    Untested:



    zmv -Q '(*)/(*)(/)' '$1 - $2'
    rmdir -- *(/^F)


    The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before. It's possible to work around this with a custom mv wrapper that records what directories it moves things from.



    Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory.



    Linux rename utility



    Untested.



    rename / ' - ' */*/
    rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


    Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



    Perl rename script



    Untested.



    prename 's~/~ - ~' */*/
    rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


    Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



    Here's a more complex approach that only removes directories that it renamed something from. Again, untested.



    prename 's~([^/]+)/~$1 - ~ and ++$d{$1}; END {map {rmdir} keys %d}' */*/





    share|improve this answer


























      8














      Zsh



      Untested:



      zmv -Q '(*)/(*)(/)' '$1 - $2'
      rmdir -- *(/^F)


      The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before. It's possible to work around this with a custom mv wrapper that records what directories it moves things from.



      Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory.



      Linux rename utility



      Untested.



      rename / ' - ' */*/
      rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


      Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



      Perl rename script



      Untested.



      prename 's~/~ - ~' */*/
      rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


      Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



      Here's a more complex approach that only removes directories that it renamed something from. Again, untested.



      prename 's~([^/]+)/~$1 - ~ and ++$d{$1}; END {map {rmdir} keys %d}' */*/





      share|improve this answer
























        8












        8








        8






        Zsh



        Untested:



        zmv -Q '(*)/(*)(/)' '$1 - $2'
        rmdir -- *(/^F)


        The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before. It's possible to work around this with a custom mv wrapper that records what directories it moves things from.



        Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory.



        Linux rename utility



        Untested.



        rename / ' - ' */*/
        rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


        Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



        Perl rename script



        Untested.



        prename 's~/~ - ~' */*/
        rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


        Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



        Here's a more complex approach that only removes directories that it renamed something from. Again, untested.



        prename 's~([^/]+)/~$1 - ~ and ++$d{$1}; END {map {rmdir} keys %d}' */*/





        share|improve this answer












        Zsh



        Untested:



        zmv -Q '(*)/(*)(/)' '$1 - $2'
        rmdir -- *(/^F)


        The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before. It's possible to work around this with a custom mv wrapper that records what directories it moves things from.



        Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory.



        Linux rename utility



        Untested.



        rename / ' - ' */*/
        rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


        Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



        Perl rename script



        Untested.



        prename 's~/~ - ~' */*/
        rmdir -- */ 2>/dev/null


        Note that this traverses symbolic links to directories in the current directory and in its subdirectories. The second line removes all empty directories, even those that didn't have a file before.



        Here's a more complex approach that only removes directories that it renamed something from. Again, untested.



        prename 's~([^/]+)/~$1 - ~ and ++$d{$1}; END {map {rmdir} keys %d}' */*/






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Gilles

        529k12810601585




        529k12810601585























            4














            Strategically, rather than moving files, have you considered leaving the current structure in place and creating links for the new structure you want?



            Tactically, a pattern that'll do the job goes like this:



            find . -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -type d -print0 | xargs -0n1 bash -c 
            'b=$(basename "$(dirname "$1")"); a=$(basename "$1"); echo ln -s "$1" "$b-$a"' {}




            • find locates all directories exactly two levels deep from the current working directory, which should be the directory containing the bands: thus two levels deep are the album names underneath the band names.1


            • xargs consumes each path containing an album and calls out to the inline bash script.


            • bash -c '...' takes the album path as its first argument, breaking that path into two parts: the band ($b) and the album ($a). Finally, the script reassembles the names into the desired format and links the new directory name to the original directory.


            Note that, in this example, the links would be created in the same directory from which you start, which also happens to be where the band names are.



            You could - and should - tweak the ln strategy above to match your intent. mv with the right paths if you physically want to rearrange, or ln if you're wanting to create a convenience "view" over the media. The important parts inside the bash script are:





            • $b the band name. Always quote it: "$b".


            • $a the album name. Always quote it: "$a".


            • $1 the physical path to the album directory. Always quote it: "$1".




            1 I believe m{ax,in}depth are supported by GNU and some BSD find, but not POSIX: in which case, rely on */* or similar shell gymnastics.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              I like this answer... you could also make hardlinks, then delete the old folder structure when you're satisfied
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              yesterday










            • @ThomasZwaagstra That's no different than moving the files
              – Darkhogg
              16 hours ago






            • 1




              @Darkhogg Exactly! OP was looking for a 1-liner to move the files. Using hardlinks with this solution would nearly accomplish that, except you would have an intermediate "preview" stage before deleting the original files
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              4 hours ago
















            4














            Strategically, rather than moving files, have you considered leaving the current structure in place and creating links for the new structure you want?



            Tactically, a pattern that'll do the job goes like this:



            find . -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -type d -print0 | xargs -0n1 bash -c 
            'b=$(basename "$(dirname "$1")"); a=$(basename "$1"); echo ln -s "$1" "$b-$a"' {}




            • find locates all directories exactly two levels deep from the current working directory, which should be the directory containing the bands: thus two levels deep are the album names underneath the band names.1


            • xargs consumes each path containing an album and calls out to the inline bash script.


            • bash -c '...' takes the album path as its first argument, breaking that path into two parts: the band ($b) and the album ($a). Finally, the script reassembles the names into the desired format and links the new directory name to the original directory.


            Note that, in this example, the links would be created in the same directory from which you start, which also happens to be where the band names are.



            You could - and should - tweak the ln strategy above to match your intent. mv with the right paths if you physically want to rearrange, or ln if you're wanting to create a convenience "view" over the media. The important parts inside the bash script are:





            • $b the band name. Always quote it: "$b".


