Integral $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$
I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.
But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
$$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
$$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
And now a round of IBP gives:
$$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.
For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.
Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.
integration definite-integrals alternative-proof
add a comment |
I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.
But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
$$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
$$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
And now a round of IBP gives:
$$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.
For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.
Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.
integration definite-integrals alternative-proof
add a comment |
I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.
But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
$$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
$$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
And now a round of IBP gives:
$$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.
For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.
Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.
integration definite-integrals alternative-proof
I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.
But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
$$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
$$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
And now a round of IBP gives:
$$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.
For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.
Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.
integration definite-integrals alternative-proof
integration definite-integrals alternative-proof
edited Jan 1 at 19:26
asked Jan 1 at 17:30
Zacky
5,1761752
5,1761752
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
From the identity
$$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$
we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral
$$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$
where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get
$$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$
Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral
$$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
=2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$
which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation
$$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
frac{log2}{2pi}.$$
This method generalises to other integrals such as
begin{align*}
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{pi }{24}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
pi }\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
end{align*}
Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce
$$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$
This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.
New contributor
At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:13
1
Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
– diech
Jan 1 at 19:18
This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 22:50
@Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
– diech
Jan 2 at 9:34
Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
– Zacky
Jan 2 at 11:30
|
show 3 more comments
That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
equals
$$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
$$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
and
$$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
Since
$$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.
2
Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:24
1
@Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 1 at 19:50
1
@Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 0:51
1
@Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 6:36
1
Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
– Zachary
Jan 2 at 7:53
|
show 3 more comments
This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series
$$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
&= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$
where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058679%2fintegral-int-0-infty-frac-ln-x-pi2-ln2-x1x2-fracdx-sqrt-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From the identity
$$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$
we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral
$$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$
where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get
$$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$
Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral
$$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
=2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$
which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation
$$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
frac{log2}{2pi}.$$
This method generalises to other integrals such as
begin{align*}
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{pi }{24}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
pi }\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
end{align*}
Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce
$$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$
This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.
New contributor
At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:13
1
Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
– diech
Jan 1 at 19:18
This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 22:50
@Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
– diech
Jan 2 at 9:34
Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
– Zacky
Jan 2 at 11:30
|
show 3 more comments
From the identity
$$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$
we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral
$$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$
where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get
$$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$
Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral
$$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
=2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$
which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation
$$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
frac{log2}{2pi}.$$
This method generalises to other integrals such as
begin{align*}
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{pi }{24}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
pi }\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
end{align*}
Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce
$$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$
This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.
New contributor
At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:13
1
Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
– diech
Jan 1 at 19:18
This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 22:50
@Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
– diech
Jan 2 at 9:34
Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
– Zacky
Jan 2 at 11:30
|
show 3 more comments
From the identity
$$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$
we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral
$$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$
where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get
$$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$
Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral
$$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
=2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$
which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation
$$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
frac{log2}{2pi}.$$
This method generalises to other integrals such as
begin{align*}
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{pi }{24}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
pi }\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
end{align*}
Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce
$$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$
This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.
New contributor
From the identity
$$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$
we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral
$$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$
where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get
$$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$
Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral
$$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
=2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$
which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation
$$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
frac{log2}{2pi}.$$
This method generalises to other integrals such as
begin{align*}
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{pi }{24}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
pi }\
int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
&=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
end{align*}
Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce
$$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$
This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
answered Jan 1 at 19:06
diech
963
963
New contributor
New contributor
At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:13
1
Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
– diech
Jan 1 at 19:18
This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 22:50
@Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
– diech
Jan 2 at 9:34
Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
– Zacky
Jan 2 at 11:30
|
show 3 more comments
At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:13
1
Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
– diech
Jan 1 at 19:18
This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 22:50
@Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
– diech
Jan 2 at 9:34
Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
– Zacky
Jan 2 at 11:30
At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:13
At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:13
1
1
Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
– diech
Jan 1 at 19:18
Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
– diech
Jan 1 at 19:18
This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 22:50
This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 22:50
@Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
– diech
Jan 2 at 9:34
@Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
– diech
Jan 2 at 9:34
Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
– Zacky
Jan 2 at 11:30
Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
– Zacky
Jan 2 at 11:30
|
show 3 more comments
That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
equals
$$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
$$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
and
$$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
Since
$$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.
2
Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:24
1
@Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 1 at 19:50
1
@Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 0:51
1
@Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 6:36
1
Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
– Zachary
Jan 2 at 7:53
|
show 3 more comments
That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
equals
$$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
$$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
and
$$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
Since
$$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.
2
Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:24
1
@Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 1 at 19:50
1
@Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 0:51
1
@Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 6:36
1
Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
– Zachary
Jan 2 at 7:53
|
show 3 more comments
That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
equals
$$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
$$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
and
$$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
Since
$$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.
That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.
$$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
equals
$$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
$$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
and
$$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
Since
$$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.
edited Jan 2 at 6:40
answered Jan 1 at 19:04
Jack D'Aurizio
287k33280657
287k33280657
2
Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:24
1
@Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 1 at 19:50
1
@Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 0:51
1
@Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 6:36
1
Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
– Zachary
Jan 2 at 7:53
|
show 3 more comments
2
Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:24
1
@Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 1 at 19:50
1
@Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 0:51
1
@Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 6:36
1
Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
– Zachary
Jan 2 at 7:53
2
2
Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:24
Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
– Zacky
Jan 1 at 19:24
1
1
@Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 1 at 19:50
@Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 1 at 19:50
1
1
@Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 0:51
@Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 0:51
1
1
@Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 6:36
@Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
– Jack D'Aurizio
Jan 2 at 6:36
1
1
Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
– Zachary
Jan 2 at 7:53
Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
– Zachary
Jan 2 at 7:53
|
show 3 more comments
This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series
$$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
&= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$
where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.
add a comment |
This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series
$$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
&= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$
where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.
add a comment |
This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series
$$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
&= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$
where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.
This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series
$$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
&= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$
where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.
answered Jan 1 at 19:05
Ininterrompue
6139
6139
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058679%2fintegral-int-0-infty-frac-ln-x-pi2-ln2-x1x2-fracdx-sqrt-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown