Why does $P(X+ Y =k) = sum_{i = 0}^k P(X+ Y = k, X = i)$ hold?












0












$begingroup$


Can someone explain, intuitively or otherwise, why the following is true:



$$P(X+ Y =k) = sum_{i = 0}^k P(X+ Y = k, X = i)tag 1$$



How can the probability of $X+Y=k$ be the same as the probability of $X+Y=k$ and $X=i$ summed over $i=0,1,...,k?$ I can't seem to grasp this, apparently basic concept and it discourages me a lot.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ${omegain Omega : X(omega)+Y(omega) = k} = bigcup_{i=0}^k {omegainOmega : X(omega)+Y(omega)=k, , X(omega)=i } $, and the sum is disjoint. That's of course if $Xin {0, , 1, , ..., k}$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Jan 7 at 21:24












  • $begingroup$
    Law of Total Probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Clarinetist
    Jan 7 at 21:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Clarinetist I know it is the LOTP with the partitions and stuff but I can't understand it. Apologies for not making it clear in my question.
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 21:26
















0












$begingroup$


Can someone explain, intuitively or otherwise, why the following is true:



$$P(X+ Y =k) = sum_{i = 0}^k P(X+ Y = k, X = i)tag 1$$



How can the probability of $X+Y=k$ be the same as the probability of $X+Y=k$ and $X=i$ summed over $i=0,1,...,k?$ I can't seem to grasp this, apparently basic concept and it discourages me a lot.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ${omegain Omega : X(omega)+Y(omega) = k} = bigcup_{i=0}^k {omegainOmega : X(omega)+Y(omega)=k, , X(omega)=i } $, and the sum is disjoint. That's of course if $Xin {0, , 1, , ..., k}$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Jan 7 at 21:24












  • $begingroup$
    Law of Total Probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Clarinetist
    Jan 7 at 21:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Clarinetist I know it is the LOTP with the partitions and stuff but I can't understand it. Apologies for not making it clear in my question.
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 21:26














0












0








0





$begingroup$


Can someone explain, intuitively or otherwise, why the following is true:



$$P(X+ Y =k) = sum_{i = 0}^k P(X+ Y = k, X = i)tag 1$$



How can the probability of $X+Y=k$ be the same as the probability of $X+Y=k$ and $X=i$ summed over $i=0,1,...,k?$ I can't seem to grasp this, apparently basic concept and it discourages me a lot.










share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




Can someone explain, intuitively or otherwise, why the following is true:



$$P(X+ Y =k) = sum_{i = 0}^k P(X+ Y = k, X = i)tag 1$$



How can the probability of $X+Y=k$ be the same as the probability of $X+Y=k$ and $X=i$ summed over $i=0,1,...,k?$ I can't seem to grasp this, apparently basic concept and it discourages me a lot.







probability probability-theory






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Jan 7 at 21:22









ParsevalParseval

2,7901718




2,7901718








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ${omegain Omega : X(omega)+Y(omega) = k} = bigcup_{i=0}^k {omegainOmega : X(omega)+Y(omega)=k, , X(omega)=i } $, and the sum is disjoint. That's of course if $Xin {0, , 1, , ..., k}$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Jan 7 at 21:24












  • $begingroup$
    Law of Total Probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Clarinetist
    Jan 7 at 21:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Clarinetist I know it is the LOTP with the partitions and stuff but I can't understand it. Apologies for not making it clear in my question.
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 21:26














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    ${omegain Omega : X(omega)+Y(omega) = k} = bigcup_{i=0}^k {omegainOmega : X(omega)+Y(omega)=k, , X(omega)=i } $, and the sum is disjoint. That's of course if $Xin {0, , 1, , ..., k}$
    $endgroup$
    – Jakobian
    Jan 7 at 21:24












  • $begingroup$
    Law of Total Probability.
    $endgroup$
    – Clarinetist
    Jan 7 at 21:25










  • $begingroup$
    @Clarinetist I know it is the LOTP with the partitions and stuff but I can't understand it. Apologies for not making it clear in my question.
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 21:26








2




2




$begingroup$
${omegain Omega : X(omega)+Y(omega) = k} = bigcup_{i=0}^k {omegainOmega : X(omega)+Y(omega)=k, , X(omega)=i } $, and the sum is disjoint. That's of course if $Xin {0, , 1, , ..., k}$
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Jan 7 at 21:24






$begingroup$
${omegain Omega : X(omega)+Y(omega) = k} = bigcup_{i=0}^k {omegainOmega : X(omega)+Y(omega)=k, , X(omega)=i } $, and the sum is disjoint. That's of course if $Xin {0, , 1, , ..., k}$
$endgroup$
– Jakobian
Jan 7 at 21:24














$begingroup$
Law of Total Probability.
$endgroup$
– Clarinetist
Jan 7 at 21:25




$begingroup$
Law of Total Probability.
$endgroup$
– Clarinetist
Jan 7 at 21:25












$begingroup$
@Clarinetist I know it is the LOTP with the partitions and stuff but I can't understand it. Apologies for not making it clear in my question.
$endgroup$
– Parseval
Jan 7 at 21:26




$begingroup$
@Clarinetist I know it is the LOTP with the partitions and stuff but I can't understand it. Apologies for not making it clear in my question.
$endgroup$
– Parseval
Jan 7 at 21:26










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1












$begingroup$

Let me take a try.



