Show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.












2












$begingroup$


If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.



I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.



I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 4:27


















2












$begingroup$


If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.



I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.



I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 4:27
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.



I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.



I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.



I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.



I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)







elementary-number-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 8 at 4:15









YellowYellow

16011




16011








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 4:27
















  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
    $endgroup$
    – Thomas Shelby
    Jan 8 at 4:27










1




1




$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27






$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Here is an alternate method.



Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.



Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    5












    $begingroup$

    Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
    $$ka+lb=1$$



    Then
    $$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$



    Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
    $$n=??$$



    Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      $n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
      $endgroup$
      – Yellow
      Jan 8 at 4:40










    • $begingroup$
      But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
      $endgroup$
      – Yellow
      Jan 8 at 17:51










    • $begingroup$
      @AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
      $endgroup$
      – N. S.
      Jan 8 at 18:18










    • $begingroup$
      Oh alright, thanks
      $endgroup$
      – Yellow
      Jan 8 at 18:34










    • $begingroup$
      The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      Jan 9 at 16:24



















    1












    $begingroup$

    Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$



    Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.



    By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













    • $begingroup$
      Induction? What do you induct on?
      $endgroup$
      – Yellow
      Jan 9 at 16:51










    • $begingroup$
      @Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
      $endgroup$
      – Bill Dubuque
      Jan 9 at 17:44












    • $begingroup$
      Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
      $endgroup$
      – Yellow
      Jan 9 at 17:58



















    0












    $begingroup$

    This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:



    $aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows



    $begin{align}
    color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
    color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
    end{align}$



    Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.



    Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065795%2fshow-that-x-nb-y-na-for-some-integer-n-greater-than-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      1












      $begingroup$

      Here is an alternate method.



      Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
      hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.



      Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        1












        $begingroup$

        Here is an alternate method.



        Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
        hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.



        Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          Here is an alternate method.



          Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
          hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.



          Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Here is an alternate method.



          Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
          hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.



          Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Jan 8 at 4:47









          tarit goswamitarit goswami

          1,7591421




          1,7591421























              5












              $begingroup$

              Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
              $$ka+lb=1$$



              Then
              $$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$



              Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
              $$n=??$$



              Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                $n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 4:40










              • $begingroup$
                But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 17:51










              • $begingroup$
                @AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
                $endgroup$
                – N. S.
                Jan 8 at 18:18










              • $begingroup$
                Oh alright, thanks
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 18:34










              • $begingroup$
                The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 16:24
















              5












              $begingroup$

              Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
              $$ka+lb=1$$



              Then
              $$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$



              Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
              $$n=??$$



              Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                $n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 4:40










              • $begingroup$
                But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 17:51










              • $begingroup$
                @AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
                $endgroup$
                – N. S.
                Jan 8 at 18:18










              • $begingroup$
                Oh alright, thanks
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 18:34










              • $begingroup$
                The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 16:24














              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
              $$ka+lb=1$$



              Then
              $$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$



              Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
              $$n=??$$



              Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$



              Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
              $$ka+lb=1$$



              Then
              $$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$



              Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
              $$n=??$$



              Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.







              share|cite|improve this answer












              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer










              answered Jan 8 at 4:37









              N. S.N. S.

              103k6111208




              103k6111208












              • $begingroup$
                $n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 4:40










              • $begingroup$
                But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 17:51










              • $begingroup$
                @AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
                $endgroup$
                – N. S.
                Jan 8 at 18:18










              • $begingroup$
                Oh alright, thanks
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 18:34










              • $begingroup$
                The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 16:24


















              • $begingroup$
                $n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 4:40










              • $begingroup$
                But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 17:51










              • $begingroup$
                @AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
                $endgroup$
                – N. S.
                Jan 8 at 18:18










              • $begingroup$
                Oh alright, thanks
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 8 at 18:34










              • $begingroup$
                The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 16:24
















              $begingroup$
              $n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 8 at 4:40




              $begingroup$
              $n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 8 at 4:40












              $begingroup$
              But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 8 at 17:51




              $begingroup$
              But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 8 at 17:51












              $begingroup$
              @AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
              $endgroup$
              – N. S.
              Jan 8 at 18:18




              $begingroup$
              @AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
              $endgroup$
              – N. S.
              Jan 8 at 18:18












              $begingroup$
              Oh alright, thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 8 at 18:34




              $begingroup$
              Oh alright, thanks
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 8 at 18:34












              $begingroup$
              The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Jan 9 at 16:24




              $begingroup$
              The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Jan 9 at 16:24











              1












              $begingroup$

              Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$



              Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.



              By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Induction? What do you induct on?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 16:51










              • $begingroup$
                @Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 17:44












              • $begingroup$
                Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 17:58
















              1












              $begingroup$

              Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$



              Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.



              By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$













              • $begingroup$
                Induction? What do you induct on?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 16:51










              • $begingroup$
                @Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 17:44












              • $begingroup$
                Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 17:58














              1












              1








              1





              $begingroup$

              Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$



              Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.



              By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$



              Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.



              By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$







              share|cite|improve this answer














              share|cite|improve this answer



              share|cite|improve this answer








              edited Jan 9 at 16:30

























              answered Jan 9 at 16:23









              Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

              209k29191639




              209k29191639












              • $begingroup$
                Induction? What do you induct on?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 16:51










              • $begingroup$
                @Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 17:44












              • $begingroup$
                Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 17:58


















              • $begingroup$
                Induction? What do you induct on?
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 16:51










              • $begingroup$
                @Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
                $endgroup$
                – Bill Dubuque
                Jan 9 at 17:44












              • $begingroup$
                Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
                $endgroup$
                – Yellow
                Jan 9 at 17:58
















              $begingroup$
              Induction? What do you induct on?
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 9 at 16:51




              $begingroup$
              Induction? What do you induct on?
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 9 at 16:51












              $begingroup$
              @Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Jan 9 at 17:44






              $begingroup$
              @Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
              $endgroup$
              – Bill Dubuque
              Jan 9 at 17:44














              $begingroup$
              Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 9 at 17:58




              $begingroup$
              Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
              $endgroup$
              – Yellow
              Jan 9 at 17:58











              0












              $begingroup$

              This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:



              $aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows



              $begin{align}
              color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
              color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
              end{align}$



              Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.



              Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                0












                $begingroup$

                This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:



                $aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows



                $begin{align}
                color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
                color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
                end{align}$



                Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.



                Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  0












                  0








                  0





                  $begingroup$

                  This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:



                  $aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows



                  $begin{align}
                  color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
                  color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
                  end{align}$



                  Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.



                  Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:



                  $aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows



                  $begin{align}
                  color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
                  color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
                  end{align}$



                  Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.



                  Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited Jan 12 at 21:28

























                  answered Jan 10 at 18:32









                  Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque

                  209k29191639




                  209k29191639






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065795%2fshow-that-x-nb-y-na-for-some-integer-n-greater-than-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      An IMO inspired problem

                      Management

                      Investment