How do I remove unnecessary fills in an EAGLE polygon?
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
add a comment |
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
Is there a reason why you want to remove this? Why do you mean that they are "unnecessary"?
– pipe
18 hours ago
add a comment |
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
There are a lot of resistors and diodes on the board, where the polygon passes like this. How can I get rid of it?
pcb eagle polygon
pcb eagle polygon
edited 13 hours ago
Peter Mortensen
1,59031422
1,59031422
asked 21 hours ago
Алекс Гарисон
465
465
Is there a reason why you want to remove this? Why do you mean that they are "unnecessary"?
– pipe
18 hours ago
add a comment |
Is there a reason why you want to remove this? Why do you mean that they are "unnecessary"?
– pipe
18 hours ago
Is there a reason why you want to remove this? Why do you mean that they are "unnecessary"?
– pipe
18 hours ago
Is there a reason why you want to remove this? Why do you mean that they are "unnecessary"?
– pipe
18 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
20 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function () {
StackExchange.schematics.init();
});
}, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-do-i-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-an-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
20 hours ago
add a comment |
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
20 hours ago
add a comment |
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
You can draw on 41 tRestrict and 42 bRestrict to prevent the pour on those places.
Traces overlapping these layers will cause DRC violations.
The pour will keep the isolate distance in the polygon properties from the restrict layer objects.
Example:
answered 20 hours ago
Jeroen3
11.2k1648
11.2k1648
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
20 hours ago
add a comment |
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
20 hours ago
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
20 hours ago
That helped! Thank you!
– Алекс Гарисон
20 hours ago
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
add a comment |
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
They are not redundant, it's really the whole point of a polygon pour: to reduce the impedance of the filled area. That said, a lot of people do it to be lazy (no judgement being made)..! Jereon's method is the scalpel blade approach (and the most correct). The hammer approach is to simply increase the "isolate" value of the polygon until it doesn't fill in between the pads of your components.
answered 20 hours ago
awjlogan
3,39811227
3,39811227
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f415015%2fhow-do-i-remove-unnecessary-fills-in-an-eagle-polygon%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Is there a reason why you want to remove this? Why do you mean that they are "unnecessary"?
– pipe
18 hours ago