            • $a the album name. Always quote it: "$a".


            • $1 the physical path to the album directory. Always quote it: "$1".




            1 I believe m{ax,in}depth are supported by GNU and some BSD find, but not POSIX: in which case, rely on */* or similar shell gymnastics.






            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              I like this answer... you could also make hardlinks, then delete the old folder structure when you're satisfied
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              yesterday










            • @ThomasZwaagstra That's no different than moving the files
              – Darkhogg
              16 hours ago






            • 1




              @Darkhogg Exactly! OP was looking for a 1-liner to move the files. Using hardlinks with this solution would nearly accomplish that, except you would have an intermediate "preview" stage before deleting the original files
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              4 hours ago














            4












            4








            4






            Strategically, rather than moving files, have you considered leaving the current structure in place and creating links for the new structure you want?



            Tactically, a pattern that'll do the job goes like this:



            find . -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -type d -print0 | xargs -0n1 bash -c 
            'b=$(basename "$(dirname "$1")"); a=$(basename "$1"); echo ln -s "$1" "$b-$a"' {}




            • find locates all directories exactly two levels deep from the current working directory, which should be the directory containing the bands: thus two levels deep are the album names underneath the band names.1


            • xargs consumes each path containing an album and calls out to the inline bash script.


            • bash -c '...' takes the album path as its first argument, breaking that path into two parts: the band ($b) and the album ($a). Finally, the script reassembles the names into the desired format and links the new directory name to the original directory.


            Note that, in this example, the links would be created in the same directory from which you start, which also happens to be where the band names are.



            You could - and should - tweak the ln strategy above to match your intent. mv with the right paths if you physically want to rearrange, or ln if you're wanting to create a convenience "view" over the media. The important parts inside the bash script are:





            • $b the band name. Always quote it: "$b".


            • $a the album name. Always quote it: "$a".


            • $1 the physical path to the album directory. Always quote it: "$1".




            1 I believe m{ax,in}depth are supported by GNU and some BSD find, but not POSIX: in which case, rely on */* or similar shell gymnastics.






            share|improve this answer












            Strategically, rather than moving files, have you considered leaving the current structure in place and creating links for the new structure you want?



            Tactically, a pattern that'll do the job goes like this:



            find . -mindepth 2 -maxdepth 2 -type d -print0 | xargs -0n1 bash -c 
            'b=$(basename "$(dirname "$1")"); a=$(basename "$1"); echo ln -s "$1" "$b-$a"' {}




            • find locates all directories exactly two levels deep from the current working directory, which should be the directory containing the bands: thus two levels deep are the album names underneath the band names.1


            • xargs consumes each path containing an album and calls out to the inline bash script.


            • bash -c '...' takes the album path as its first argument, breaking that path into two parts: the band ($b) and the album ($a). Finally, the script reassembles the names into the desired format and links the new directory name to the original directory.


            Note that, in this example, the links would be created in the same directory from which you start, which also happens to be where the band names are.



            You could - and should - tweak the ln strategy above to match your intent. mv with the right paths if you physically want to rearrange, or ln if you're wanting to create a convenience "view" over the media. The important parts inside the bash script are:





            • $b the band name. Always quote it: "$b".


            • $a the album name. Always quote it: "$a".


            • $1 the physical path to the album directory. Always quote it: "$1".




            1 I believe m{ax,in}depth are supported by GNU and some BSD find, but not POSIX: in which case, rely on */* or similar shell gymnastics.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            bishop

            2,0662822




            2,0662822








            • 1




              I like this answer... you could also make hardlinks, then delete the old folder structure when you're satisfied
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              yesterday










            • @ThomasZwaagstra That's no different than moving the files
              – Darkhogg
              16 hours ago






            • 1




              @Darkhogg Exactly! OP was looking for a 1-liner to move the files. Using hardlinks with this solution would nearly accomplish that, except you would have an intermediate "preview" stage before deleting the original files
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              4 hours ago














            • 1




              I like this answer... you could also make hardlinks, then delete the old folder structure when you're satisfied
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              yesterday










            • @ThomasZwaagstra That's no different than moving the files
              – Darkhogg
              16 hours ago






            • 1




              @Darkhogg Exactly! OP was looking for a 1-liner to move the files. Using hardlinks with this solution would nearly accomplish that, except you would have an intermediate "preview" stage before deleting the original files
              – Thomas Zwaagstra
              4 hours ago








            1




            1




            I like this answer... you could also make hardlinks, then delete the old folder structure when you're satisfied
            – Thomas Zwaagstra
            yesterday




            I like this answer... you could also make hardlinks, then delete the old folder structure when you're satisfied
            – Thomas Zwaagstra
            yesterday












            @ThomasZwaagstra That's no different than moving the files
            – Darkhogg
            16 hours ago




            @ThomasZwaagstra That's no different than moving the files
            – Darkhogg
            16 hours ago




            1




            1




            @Darkhogg Exactly! OP was looking for a 1-liner to move the files. Using hardlinks with this solution would nearly accomplish that, except you would have an intermediate "preview" stage before deleting the original files
            – Thomas Zwaagstra
            4 hours ago




            @Darkhogg Exactly! OP was looking for a 1-liner to move the files. Using hardlinks with this solution would nearly accomplish that, except you would have an intermediate "preview" stage before deleting the original files
            – Thomas Zwaagstra
            4 hours ago


















            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f492030%2fflattening-directory-hierarchy-preserving-directory-names-in-new-directory-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            An IMO inspired problem

            Management

            Investment