Your formula holds only if $X$ can take on non-negative integer values only.



Then it is just an algebraic way of saying, for instance (taking $k=3$)




the chance I have 3 kids is equal to

the sum of the chance I have 3 girls and 0 boys plus the chance I have 2 girls and 1 boy plus the chance I have 1 girl and 2 boys plus the chance I have 0 girls and 3 boys.




Which itself is a probabilistic version of




If I have 3 children, then exactly one of the following is true: I have 0 sons, I have 1 son, I have 2 sons, I have 3 sons.




Here $X$ and $Y$ stand for the number of male and female children I have, and the non-negative integer condition obviously holds.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is perfect! Thank you ver much!
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 22:36











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065512%2fwhy-does-px-y-k-sum-i-0k-px-y-k-x-i-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1












$begingroup$

Let me take a try.



Your formula holds only if $X$ can take on non-negative integer values only.



Then it is just an algebraic way of saying, for instance (taking $k=3$)




the chance I have 3 kids is equal to

the sum of the chance I have 3 girls and 0 boys plus the chance I have 2 girls and 1 boy plus the chance I have 1 girl and 2 boys plus the chance I have 0 girls and 3 boys.




Which itself is a probabilistic version of




If I have 3 children, then exactly one of the following is true: I have 0 sons, I have 1 son, I have 2 sons, I have 3 sons.




Here $X$ and $Y$ stand for the number of male and female children I have, and the non-negative integer condition obviously holds.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is perfect! Thank you ver much!
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 22:36
















1












$begingroup$

Let me take a try.



Your formula holds only if $X$ can take on non-negative integer values only.



Then it is just an algebraic way of saying, for instance (taking $k=3$)




the chance I have 3 kids is equal to

the sum of the chance I have 3 girls and 0 boys plus the chance I have 2 girls and 1 boy plus the chance I have 1 girl and 2 boys plus the chance I have 0 girls and 3 boys.




Which itself is a probabilistic version of




If I have 3 children, then exactly one of the following is true: I have 0 sons, I have 1 son, I have 2 sons, I have 3 sons.




Here $X$ and $Y$ stand for the number of male and female children I have, and the non-negative integer condition obviously holds.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is perfect! Thank you ver much!
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 22:36














1












1








1





$begingroup$

Let me take a try.



Your formula holds only if $X$ can take on non-negative integer values only.



Then it is just an algebraic way of saying, for instance (taking $k=3$)




the chance I have 3 kids is equal to

the sum of the chance I have 3 girls and 0 boys plus the chance I have 2 girls and 1 boy plus the chance I have 1 girl and 2 boys plus the chance I have 0 girls and 3 boys.




Which itself is a probabilistic version of




If I have 3 children, then exactly one of the following is true: I have 0 sons, I have 1 son, I have 2 sons, I have 3 sons.




Here $X$ and $Y$ stand for the number of male and female children I have, and the non-negative integer condition obviously holds.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Let me take a try.



Your formula holds only if $X$ can take on non-negative integer values only.



Then it is just an algebraic way of saying, for instance (taking $k=3$)




the chance I have 3 kids is equal to

the sum of the chance I have 3 girls and 0 boys plus the chance I have 2 girls and 1 boy plus the chance I have 1 girl and 2 boys plus the chance I have 0 girls and 3 boys.




Which itself is a probabilistic version of




If I have 3 children, then exactly one of the following is true: I have 0 sons, I have 1 son, I have 2 sons, I have 3 sons.




Here $X$ and $Y$ stand for the number of male and female children I have, and the non-negative integer condition obviously holds.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Jan 7 at 21:48









kimchi loverkimchi lover

9,74631128




9,74631128












  • $begingroup$
    This is perfect! Thank you ver much!
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 22:36


















  • $begingroup$
    This is perfect! Thank you ver much!
    $endgroup$
    – Parseval
    Jan 7 at 22:36
















$begingroup$
This is perfect! Thank you ver much!
$endgroup$
– Parseval
Jan 7 at 22:36




$begingroup$
This is perfect! Thank you ver much!
$endgroup$
– Parseval
Jan 7 at 22:36


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3065512%2fwhy-does-px-y-k-sum-i-0k-px-y-k-x-i-hold%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

1300-talet

1300-talet

Display a custom attribute below product name in the front-end Magento 1.9.3.8