Integral $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$












18














I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.



But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
$$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
$$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
And now a round of IBP gives:
$$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
$$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.




For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.




Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.










share|cite|improve this question





























    18














    I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
    Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.



    But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
    $$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
    Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
    $$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
    $$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
    And now a round of IBP gives:
    $$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
    Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
    We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
    Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
    $$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
    Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
    I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.




    For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.




    Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.










    share|cite|improve this question



























      18












      18








      18


      15





      I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
      Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.



      But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
      $$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
      Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
      $$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
      $$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
      And now a round of IBP gives:
      $$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
      Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
      We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
      Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
      $$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
      Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
      I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.




      For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.




      Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I have stumbled upon the following integral:$$I=int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=-frac{pi}{24}$$
      Although I could solve it, I am not quite comfortable with the way I did it.



      But first I will show the way. We can substitute $ln x rightarrow t $ which gives:
      $$I=int_{-infty}^infty frac{t}{pi^2+t^2}frac{e^{frac{t}{2}}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=-x}=int_{-infty}^infty frac{-x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}dx$$
      Also adding the two integral from above and simplify some of it yields:
      $$2I= int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}left(frac{e^{frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^x)^2}-frac{e^{-frac{x}{2}}}{(1+e^{-x})^2}right)dx$$
      $$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{4} int_{-infty}^infty frac{x}{pi^2+x^2}frac{sinh left(frac{x}{2}right)}{cosh ^2left(frac{x}{2}right)}dx$$
      And now a round of IBP gives:
      $$I=frac12 int_{-infty}^infty left(frac{x^2-pi^2}{(x^2+pi^2)^2}right)left(frac{1}{cosh left(frac{x}{2}right)}right)dx$$
      Using the Plancherel theorem the integral simplifies to: $$I=int_0^infty left(sqrt{frac{pi}{2}}xleft(-e^{-pi x}right)right)left(sqrt{2pi}frac{1}{cosh(pi x)}right)dxoverset{pi xrightarrow x}=-frac{1}{pi}int_0^infty frac{x}{cosh( x)}e^{- x}dx$$
      We also have the following Laplace tranform for:$$f(t)=frac{t}{cosh( t)}rightarrow F(s)=frac18left(psi_1left(frac{s+1}{4}right)-psi_1left(frac{s+3}{4}right)right)$$
      Where $displaystyle{psi_1(z)=sum_{n=0}^infty frac{1}{(z+n)^2}},$ is the trigamma function.
      $$Rightarrow I=-frac{1}{pi}F(s=1)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(psi_1left(frac{1}{2}right)-psi_1 (1)right)=-frac{1}{pi}cdot frac18left(frac{pi^2}{2}-frac{pi^2}{6}right)=-frac{pi}{24}$$
      Have I done anything wrong, or can it be improved?
      I have to admit that I mostly used wolfram when applying Plancherel theorem and Laplace transform which I'm not comfortable with, but I didn't find an alternative method myself.




      For this question I would like to see a different proof that doesn't rely on that theorem.




      Probably not needed, but I should mention that my contour integration knowledge is pretty low. Also maybe there is a conexion with this integral, but I didn't find any.







      integration definite-integrals alternative-proof






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Jan 1 at 19:26

























      asked Jan 1 at 17:30









      Zacky

      5,1761752




      5,1761752






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          From the identity



          $$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$



          we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral



          $$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
          frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$



          where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get



          $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$



          Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral



          $$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
          =2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$



          which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation



          $$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
          frac{log2}{2pi}.$$



          This method generalises to other integrals such as



          begin{align*}
          int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
          &=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
          int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
          &=-frac{pi }{24}\
          int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
          &=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
          int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
          &=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
          int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
          &=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
          pi }\
          int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
          &=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
          end{align*}



          Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce



          $$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$



          This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.






          share|cite|improve this answer










          New contributor




          diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
          Check out our Code of Conduct.


















          • At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 19:13






          • 1




            Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
            – diech
            Jan 1 at 19:18










          • This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 22:50












          • @Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
            – diech
            Jan 2 at 9:34










          • Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
            – Zacky
            Jan 2 at 11:30



















          6














          That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:



          $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
          which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.



