Show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.
$begingroup$
If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.
I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.
I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)
elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.
I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.
I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)
elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.
I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.
I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)
elementary-number-theory
$endgroup$
If $ a$, $ b$, $ x$, $ y$ are integers greater than $1$ such that $ a$ and $ b$ have no common factor except $1$ and $ x^a = y^b$ show that $ x = n^b$, $ y = n^a$ for some integer $ n$ greater than $1$.
I started this way: $x^a=y^b$ $=>$ $x=y^{b/a}=(y^{1/a})^b$. Thus $x$ is an integer, and so is $y^{1/a}$, so $y=n^a$ for some integer $n$ greater than $1$. Then from the given relation, we get $x=n^b$.
I am not very convinced with my solution, as I feel I did some mistake. Can anyone point out where the mistake is? Any other solution is also welcome :)
elementary-number-theory
elementary-number-theory
asked Jan 8 at 4:15
YellowYellow
16011
16011
1
$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27
1
1
$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27
$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is an alternate method.
Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.
Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
$$ka+lb=1$$
Then
$$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$
Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
$$n=??$$
Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 4:40
$begingroup$
But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 17:51
$begingroup$
@AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 8 at 18:18
$begingroup$
Oh alright, thanks
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 18:34
$begingroup$
The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 16:24
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$
Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.
By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Induction? What do you induct on?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 16:51
$begingroup$
@Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 17:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:
$aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows
$begin{align}
color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
end{align}$
Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.
Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065795%2fshow-that-x-nb-y-na-for-some-integer-n-greater-than-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Here is an alternate method.
Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.
Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is an alternate method.
Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.
Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Here is an alternate method.
Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.
Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.
$endgroup$
Here is an alternate method.
Note that set of primes dividing $x$ and $y$ are same. Take any prime $p$ diving $x$(and
hence $y$), and let $alpha$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $x$ and $beta$ is the maximum power of $p$ in $y$. Then $x^a=y^b implies p^{alpha a}=p^{beta b}$, which implies $a|beta b $ and $b| alpha a$. But remember that $gcd(a,b)=1$. So, $a|beta$ and $b|alpha$.
Suppose, $beta= acdot beta_p$ and $alpha=bcdot alpha_p$. Then we have, $alpha a=beta b$ or, $balpha_pa =abeta_p b$ or, $alpha_p=beta_p$. So, for each prime $p$ diving $x$, we have such $alpha_p$. Check that $n=prod_{p|n}p^{alpha_p}$ satisfies the required property.
answered Jan 8 at 4:47
tarit goswamitarit goswami
1,7591421
1,7591421
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
$$ka+lb=1$$
Then
$$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$
Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
$$n=??$$
Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 4:40
$begingroup$
But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 17:51
$begingroup$
@AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 8 at 18:18
$begingroup$
Oh alright, thanks
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 18:34
$begingroup$
The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 16:24
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
$$ka+lb=1$$
Then
$$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$
Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
$$n=??$$
Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
$n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 4:40
$begingroup$
But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 17:51
$begingroup$
@AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 8 at 18:18
$begingroup$
Oh alright, thanks
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 18:34
$begingroup$
The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 16:24
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
$$ka+lb=1$$
Then
$$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$
Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
$$n=??$$
Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.
$endgroup$
Hint You can find some $k,l in mathbb Z$ such that
$$ka+lb=1$$
Then
$$n=n^{ka+lb}=(n^a)^kcdot(n^b)^l$$
Now, if you want $x = n^b, y=n^a$ then the only possible choice for $n$ is
$$n=??$$
Just prove that this is an integer and that this choice works.
answered Jan 8 at 4:37
N. S.N. S.
103k6111208
103k6111208
$begingroup$
$n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 4:40
$begingroup$
But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 17:51
$begingroup$
@AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 8 at 18:18
$begingroup$
Oh alright, thanks
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 18:34
$begingroup$
The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 16:24
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
$n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 4:40
$begingroup$
But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 17:51
$begingroup$
@AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 8 at 18:18
$begingroup$
Oh alright, thanks
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 18:34
$begingroup$
The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 16:24
$begingroup$
$n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 4:40
$begingroup$
$n=y^kx^l?$ Is that what you mean?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 4:40
$begingroup$
But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 17:51
$begingroup$
But $k$ and $l$ may be negative right?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 17:51
$begingroup$
@AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 8 at 18:18
$begingroup$
@AnuRadha True. But with this choice you can show that $x=n^b, y=n^a$ and deduce from here that $n$ is integer.