          $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
          equals
          $$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
          The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
          $$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
          and
          $$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
          Since
          $$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
          our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 2




            Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 19:24








          • 1




            @Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 1 at 19:50






          • 1




            @Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 2 at 0:51






          • 1




            @Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 2 at 6:36






          • 1




            Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
            – Zachary
            Jan 2 at 7:53



















          3














          This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series



          $$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
          &= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$



          where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058679%2fintegral-int-0-infty-frac-ln-x-pi2-ln2-x1x2-fracdx-sqrt-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            8














            From the identity



            $$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$



            we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral



            $$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
            frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$



            where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get



            $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$



            Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral



            $$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
            =2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$



            which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation



            $$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
            frac{log2}{2pi}.$$



            This method generalises to other integrals such as



            begin{align*}
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{pi }{24}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
            pi }\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
            end{align*}



            Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce



            $$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$



            This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:13






            • 1




              Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
              – diech
              Jan 1 at 19:18










            • This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 22:50












            • @Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
              – diech
              Jan 2 at 9:34










            • Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
              – Zacky
              Jan 2 at 11:30
















            8














            From the identity



            $$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$



            we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral



            $$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
            frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$



            where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get



            $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$



            Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral



            $$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
            =2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$



            which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation



            $$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
            frac{log2}{2pi}.$$



            This method generalises to other integrals such as



            begin{align*}
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{pi }{24}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
            pi }\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
            end{align*}



            Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce



            $$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$



            This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.


















            • At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:13






            • 1




              Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
              – diech
              Jan 1 at 19:18










            • This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 22:50












            • @Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
              – diech
              Jan 2 at 9:34










            • Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
              – Zacky
              Jan 2 at 11:30














            8












            8








            8






            From the identity



            $$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$



            we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral



            $$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
            frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$



            where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get



            $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$



            Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral



            $$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
            =2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$



            which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation



            $$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
            frac{log2}{2pi}.$$



            This method generalises to other integrals such as



            begin{align*}
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{pi }{24}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
            pi }\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
            end{align*}



            Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce



            $$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$



            This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.






            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            From the identity



            $$Imint_0^infty e^{-(pi-it)x},dx=frac t{pi^2+t^2}$$



            we see that it suffices to compute the imaginary part of the integral



            $$int_0^infty dxint_{-infty}^infty dt;
            frac{e^{alpha t}}{(1+e^t)^2}e^{-pi x}$$



            where $alpha=1/2+ix$. Now, the integral with respect to $t$ is easy by means of the substitution $u=e^t$ and using the beta function. We thus get



            $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12-ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$



            Taking the imaginary part we see that the problem boils down to compute the integral



            $$int_0^infty frac{x e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx
            =2int_0^infty frac{x}{1+e^{2pi x}},dx$$



            which, after the substitution $v=2pi x$, reduces to the integral representation of the eta function $eta(2)$. Also notice that taking the real part we obtain the evaluation



            $$int_0^inftyfrac1{(pi^2+log^2 x)(1+x)^2} frac{dx}{sqrt x}=
            frac{log2}{2pi}.$$



            This method generalises to other integrals such as



            begin{align*}
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{3log (2)}{8 pi }-frac{3 zeta (3)}{16 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{pi }{24}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=frac{5 log (2)}{16 pi }-frac{9 zeta (3)}{32 pi ^3}\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^4} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{223 pi }{5760}\
            int_0^infty frac{1}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{43 zeta (3)}{128 pi ^3}+frac{15 zeta (5)}{256 pi ^5}+frac{35 log (2)}{128
            pi }\
            int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^5} frac{dx}{sqrt x}
            &=-frac{103 pi }{2880}\
            end{align*}



            Incidentally, since the integrals $int_0^infty frac{ln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^k} frac{dx}{sqrt x}$ both yield the same value for $k=2,3$, we also deduce



            $$int_0^infty frac{sqrt xln x}{(pi^2+ln^2 x)(1+x)^3};dx=0.$$



            This, however, should not be surprising due to the symmetry $xmapsto1/x$.







            share|cite|improve this answer










            New contributor




            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago





















            New contributor




            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered Jan 1 at 19:06









            diech

            963




            963




            New contributor




            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            diech is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.












            • At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:13






            • 1




              Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
              – diech
              Jan 1 at 19:18










            • This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 22:50












            • @Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
              – diech
              Jan 2 at 9:34










            • Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
              – Zacky
              Jan 2 at 11:30


















            • At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:13






            • 1




              Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
              – diech
              Jan 1 at 19:18










            • This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 22:50












            • @Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
              – diech
              Jan 2 at 9:34










            • Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
              – Zacky
              Jan 2 at 11:30
















            At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 19:13




            At first sight this looks quite impressive! Give me some time to try to understand it better.
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 19:13




            1




            1




            Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
            – diech
            Jan 1 at 19:18




            Thanks! I hope you enjoy completing the steps, but tell me if you need more details.
            – diech
            Jan 1 at 19:18












            This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 22:50






            This is very beautiful. But I get here: $$int_0^infty pileft(frac12color{red}+ixright)frac{e^{-pi x}}{cosh(pi x)},dx.$$ Am I wrong?
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 22:50














            @Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
            – diech
            Jan 2 at 9:34




            @Zacky Are you sure? I've checked my calculations and I am still getting $-ix$. In any case, your integral is negative, so the imaginary part should also be negative, shouldn't it?
            – diech
            Jan 2 at 9:34












            Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
            – Zacky
            Jan 2 at 11:30




            Well, I have $$int_{-infty}^infty frac{e^{at}}{(1+e^t)^2}dtoverset{t=ln u}=int_0^infty frac{u^{a-1}}{(1+u)^2}du=B(a,2-a)=aGamma(a)Gamma(1-a)$$And since $a=frac12color{red}+ix$ and by the reflection formula it gives that.
            – Zacky
            Jan 2 at 11:30











            6














            That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
            which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
            equals
            $$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
            The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
            $$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
            and
            $$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
            Since
            $$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
            our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 2




              Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:24








            • 1




              @Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 1 at 19:50






            • 1




              @Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 0:51






            • 1




              @Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 6:36






            • 1




              Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
              – Zachary
              Jan 2 at 7:53
















            6














            That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
            which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
            equals
            $$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
            The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
            $$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
            and
            $$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
            Since
            $$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
            our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 2




              Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:24








            • 1




              @Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 1 at 19:50






            • 1




              @Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 0:51






            • 1




              @Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 6:36






            • 1




              Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
              – Zachary
              Jan 2 at 7:53














            6












            6








            6






            That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
            which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
            equals
            $$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
            The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
            $$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
            and
            $$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
            Since
            $$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
            our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            That $pi^2+log^2(x)$ makes me think to the integral representation for Gregory coefficients:



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{dx}{(1+x)^n (pi^2+log^2 x)} = frac{1}{n!}left[frac{d^n}{dx^n}frac{z}{log(1-z)}right]_{z=0}=[z^n]frac{z}{log(1-z)} tag{1}$$
            which can be seen as a consequence of the Lagrange-Buhrmann inversion theorem. We just need to insert a factor $frac{log x}{sqrt{x}}$ in the integrand function appearing in the LHS, so let's go back to the residue theorem.



            $$ int_{0}^{+infty}frac{log(x),dx}{sqrt{x}(1+x)^2(pi^2+log^2 x)}=int_{-infty}^{+infty}frac{t e^{-t/2}}{(2coshfrac{t}{2})^2 (pi^2+t^2)},dt$$
            equals
            $$ -frac{1}{4}int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinhfrac{t}{2}}{(t^2+pi^2)cosh^2frac{t}{2}},dt=-int_{mathbb{R}}frac{tsinh t}{(4t^2+pi^2)cosh^2 t},dt. $$
            The meromorphic function $frac{sinh t}{cosh^2 t}=-frac{d}{dt}left(frac{1}{cosh t}right)$ only has double poles with residue zero, hence all the mass of the last integral comes from the singularity at $frac{pi i}{2}$ and from the behaviour at infinity. The residue theorem grants
            $$ frac{1}{cosh x}=sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{pi(2n+1)}{frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2} $$
            and
            $$ frac{sinh x}{cosh^2 x} = sum_{ngeq 0}(-1)^n frac{2pi(2n+1)x}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2}.$$
            Since
            $$ int_{mathbb{R}}frac{2pi(2n+1)x^2}{(frac{pi^2}{4}(2n+1)^2+x^2)^2 (pi^2+4x^2)},dx = frac{1}{2pi(n+1)^2}$$
            our integral equals $-frac{1}{2pi}eta(2)=color{red}{-frac{pi}{24}}$ by the dominated convergence theorem, allowing to switch $int_{mathbb{R}}$ and $sum_{ngeq 0}$. $frac{1}{24}$ is also the coefficient of $z^3$ in $frac{z}{log(1-z)}$, but so far I have not found a direct way to relate the original integral to the $n=3$ instance of $(1)$.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Jan 2 at 6:40

