$endgroup$
– N. S.
Jan 8 at 18:18
$begingroup$
Oh alright, thanks
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 18:34
$begingroup$
Oh alright, thanks
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 8 at 18:34
$begingroup$
The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 16:24
$begingroup$
The precise intent of the hint will likely be far from clear for many readers. Please provide further details.
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 16:24
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$
Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.
By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Induction? What do you induct on?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 16:51
$begingroup$
@Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 17:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$
Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.
By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Induction? What do you induct on?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 16:51
$begingroup$
@Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 17:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$
Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.
By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$
$endgroup$
Mimic $rmcolor{#c00}{subtractive}$ Euclidean algorithm on $color{#c00}{(a,b)}.,$ Clear if $,a=b,$ by $,a,b,$ coprime $,Rightarrow, a=b=1$
Else wlog $,a > b,$ therefore $ x^{largecolor{#c00}{a-b}} = (y/x)^{large color{#c00}b},$ and $,y/xinBbb Z,$ via Rational Root Test.
By induction we infer $, x = n^{large b}, y/x = n^{large a-b} Rightarrow, y = n^{large a}$
edited Jan 9 at 16:30
answered Jan 9 at 16:23
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
209k29191639
209k29191639
$begingroup$
Induction? What do you induct on?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 16:51
$begingroup$
@Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 17:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Induction? What do you induct on?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 16:51
$begingroup$
@Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 17:58
$begingroup$
Induction? What do you induct on?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 16:51
$begingroup$
Induction? What do you induct on?
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 16:51
$begingroup$
@Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 17:44
$begingroup$
@Anu Same as in the subtractive Euclidean algorithm, e.g as there we can use the "height" $,h(a,b) := a+b,$ Any $h$ that descreases when we subtract its smaller argument from the larger also yields descent (e.g. we can also choose $,h =$ max, product, etc)
$endgroup$
– Bill Dubuque
Jan 9 at 17:44
$begingroup$
Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 17:58
$begingroup$
Your answer is nice, though it takes some time for me to realize what is actually going on. (Umm, I am new to such kind of inductive stuff). Anyways, thanks. I accept your solution.
$endgroup$
– Yellow
Jan 9 at 17:58
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:
$aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows
$begin{align}
color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
end{align}$
Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.
Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:
$aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows
$begin{align}
color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
end{align}$
Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.
Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:
$aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows
$begin{align}
color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
end{align}$
Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.
Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.
$endgroup$
This is a multiplicative form of the following well known result about fractions, and its proof follows immediately by translating well-known additive proofs into multiplicative form, for example:
$aj!+!bk=1, {xa=yb},Rightarrow, bbox[5px,border:1px solid red]{dfrac{y}x = dfrac{a}b,Rightarrow,begin{align},y = na\ x = nbend{align}} {rm for some}, ninBbb Z, $ with proof as follows
$begin{align}
color{#c00}{xa=yb},Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x(color{#c00}aj!+!bk) = (color{#c00}yj!+!xk)color{#c00}b = n b,, y = color{#c00}y(color{#c00}bk!+!aj) = (yj!+!color{#c00}xk)color{#c00}a = n a\[.3em]
color{#c00}{x^{Large a}= y^{Large b}}Rightarrow,x &= color{#c00}x^{Large color{#c00}aj,+,kb} = (color{#c00}y^{Large j}! cdot x^{Large k})^{Large color{#c00}b} = n^{Large b}, y = color{#c00}y^{Largecolor{#c00} bk,+,aj} = (y^{Large j}! cdot color{#c00}x^{Large k})^{Largecolor{#c00} a} = n^{Large a}
end{align}$
Note $, n = y^{large j} x^{large k},$ is a rational root of $,n^{large a} = yinBbb Z,$ so $,ninBbb Z,$ by the Rational Root Test.
Remark $ $ The analogy between additive and multiplicative forms will be clarified when one studies abelian groups as $Bbb Z!-!$ modules. The fundamental result about principality of fractions is sometimes called Unique Fractionization to emphasize its close relationship with unique factorization.
edited Jan 12 at 21:28
answered Jan 10 at 18:32
Bill DubuqueBill Dubuque
209k29191639
209k29191639
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065795%2fshow-that-x-nb-y-na-for-some-integer-n-greater-than-1%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
${sqrt 2}^2=2$ but ${sqrt 2}$ is not an integer.
$endgroup$
– Thomas Shelby
Jan 8 at 4:27