            answered Jan 1 at 19:04









            Jack D'Aurizio

            287k33280657




            287k33280657








            • 2




              Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:24








            • 1




              @Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 1 at 19:50






            • 1




              @Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 0:51






            • 1




              @Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 6:36






            • 1




              Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
              – Zachary
              Jan 2 at 7:53














            • 2




              Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
              – Zacky
              Jan 1 at 19:24








            • 1




              @Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 1 at 19:50






            • 1




              @Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 0:51






            • 1




              @Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
              – Jack D'Aurizio
              Jan 2 at 6:36






            • 1




              Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
              – Zachary
              Jan 2 at 7:53








            2




            2




            Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 19:24






            Thank you for the answer, I thought too that it can be related to the Gregory coefficients, also I should mention that I learnt about the Plancherel theorem from your answer here:math.stackexchange.com/a/2891545/515527
            – Zacky
            Jan 1 at 19:24






            1




            1




            @Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 1 at 19:50




            @Zachary: this is Herglotz trick for $frac{1}{cosh}$, followed by termwise differentiation. We have $frac{1}{cosh z} = sum_{xi} frac{R_{xi}}{z-xi}$ where $xi$ are the (simple) zeroes of $cosh$ and $R_xi$ is the residue at $z=xi$ of $frac{1}{cosh}$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 1 at 19:50




            1




            1




            @Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 2 at 0:51




            @Zachary: the trick to get my representation is to couple the contribution provided by the poles at $(2n+1)frac{pi i}{2}$ for $n=Ninmathbb{N}$ and $n=-(N+1)$.This cancels the imaginary part and leaves a series on $ngeq 0$.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 2 at 0:51




            1




            1




            @Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 2 at 6:36




            @Zachary: that's my fault, I wrote wrong constants, now fixing.
            – Jack D'Aurizio
            Jan 2 at 6:36




            1




            1




            Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
            – Zachary
            Jan 2 at 7:53




            Alright. Can I just say that the coupling of poles method is genius. Before doing that, I had an absolute mess of an infinite series, but thanks to your suggestion I managed to nicely simplify the sum. I really appreciate your answers here and I learn a lot from them. I especially enjoyed this one: math.stackexchange.com/questions/2529614/… :) Now, I'm always ready to use the Laplace "Integration by parts" methods.
            – Zachary
            Jan 2 at 7:53











            3














            This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series



            $$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
            &= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$



            where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.






            share|cite|improve this answer


























              3














              This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series



              $$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
              &= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$



              where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                3












                3








                3






                This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series



                $$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
                &= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$



                where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.






                share|cite|improve this answer












                This is not a full answer, but one does not need the full Laplace transform of $x/cosh x$, as the integral can be done by expanding $1/cosh x$ into a geometric series



                $$begin{aligned} I = int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{cosh x},mathrm{d}x &= 2int_{0}^{infty}frac{xe^{-x}}{e^{x}}frac{mathrm{d}x}{1+e^{-2x}} = 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}(-1)^{n}int_{0}^{infty}xe^{-(2+2n)x},mathrm{d}x \
                &= 2sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{4(1+n)^{2}}int_{0}^{infty}ue^{-u},mathrm{d}u = frac{1}{2}sum_{n=0}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n}}{(1+n)^{2}} \ &= frac{1}{2}sum_{n=1}^{infty}frac{(-1)^{n-1}}{n^{2}} = frac{eta(2)}{2} = frac{pi^{2}}{24}end{aligned}$$



                where $eta(s)$ is the Dirichlet eta function.







                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Jan 1 at 19:05









                Ininterrompue

                6139




                6139






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3058679%2fintegral-int-0-infty-frac-ln-x-pi2-ln2-x1x2-fracdx-sqrt-x%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    An IMO inspired problem

                    Management

                    Has there ever been an instance of an active nuclear power plant within or near a war zone?